You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 3, 2019

Thailand’s SEC Provides Legal Clarity with Equity Crowdfunding Regulations

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

Crowdfunding in Thailand has generally been regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and this covered a narrow scope of crowdfunding activities, including offering newly-issued shares via “electronic systems or networks.” Recently, the SEC issued new regulations expanding the scope of permitted crowdfunding activities to include other parts of equity crowdfunding. SEC Notification Tor Jor. 21/2562 Re: The Offering of Securities for Sale through Crowdfunding Portals and related regulations came into force on May 16, 2019, and replaced the previous SEC notifications on crowdfunding. The new SEC crowdfunding notification expands previous restrictions, including allowing issuers to offer “plain vanilla” debentures as well as shares, and adjusting the specific restrictions on issuing securities to retail and non-retail investors.

Crowdfunding Portals

The new SEC crowdfunding notification defines crowdfunding portals as websites, mobile apps, or other similar electronic media developed for offering securities for sale. Crowdfunding portals must be incorporated in Thailand, must have a minimum paid-up registered capital of THB 5 million, and their systems must be ready for use upon applying to the SEC for approval to operate.

After receiving approval from the SEC, crowdfunding portals must operate within the scope of their license and comply with the standards and requirements of the notification. This includes an obligation to record information relating to the issuing of securities on the platform and keep that information for at least two years after the date of offering. Crowdfunding portals are also required to disclose transaction summary reports to the SEC.

Crowdfunding portals are responsible for complying with Know Your Customer procedures relating to their investors and must also assess each investor’s knowledge and abilities regarding investment in shares and debentures. Crowdfunding portals must also provide investors with information about investment, including the benefits and risks of investing in shares and debentures, rights of cancellation, and information on the issuers.

Issuers

Under the new SEC crowdfunding notification, an issuer must not be listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand, must be a company incorporated under Thai law, and must intend to use the proceeds of newly-issued shares and debentures to fund the company’s operations, or for refinancing. Qualifying issuers will be exempt from licensing requirements; however, they must only offer securities through one crowdfunding portal unless they receive approval from the SEC to do otherwise. Issuers must also file the results of offering crowdfunding securities with the SEC and must appoint a securities registrar.

Issuer compliance with SEC crowdfunding regulations is generally the responsibility of the crowdfunding portal on which the issuer is offering securities. Crowdfunding portals are responsible for screening issuers wishing to offer crowdfunding shares or debentures via the crowdfunding portal, in order to determine whether the issuer complies with the requirements under the SEC crowdfunding notification. If the crowdfunding portal discovers, or has reason to believe, that an issuer violates the provisions of the notification or other law, the crowdfunding portal must reject the issuer and inform the SEC of the violation immediately.

Investors

Non-retail investors include institutional investors, mutual fund companies and venture capital investors, angel investors, and other crowdfunding portals. The term “angel investors” refers to private individuals who either:

  • have invested directly in shares for a period of at least one year, and (i) have net assets of at least THB 50 million, not including the property value of that person’s residence, or (ii) have an annual income of at least THB 4 million; or
  • have knowledge and skill relating to business operation or investment, experience assessing the value of business operators, or experience advising on business development

An issuer may not offer crowdfunding securities to more than 50 different angel investors and crowdfunding portals in any 12-month period.    

Retail investors are individual investors who do not meet the criteria listed above. The value of crowdfunding securities offered by an issuer to a retail investor must be no more than THB 100,000 to each retail investor. The value of crowdfunding securities offered by an issuer to all retail investors must be no more than THB 20 million within 12 months of the first offering of crowdfunding securities, and the total value of crowdfunding securities that may be offered to individual investors starting from the date of first offering is capped at THB 40 million.

Conclusion

Thailand’s embrace of crowdfunding and innovative crowdfunding platforms is a further strengthening of the increasingly active and profitable fintech sector in the country. While tech entrepreneurs had already been taking steps in the equity crowdfunding space, the SEC’s actions have codified the process, aiming to facilitate grassroots financing through crowdfunding initiatives in a way that mutually benefits both entrepreneurs and their supporters (i.e., investors) as well as the platform operators who bring these groups together. The effect of this development will become clear in the coming years, but in principle it should smooth out challenges, remove uncertainty, and provide legal clarity for greater crowdfunding innovation in the country.

Download Full Article

Practices

Banking and Finance

Capital Markets

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 16, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has broadened the definition of institutional investors, expanded the types of qualifying investments, and updated financial qualification thresholds for various investor categories through a revised notification on the definitions of institutional investors, ultra-high net worth investors, and high net worth investors. The amended framework, which came into force on March 1, 2026, adds digital asset business operators, investment planners, and investment consultants to the roster of entities recognized as institutional investors, and broadens the definition of investment to account for digital tokens. Expanded Definition of Institutional Investors Under the SEC’s revised notification, the category of institutional investors now expressly includes digital asset business operators licensed under the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). This addition recognizes the growing role of digital asset platforms and service providers in Thailand’s investment ecosystem and aligns the regulatory treatment of digital markets with that of traditional markets. The definition of institutional investors now also encompasses investment planners and investment consultants approved by the SEC. Previously, only SEC-approved investment analysts held this status; the expansion covers a broader scope of professionals who possess comparable expertise and experience in evaluating investment opportunities. Broadened Investment Definition The revised framework now defines investment to mean direct or indirect investment in a wider range of assets beyond deposits. Specifically, the definition covers: Securities under the Securities and Exchange Act Derivatives under the Derivatives Act Investment tokens offered to the public Government-issued digital tokens (G-tokens) as specified in a separate SEC notification This expansion ensures that financial status assessments reflect the full spectrum of an investor’s holdings, including emerging digital assets. Updated Financial Qualification Thresholds The amended SEC notification also provides updated qualification thresholds for angel investors, ultra-high net worth investors, and high net worth investors. While the core criteria
Read More
March 10, 2026
Thailand’s Ministry of Finance and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have issued regulations broadening the criteria for determining who qualifies as a “major shareholder” of licensed securities and digital asset business operators. Under relevant SEC regulations, major shareholders of a regulated entity must obtain regulatory approval and undergo screening by the SEC. The revised framework introduces both shareholding-based and control-based tests to determine which shareholders require regulatory approval for a wider range of indirect ownership structures and de facto control. The Ministry of Finance notification took effect on February 21, 2026, while the SEC’s clarifying rules took effect on March 4, 2026. These changes aim to enhance transparency around beneficial ownership and strengthen regulatory oversight of entities operating in Thailand’s capital markets. Expanded Definition Under the revised framework, a “major shareholder” now includes persons who directly or indirectly hold more than 10% of the voting rights in a regulated company, as well as persons who exercise control over the regulated company or its shares. This system of two separate tests, based on both shareholding and control, differs from the prior regime, which focused primarily on shareholding thresholds and applied a more limited method for determining indirect shareholdings. The two tests (detailed below) operate independently of each other, and any person identified by either of the tests will be deemed a major shareholder. Shareholding-Based Test Broadens Indirect Ownership Attribution For the shareholding-based test, the SEC recognizes two existing methods for identifying indirect ownership, together with a new proportional attribution method. Any person captured under these methods, which are described below, will be regarded as a major shareholder of the regulated company and must obtain SEC approval as a major shareholder. First, the existing framework continues to apply to both first-tier and chain ownership structures. Approval is required for (1) first-tier
Read More
March 5, 2026
Amid increasing financial globalization, Vietnam’s establishment of an International Financial Center (IFC) represents a strategic initiative to attract high-quality foreign investment and enhance the country’s position in the global financial system. In support of this objective, a Specialized Court was introduced under Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 as a dedicated dispute resolution mechanism within the IFC framework. The Specialized Court at the IFC was subsequently operationalized by Law on the Specialized Court No. 150/2025/QH15, effective from January 1, 2026. Organizational Structure of the Specialized Court The Specialized Court at the IFC is a court within the system of the People’s Courts, organized and operating in accordance with the Law on the Specialized Court, and vested with jurisdiction to adjudicate and resolve cases at the IFC. The Specialized Court is located in Ho Chi Minh City and comprises (i) a Court of First Instance; (ii) a Court of Appeal, and (iii) a supporting apparatus. Jurisdiction of the Specialized Court The jurisdiction of the Specialized Court at the IFC is strictly defined based on both (i) the subject matter of the cases and (ii) the membership status of the parties involved. Specifically, the Specialized Court has jurisdiction over (except for cases involving public interests or the interests of the state) the following: Disputes arising from investment and business activities. Requests for recognition and enforcement in Vietnam of judgments and decisions of foreign courts and foreign arbitral awards. Requests related to dispute resolution by arbitration. Other disputes directly related to investment and business activities (to be specified by the Supreme People’s Court). Additionally, at least one party in the case must be a member of the IFC. The IFC’s membership status is established through registration, recognition as a member, or the grant of a license for establishment and operation within the IFC. In the
Read More
February 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has officially implemented a new regulatory framework supervising systemically important retail payment systems (SIRPS), effective February 21, 2026, with PromptPay being the first payment system designated as a SIRPS. Under this new set of regulations, the BOT may designate payment systems under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017) as SIRPSs based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Once a system is designated as a SIRPS, the operator becomes subject to expanded supervisory obligations beyond the general requirements of the Payment Systems Act. Enhanced Supervisory Requirements SIRPS operators must comply with a heightened supervisory regime across three key areas, outlined below. 1. Governance SIRPS operators must maintain robust and transparent governance structures, including: Balanced board composition, with at least one-third of the board comprising independent directors who represent stakeholders in the system (such as payment service providers, consumers, and experts). Independent directors may serve for no more than two consecutive terms. Subcommittees to assist the board in overseeing compliance, policy implementation, and operational strategy. Clear separation between executives responsible for risk and information security and those overseeing day-to-day business operations. Risk Management and System SecuritySIRPS operators must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks, including: Clear service agreements between the SIRPS operator and its direct participants (payment service providers who connect directly to the SIRPS), defining roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. These agreements must include obligations for direct SIRPS participants to supervise any indirect participants they onboard to ensure compliance with service agreements and business rules. A business continuity plan covering both IT and non-IT aspects, with annual review. The SIRPS must target service availability comparable to international payment infrastructures, including the ability to recover operations within two hours of a disruption and to maintain scalable operational capacity. Tools and controls to monitor and manage material or
Read More