You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 3, 2019

Thailand’s SEC Provides Legal Clarity with Equity Crowdfunding Regulations

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

Crowdfunding in Thailand has generally been regulated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), and this covered a narrow scope of crowdfunding activities, including offering newly-issued shares via “electronic systems or networks.” Recently, the SEC issued new regulations expanding the scope of permitted crowdfunding activities to include other parts of equity crowdfunding. SEC Notification Tor Jor. 21/2562 Re: The Offering of Securities for Sale through Crowdfunding Portals and related regulations came into force on May 16, 2019, and replaced the previous SEC notifications on crowdfunding. The new SEC crowdfunding notification expands previous restrictions, including allowing issuers to offer “plain vanilla” debentures as well as shares, and adjusting the specific restrictions on issuing securities to retail and non-retail investors.

Crowdfunding Portals

The new SEC crowdfunding notification defines crowdfunding portals as websites, mobile apps, or other similar electronic media developed for offering securities for sale. Crowdfunding portals must be incorporated in Thailand, must have a minimum paid-up registered capital of THB 5 million, and their systems must be ready for use upon applying to the SEC for approval to operate.

After receiving approval from the SEC, crowdfunding portals must operate within the scope of their license and comply with the standards and requirements of the notification. This includes an obligation to record information relating to the issuing of securities on the platform and keep that information for at least two years after the date of offering. Crowdfunding portals are also required to disclose transaction summary reports to the SEC.

Crowdfunding portals are responsible for complying with Know Your Customer procedures relating to their investors and must also assess each investor’s knowledge and abilities regarding investment in shares and debentures. Crowdfunding portals must also provide investors with information about investment, including the benefits and risks of investing in shares and debentures, rights of cancellation, and information on the issuers.

Issuers

Under the new SEC crowdfunding notification, an issuer must not be listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand, must be a company incorporated under Thai law, and must intend to use the proceeds of newly-issued shares and debentures to fund the company’s operations, or for refinancing. Qualifying issuers will be exempt from licensing requirements; however, they must only offer securities through one crowdfunding portal unless they receive approval from the SEC to do otherwise. Issuers must also file the results of offering crowdfunding securities with the SEC and must appoint a securities registrar.

Issuer compliance with SEC crowdfunding regulations is generally the responsibility of the crowdfunding portal on which the issuer is offering securities. Crowdfunding portals are responsible for screening issuers wishing to offer crowdfunding shares or debentures via the crowdfunding portal, in order to determine whether the issuer complies with the requirements under the SEC crowdfunding notification. If the crowdfunding portal discovers, or has reason to believe, that an issuer violates the provisions of the notification or other law, the crowdfunding portal must reject the issuer and inform the SEC of the violation immediately.

Investors

Non-retail investors include institutional investors, mutual fund companies and venture capital investors, angel investors, and other crowdfunding portals. The term “angel investors” refers to private individuals who either:

  • have invested directly in shares for a period of at least one year, and (i) have net assets of at least THB 50 million, not including the property value of that person’s residence, or (ii) have an annual income of at least THB 4 million; or
  • have knowledge and skill relating to business operation or investment, experience assessing the value of business operators, or experience advising on business development

An issuer may not offer crowdfunding securities to more than 50 different angel investors and crowdfunding portals in any 12-month period.    

Retail investors are individual investors who do not meet the criteria listed above. The value of crowdfunding securities offered by an issuer to a retail investor must be no more than THB 100,000 to each retail investor. The value of crowdfunding securities offered by an issuer to all retail investors must be no more than THB 20 million within 12 months of the first offering of crowdfunding securities, and the total value of crowdfunding securities that may be offered to individual investors starting from the date of first offering is capped at THB 40 million.

Conclusion

Thailand’s embrace of crowdfunding and innovative crowdfunding platforms is a further strengthening of the increasingly active and profitable fintech sector in the country. While tech entrepreneurs had already been taking steps in the equity crowdfunding space, the SEC’s actions have codified the process, aiming to facilitate grassroots financing through crowdfunding initiatives in a way that mutually benefits both entrepreneurs and their supporters (i.e., investors) as well as the platform operators who bring these groups together. The effect of this development will become clear in the coming years, but in principle it should smooth out challenges, remove uncertainty, and provide legal clarity for greater crowdfunding innovation in the country.

Download Full Article

Practices

Banking and Finance

Capital Markets

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has overhauled its approach to related-party transactions (RPTs) by issuing new rules that simplify approval processes while expanding oversight. Capital Market Supervisory Board Notification No. TorJor. 46/2568 will replace the longstanding Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551, which has governed RPT compliance for over a decade. The new regulation takes effect on July 1, 2026. Any RPT matters approved by a company’s board of directors or approved for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551. The new RPT rules will introduce significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Consolidated Definitions Under the previous framework, key definitions relevant to RPT compliance were dispersed across multiple sources, including SEC notifications, Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) regulations, and provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act (before amendments). The new regulation consolidates these definitions into a single notification. Concepts such as “related party” and “connected person,” as well as relevant transaction categories, are now more systematically organized and written in greater detail. The SET has yet to issue corresponding regulations, which should include more detailed related disclosure requirements. Unified Threshold and Mandatory Board Approval The most significant change under the new regulation is the elimination of the multitiered approval framework based on transaction type. Instead of various categories, transactions are now classified as either (1) financial assistance provided to related persons, or (2) other RPTs in order to determine the level of corporate approvals and disclosures for each transaction size in these categories, but the concept remains the same. Under the previous regulation, RPTs were divided into small, medium, and large transactions, with differing approval requirements. The new regulation effectively merges the small and medium categories. As a result, all RPTs must now be approved by the board of directors as a baseline
Read More
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a new regulation on material transactions (MTs) to govern asset acquisitions and disposals by listed companies and their subsidiaries. The new notification on MT criteria (No. TorJor. 45/2568) from the Capital Market Supervisory Board replaces the long-standing notification (No. TorJor. 20/2551) that has governed such matters. The SEC has also introduced parallel amendments to the country’s related-party transaction rules. The new regulation will take effect on July 1, 2026. Any MT matters approved by a company’s board of directors for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 20/2551. Following that date, the new MT rules will introduce several significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Expanded Scope of Material Transactions One of the key changes under the new regulation is the expansion of the definition of MTs, which now expressly covers financial assistance and certain lease and business lease arrangements that are not in the ordinary course of business of the listed company or its subsidiaries. For financial assistance, this includes lending, granting credit, providing guarantees, or entering into any arrangement that increases the company’s financial obligations, particularly where the recipient is facing liquidity issues or unable to repay debts. Other forms of financial support also fall within scope. However, whether the provision of collateral for others qualifies as an MT remains somewhat unclear, since no disposal of assets occurs for the provider of collateral. This issue remains to be carefully considered. For lease-related transactions, the MT rules now specifically include the lease or hire-purchase of all or part of a business or assets operated by or belonging to a listed company or its subsidiaries. New Exemptions The new regulation introduces clearer exemptions for transactions between a listed company and its subsidiaries or among subsidiaries, which
Read More
February 9, 2026
When unauthorized credit card transactions occur, who bears responsibility—the cardholder or the issuing bank? In Thailand, a landmark 2025 ruling by the country’s Supreme Court has clarified this question, establishing a stricter standard for banks in fraud disputes and significantly strengthening consumer protections. The case centered on disputed charges where a customer claimed their credit card had been used without authorization. The bank sued to recover the amount, and both the court of first instance and the Court of Appeal ruled in favor of the bank. However, the Supreme Court overruled their judgments and decided that the customer did not need to pay for the unauthorized transactions, placing liability squarely on the bank. This ruling was based on three key findings, which are outlined below. Finding 1: Insufficient Expert Testimony In this case, the bank bore the burden of proving matters related to the credit card system’s manufacture, design, security, and operation, as required under the Consumer Case Procedure Act B.E. 2551 (2008). To meet this requirement, the bank presented testimony from two employees in its credit card department regarding ’security measures and issuance procedures. However, the Supreme Court found these witnesses unqualified as experts, as they did not present technical or academic evidence and did not possess specialized expertise in credit card technology. As a result, their testimony failed to establish that the bank’s credit card technology was sufficiently secure against fraudulent misuse. Finding 2: Contradictory Terms and Conditions The bank’s own credit card terms and conditions included a provision acknowledging that despite the card’s EMV security standards, cardholders must still exercise caution to prevent unauthorized access. The Supreme Court interpreted this clause as an explicit admission that credit card systems remain vulnerable to hacking and fraud, even with high-level security measures in place. This acknowledgment undermined the
Read More
February 4, 2026
On November 18, 2025, Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance released for public consultation a draft decree on administrative sanctions in the field of crypto assets and crypto asset markets (the “Draft Decree”), intended to implement Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP dated September 9, 2025, on the pilot crypto asset market in Vietnam (“Resolution 05”). While Resolution 05 sets out who may participate and under what conditions, the Draft Decree addresses a more practical question for market participants, i.e., what happens if those conditions are not met. In doing so, the Draft Decree offers important insight into how Vietnamese regulators intend to supervise, discipline, and ultimately shape the crypto market during the pilot phase. Regulatory Scope and Overall Sanctions Architecture The Draft Decree applies to both domestic and foreign organizations and individuals engaging in crypto-related activities in Vietnam’s market. Covered entities include: (i) crypto asset issuers; (ii) crypto asset service providers, including trading platforms and market operators; (iii) Vietnamese and foreign investors participating in the pilot market; and (iv) other organizations involved in the offering, issuance, or provision of crypto-related services in Vietnam. The breadth of this scope is deliberate. It appears to reflect a regulatory view that cross-border structures, offshore platforms, and indirect participation may not necessarily insulate market actors from compliance obligations once they operate within the pilot framework. For the crypto industry, this may mark a shift from regulatory ambiguity toward a more explicit articulation of jurisdictional reach. At first glance, the Draft Decree’s monetary penalties appear restrained. The maximum fine per administrative violation is capped at VND 200 million (approx. USD 7,700) for organizations and VND 100 million (approx. USD 3,800) for individuals. However, focusing solely on fine levels risks missing the point. The Draft Decree also places great regulatory weight on supplementary sanctions and corrective measures, including: (i)
Read More