You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 5, 2019

Thailand’s Robust Employee Protections under the LPA Get Another Upgrade

Thailand’s labour laws have long been known for the strength of protections afforded to employees. Continuing this trend, a slew of new amendments to the Labour Protection Act (LPA), passed on December 13, 2018, will further enhance worker protection, improve working conditions, and impose sanctions on employers who fail to uphold them.

The updates to Thailand’s labour law will come into effect 30 days after its publication in the Government Gazette, which is expected to be in early 2019. The key changes are summarized below:

New category of statutory severance pay

A new category of entitlement for statutory severance pay has been added for employees who have worked for an uninterrupted period of 20 years or more. Statutory severance pay is currently capped at the equivalent of 300 days’ wages for employees who have worked for an uninterrupted period of 10 years or more. However, those who have been employed for 20 years or more at the time of termination will now be entitled to the equivalent of 400 days at their most recent rate of pay—a massive increase of 33%.

Increased maternity Leave

Employers must grant pregnant employees 98 days of maternity leave—an increase of eight (8) days from the previous law. This is inclusive of days the employee’s scheduled weekly holidays, public holidays, and annual holidays. In addition, maternity leave is now defined to also include leave which is taken for pre-natal examinations before the delivery. The employer must pay up to 45 days’ wages during the maternity leave period.

Paid necessary business leave

Necessary business leave (that is, leave to carry out necessary business) is recognized under the current Labour Protection Act, and is at the discretion of employers to stipulate the criteria for such leave in its work rules. Nonetheless, the Act is silent on many key details including the number of necessary business leave days an employee is entitled to, and whether the leave will be with or without pay. The new law rectifies this, stating that employers must now grant employees a minimum of three (3) days of paid necessary business leave per year. However, “necessary business” itself remains undefined, leaving scope for further ambiguity. While some circumstances may qualify—notably when an employee’s physical attendance somewhere is required by the government—there are others that may be unclear and the interpretation in such cases will remain at the discretion of employers and its policies.

Workplace relocation notification

If an employer relocates an employee’s current workplace to a new establishment, or to another of its existing work locations, the employer has a duty to post a conspicuous announcement at the current workplace, for a continuous period of at least 30 days, in advance of the relocation. The announcement must clearly state which employees will be relocated, and the scheduled date of the relocation. If an employee thinks that the relocation will significantly affect his or her ordinary way of living, or that of his or her family, and therefore does not wish to relocate to the new place of business, such employee must inform the employer in writing within 30 days of the date of the announcement, or the date of relocation. In this case, the employee is entitled to severance pay calculated at the normal rate.

Consent required for change of employer

Where there is a change of employer, including where an employer changes as a result of a transfer of functions or staff from one juristic person to another, and where a registered merger between the employer and another juristic person results in a new entity, the employer must obtain consent from the employees who will be transferred. The new employer will assume all the rights and responsibilities owed to the transferred employees by the previous employer.

75% wages payable during suspension of business

Where it is necessary for an employer to temporarily suspend business, in part or in whole, for any reason other than force majeure, the employer must pay the employee at least 75 percent of his or her usually daily wages throughout the suspension period. Such payment shall be made at the place of work of the employee. If the payment is to be made elsewhere, or by other means, consent of the employee must be obtained.

Interest on statutory payments

If an employer defaults on payments owed to employees for wages in lieu of advance notice, wages during temporary cessation of the employer’s operations, or other payments due to an employee under the Labour Protection Act, they must pay interest on the default amount at 15% per annum.

Payment in lieu of notice required on date of termination

Under Thai labour law, an employer may terminate an indefinite term employment contract immediately, without notifying the employee at least one payment cycle in advance, by paying wages in lieu of advance notice. The amendment clarifies a previous ambiguity in this requirement, by stating the payment must be paid to the employee on the termination date.

Gender equality

Employers must pay wages, overtime payments, payments for working on holidays, and payments for working overtime on holidays, at the same rate for both male and female employees who undertake work of the same nature, quality, and quantity, or work of the same value, at an equal rate.

Sanctions

Several penalties for employers that fail to comply with the provisions in the Labour Protection Act have also been amended to extend them to cover the new amendments.

These new amendments range from the procedural, such as notification requirements for changing employment circumstances, to the financially substantial, such as the dramatic increase to severance pay for long-serving staff. However, both categories are designed with employee protection firmly in mind, and the burden to comply is firmly on employers. Failure to comply could result in severe penalties, and it is therefore vital for employers to thoroughly review their employment agreements and work rules to ensure that they comply with the new rules when they come into effect.

This story was originally published in the Bangkok Post, under a different title, and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. The original story can be viewed here on the Bangkok Post website, or downloaded using the link below.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.