You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 5, 2019

Thailand’s Robust Employee Protections under the LPA Get Another Upgrade

Thailand’s labour laws have long been known for the strength of protections afforded to employees. Continuing this trend, a slew of new amendments to the Labour Protection Act (LPA), passed on December 13, 2018, will further enhance worker protection, improve working conditions, and impose sanctions on employers who fail to uphold them.

The updates to Thailand’s labour law will come into effect 30 days after its publication in the Government Gazette, which is expected to be in early 2019. The key changes are summarized below:

New category of statutory severance pay

A new category of entitlement for statutory severance pay has been added for employees who have worked for an uninterrupted period of 20 years or more. Statutory severance pay is currently capped at the equivalent of 300 days’ wages for employees who have worked for an uninterrupted period of 10 years or more. However, those who have been employed for 20 years or more at the time of termination will now be entitled to the equivalent of 400 days at their most recent rate of pay—a massive increase of 33%.

Increased maternity Leave

Employers must grant pregnant employees 98 days of maternity leave—an increase of eight (8) days from the previous law. This is inclusive of days the employee’s scheduled weekly holidays, public holidays, and annual holidays. In addition, maternity leave is now defined to also include leave which is taken for pre-natal examinations before the delivery. The employer must pay up to 45 days’ wages during the maternity leave period.

Paid necessary business leave

Necessary business leave (that is, leave to carry out necessary business) is recognized under the current Labour Protection Act, and is at the discretion of employers to stipulate the criteria for such leave in its work rules. Nonetheless, the Act is silent on many key details including the number of necessary business leave days an employee is entitled to, and whether the leave will be with or without pay. The new law rectifies this, stating that employers must now grant employees a minimum of three (3) days of paid necessary business leave per year. However, “necessary business” itself remains undefined, leaving scope for further ambiguity. While some circumstances may qualify—notably when an employee’s physical attendance somewhere is required by the government—there are others that may be unclear and the interpretation in such cases will remain at the discretion of employers and its policies.

Workplace relocation notification

If an employer relocates an employee’s current workplace to a new establishment, or to another of its existing work locations, the employer has a duty to post a conspicuous announcement at the current workplace, for a continuous period of at least 30 days, in advance of the relocation. The announcement must clearly state which employees will be relocated, and the scheduled date of the relocation. If an employee thinks that the relocation will significantly affect his or her ordinary way of living, or that of his or her family, and therefore does not wish to relocate to the new place of business, such employee must inform the employer in writing within 30 days of the date of the announcement, or the date of relocation. In this case, the employee is entitled to severance pay calculated at the normal rate.

Consent required for change of employer

Where there is a change of employer, including where an employer changes as a result of a transfer of functions or staff from one juristic person to another, and where a registered merger between the employer and another juristic person results in a new entity, the employer must obtain consent from the employees who will be transferred. The new employer will assume all the rights and responsibilities owed to the transferred employees by the previous employer.

75% wages payable during suspension of business

Where it is necessary for an employer to temporarily suspend business, in part or in whole, for any reason other than force majeure, the employer must pay the employee at least 75 percent of his or her usually daily wages throughout the suspension period. Such payment shall be made at the place of work of the employee. If the payment is to be made elsewhere, or by other means, consent of the employee must be obtained.

Interest on statutory payments

If an employer defaults on payments owed to employees for wages in lieu of advance notice, wages during temporary cessation of the employer’s operations, or other payments due to an employee under the Labour Protection Act, they must pay interest on the default amount at 15% per annum.

Payment in lieu of notice required on date of termination

Under Thai labour law, an employer may terminate an indefinite term employment contract immediately, without notifying the employee at least one payment cycle in advance, by paying wages in lieu of advance notice. The amendment clarifies a previous ambiguity in this requirement, by stating the payment must be paid to the employee on the termination date.

Gender equality

Employers must pay wages, overtime payments, payments for working on holidays, and payments for working overtime on holidays, at the same rate for both male and female employees who undertake work of the same nature, quality, and quantity, or work of the same value, at an equal rate.

Sanctions

Several penalties for employers that fail to comply with the provisions in the Labour Protection Act have also been amended to extend them to cover the new amendments.

These new amendments range from the procedural, such as notification requirements for changing employment circumstances, to the financially substantial, such as the dramatic increase to severance pay for long-serving staff. However, both categories are designed with employee protection firmly in mind, and the burden to comply is firmly on employers. Failure to comply could result in severe penalties, and it is therefore vital for employers to thoroughly review their employment agreements and work rules to ensure that they comply with the new rules when they come into effect.

This story was originally published in the Bangkok Post, under a different title, and is reproduced here with permission and thanks. The original story can be viewed here on the Bangkok Post website, or downloaded using the link below.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 13, 2021
With COVID-19 cases continuing to pose a significant threat throughout Thailand, many employers have ordered their employees to work exclusively from home in order to minimize their chances of contracting the virus. However, this luxury is not afforded to all employees—some are unable to work from home due to the nature of their work, and consequently they are placed in the precarious position of being exposed to possible infection. Thailand’s Social Security Office (SSO) understood these risks early in the pandemic and, in March 2020, issued guidelines through the Workmen’s Compensation Fund Office on employees’ entitlement to claim benefits from the workers’ compensation fund (WCF) if they contract the virus as a result of their work. The WCF provides medical-related assistance and compensation to employees who directly suffer from a work-related injury or sickness (subject to certain conditions). Falling ill with COVID-19 during the performance of work duties may constitute suffering work-related sickness, thereby allowing employees to claim compensation from the WCF by submitting the Kor Thor 16 form, a medical certificate, treatment records, records of the employee’s working hours, and other relevant documentation. Upon receiving a claim, the SSO will investigate by collecting facts and evidence from the employer, the infected employee and his or her colleagues, and any witnesses. The official will examine the employee’s duties and working conditions in detail, taking into consideration any relevant information, such as evidence regarding the employee’s travel or movements prior to falling sick. Once all the facts and evidence are gathered, the matter will be submitted to a medical subcommittee responsible for determining whether the employee’s onset of COVID-19 is due to his or her work. If the subcommittee finds that the employee’s contraction of the virus did indeed result from the performance of his or her work duties, the
August 26, 2021
Around the world, COVID-19 is continuing to threaten the health of millions, interrupt daily life, and throttle business activity. In Thailand, the latest wave of infections has been more intense than any since the beginning of the pandemic, and many businesses have been forced to close down once again. There are reasons for hope though—chief among them the increasing pace of vaccinations. Not only are the vaccines effective at preventing serious health issues, they are helping keep both employees and customers safe in business settings so that commerce, trade, and tourism can resume once again. Many in Thailand have already been vaccinated, and struggling employers are looking ahead to safely resuming full business activities, from reopening offices for employees who have been working from home, to welcoming customers and clients back to an environment that minimizes the risk of COVID-19 exposure. In anticipation of such a return to business at full capacity, many Thai employers are taking note of companies and organizations overseas boosting COVID-19 safety in workplaces by mandating vaccines and other measures, and asking whether such mandates could be imposed here in Thailand. The main legal concept to consider here is the provision in the Labor Protection Act B.E. 2541 (1998), which authorizes employers to issue “lawful and just” orders to employees. For an order to be “lawful and just,” it must be proportionate to the circumstance. In the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers can refer to the Communicable Diseases Act B.E. 2558 (2015), as well as other local regulations, to provide grounds when asserting that their risk-mitigation orders are proportionate, lawful, and just. It is doubtful that a Thai court would rule that the circumstances we find ourselves in now would justify an employer requiring employees to be vaccinated, but this legal standard can
August 25, 2021
Multilaw has published the latest edition of How to Hire and Fire, a guide to the rules and regulations governing employment relationships in over 90 jurisdictions around the world. Lawyers at Tilleke & Gibbins prepared the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters of the guide, which covers the following main topics: General principles: Forums for adjudicating employment disputes, main sources of employment law, employees working for foreign companies in Cambodia or abroad for domestic companies, and data privacy. Hiring the employee: Legal requirements for employment agreements, types of agreement, secrecy and confidentiality, ownership of inventions and other IP rights, pre-employment considerations, hiring of non-nationals, hiring specified categories of individuals, and outsourcing and sub-contracting. Maintaining the employment relationship: Changes to the contract, changes in business ownership, social security, accidents at work, discipline and grievances, harassment, discrimination, equal pay, compulsory training obligations, offsetting earnings, maternity and disability leave, insurance, absence for military or public service duties, trade unions, employee strikes, and employers’ liability for actions of employees. Firing the employee: Procedures for terminating employment agreements, instant dismissal, employee resignation, termination on notice, age-related termination, force majeure automatic termination, collective dismissals, termination by agreement, directors and senior officers, rules for companies facing financial difficulties, restriction of future activities, whistleblowers, garden leave, severance payments and tax considerations, allowances, and time limits for post-termination claims. General: Specific matters unique or important to each jurisdiction. Multilaw is a global network of carefully selected, independent law firms consisting of over 10,000 commercial lawyers in more than 100 countries, able to provide expert legal advice in complex environments around the globe. The full guide is available for free on the Multilaw website.