You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 2, 2020

Thailand’s New Transfer Pricing Disclosure Requirements

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

If your company has been doing business in Thailand, you might already be aware of the additional corporate tax reporting requirement for the accounting period for the 2019 fiscal year (FY2019), starting from January 1, 2019. Under the new requirements, companies with income of at least THB 200 million that transacted with related parties are now required to file a transfer pricing disclosure form with the Revenue Department (RD) upon filing the annual corporate income tax return, called a PND.50. This new two-page form is the Transfer Pricing Disclosure Form.

The aim of this article is to help you understand whether your company is required to file the disclosure form, and, if so, the correct way to complete and file it.

Who Has to File the Disclosure Form?

1.  Companies with at least THB 200 million of income in FY2019

This THB 200 million threshold refers to the total income presented on your company’s audited financial statements for FY2019, not just the income from sales or services without regard to other income. Also, this should not be confused with the total taxable income on your company’s PND.50, which might be unequal to the company’s total income on financial statements.

2.  Companies that transacted with a “related party” during the accounting period

Under section 71 bis of the Revenue Code, two or more companies or juristic partnerships are considered “related parties” under the following circumstances:

  1. They hold shares in another entity, whether directly or indirectly, of at least 50 percent of that entity’s total share capital.
  2. The same shareholder holds shares in each entity, whether directly or indirectly, amounting to at least 50 percent of the total share capital.
  3. They are related in terms of capital, management, or control that makes one entity unable to operate independently from the other, as prescribed by ministerial regulation.

For FY2019, companies can only be considered related parties due to share capital (i.e., the first two rules listed above). The RD has not yet issued a ministerial regulation to further define the entities classified under rule 3. Therefore, for now, there is no need to take action if your company is only related to another company because of the capital, management, or control.

Parties related by shares under rules 1 and 2 seem to be simple to identify. However, the phrase “whether directly or indirectly” makes things a bit more complex. This phrase means you have to know the whole shareholding structure and percentage all the way up to the ultimate parent-company level, regardless of whether it is in Thailand. If your company is the one holding at least 50% of the total share capital in another company (i.e., your company is the parent company), you will have to know what, and how much, each subsidiary holds. This phrase also requires you to know your company’s vertical relationships with other companies. The chart below illustrates this principle, as described in related-party rules 1 and 2.

In this scenario, during FY2019, Company A provided services to Company B, resulting in the total income of Company A crossing the THB 200 million threshold. Company A and Company B do not hold any shares in each other, but they are considered related parties, because of Company D.

The shareholding structure makes Company D a related party of all three of the other companies under rule 1—by Company D’s direct share ownership of Companies B and C, and by its indirect share ownership of Company A. As a result of this indirect share ownership, Company A and Company B are related parties under rule 2. If the total income of Company B was less than THB 200 million, then only Company A would have to file the disclosure form. However, on the disclosure form, Company A would have to report all three companies (Companies B, C, and D) as related parties, even though none of these three entities are required to file their own disclosure form in FY2019, including the value and type of transactions that Company A had with the three related parties.

How to Complete the Disclosure Form   

Information about transactions between related parties could expose many tax and transfer pricing issues.

The RD would like to see the value of ten transaction types occurring during the year with each related party. This means that your accounting team will likely have a lot of additional work.

For instance, the disclosure form asks for the cost of raw materials and products purchased from related parties during the year. If you purchased raw materials or products from one related party, that would seem straightforward. However, the number that the RD wants to see is the expenses incurred during that particular year only. The cost of goods or services on your company’s accounts would normally also carry the cost from the previous year.

Therefore, your accounting team cannot simply lift the accounting sum to fill in the disclosure form. The number will need to be adjusted to reflect the shorter time period.

Another example is the disclosure form asking for the amount of royalty fees that the company actually paid during the year—generally meaning royalties paid under section 40(3) of the Thai Revenue Code (e.g., licensing fees, copyright fees, etc.). However, if your company paid rental to related parties overseas, that rental may be considered royalties as well under some double taxation agreements. Therefore, your accounting team will also need to know the relevant agreements and apply the withholding tax rate or value added tax correctly).

In addition to the amount disclosures, there are also checkbox questions to be completed.

How to File the Disclosure Form

Although the disclosure form has to be filed together with the PND.50, the disclosure form is currently not available for e-filing. In February 2020, the RD stated that they were working on implementing online filing for the disclosure form, but we anticipate that it may only become available shortly before the filing due date—May 29, 2020, if your company accounting period for 2019 was from January 1 to December 31.

It must also be noted that, even if e-filing becomes an option for filing the disclosure form, there is currently no law to allow extension of the filing due date for an additional eight days, as there is for the filing of other tax returns. The RD would have to issue a new law to extend the due date for online filing of the disclosure form. The Notification of the Ministry of Finance Concerning the Due Date Extension for e-Tax Filings and Payments, issued on January 28, 2019, does not cover the filing of the disclosure form.

Impact

Although the disclosure form is meant to be a tool for transfer pricing risk assessment purposes and not for tax assessment, there are financial liabilities for noncompliance. The fine for not filing, or reporting incorrect information without a justifiable reason, is THB 200,000 (approx. USD 6,425), whereas the fine for not filing the PND.50 on time is only THB 2,000 (approx. USD 64). The hefty fine will be imposed regardless of whether the violating company pays millions in corporate income tax or had no tax shortfall at all. Therefore, prudent business owners must consider their company’s filing requirements carefully—both whether they are required to file the disclosure form, and, if so, what information must be disclosed.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Tax

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 6, 2025
On February 18, 2025, the Thai Senate approved an amendment to the Act on the Establishment of and Procedures for the Tax Court. This follows the July 2024 approval by the Thai cabinet and subsequent preparation of supporting secondary legislation. This important amendment to procedural law, once it takes effect, will extend the exclusive jurisdictional powers of the Tax Court to all criminal tax, customs, and excise tax claims in addition to the court’s existing jurisdiction over all such civil claims. The amendment, while now formally approved by the legislature, is awaiting the king’s signature and will take effect 180 days after its publication in the Government Gazette. Based upon its projected publication date, the amendment will likely take effect by the end of the third quarter of this year. This development is set to offer a more sophisticated Tax Court litigation process for highly specialized and often complex criminal tax and customs claims, something with which Thailand’s traditional criminal courts have struggled. It also ensures that all tax and customs matters are adjudicated before the same court, saving time, party costs, and judicial resources. This appears likely to result in more consistent adjudication of criminal tax and customs disputes, a benefit for the Thai government and party litigants alike. Any ongoing criminal tax and customs claims already commenced with the respective criminal courts on the date on which the amendment becomes effective will remain under the exclusive jurisdiction of those criminal courts. The Tax Court will have exclusive jurisdiction over all other claims. This important legislative change offers those managing or otherwise facing civil and/or criminal Thai tax or customs disputes the opportunity to more effectively plan and execute a uniform defense strategy before a single, qualified forum.
Read More
January 3, 2025
Thailand has adopted the OECD’s global minimum tax framework through the Emergency Decree on Top-Up Tax B.E. 2567 (2024). Published in the Government Gazette on December 26, 2024, this legislation implements a 15% global minimum effective tax rate for large multinational enterprise (MNE) groups. The emergency decree took effect on January 1, 2025. The emergency decree was enacted through expedited procedures to implement “pillar two” of the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) 2.0 project’s Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules. This swift implementation ensures Thailand can collect relevant tax revenues and prevents potential revenue losses from MNEs that might otherwise shift profits to jurisdictions with lower tax rates or to countries that have already implemented similar top-up tax legislation. Key aspects of Thailand’s implementation of the global minimum tax through the emergency decree are described below. Top-Up Tax The emergency decree introduces a dual mechanism for collecting additional top-up tax from MNEs whose effective tax rate falls below 15%. The first mechanism is a domestic top-up tax that targets MNEs operating within Thailand when their local effective tax rate is lower than 15%. The second mechanism is the income inclusion rule, which determines when a company’s foreign income should be included in the parent (main) company’s taxable income. This rule applies to Thai-based entities—including ultimate parent entities (UPE), intermediate parent entities, and partially owned parent entities—that hold ownership stakes in low-tax foreign jurisdictions. Scope MNEs subject to Thailand’s implementation of the global minimum tax framework are defined in the emergency decree as those whose UPEs report consolidated revenue of at least EUR 750 million (approximately THB 28 billion) in at least two of the four accounting periods preceding the relevant fiscal year. Reporting and Payment In-scope MNEs must comply with specific reporting obligations to the Thai Revenue Department. The filing deadline is set
Read More
December 4, 2024
Thailand Legal Basics, a valuable primer for foreign investors, explores all aspects of living and doing business in Thailand. Written by specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok, it is the only comprehensive English-language guide to the Thai legal system with a focus on the concerns of foreign business and investment.
Read More
August 20, 2024
Following the enactment of the Tax Administration Law (TAL), Myanmar’s Ministry of Planning and Finance has issued Notification No. 44/2024, which outlines directives and procedures for addressing violations of tax law provisions. These procedures, which came into force on June 13, 2024, primarily focus on three key areas: tax evasion, impeding tax administration, and failure to preserve secrecy. The notification primarily aims to address tax evasion, impeding tax administration, and failure to preserve secrecy, classifying these offenses as either subject to arrest without warrant or not. Notably, tax evasion is classified as an offense subject to arrest without warrant, while impeding tax administration and failure to preserve secrecy are not. The notification also prescribed the forms for notifying taxpayers before taking any action. Tax Evasion Tax evasion refers to a taxpayer who willfully evades the assessment, payment, or collection of tax. Penalties for such offenses include fines of MMK 250,000 (approx. USD 120) or 100% of the evaded tax (whichever is greater), imprisonment for up to seven years, or both. The enforcement process for tax evasion requires the chief officer of the township revenue department or an officer in charge (the tax authority) to assess the relevant documents and information provided by the taxpayer. If a taxpayer is found to be evading tax, the tax authority must send a notice in the prescribed form for verification within 15 days. Taxpayers may apply for a one-time extension of 15 days to submit requested documents and make disclosures. If the taxpayer cannot fulfill the requirements as instructed, the tax authority will seek approval from the director general of the Internal Revenue Department (IRD) for criminal proceedings as cognizable offences. Impeding Tax Administration and Failure to Preserve Secrecy Impeding tax administration refers to obstruction or attempted obstruction of taxation staff or officers
Read More