You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 2, 2020

Thailand’s New Transfer Pricing Disclosure Requirements

Informed Counsel

If your company has been doing business in Thailand, you might already be aware of the additional corporate tax reporting requirement for the accounting period for the 2019 fiscal year (FY2019), starting from January 1, 2019. Under the new requirements, companies with income of at least THB 200 million that transacted with related parties are now required to file a transfer pricing disclosure form with the Revenue Department (RD) upon filing the annual corporate income tax return, called a PND.50. This new two-page form is the Transfer Pricing Disclosure Form.

The aim of this article is to help you understand whether your company is required to file the disclosure form, and, if so, the correct way to complete and file it.

Who Has to File the Disclosure Form?

1.  Companies with at least THB 200 million of income in FY2019

This THB 200 million threshold refers to the total income presented on your company’s audited financial statements for FY2019, not just the income from sales or services without regard to other income. Also, this should not be confused with the total taxable income on your company’s PND.50, which might be unequal to the company’s total income on financial statements.

2.  Companies that transacted with a “related party” during the accounting period

Under section 71 bis of the Revenue Code, two or more companies or juristic partnerships are considered “related parties” under the following circumstances:

  1. They hold shares in another entity, whether directly or indirectly, of at least 50 percent of that entity’s total share capital.
  2. The same shareholder holds shares in each entity, whether directly or indirectly, amounting to at least 50 percent of the total share capital.
  3. They are related in terms of capital, management, or control that makes one entity unable to operate independently from the other, as prescribed by ministerial regulation.

For FY2019, companies can only be considered related parties due to share capital (i.e., the first two rules listed above). The RD has not yet issued a ministerial regulation to further define the entities classified under rule 3. Therefore, for now, there is no need to take action if your company is only related to another company because of the capital, management, or control.

Parties related by shares under rules 1 and 2 seem to be simple to identify. However, the phrase “whether directly or indirectly” makes things a bit more complex. This phrase means you have to know the whole shareholding structure and percentage all the way up to the ultimate parent-company level, regardless of whether it is in Thailand. If your company is the one holding at least 50% of the total share capital in another company (i.e., your company is the parent company), you will have to know what, and how much, each subsidiary holds. This phrase also requires you to know your company’s vertical relationships with other companies. The chart below illustrates this principle, as described in related-party rules 1 and 2.

In this scenario, during FY2019, Company A provided services to Company B, resulting in the total income of Company A crossing the THB 200 million threshold. Company A and Company B do not hold any shares in each other, but they are considered related parties, because of Company D.

The shareholding structure makes Company D a related party of all three of the other companies under rule 1—by Company D’s direct share ownership of Companies B and C, and by its indirect share ownership of Company A. As a result of this indirect share ownership, Company A and Company B are related parties under rule 2. If the total income of Company B was less than THB 200 million, then only Company A would have to file the disclosure form. However, on the disclosure form, Company A would have to report all three companies (Companies B, C, and D) as related parties, even though none of these three entities are required to file their own disclosure form in FY2019, including the value and type of transactions that Company A had with the three related parties.

How to Complete the Disclosure Form   

Information about transactions between related parties could expose many tax and transfer pricing issues.

The RD would like to see the value of ten transaction types occurring during the year with each related party. This means that your accounting team will likely have a lot of additional work.

For instance, the disclosure form asks for the cost of raw materials and products purchased from related parties during the year. If you purchased raw materials or products from one related party, that would seem straightforward. However, the number that the RD wants to see is the expenses incurred during that particular year only. The cost of goods or services on your company’s accounts would normally also carry the cost from the previous year.

Therefore, your accounting team cannot simply lift the accounting sum to fill in the disclosure form. The number will need to be adjusted to reflect the shorter time period.

Another example is the disclosure form asking for the amount of royalty fees that the company actually paid during the year—generally meaning royalties paid under section 40(3) of the Thai Revenue Code (e.g., licensing fees, copyright fees, etc.). However, if your company paid rental to related parties overseas, that rental may be considered royalties as well under some double taxation agreements. Therefore, your accounting team will also need to know the relevant agreements and apply the withholding tax rate or value added tax correctly).

In addition to the amount disclosures, there are also checkbox questions to be completed.

How to File the Disclosure Form

Although the disclosure form has to be filed together with the PND.50, the disclosure form is currently not available for e-filing. In February 2020, the RD stated that they were working on implementing online filing for the disclosure form, but we anticipate that it may only become available shortly before the filing due date—May 29, 2020, if your company accounting period for 2019 was from January 1 to December 31.

It must also be noted that, even if e-filing becomes an option for filing the disclosure form, there is currently no law to allow extension of the filing due date for an additional eight days, as there is for the filing of other tax returns. The RD would have to issue a new law to extend the due date for online filing of the disclosure form. The Notification of the Ministry of Finance Concerning the Due Date Extension for e-Tax Filings and Payments, issued on January 28, 2019, does not cover the filing of the disclosure form.

Impact

Although the disclosure form is meant to be a tool for transfer pricing risk assessment purposes and not for tax assessment, there are financial liabilities for noncompliance. The fine for not filing, or reporting incorrect information without a justifiable reason, is THB 200,000 (approx. USD 6,425), whereas the fine for not filing the PND.50 on time is only THB 2,000 (approx. USD 64). The hefty fine will be imposed regardless of whether the violating company pays millions in corporate income tax or had no tax shortfall at all. Therefore, prudent business owners must consider their company’s filing requirements carefully—both whether they are required to file the disclosure form, and, if so, what information must be disclosed.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 9, 2021
Lawyers from Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok have updated the Thailand section of the Digital Business Global Guide, a Q&A-style guide from Thomson Reuters Practical Law that provides detailed information on the regulatory environment surrounding digital business operations in 38 countries around the world. The Thailand overview covers the following main topics: Regulatory overview Setting up and running a business online Cybersecurity, data privacy, and data protection implications Linking Domain names Jurisdiction and governing law Advertising/marketing Tax Protecting an online business Liability for products/services supplied online Insurance Reform Practical Law, produced by Thomson Reuters, is the world’s leading legal know-how resource for business lawyers, publishing a huge range of guides covering hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The full Digital Business in Thailand: Overview is available on the Practical Law website.
March 2, 2021
Like many countries, Thailand requires stamp duty to be paid on the execution of certain legal instruments. A liable person who fails to pay stamp duty on a required instrument can be subject to a maximum surcharge of six times the applicable stamp duty, and an instrument on which stamp duty has not been paid will not be admissible as evidence in civil cases (that is, it will have limited legal weight and enforceability). Before July 2019, there were three methods for paying stamp duty: Affixing adhesive stamps on the instrument (and canceling it by the liable person in order to make sure that the adhesive stamp duty cannot be reused); Having a stamp impressed on the paper instrument; or Filing a prescribed form and paying the duty by cash or cashiers cheque at an area revenue office. In addition to paying the correct amount of stamp duty, the law also requires that stamp duty on certain instruments be paid using a specific prescribed method from the list above. Failure to use the prescribed method would be considered as that the stamp duty not having been paid. For example, a hire-of-work instrument is subject to stamp duty, but if the remuneration stated within the agreement is at least THB 1,000,000 (approximately USD 33,500), the stamp duty must be paid by filing a prescribed form and paying by cash or cashier’s cheque at an area revenue office. Affixing adhesive stamp duty is not allowed in that circumstance. E-Stamp Duty In June 2019, the Revenue Department introduced a fourth method of paying stamp duty, allowing online payments in specific circumstances (e-Stamp Duty). After the launch of the e-Stamp Duty system, the Revenue Department issued a notification (Notification of the Director-General of Revenue concerning Stamp Duty (No. 58)) requiring stamp duty on
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension