You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 2, 2021

Thailand’s New Electronic Meeting Laws and Security Measures

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a significant increase in the popularity of electronic meetings among businesses across the world, as physical meetings became unfeasible due to government lockdowns and regulations limiting gatherings to limit the risk of further spreading the disease. In Thailand, this turn of events has resulted in the promulgation of a new electronic meeting law to modernize rules that facilitate the convening of corporate entities’ statutory meetings as required under Thai law.

Electronic meetings in Thailand have been permitted to some degree since June 27, 2014, when the Announcement of the National Council for Peace and Order No. 74/2557 on Teleconferences through Electronic Means B.E. 2557 (2014) first allowed the practice, subject to various restrictions. However, many companies considered two strict requirements under this announcement to be impractical: at least one-third of the quorum for the electronic meeting had to physically attend the meeting at the designated meeting venue, which implies that no more than two-thirds of the quorum could choose to attend the meeting via electronic means; and all participants of the electronic meeting (whether attending electronically or in person) had to be physically present in Thailand at the time of the meeting, which effectively prohibited overseas participation.

New Rules for Electronic Meetings

The new electronic meeting law, the Royal Decree on Teleconferences through Electronic Means B.E. 2563 (2020), came into effect on April 19, 2020, replacing the 2014 order and relaxing its most onerous limitations in order to facilitate meetings of directors and shareholders via electronic means during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The key relaxations codified by the royal decree include allowing all attendees to attend meetings via electronic means, such as by phone or videoconferencing, from anywhere in the world. Furthermore, there is no longer a physical attendance requirement, and notices (and enclosures) calling a meeting can be distributed to participants via electronic mail, replacing the standard postal requirement of the 2014 announcement.

The new royal decree also needed to introduce certain statutory protocols in order to safeguard the integrity of the new meeting procedures. First, the meeting organizer must keep records of the meeting notice that is sent out electronically, and must verify the identities of the participants before the meeting starts. There must also be an audio or audiovisual record of the entire meeting (except for secret meetings), and the electronic traffic data of all attendees (i.e., the log file of usernames and login/logout dates and times) must be kept as evidence. Minutes of the meetings must also be documented, whether in an electronic or physical format.

Similar to the previous law, the new royal decree applies to board meetings and shareholders meetings of both private and public companies in Thailand, as well as to meetings of partnerships, trade associations, and chambers of commerce. Companies may choose to hold electronic meetings regardless of whether their articles of association have any provision specially permitting this. In addition, the standard rules and conditions for physical meetings still apply to electronic meetings, for instance, appointment of a proxy is allowed at a shareholders meeting but not at board meetings.

Security Measures for E-Meetings

To supplement the new royal decree, the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society (MDES) issued a new set of mandatory security standards for electronic meetings in its Notification Re: Standards for Maintaining Security of Meetings via Electronic Means B.E. 2563 (2020). The notification, which came into effect on May 26, 2020, outlines various mandatory security measures and procedures for electronic meetings. It also regulates the role and functions of the “conference control system” and the “system controller.” While the new royal decree already addressed security measures to some degree through its statutory protocols, the MDES notification added the following key requirements:

  • Method of identity check. The meeting organizer may adopt any secured method of identity verification, such as username and password or one-time password.
  • Two-way communication. The meeting must have sufficient bandwidth to provide a clear and continuous communication channel—whether via interactive audio or video communication—to allow participants to interact and express opinions to one another without interruption throughout the meeting.
  • Conference control system. The chair of the meeting (or the system controller) must have technological access to control or restrict, whether permanently or temporarily, the participation of attendees during the meeting in case of necessity or emergency.
  • Access to documents and data. Attendees must be able to access documents and data presented during the meeting.
  • Voting mechanism. The meeting must grant access to the technological tools to facilitate voting by the attendees, whether in the form of a general vote or a secret vote;
  • Storage of records. The meeting must keep records and data in connection with the meeting, including method of identity check, method and results of votes, audio or audiovisual recording (except for secret meetings), attendees’ electronic traffic data, and occurrence of disruptions during the meeting (if any).
  • Troubleshooting. Attendees must be able to report disruptions and errors that occur during the meeting, and the organizer must arrange for proper solutions and preventive measures.
  • IT security standards. The meeting must meet minimum IT security in terms of confidentiality, integrity, accessibility, privacy and protection of personal data, and other IT security measures.

It has become a general and convenient practice for electronic meetings to be conducted via free or paid conference applications or platforms, such as MS Teams, Zoom, Google Meet, and so on. The Electronic Transaction Development Agency (ETDA) is empowered to verify and certify whether the conference control systems have the technical capabilities or functions to comply with the security measures set out by the MDES notification on e-meeting security. To date, several conference control systems have voluntarily completed the ETDA’s self-assessment, but only a few have opted to apply with ETDA for its official certification. Both groups are published on the ETDA website at https://www.etda.or.th.

Meeting organizers from all Thai companies should familiarize themselves with these new laws and rules on electronic meetings and carefully choose a conference control system that both complies with the regulations and is compatible with their needs. Regardless of the platform chosen, the royal decree and the associated MDES notification have taken a much-needed, modernizing step that significantly eases the process of corporate operations in Thailand. These developments are an encouraging indication of Thailand’s intent to facilitate international business in the country, and a welcome innovation for shareholders and board members.

Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 8, 2025
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) has issued regulations revising its criteria for certain foreign companies that receive promotional privileges to own land under limited circumstances. The revised allowance is detailed in the Notification of the Board of Investment No. 16/2567 Re: Criteria for Permitting Foreign Juristic Persons Receiving Investment Promotion to Hold Land Ownership for Office and Residence, which was published in the Government Gazette on December 9, 2024, after having been officially issued on November 1, 2024. The notification was made in conjunction with the subordinate Notification of the Office of the Board of Investment No. Por. 8/2567 Re: Criteria and Conditions for Permitting Foreign Juristic Persons Receiving Investment Promotion to Own Land for Office and Residence for Operational-Level Workers to Operate Business Granted Investment Promotion, dated November 4, 2024. Under the new BOI notification and subordinate notification, foreign juristic persons that receive promotional privileges from the BOI, with paid-up registered capital of at least THB 50 million, are eligible to own land for office use or residential purposes, subject to certain criteria and conditions: Office use. Land used for this purpose must be for an office of the relevant BOI-promoted business, with an area limit of 5 rai (8,000 square meters). Residential use. Land used for this purpose must be for the residences of operational-level workers (i.e., unskilled laborers), with an area limit of 20 rai (32,000 square meters). In addition, there must be common facilities (e.g., parking, first-aid room, kitchen, and other amenities, as approved by the BOI). The land must be located within 10 kilometers of the place of business operation, and the number of rooms must be consistent with the number of workers. For more information on this notification, or on any aspect of property law in Thailand, please contact Chaiwat Keratisuthisathorn at  [email protected],
Read More
January 3, 2025
Thailand has adopted the OECD’s global minimum tax framework through the Emergency Decree on Top-Up Tax B.E. 2567 (2024). Published in the Government Gazette on December 26, 2024, this legislation implements a 15% global minimum effective tax rate for large multinational enterprise (MNE) groups. The emergency decree took effect on January 1, 2025. The emergency decree was enacted through expedited procedures to implement “pillar two” of the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) 2.0 project’s Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules. This swift implementation ensures Thailand can collect relevant tax revenues and prevents potential revenue losses from MNEs that might otherwise shift profits to jurisdictions with lower tax rates or to countries that have already implemented similar top-up tax legislation. Key aspects of Thailand’s implementation of the global minimum tax through the emergency decree are described below. Top-Up Tax The emergency decree introduces a dual mechanism for collecting additional top-up tax from MNEs whose effective tax rate falls below 15%. The first mechanism is a domestic top-up tax that targets MNEs operating within Thailand when their local effective tax rate is lower than 15%. The second mechanism is the income inclusion rule, which determines when a company’s foreign income should be included in the parent (main) company’s taxable income. This rule applies to Thai-based entities—including ultimate parent entities (UPE), intermediate parent entities, and partially owned parent entities—that hold ownership stakes in low-tax foreign jurisdictions. Scope MNEs subject to Thailand’s implementation of the global minimum tax framework are defined in the emergency decree as those whose UPEs report consolidated revenue of at least EUR 750 million (approximately THB 28 billion) in at least two of the four accounting periods preceding the relevant fiscal year. Reporting and Payment In-scope MNEs must comply with specific reporting obligations to the Thai Revenue Department. The filing deadline is set
Read More
December 20, 2024
With intellectual property playing an ever-increasing role in economic development, the need to harness, promote, and protect ASEAN innovation remains urgent as integration progresses. Among its objectives, the ASEAN Economic Community aims to transform the region into a hub of innovation and competitiveness and ensure that the region remains an active participant in the international IP community. With ASEAN member states increasing IP generation and further committing to global IP regimes, the region is increasingly looking toward sophisticated IP ownership and holding structures. IP Holding Companies ASEAN-based companies continue to centralize ownership of their IP assets in offshore holding and licensing vehicles—an approach multinational companies headquartered elsewhere have been using for a number of years. IP-intensive companies look to locate their IP portfolios in low-tax jurisdictions with strong IP registration and protection laws. The company then licenses the IP to operating companies in the group or to third-party licensees, franchisees, agents, distributors, and other partners in return for royalties or license fees. These special-purpose vehicles are typically referred to as IP holding companies. IP holding companies are popular because they can help corporations minimize tax, gain tax benefits or concessions, protect IP from bankruptcy or other claims against the parent company, and focus management attention on the IP portfolio as an income generator. Tax and IP Holding Companies Tax is the primary reason most companies park their IP in separate IP holding vehicles. Sometimes, companies choose to establish their IP holding company in a no-tax, low-tax, or preferred-tax jurisdiction close to their home country. The selected jurisdiction should also be a country with a large and well-established tax treaty network. Double taxation treaties are key considerations in jurisdiction shopping. If the IP assets need to be pledged as security for future borrowings or if they are to be included
Read More
December 4, 2024
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to Restructuring in Southeast Asia, a comparative guide produced by Drew Network Asia (DNA). The publication outlines the principal debt restructuring processes available to corporate debtors across nine Southeast Asian jurisdictions and provides an accessible overview for lenders, creditors, and companies navigating financial distress in the region. Structured in a question-and-answer format, each jurisdictional chapter addresses the same core topics, allowing readers to compare approaches across markets. The guide covers key issues such as available restructuring mechanisms, court-supervised and out-of-court options, the roles and powers of creditors, and the implications of restructuring on ongoing business operations. As with other DNA resources, the guide aims to provide practical orientation rather than exhaustive analysis. Legislative developments and jurisdiction-specific considerations may affect the applicability of certain procedures, and readers requiring tailored advice are encouraged to contact the practitioners listed at the end of each chapter. The full guide is available for download using the button below or directly from the DNA website.
Read More