You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 15, 2025

Thailand Prepares Startup Promotion Act to Unlock Fundraising and Support

Subscribe to Updates

Thailand is taking steps to energize its startup scene by drafting the Startup Promotion Law. This draft law aims to remove obstacles, open new funding opportunities, and provide coordinated government support. The goal is to make it easier for Thailand-based startups to grow and compete on a global stage.

Why Is This Law Needed?

For many years, Thai startups have operated under traditional company law frameworks that were not designed with high-growth businesses or with fundraising opportunities in mind. Restrictions on issuing bonds, offering shares to outside investors, and repurchasing shares for employee incentive programs made it challenging for emerging companies to access capital and accelerate their growth. The draft Startup Promotion Act seeks to remove these obstacles and foster a more competitive, entrepreneur-friendly environment in Thailand.

Who’s in Charge?

Two main organizations will oversee the startup ecosystem:

  • Startup Promotion Committee: This group, to be appointed by the National Science, Research, and Innovation Policy Council, will set national strategies, policies, and budget; design promotional campaign and incentives; and propose further legislative amendments to promote startups.
  • National Innovation Agency (NIA): Under the draft act, the NIA will be the main contact for startups and will serve as the secretariat office of the Startup Promotion Committee, coordinating data, advising startups, maintaining the public registry, and providing funding and investment (grants, repayable grants, loans, and equity) under committee criteria and, where applicable, cabinet approval.

What Startups Are Eligible for Benefits?

To be officially recognized and access benefits, a company must:

  • Be a private limited company less than 10 years old at the time of application. Existing companies that already exceed the 10-year threshold may still apply for startup statues within one year of the law’s enactment, as long as they otherwise still qualify for the new regime.
  • Have average annual revenue not exceeding THB 300 million over the past three years (with possible adjustments for different sectors).
  • Never have declared dividends before.
  • Not be controlled by another company, unless the parent is also a certified startup or a university spinoff focused on commercializing research.

Application Process

Applications must be submitted online to the NIA, and applicants must certify the accuracy of all information provided. Once approved, the company’s name will be published by the NIA on a list categorized by business sector.

Labor Requirement

Within two years of certification, startups must employ a minimum number of qualified Thai workers, as specified by the Startup Promotion Committee.

What Are the Main Benefits for Eligible Startups?

Certified startups will receive special privileges for five years. For categories designated as deep‑tech, the committee may extend the term for a total of up to ten years.

Flexible Corporate Financing

  • Startups can publicly offer shares and issue corporate bonds, which are currently restricted under Thai law.
  • They can allocate new shares to outside investors in addition to existing shareholders.
  • Debt can be converted into equity, making it easier to use modern investment tools like convertible notes.
  • Preferred shares can be converted into ordinary shares.
  • Startups can buy back up to 20% of their own shares as treasury stock. Buybacks are allowed for financial management, fulfilling investment agreements, or acquiring shares from dissenting shareholders. Treasury shares can be used for employee stock option programs (ESOPs) or future investment allocations.

Government Support Measures

  • Tax incentives: Access to tax benefits designed to support startup growth.
  • Immigration benefits: Facilitation under existing immigration and foreign-worker laws; the committee may propose categories of qualified foreign experts and high-skill personnel for certified startups.
  • Government procurement: Where suitable, agencies will treat certified startups’ goods and services as items the state intends to promote under the Public Procurement and Supplies Administration Act.
  • Intellectual property support: Assistance with IP registration and protection.
  • Investment incentives: Eligibility for incentives under the Board of Investment (BOI), Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC), and other competitiveness enhancement initiatives.

The draft law requires the relevant government agencies to assist certified startups in accessing these applicable benefits. The NIA will coordinate information, request documents, and serve as a hub connecting startups to tax, immigration, procurement, IP, BOI/EEC, and other authorities.

How Is Compliance Enforced?

The law sets out clear sanctions and other mechanisms to make sure only eligible startups benefit and that privileges are not abused:

  • Administrative fines: Fines range from THB 20,000 to THB 100,000 for violations such as unlawful public offerings of shares or bonds, holding too many treasury shares, failing to maintain a share register, or not canceling unallocated shares after a project ends. Ongoing violations can result in additional daily fines.
  • Personal liability: Directors, managers, and responsible officers can be held personally liable if a violation occurs due to their actions or inaction.
  • Annual reconfirmation: Startups must reconfirm their eligibility every year. Failure to do so, or providing false information, can result in removal from the official list and loss of benefits.
  • Oversight and monitoring: The NIA monitors compliance and may conduct checks or request more information from certified startups.

Outlook

Thailand’s Startup Promotion Law is a significant step toward modernizing business regulations and supporting local innovation. By making fundraising easier and improving access to government support, the law aims to help startups grow and compete internationally. The draft act has completed public consultation and is now progressing to Parliament, and both startups and investors should keep track of its developments.

Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 10, 2026
Thailand’s Ministry of Finance and Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) have issued regulations broadening the criteria for determining who qualifies as a “major shareholder” of licensed securities and digital asset business operators. Under relevant SEC regulations, major shareholders of a regulated entity must obtain regulatory approval and undergo screening by the SEC. The revised framework introduces both shareholding-based and control-based tests to determine which shareholders require regulatory approval for a wider range of indirect ownership structures and de facto control. The Ministry of Finance notification took effect on February 21, 2026, while the SEC’s clarifying rules took effect on March 4, 2026. These changes aim to enhance transparency around beneficial ownership and strengthen regulatory oversight of entities operating in Thailand’s capital markets. Expanded Definition Under the revised framework, a “major shareholder” now includes persons who directly or indirectly hold more than 10% of the voting rights in a regulated company, as well as persons who exercise control over the regulated company or its shares. This system of two separate tests, based on both shareholding and control, differs from the prior regime, which focused primarily on shareholding thresholds and applied a more limited method for determining indirect shareholdings. The two tests (detailed below) operate independently of each other, and any person identified by either of the tests will be deemed a major shareholder. Shareholding-Based Test Broadens Indirect Ownership Attribution For the shareholding-based test, the SEC recognizes two existing methods for identifying indirect ownership, together with a new proportional attribution method. Any person captured under these methods, which are described below, will be regarded as a major shareholder of the regulated company and must obtain SEC approval as a major shareholder. First, the existing framework continues to apply to both first-tier and chain ownership structures. Approval is required for (1) first-tier
Read More
March 6, 2026
Thailand’s Legislation Consideration Committee of the Ministry of Interior has ruled that in-game loot boxes in online games do not constitute gambling under the Gambling Act B.E. 2478 (1935). This first-of-its-kind ruling provides useful guidance for online game operators and digital entertainment companies operating in Thailand. Background The ruling came in response to an inquiry concerning an online role-playing game operator that launched a campaign featuring a loot box mechanism. The mechanism allowed players to purchase a token in exchange for the opportunity to receive a virtual loot box containing randomized in-game items. The key features of this were as follows: The items received were digital, noncash items usable only within the game. The items could not be exchanged, redeemed, or converted into cash with the game operator. Items may differ in rarity but remain purely virtual. The central question was whether paying money to obtain randomized in-game items constituted a risk-based activity involving the chance to receive money or property of monetary value, which would constitute gambling under the Gambling Act. Committee Ruling The committee reached the following conclusions regarding the characteristics of the game’s loot-box mechanism: No cash or monetary equivalent: Players did not receive cash or property that could be exchanged for cash. The in-game items were merely usage rights within the online game ecosystem. No real-world monetary valuation: There was no determination of item value in real currency, and no mechanism for redeeming or converting items into money with the game operator. Any off-platform trading of in-game items between players is irrelevant to online game operators, as any value arising from such transactions is determined by the market rather than by the operators themselves. Service fee characterization: Payments made by players purchasing in-game loot boxes constituted fees for online game services. Accordingly, the committee concluded
Read More
March 5, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has filed a criminal complaint against a licensed digital asset broker, its overseas trading platform, and its executives for allegedly operating an unlicensed digital asset exchange targeting Thai customers. The case marks an escalation in the SEC’s enforcement efforts against unlicensed offshore platforms that attempt to serve Thai users through local licensed entities. Criminal Complaint On February 20, 2026, the SEC filed a criminal complaint with the Economic Crime Suppression Division against a local licensed digital asset broker, its overseas global trading platform, and its executives. The SEC alleges that the parties violated the Digital Asset Business Emergency Decree B.E. 2561 (2018) by cooperatively operating a digital asset exchange business on a cross-border basis since 2023 without the required SEC license. According to the SEC, the local broker promoted the overseas platform’s services to the public through Thai-language posts on social media channels, with services available exclusively to customers residing in Thailand. Access to the global platform was provided through the local broker’s website and mobile application. Customers who registered for the local broker’s services were automatically granted access to the global platform without having to undergo a separate identity verification process. The SEC also found that the local broker provided back-office system support services to the global platform. The SEC considers these activities to constitute joint operation of an unlicensed digital asset exchange. The former executives of the local broker are being held liable as the responsible persons during the relevant period. The SEC emphasized that the complaint initiates the criminal process, and the decision to prosecute or convict the accused parties will ultimately be made by law enforcement authorities and the criminal courts. Platform Blocking The SEC has also coordinated with the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society to block public
Read More
February 27, 2026
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has officially implemented a new regulatory framework supervising systemically important retail payment systems (SIRPS), effective February 21, 2026, with PromptPay being the first payment system designated as a SIRPS. Under this new set of regulations, the BOT may designate payment systems under the Payment Systems Act B.E. 2560 (2017) as SIRPSs based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. Once a system is designated as a SIRPS, the operator becomes subject to expanded supervisory obligations beyond the general requirements of the Payment Systems Act. Enhanced Supervisory Requirements SIRPS operators must comply with a heightened supervisory regime across three key areas, outlined below. 1. Governance SIRPS operators must maintain robust and transparent governance structures, including: Balanced board composition, with at least one-third of the board comprising independent directors who represent stakeholders in the system (such as payment service providers, consumers, and experts). Independent directors may serve for no more than two consecutive terms. Subcommittees to assist the board in overseeing compliance, policy implementation, and operational strategy. Clear separation between executives responsible for risk and information security and those overseeing day-to-day business operations. Risk Management and System SecuritySIRPS operators must implement comprehensive risk management frameworks, including: Clear service agreements between the SIRPS operator and its direct participants (payment service providers who connect directly to the SIRPS), defining roles and responsibilities among stakeholders. These agreements must include obligations for direct SIRPS participants to supervise any indirect participants they onboard to ensure compliance with service agreements and business rules. A business continuity plan covering both IT and non-IT aspects, with annual review. The SIRPS must target service availability comparable to international payment infrastructures, including the ability to recover operations within two hours of a disruption and to maintain scalable operational capacity. Tools and controls to monitor and manage material or
Read More