You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 14, 2022

Thailand Officially Opens New M&A Pathway—Plus Eight Other Notable Changes in the Amended CCC

On November 8, 2022, the Act Amending the Civil and Commercial Code B.E. 2565 (No. 23)—which Tilleke & Gibbins wrote about last month as the law was poised for enactment—was published in the Government Gazette, completing a lengthy process that had been under scrutiny for over two years. The act is expected to come into effect on February 6, 2023 (i.e., 90 days after the date of publication).

New M&A Option

The new amendments contain a number of important changes, but perhaps the most notable is the introduction of a new type of business combination. The Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) previously only allowed “amalgamation,” which is a consolidation of two or more companies resulting in the formation of a new entity, with all the amalgamating companies being dissolved.

The amended CCC provides more options by introducing “merger” as another possible type of business combination. A merger occurs when two or more companies merge and one of the companies continues to exist while the others companies are dissolved. Like the newly created company in an amalgamation, the surviving entity in a merger assumes the property, liabilities, rights, obligations and responsibilities of all the dissolved entities.

Some important considerations for the merger process (which also apply to amalgamations) are specified in the amended CCC as follows:

  • Purchase of shares from dissenting shareholders. The amended CCC allows minority shareholders who disagree with the merger (or amalgamation) to sell their shares to the other existing shareholders at the agreed price. Alternatively, the price may be determined by an appointed valuer if the parties cannot reach an agreement on the purchase price. If the share purchase does not occur within 14 days of the offer date, the shareholder who rejects the offer will become a shareholder of the surviving (or newly created) company after the merger (or amalgamation). Rules for the appointment of a valuer will be set out in ministerial regulations.
  • Period for creditor objection process. Each merging (or amalgamating) company must send notice of the merger (or amalgamation) to any creditors listed in the accounts of the company and publish the resolution in a daily newspaper within 14 days of the resolution. Creditors can send an objection within one month receiving the notice. If an objection is raised, the company cannot proceed with the merger (or amalgamation) unless it has satisfied the claim or given security for it.
  • Quorum and voting requirements for corporate governance. The director must call a shareholders’ meeting to pass a resolution on the name, objectives, share capital, allocation of shares, memorandum and articles of association, selection of directors, appointment of an auditor, and other necessary matters within six months of the resolution to merge, unless shareholders have resolved to extend the deadline (up to one year). The quorum for passing the resolution is participation of shareholders holding not less than 50 percent of the total shares of all merging (or amalgamating) companies. Passage of the resolution requires a majority vote of the shareholders attending the meeting, unless agreed otherwise.

General Corporate Governance and Procedural Changes

The newly published amendments to the CCC make eight other major changes—all of which apply only to private limited companies:

  1. Number of shareholders for incorporation. The amended CCC reduces the minimum number of promoters who can establish a private limited company from three persons to two. This will facilitate the registration of the company and provide promoters with more options.
  2. Term of memorandum of association (MOA). Under the amended CCC, a founder needs to register the incorporation of the company within three years of registering the MOA. Previously, a registered MOA was valid for 10 years. For MOAs that were registered under the old provisions but the company has not yet been registered, the promoter will need to register the company within 180 days of the amended CCC entering into force.
  3. Share certificates. Under the amended CCC, every share certificate must be signed by at least one director and must bear the seal of the company (if the company has a seal). Prior to this amendment, there was no requirement for share certificates to bear the seal of the company.
  4. E-meetings for boards of directors. The amended CCC provides that board of directors meetings can be convened electronically, provided that the meeting is carried out in accordance with the laws applicable to electronic meetings. This means that a director can attend and vote in the meetings remotely, unless the company’s articles of association specify otherwise.
  5. Shareholders’ meeting notice. Companies are no longer required to publish a notice calling a general meeting of shareholders in a local newspaper, unless the company has issued share certificates to bearers. Under the amended CCC, a company can call a general meeting of shareholders by sending a notice by post with acknowledgement of receipt to every shareholder whose name appears in the register of shareholders. This must be done not less than seven days before the meeting date—or 14 days if the notice is for a special resolution. A company with share certificates issued to bearers is still required to publish a notice at least once in local newspaper or via electronic means, as prescribed by the relevant ministerial regulations.
  6. Quorum for shareholders’ meetings. Under amended CCC, a general meeting may not transact any business unless not less than two shareholders representing not less than one-fourth of the capital of the company are present, either themselves or via proxy.
  7. Payment of shareholder dividends. Under the previous version of the CCC, shareholder dividends had to be “made” within one month of being approved by a company’s shareholders or its board of directors. The amended CCC clarifies that the dividends must be “completely made” within one month of being approved by a company’s shareholders or by its board of directors.
  8. Dissolution by court order. Since the minimum number of promoters is reduced from three persons to two, the number of shareholders required to request a court-ordered dissolution of the company is reduced to one person. As amended, the fact that a company only has two shareholders will not cause a dissolution (though this was the case under the previous version of the CCC).

Doing Business under the Amended CCC

Taken as a whole, the amended CCC should be a positive development for the business environment in Thailand. It eases the process of company incorporation, holding director’s meetings, and issuing notices to shareholders. It also provides businesses with more options for integration, giving companies more options for their strategic M&A and transactional activities.

While some details of implementation remain to be seen, it is likely that the amended CCC will create a more conducive environment for investing and doing business in Thailand.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
April 15, 2026
On March 31, 2026, Vietnam’s government issued Decree 102/2026/ND-CP (Decree 102), which amends Decree 75/2019/ND-CP on administrative sanctions for competition law violations (Decree 75). Effective from May 20, 2026, the new decree introduces a number of significant changes aimed at strengthening enforcement, revising penalty structures, and broadening the range of remedial measures, primarily for violations related to economic concentration. Revised Penalties for Economic Concentration Violations Decree 102 significantly revises the penalties for violations related to economic concentration. Failure to notify an economic concentration; implementing an economic concentration before clearance Under the new framework, Articles 14 and 15 of Decree 75 have been amended to impose a range of monetary fines, rather than relying solely on percentage‑based penalties as under the previous regime, for violations involving the failure to notify an economic concentration or the implementation of an economic concentration prior to clearance. The fines range from VND 500 million to VND 1 billion for each enterprise participating in a concentration with combined assets, revenues, or purchase value below VND 3,000 billion in the preceding fiscal year, capped at 5% of the violating enterprise’s total turnover in the relevant market. For concentrations meeting or exceeding the VND 3,000 billion threshold across those same metrics, the fines increase to VND 1 billion to VND 2 billion per enterprise, also subject to the 5% cap. These differentiated thresholds allow penalties to better reflect the size of the transaction and its potential competitive impact. Non-compliance with conditional approvals Enterprises that do not implement or only partially implement the conditions specified in a conditional economic concentration approval decision face fines ranging from 1% to 3% of total turnover in the relevant market during the fiscal year preceding the violation. Decree 102 also adds a new remedial measure requiring enterprises to fully implement all conditions
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
March 31, 2026
Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) has issued a regulation imposing additional requirements for amending a company’s directors and signatory power to designate a foreign national as an authorized signatory of the company. This measure, effective April 1, 2026, has been introduced in response to the widespread use of Thai nationals as nominees to conduct business on behalf of foreigners, a practice considered to have an adverse impact on the country’s economic stability and security. The new measures are particularly concerned with changes to the authorized signatory structure of companies that originally had only Thai directors authorized to sign for and bind the company. Under the new rules, any amendment that results in a foreign national becoming an authorized signatory—whether solely or jointly—for such a company will be subject to additional verification. Directors signing an application to register such an amendment to the company’s authorized signatory structure are now also required to provide a statement confirming that all shareholders of the company have made genuine contributions and no Thai national has assisted with, supported, or participated in business activities in a nominee capacity. Implications Companies intending to appoint foreign directors as authorized signatories should be aware of the increased regulatory requirements and assessments. Additional documentation and confirmations may be required as part of the registration process.