You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 16, 2023

Thailand: New Order Closes Tax Loophole for Offshore-Sourced Income

Subscribe to Updates

On September 15, Revenue Departmental Order No. Por. 161/2566 was published, fundamentally changing how Thailand tax residents’ offshore-sourced income will be taxed.

Under the order, starting from January 1, 2024, the offshore-sourced income of tax residents will be subject to Thai personal income tax (PIT) in any year that it is brought into Thailand. The purpose of this new rule is to ensure consistent tax collection practices among tax officers and to tackle tax avoidance strategies commonly used by individual taxpayers.

PIT on Offshore-Sourced Income

According to the resident rule in Thailand’s Revenue Code, Thailand tax residents (i.e., persons who reside in Thailand for at least 180 days in a calendar year) are subject to PIT on their domestic-sourced and offshore-sourced income. “Offshore-sourced income” is broadly defined to include income from work, business, or assets outside Thailand.

Existing Practice

Currently, Thailand tax residents’ offshore-sourced income is exempted from PIT if it is brought into Thailand after the calendar year in which it was earned. This exemption was adopted 28 years ago in the Revenue Department’s interpretation stated in a resolution from February 1985. This exemption by interpretation has led some Thailand tax residents to avoid PIT by simply holding their newly earned offshore-sourced income abroad temporarily and then bringing it into Thailand at a later time. Through the years, a number of tax rulings have affirmed this practice.

New PIT Collection Rules for Offshore-Sourced Income

Revenue Departmental Order No. Por. 161/2566 simply revokes the favorable exemption adopted under the February 1985 resolution so that the delay tactic is no longer able to succeed in avoiding tax. Starting from January 1, 2024, the offshore-sourced income of Thailand tax residents will be subject to PIT whenever it is brought into Thailand, at which time the offshore-sourced income must be declared to the Thai Revenue Department in the tax return for that taxable year.

Considerations

Although Revenue Departmental Order Por. 161/2566 overturns the longstanding exemption and establishes blanket PIT collection on offshore-sourced income when it is brought into Thailand, the effectiveness and efficiency of the Thai Revenue Department’s collection of the tax due remain to be seen. Generally, PIT collection depends on taxpayers’ faithful and full declaration of income in their PIT returns filed by the end of March each year.

Moreover, some valid exceptions remain. For instance, offshore-sourced income retained outside Thailand is not subject to PIT. Also, individuals who reside in Thailand for less than 180 days in a calendar year are not subject to PIT on their offshore-sourced income, even if it is brought into Thailand. Furthermore, certain types of offshore-sourced income that are not recognized as any type of assessable income are not subject to PIT.

For more details on Thailand’s taxation of tax residents’ offshore-sourced income, or on any aspect of tax laws and regulations in Thailand, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].

Related Professionals

Practices

Tax

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 9, 2021
Lawyers from Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok have updated the Thailand section of the Digital Business Global Guide, a Q&A-style guide from Thomson Reuters Practical Law that provides detailed information on the regulatory environment surrounding digital business operations in 38 countries around the world. The Thailand overview covers the following main topics: Regulatory overview Setting up and running a business online Cybersecurity, data privacy, and data protection implications Linking Domain names Jurisdiction and governing law Advertising/marketing Tax Protecting an online business Liability for products/services supplied online Insurance Reform Practical Law, produced by Thomson Reuters, is the world’s leading legal know-how resource for business lawyers, publishing a huge range of guides covering hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The full Digital Business in Thailand: Overview is available on the Practical Law website.
Read More
March 2, 2021
Like many countries, Thailand requires stamp duty to be paid on the execution of certain legal instruments. A liable person who fails to pay stamp duty on a required instrument can be subject to a maximum surcharge of six times the applicable stamp duty, and an instrument on which stamp duty has not been paid will not be admissible as evidence in civil cases (that is, it will have limited legal weight and enforceability). Before July 2019, there were three methods for paying stamp duty: Affixing adhesive stamps on the instrument (and canceling it by the liable person in order to make sure that the adhesive stamp duty cannot be reused); Having a stamp impressed on the paper instrument; or Filing a prescribed form and paying the duty by cash or cashiers cheque at an area revenue office. In addition to paying the correct amount of stamp duty, the law also requires that stamp duty on certain instruments be paid using a specific prescribed method from the list above. Failure to use the prescribed method would be considered as that the stamp duty not having been paid. For example, a hire-of-work instrument is subject to stamp duty, but if the remuneration stated within the agreement is at least THB 1,000,000 (approximately USD 33,500), the stamp duty must be paid by filing a prescribed form and paying by cash or cashier’s cheque at an area revenue office. Affixing adhesive stamp duty is not allowed in that circumstance. E-Stamp Duty In June 2019, the Revenue Department introduced a fourth method of paying stamp duty, allowing online payments in specific circumstances (e-Stamp Duty). After the launch of the e-Stamp Duty system, the Revenue Department issued a notification (Notification of the Director-General of Revenue concerning Stamp Duty (No. 58)) requiring stamp duty on
Read More
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More