You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 25, 2021

Thailand Issues Country-by-Country Transfer Pricing Reporting Regulation

Subscribe to Updates

On September 30, 2021, Thailand’s Revenue Department released a notification prescribing country-by-country (CBC) transfer pricing reporting requirements for multinational enterprise (MNE) groups that do business in Thailand.

The Notification of the Director-General of the Revenue Department Re: Income Tax (No. 408) applies to accounting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2021, with the CBC report submitted at the same time as the annual corporate income tax (P.N.D. 50) filing (i.e., within 150 days of the end of the accounting period). For example, if the accounting period ends on December 31, 2021, the CBC report must be filed by May 30, 2022.

Background

The CBC report functions as part of a three-tier structure, together with a global master file and a local file, as recommended by the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Sharing (BEPS) Action 13 report (Transfer Pricing Documentation and Country-by-Country Reporting). The CBC reporting requirement targets large MNEs, with the aim of encouraging international tax transparency, improving tax authorities’ access to information on MNEs’ global allocation of income and taxes paid, and helping governments to assess high-level transfer pricing risks and conduct economic and statistical analysis.

The CBC reporting requirement will allow Thailand to exchange tax and financial information on an automatic basis with other signatories of the Multilateral Convention on Mutual Administrative Assistance on Tax Matters. This goes in tandem with the recently passed Act Amending the Revenue Code (No. 54) B.E. 2564 (2021), which empowers the director-general of the Revenue Department to exchange information with competent authorities in other jurisdictions.

Entities Required to Submit CBC Reports

The CBC report notification applies to MNE groups that do business in Thailand and at least one other jurisdiction and that have consolidated group revenue of at least THB 28 billion (approx. USD 847.6 million) in a 12-month accounting period (prorated for shorter periods).

Generally, ultimate parent entities (UPEs; see definitions below) incorporated in Thailand must submit a CBC report to the Revenue Department. For foreign UPEs (i.e., those not registered in Thailand), an MNE group member that operates in Thailand may have to file the report locally.

However, these Thai members of the MNE group will not have to submit the CBC report if the following conditions are met:

  • The foreign UPE already files a CBC report in its own tax residence; and
  • The tax residence of the foreign UPE has an effective CBC reporting competent authority agreement with Thailand, and CBC reports can be shared successfully with Thailand.

In addition, for the purposes of multijurisdictional exchange of information, a Thai member of an MNE group may be formally appointed by a foreign UPE as a Thai surrogate parent entity (SPE) to file the reports on its behalf. However, the accounting periods of the foreign UPE and the SPE must be the same, and the foreign UPE must notify the Revenue Department of the appointment of the SPE.

By formally appointing the SPE in Thailand, the MNE group may be exempt from CBC reporting requirements in other jurisdictions that have a competent authority agreement with Thailand under which CBC reports are exchanged. This is similar to the filing exemption (see below) offered by the Revenue Department.

Filing Exemptions
A Thai member of an MNE group mentioned above is exempt from filing CBC reports with the Revenue Department if all of the following conditions are met:

  • The foreign UPE has appointed an SPE residing outside Thailand (i.e., an SPE located in a third country) to file CBC reports with the competent authority of the third-country SPE’s country of tax residence;
  • The third-country SPE’s country of tax residence requires the filing of CBC reports;
  • A competent authority agreement between the third-country SPE’s country of tax residence and Thailand is in effect by the CBC report filing deadline in Thailand;
  • The third-country SPE’s country of tax residence has not reported a systemic failure regarding its information exchange to Thailand;
  • The third-country SPE has notified the competent authority in its country of tax residence of its appointment as a reporting entity; and
  • The Thai Member of the MNE group has notified the Revenue Department of the appointment of the third-country SPE.

Defining a UPE

The definition of UPE is generally based on the requirement to prepare consolidated financial statements. Under the CBC reporting notification, an entity is considered a UPE in either of the following scenarios:

  • It directly or indirectly owns enough of one or more other entities in the same MNE group that it has to prepare consolidated financial statements under accounting principles of its country of tax residence, or would have to if its equity interests were traded on a securities exchange in that country (or the Stock Exchange of Thailand if the country has no securities exchange). In addition, in order to be considered a UPE it cannot be directly or indirectly owned, in the above manner, by any other entity in the same MNE group.
  • It does not have an ownership interest (in the manner described above) in any other entity, but it conducts business through a permanent establishment in another country.
Related Professionals

Practices

Tax

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 6, 2025
On February 18, 2025, the Thai Senate approved an amendment to the Act on the Establishment of and Procedures for the Tax Court. This follows the July 2024 approval by the Thai cabinet and subsequent preparation of supporting secondary legislation. This important amendment to procedural law, once it takes effect, will extend the exclusive jurisdictional powers of the Tax Court to all criminal tax, customs, and excise tax claims in addition to the court’s existing jurisdiction over all such civil claims. The amendment, while now formally approved by the legislature, is awaiting the king’s signature and will take effect 180 days after its publication in the Government Gazette. Based upon its projected publication date, the amendment will likely take effect by the end of the third quarter of this year. This development is set to offer a more sophisticated Tax Court litigation process for highly specialized and often complex criminal tax and customs claims, something with which Thailand’s traditional criminal courts have struggled. It also ensures that all tax and customs matters are adjudicated before the same court, saving time, party costs, and judicial resources. This appears likely to result in more consistent adjudication of criminal tax and customs disputes, a benefit for the Thai government and party litigants alike. Any ongoing criminal tax and customs claims already commenced with the respective criminal courts on the date on which the amendment becomes effective will remain under the exclusive jurisdiction of those criminal courts. The Tax Court will have exclusive jurisdiction over all other claims. This important legislative change offers those managing or otherwise facing civil and/or criminal Thai tax or customs disputes the opportunity to more effectively plan and execute a uniform defense strategy before a single, qualified forum.
Read More
January 3, 2025
Thailand has adopted the OECD’s global minimum tax framework through the Emergency Decree on Top-Up Tax B.E. 2567 (2024). Published in the Government Gazette on December 26, 2024, this legislation implements a 15% global minimum effective tax rate for large multinational enterprise (MNE) groups. The emergency decree took effect on January 1, 2025. The emergency decree was enacted through expedited procedures to implement “pillar two” of the OECD’s Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) 2.0 project’s Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules. This swift implementation ensures Thailand can collect relevant tax revenues and prevents potential revenue losses from MNEs that might otherwise shift profits to jurisdictions with lower tax rates or to countries that have already implemented similar top-up tax legislation. Key aspects of Thailand’s implementation of the global minimum tax through the emergency decree are described below. Top-Up Tax The emergency decree introduces a dual mechanism for collecting additional top-up tax from MNEs whose effective tax rate falls below 15%. The first mechanism is a domestic top-up tax that targets MNEs operating within Thailand when their local effective tax rate is lower than 15%. The second mechanism is the income inclusion rule, which determines when a company’s foreign income should be included in the parent (main) company’s taxable income. This rule applies to Thai-based entities—including ultimate parent entities (UPE), intermediate parent entities, and partially owned parent entities—that hold ownership stakes in low-tax foreign jurisdictions. Scope MNEs subject to Thailand’s implementation of the global minimum tax framework are defined in the emergency decree as those whose UPEs report consolidated revenue of at least EUR 750 million (approximately THB 28 billion) in at least two of the four accounting periods preceding the relevant fiscal year. Reporting and Payment In-scope MNEs must comply with specific reporting obligations to the Thai Revenue Department. The filing deadline is set
Read More
December 4, 2024
Thailand Legal Basics, a valuable primer for foreign investors, explores all aspects of living and doing business in Thailand. Written by specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok, it is the only comprehensive English-language guide to the Thai legal system with a focus on the concerns of foreign business and investment.
Read More
August 20, 2024
Following the enactment of the Tax Administration Law (TAL), Myanmar’s Ministry of Planning and Finance has issued Notification No. 44/2024, which outlines directives and procedures for addressing violations of tax law provisions. These procedures, which came into force on June 13, 2024, primarily focus on three key areas: tax evasion, impeding tax administration, and failure to preserve secrecy. The notification primarily aims to address tax evasion, impeding tax administration, and failure to preserve secrecy, classifying these offenses as either subject to arrest without warrant or not. Notably, tax evasion is classified as an offense subject to arrest without warrant, while impeding tax administration and failure to preserve secrecy are not. The notification also prescribed the forms for notifying taxpayers before taking any action. Tax Evasion Tax evasion refers to a taxpayer who willfully evades the assessment, payment, or collection of tax. Penalties for such offenses include fines of MMK 250,000 (approx. USD 120) or 100% of the evaded tax (whichever is greater), imprisonment for up to seven years, or both. The enforcement process for tax evasion requires the chief officer of the township revenue department or an officer in charge (the tax authority) to assess the relevant documents and information provided by the taxpayer. If a taxpayer is found to be evading tax, the tax authority must send a notice in the prescribed form for verification within 15 days. Taxpayers may apply for a one-time extension of 15 days to submit requested documents and make disclosures. If the taxpayer cannot fulfill the requirements as instructed, the tax authority will seek approval from the director general of the Internal Revenue Department (IRD) for criminal proceedings as cognizable offences. Impeding Tax Administration and Failure to Preserve Secrecy Impeding tax administration refers to obstruction or attempted obstruction of taxation staff or officers
Read More