You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 11, 2025

Thailand: Anti-Money Laundering

Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence

Thailand traditionally has had a reputation as a “crossroads” for numerous illegal activities and of the laundering of significant sums of tainted money.

Member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF)? No.

Any Egmont members? Yes. Thailand’s Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) is a member of the Egmont Group.

Regulation

The relevant law, known as the Anti-Money Laundering Act (the Act), was passed in March 1999 with the aim of combating not only the drug trade but also other illicit activities, such as corruption, criminal fraud and prostitution.

There have been a number of changes and updates to the Act, the most recent one in late 2015, in which the Act was amended to include:

  • Additional predicate offences such as offences relating to human trafficking, online gambling and offences relating to unfair practices relating to derivatives and agricultural commodity futures.
  • Broader scope of money laundering offence.
  • Non-disclosure obligations to applicable financial institutions and reporting entities.
  • Compulsory training to financial institutions and reporting entities’ employees responsible to monitor and ensure compliance with the Act.
  • Retention period.

Enhanced penalties

Additionally, discussions did take place mooting further changes to the Act, set out in 2020 and 2021 drafts. Proposed changes included suggestions to expand the definitions of financial institutes, predicate offences and professions, as well as to impose greater reporting and due diligence responsibilities on companies subject to the Act. However, recent amendments to the Act in 2022 only included minor procedural and substantive changes that did not materially alter or expand the Act. The most notable amendments were changes to an injured party’s rights to claim damages caused by a predicate offence and the rights of beneficiaries claiming assets seized by the government in connection with a predicate offence.

Financial intelligence unit

Of the total number of transactions reported to AMLO annually, a relatively small portion result in further investigation for violation of the Act. That said, the trend is for more active participation and enforcement by AMLO in recent years.

Targeted crimes

Currently, the Act covers the transfer or conversion of funds or property obtained from the following predicate offences:

  • Offences relating to narcotics.
  • Human trafficking and offence of sexuality and prostitution.
  • Fraud against the public.
  • Fraud involving financial institutions.
  • Abuse of position by a government official.
  • Extortion.
  • Trade in contraband.
  • Terrorism.
  • Gambling offences, including online gambling, with particular emphasis on large scale organisation of gambling games.
  • Participation in racketeering groups or participation in a criminal association.
  • Receiving stolen property only as it constitutes assisting in the selling, buying, pawning or receiving, in any way, property obtained from the commission of an offence with the nature of business conduct.
  • Counterfeiting or alteration of currencies, seals, stamps and tickets with the nature of business conduct.
  • Criminal trading only where it is associated with the counterfeiting or violating of intellectual property rights to goods or the commission of an offence under the laws on the protection of intellectual property rights with the nature of business conduct.
  • Forgery of a document of right, electronic cards or passports with a nature of regular or business conduct.
  • The unlawful use, holding, or possessing of natural resources or a process of illegal exploitation of natural resources with a nature of business conduct.
  • The commission of an offence relating to murder or grievous bodily injury which leads to the acquisition of assets.
  • Restraining or confining a person only where it is to demand or obtain benefits or to negotiate for any benefits.
  • Theft, extortion, blackmail, robbery, gang-robbery, fraud or misappropriation with a nature of regular conduct.
  • Acts of piracy under anti-piracy law.
  • Unfair securities trading practice under the law on securities and stock exchange or unfair futures trading under the law on futures contracts or unfair practice which affect trading price of agricultural futures under the law on agricultural futures trading.
  • Offences related to arms and arms equipment which is or may be used in combat or war under the law on arms control.

In view of Thailand’s ongoing commitment to the prevention of financial crimes and aim to strengthen regulatory compliance, The Thai Bankers’ Association, the Association of State Financial Institutions and member banks are required to establish industry standards in areas identified by AMLO and the Bank of Thailand as needing improvement. This includes the development of systems and tools to effectively monitor Dual-Use Items and products that have high risks of being used to produce weapons that threaten international security, known as the Common High Priority List: CHPL. These standards will be applied starting January 2025.

Money laundering offence

Under the Act, it is a crime to transfer, convert or receive the transfer of funds or property arising from the above referenced criminal offences for the purpose of hiding or concealing the source of the funds.

The penalties are:

  • Natural person: imprisonment for a term of one year to 10 years and/or a fine of 20,000 to 200,000 baht.
  • Juristic person: a fine of 200,000 to 1,000,000 baht.

It is also important to note that the Act includes provisions targeted specifically at government officials, whereby the aforementioned fines and maximum prison sentences are doubled for government officials and can be tripled if certain categories of government officials are involved in a conspiracy to commit a money laundering offence. This represents a concerted effort to tackle the consistent problem of institutional corruption in Thailand.

Banking transactions are a primary activity subject to scrutiny under the Act, but other financial transactions are also covered. For example, an individual who secretly uses money from a drug sale to purchase shares of publicly traded stocks on the Stock Exchange of Thailand could be prosecuted under the Act.

Furthermore, a corrupt government official who uses money obtained from a bribe to then purchase land runs the risk of being exposed, having the land confiscated and being subject to double-scale fines. Even property developers, who knowingly hold or accept money for concealment that they know is derived from one of the stated criminal offences, can be subject to enforcement under the Act.

Enforcement officials can seize, without a warrant, money or property connected with the commission of one of the enumerated criminal offences or a money laundering offence. In such cases, the owner of the seized property must be able to demonstrate that the property is unrelated to the commission of one of the enumerated crimes, or a money laundering offence, in order to recover the property.

Designated persons

A designated person, which refers to an individual, group, juristic person (legal entity), or organisation that have been identified by AMLO as engaging in terrorism, proliferation, or financing of weapons of mass destruction, may petition the court in line with a Civil Court order as of April 1, 2025, for the following:

  1. To order the delisting of such persons from the designation list.
  2. To lift the freezing of assets.
  3. To seek permission to take any action with the frozen assets.

Reporting requirements

A key provision of the Act is the requirement that financial institutions and other reporting entities that tend to be used as vehicles for money laundering report all cash transactions of 2 million baht or more. Property transactions in excess of 5 million baht must also be reported. Also required for reporting are all suspicious transactions that may be related to one of the enumerated criminal offences, are more complex than normal, lack economic plausibility, or appear to have been undertaken to avoid compliance with the anti-money laundering law.

For such transactions, the financial institutions must require their customers to provide a detailed record of the transactions. The latter requirement is generally left to the practical discretion of the financial institution which must then choose between customer confidentiality concerns and compliance with the Act.

The AMLO has also implemented separate regulations which require all persons entering or leaving Thailand to declare currency in their possession where the amount meets or exceeds certain statutory minimum levels. Recently, the AMLO has released notifications requiring business subject to the Act to establish internal protocols, policies and procedures to address anti-money laundering risks within their company.

Failure to comply with the Act’s reporting requirements is punishable by a fine of up to 1 million baht and a daily fine of up to 10,000 baht a day through the period of violation or not acting correctly. Filing a false report is punishable by imprisonment of up to two years and/or a fine of 50,000 to 500,000 baht.

Thailand has made great progress in its legislative efforts to combat illicit crime and the transfer of funds related to such crimes. While much has been done and the laws are in place, ultimate success depends on the practical enforcement of the law.

 

Tilleke & Gibbins provided this Thailand country update for Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence. The update is available as a PDF through the button below.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 8, 2026
Doing business in Thailand means operating under a strict regulatory framework. From time to time, companies may receive unexpected administrative orders from government authorities that restrict their operations, impose new compliance obligations, or levy fines and penalties. When this happens, a business may challenge the order under Thailand’s administrative law system. The primary concern in pursuing administrative litigation is timing, as strict statutory deadlines apply and missing them can permanently affect a company’s rights. First Step: Administrative Appeal Many companies assume the first step is to immediately bring the matter before the Administrative Court to seek revocation or suspension of the order. Some even attempt to request an interim injunction to stop the order from taking effect. However, Thai law generally requires that the company first challenge the order through an administrative appeal with the same agency that issued it. Only after this process is complete can the matter be taken to court. Seeking an interim injunction at this stage is also not possible. This is because Thai law does not allow a standalone application for an interim injunction; an injunction can only be requested together with the underlying complaint filed with the Administrative Court. Since a court complaint cannot be filed until the administrative appeal process has been exhausted, an injunction is usually not available at the early stage. What Are the Timeframes for Administrative Appeal? Thailand applies a two-stage administrative appeal process. The appeal must first be submitted to the same authority that issued the order, which will review its own decision. If that authority affirms its decision, the appeal is then escalated to the relevant higher authority for further review. In most cases, both stages must be completed before a company is allowed to proceed to court. The timeframe for filing an administrative appeal is very
December 3, 2025
Recent high-profile corporate fraud and accounting scandals have brought increased scrutiny to governance, compliance, and enforcement practices in Thailand, highlighting the legal and practical challenges facing companies operating in the country. As regulators and law enforcement authorities sharpen their focus on financial misconduct, cybercrime, and corruption, businesses must navigate a complex and evolving investigative landscape. Tilleke & Gibbins’ investigations and compliance team examines these issues in the Thailand chapter of The Practitioner’s Guide to Global Investigations – Tenth Edition, published by Global Investigations Review (GIR). The chapter provides a detailed overview of Thailand’s legal framework for corporate investigations, offering practical guidance for companies and counsel responding to regulatory and criminal scrutiny. The Thailand chapter covers key topics including corporate criminal liability, enforcement priorities, internal investigations, data protection considerations, dawn raids, whistleblowing, cyber-related investigations, and cross-border cooperation. It also addresses emerging issues such as cybersecurity enforcement, economic sanctions compliance, and anticipated developments affecting investigations in Thailand. The chapter is authored by John Frangos, Chitchai Punsan, Alongkorn Tongmee, Michael Ramirez, Piyawat Vitooraporn, and Michelle McLeod. The Thailand chapter is available as a PDF below, and the full guide can be accessed on the GIR website.
August 1, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Vietnam chapter to Corporate Governance 2025, part of the International Comparative Legal Guides (ICLG) series published by Global Legal Group. This respected guide offers comprehensive, jurisdiction-specific overviews of corporate governance laws and practices around the world. Each jurisdictional chapter follows a clear Q&A format, providing practical insights into critical issues such as: Sources of corporate governance regulation Shareholders’ rights, powers, and responsibilities Structure and duties of management bodies Stakeholder involvement in governance Transparency and reporting requirements ESG and sustainability-related obligations Cybersecurity and technology-related disclosures The Vietnam chapter was authored by Tram Ngoc Bich Nguyen, Truc Thi Thanh Tran, Dung Thi Phuong Le, and Quang Minh Vu, members of Tilleke & Gibbins’ corporate and commercial team in Ho Chi Minh City. The authors provide detailed analysis of Vietnam’s corporate governance framework, including recent developments such as the 2025 amendments to the Law on Enterprises requiring disclosure of ultimate beneficial ownership and the increasing emphasis on sustainable business practices and responsible corporate conduct. The chapter also discusses practical considerations for foreign investors in Vietnam, such as overlapping signing authorities between key company officers, enforcement of shareholders’ agreements, and disclosure obligations related to ownership and management roles. The complete Vietnam chapter is available as a PDF below. The Vietnam chapter—and the full Corporate Governance 2025 guide—are also freely available on the ICLG website.
June 16, 2025
Thailand has amended its primary anticorruption law to provide robust new protections and direct assistance to whistleblowers. The Organic Act on Anti-Corruption (No. 2) B.E. 2568 (2025) was published in the Government Gazette on June 5, 2025, and came into force the following day. The amendment introduces a clear framework for safeguarding and supporting individuals who report graft. The amendment addresses a critical gap in the previous legislation by establishing formal mechanisms to protect and assist those who come forward with information. The key changes aim to shield whistleblowers from retaliatory legal and disciplinary actions, thereby encouraging more citizens to participate in exposing corruption without fear of reprisal. Key updates to the law are discussed below. Whistleblower Immunity The amendment clarifies and strengthens legal immunity by revising section 132 of Thailand’s original anticorruption law from 2018. Under the revised section, individuals who provide good-faith statements, information, evidence, or opinions to the National Anti-Corruption Commission (NACC) regarding offenses under its jurisdiction will be protected from civil, criminal, and disciplinary liability. This protection is explicitly extended to individuals who provide information to other state agencies tasked by the NACC to investigate corruption, such as the Public Sector Anti-Corruption Commission or the whistleblower’s own supervisors. Protection and Assistance A new section added to the law establishes a clear and swift process for activating protections. When the NACC learns that a whistleblower is facing legal complaints, criminal charges, or disciplinary action due to their report, the commission must review the matter and decide on providing protection within 15 days. If the NACC determines that the whistleblower acted in good faith, its office is required to provide immediate assistance. Legal and Financial Support Another newly introduced section outlines a wide range of assistance measures the NACC office can provide in civil and criminal cases