You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 29, 2015

Thailand – Amendments to Bankruptcy Act

New amendments to Thailand’s Bankruptcy Act aim to: (1) streamline the procedures which require court approval in reviewing claims for repayment of debt; (2) allow creditors additional time to file a claim for debt repayment if the cause of late filing was a force majeure  event; and (3) increase the current penalties to match present economic and social conditions.

1. Streamlined procedures

Section 105 has been amended to give the receiver, and not the court, the authority to examine claims for repayment of debts. 

Section 106 has been amended to give the official receiver, and not the court, the authority to review disputed claims of debt repayment and issue orders to dismiss or approve such claims.  

Previously, under Section 107, the court had the authority to examine claims for repayment of debts and review disputed claims. However, Section 107 was repealed by the amendments.   

Following the amendments of Sections 105 and 106, several other provisions which required court approval in relation to debt repayment claims have also been amended, and now only require the receiver’s approval. 

2. Timeline for debt repayment claim

Section 91 requires a creditor to file a claim with the receiver within two months of the bankruptcy order’s publication date, which can be extended for an additional two months if the creditor resides outside of Thailand.

A new provision, Section 91/1, has been added which allows a creditor who has not filed a claim within the prescribed time to file the claim at a later time if the creditor can prove that the failure to file on time was due to a force majeure  event.  

The creditor must file a petition for debt repayment with the court, together with proof of the force majeure  event. If the court finds in favor of the creditor, it will issue an order permitting the creditor to file the claim with the receiver within the period prescribed in the order. 

The creditor will be entitled to be paid out of the assets of the debtor which remain after distribution has been made to those who filed a petition before the creditor. In addition, actions previously taken by the court, the receiver, and the creditors’ meetings will not be affected.  

3. Increased penalties 

The amendments increased the penalties from THB 100, THB 200, THB 500, and THB 1,000 to THB 20,000, THB 40,000, THB 100,000, and THB 200,000, respectively, in various sections of the Bankruptcy Act.

These amendments came into effect on August 27, 2015, as codified in the Bankruptcy Act (No. 8) B.E. 2558. If you have any questions about the new amendments to the Bankruptcy Act or your other financial requirements under Thai law, please contact Piyanuj (Lui) Ratprasatporn at +66 2653 5533 or [email protected].

RELATED INSIGHTS​

December 3, 2025
Thailand’s Civil Court has issued a regulation targeting the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the preparation of pleadings and other documents submitted to the court. Effective November 17, 2025, the regulation aligns with September 2025 guidance from the president of the Supreme Court, and aims to safeguard accuracy, transparency, and public confidence in civil adjudication. The regulation applies to all parties submitting pleadings or any documents to the Civil Court that are prepared using AI tools or contain AI-generated content. It subjects AI used for these purposes to strict requirements on verification, disclosure, and accountability. Core Obligations The regulation imposes four principal obligations: Lawyers who use AI remain subject to duties of honesty, responsibility to the court, professional standards, and legal ethics, including the duty to assess the appropriateness of the AI tool for the work. Parties and lawyers must verify the accuracy and completeness of all facts, legal provisions, and citations in AI-generated content before submission. Parties and lawyers must disclose to the court any AI-generated content by clearly marking the beginning and end of the AI-generated portion with prescribed statements (see below). Additionally, a certification confirming the use of AI must be provided at the end of the pleading or document, stating that AI was used for certain portions and that the party has reviewed and certifies the accuracy of factual and legal content. Parties and lawyers bear the same full legal and ethical responsibility for AI-generated content as they do for personally authored documents; they cannot evade responsibility or avoid liability by citing AI-related errors. Likewise, parties must ensure that any AI-generated content is truthful, accurate, and unbiased. Prescribed Disclosure Language Each instance of AI-generated content must be preceded by the statement “[The following content was prepared using artificial intelligence]” and must end with “[End
December 2, 2025
Investing in Mainland Southeast Asia is Tilleke & Gibbins’ essential guide for investors looking to do business in this vibrant region, whether it’s starting operations as a newly established entity or expanding into new territories or business models.
November 28, 2025
On November 26, 2025, the government of Vietnam issued Resolution No. 8/2025/NQ-CP to extend and expand the pilot program allowing Vietnamese citizens who meet certain conditions to gamble at three integrated casino resorts in Vietnam: Corona Resorts & Casino Phu Quoc (An Giang Province) – Effective immediately, and continuing an ongoing pilot program that started in 2019. The Grand Casino Ho Tram (Ho Chi Minh City) – New pilot program for five years starting November 26, 2025. Van Don Integrated Casino & Tourism Complex (Quang Ninh Province) – New pilot program for five years from the date the casino receives its license. The pilot program was originally established under Decree No. 03/2017/ND-CP on casino business, which also sets out the specific eligibility conditions for Vietnamese citizens. After the pilot period, these projects must stop allowing Vietnamese players until the government issues further decisions. This expansion of the pilot program comes after Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) released a draft decree earlier this year proposing significant changes to the regulatory framework governing casino operations. These revisions, which focus on increasing fiscal contributions from local players and strengthening compliance obligations for casino operators nationwide, are detailed below. Proposed Increase in Casino Entry Fees for Vietnamese Players The draft decree increases the entry fees applicable to Vietnamese citizens permitted to play at casinos. Under the current regulations, Vietnamese players are required to pay an entry fee of VND 1 million (approx. USD 38) for 24 consecutive hours or VND 25 million (approx. USD 950) per month. The draft decree proposes increasing these fees to VND 2.5 million (approx. USD 95) for 24 consecutive hours and VND 50 million (approx. USD 1,900) per month, effectively doubling the existing amounts and marking the first major fee revision since the pilot program allowing Vietnamese players
November 19, 2025
Litigation has its place in resolving business disputes, but it is often time-consuming and costly. In Thailand, a straightforward civil case can take a year or more to reach judgment at first instance, and appeals can extend that timeline further. Court filing fees are tied to the value of the claim, typically amounting to around two percent for claims up to THB 50 million, before accounting for attorney fees, translation costs, expert work, and the internal time that management must devote to the case. Against this backdrop, Thai law provides an alternative pathway for parties to attempt resolution before filing suit, and Thai courts commonly encourage mediation as part of the dispute-resolution process. Specifically, prelitigation mediation is a court-supervised process designed to facilitate confidential settlement discussions at an early stage. Participation is voluntary and requires the consent of both parties. The process does not replace litigation but is available in parallel as an initial step for interested parties. If the parties reach an agreement, the settlement can be recorded as a consent judgment that is directly enforceable in Thailand. If no settlement is reached, the parties retain their full right to proceed with a court claim. Reasons to Consider Prelitigation Mediation Prelitigation mediation can offer several advantages. It may shorten timelines from months or years to just weeks, reduce legal costs, and keep discussions confidential. It also allows parties to pursue practical, business-driven solutions or tailored remedies that address their specific needs—outcomes that may not be available through traditional litigation. To facilitate this process, under Thailand’s Civil Procedure Code, parties may petition the court to initiate prelitigation mediation before filing a suit. If the opposing party agrees, the court appoints a mediator to work with the parties under established mediation rules. In such a scenario, there are no court