You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 5, 2024

Thailand Adopts Investment Incentive Policies for Software Development and Data Centers

On March 15, 2024, Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) updated its investment incentives for software development and data centers by issuing a regulation replacing the previous categories of software or platforms for digital services or content (category 8.1) and data centers (category 8.2.1).
The new and updated categories are detailed below.

Software and Platform Development

Under the new promotion policy, the BOI has made separate subcategories for “development” and “improvement” of software or platforms, each with its own set of incentives. The BOI is expected to clarify the characteristics of these two activities in a forthcoming announcement. Qualifying development activities are eligible for a corporate income tax (CIT) exemption for eight years (capped), while improvement activities are not eligible for any CIT exemption.

A number of adjustments have been made to the eligibility criteria for development of software and platforms for digital services or content. These include the following:

  • Salary expenditures for Thai information technology (IT) personnel hired temporarily after applying for investment promotion can now be included in the calculation of total salary expenditures for Thai IT personnel hired subsequent to applying for investment promotion. Previously, only salary expenditures for permanently employed personnel could be included in this figure. The minimum salary expenditures for each project remain unchanged at THB 1.5 million per year.
  • Similarly, salary expenditures for temporary hiring of Thai IT personnel can be included in calculating the actual expenditures in the year that the project would like to benefit from the CIT exemption.
  • Projects must commence operations within 12 months of the promotion certificate being issued. No extensions are allowed.
  • Projects are no longer allowed to extend the machinery importation period.

The other eligibility criteria for development of software and platforms for digital services or content remain unchanged.

Projects in the new BOI subcategory for improvement of software and platforms for digital services or content are not eligible for CIT exemption but can receive other incentives. To be eligible for these incentives, projects in this category must meet the following criteria:

  • Expenditures on salaries for Thai IT personnel hired (including temporarily) after applying for investment promotion must be at least THB 1.5 million per year.
  • Projects must propose a plan for improvement of the software, digital platform, or digital content to be sold or provided, as stipulated by the BOI.
  • Projects may not amend the category in which they benefit from investment promotion.
  • Projects must commence operations within 12 months of the promotion certificate being issued. No extensions are allowed.
  • Projects may not extend the machinery importation period.
  • Projects may not own land.

In addition, projects in this subcategory are notably allowed to utilize secondhand machinery or the project’s existing machinery, and are not subject to the common BOI prohibition on such use.

Data Centers

Qualifying data centers are still eligible for CIT exemption (no cap) for eight years, but there are minor updates to the eligibility criteria:

  • Projects must install an electrical system of at least two megawatts to support the power consumption of computer equipment.
  • Projects are no longer required to have an area of at least 3,000 square meters.
  • Projects must still obtain ISO/IEC 27001 certification before they can receive CIT exemption, but there is no longer an explicit requirement that they obtain the certification before the full operation deadline.

In addition, projects in the data center category are exempt from the general BOI requirement that projects benefiting from investment promotion obtain ISO 9000, ISO 14000, or other equivalent international certification.

For more details on BOI incentives for software and data center activities, or on any aspect of investment promotion in Thailand, please contact Athistha (Nop) Chitranukroh at [email protected], Nopparat Lalitkomon at [email protected], or Napassorn Lertussavavivat at [email protected].

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 27, 2025
Three American giants are actively protecting their intellectual property rights against generative AI, as two legal battles commence on both sides of the Atlantic. In the UK, Seattle-based media company Getty Images accuses UK-based Stability AI of multiple IP infringements. In the US, The Walt Disney Company and Universal Studios are teaming up against Midjourney, an AI startup, with their main ground being copyright infringement. Both cases are centered around questions legal minds have been posing since the introduction of generative AI: Is the output of generative AI an infringement? And who is ultimately responsible for the output, the platform or the user? Getty Images v. Stability AI Getty initially filed a claim in the High Court in 2023, which resulted in Stability applying for reverse summary judgment on the grounds that Getty had no real prospect of success, arguing that their operations took place outside the UK. However, the High Court judge hearing the case decided that the claims brought by Getty did have a real prospect of succeeding in court. Despite this, Stability saw a small victory when the court ruled that the representative action brought by Getty would not succeed due to the difficulties in identifying who qualified for the class. The proposed class was comprised of 50,000 rightsholders who alleged their rights were also infringed. Stability was successful in arguing that identifying these individuals would be challenging due to the unclear definition of the class. This current trial is centered around four main grounds: Copyright infringement. Getty accuses Stability of using content that Getty owns or has an exclusive license for when training their model, Stable Diffusion, resulting in the generated output containing substantial parts of that content. Getty is also alleging secondary copyright infringement, arguing that Stability is importing an article into the UK
June 26, 2025
Vietnam’s new Personal Data Protection Law (PDPL) was passed by the National Assembly on June 26, 2025, and will enter into force on January 1, 2026. The PDPL introduces several new concepts, exemptions, and obligations in comparison with the current Decree No. 13/2023/ND-CP on personal data protection (PDPD), while other contents remain essentially the same. The relationship between the PDPD and the PDPL has not been clearly addressed; however, it is expected that the government will issue a new decree providing necessary guidance on certain requirements under the PDPL, and the PDPD will remain in effect until it is replaced by this new decree. Some key points of the new PDPL include the following: Personal data will be further defined by lists of basic personal data and sensitive personal data to be issued by the government. The consent-centric approach of the PDPD remains in place, along with additional exemptions for certain data processing activities. The requirements for the data processing impact assessment (DPIA) and transfer impact assessment (TIA) remain unchanged. However, there are new exemptions for the TIA, including for the processing and storing in the cloud of employee data, and when the data subject is the person sending its own data outside of Vietnam. Consent obtained under the PDPD remains valid under the PDPL. DPIAs and TIAs submitted under the PDPD are valid under the PDPL but may need to be updated to be in line with the requirements of the PDPL. Administrative fines depend on the type of violation. The fine for sale and purchase of personal data will be 10 times the revenue from the sale or VND 3 billion (about USD 115,000), whichever is higher. The fine for cross-border transfer violations is 5% of the violator’s revenue of the preceding year or VND 3 billion,
June 25, 2025
Generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is no longer a distant innovation confined to science fiction and research labs; it has become an integral part of daily business operations worldwide. Employees across industries are adopting GenAI tools at a remarkable pace—including in Southeast Asia, where a tech-savvy workforce and widespread internet and mobile access have driven early adoption. The reality facing organizations today is clear: employees are integrating GenAI into their daily work, often without official approval or clear policies. This phenomenon, often called “Bring Your Own AI,” comes out of a disconnect between organizational governance and employee behavior and reveals the urgent need for proactive AI policies and oversight. For business leaders and legal teams, GenAI is both an opportunity and a challenge. On one hand, these tools can deliver real business value and boost efficiency. On the other, the unsanctioned and unmonitored use of GenAI introduces substantial legal risks, such as data privacy violations, confidentiality breaches, and intellectual property issues. The widespread adoption of GenAI tools by employees, regardless of official organizational stance or guidelines, demonstrates that prohibition is neither practical nor effective. A more strategic approach involves establishing comprehensive governance policies that encourage responsible AI use while managing the risks. Organizations that take the lead in developing GenAI governance policies are better positioned to benefit from its transformative potential. The question isn’t whether GenAI will change how we work, but how quickly organizations can put the right safeguards in place to manage this change successfully. Risks of GenAI Use The use of GenAI in business operations, whether sanctioned or not, exposes organizations to a unique set of risks. The following are particularly relevant: Data security and confidentiality: General GenAI tools in the market may transmit data to external servers, retain conversation histories, and use inputs for model training.
June 19, 2025
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has released draft guidelines establishing principles for managing artificial intelligence (AI) risks in the financial sector. The draft guidelines provide a structured framework for the responsible adoption of AI technologies. Financial service providers will be able to use the guidelines as a reference to appropriately manage their risks in a manner that aligns with internationally recognized best practices. The BOT is accepting public comments on the draft guidelines until June 30, 2025. Scope and Application The draft guidelines apply to all financial service providers, including financial institutions and special financial institutions under the Financial Institution Business Act, as well as payment providers under the Payment Systems Act. These guidelines supplement existing BOT risk management guidelines covering IT risk management, third-party risk management, data governance, and market conduct. The guidelines define AI systems as systems that mimic human intelligence, including machine learning, deep learning, generative AI (such as large language models), and agentic AI. This definition specifically excludes rule-based automation systems like robotic process automation and condition matching. Key Risk Management Principles The guidelines lay out two main principles in managing AI risk. Governance: Financial service providers should define and establish clear roles and responsibilities for their personnel and AI system supervision structures to uphold FEAT (fairness, ethics, accountability, and transparency) principles as follows: Stakeholder roles and responsibilities. Financial service providers should define roles and responsibilities for boards and executives on AI risk oversight. Responsibilities include establishing an AI system usage policy, designating personnel responsible for AI risk management, and building awareness of AI-related risk within the organization. AI system usage policy. The AI system usage policy should be aligned with organizational objectives, regulatory requirements, and FEAT principles. These policies should be reviewed regularly to respond to technological advancements and evolving risk profiles. Risk management