You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 10, 2026

Thai SEC Proposes Expanding Oversight to Cover Funding Sources of Capital Markets Operators

Subscribe to Updates

Following Thailand’s recent expansion of the “major shareholder” definition for securities and digital asset businesses, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) launched a public hearing on April 7, 2026, on expanding the major shareholder definition further to cover funding sources behind share acquisitions in licensed securities and digital asset business operators.

The public hearing will remain open for 15 days from the launch date, after which the proposed expansion is expected to take effect promptly so that operators can comply with both the earlier and additional requirements within the 180-day transitional period under the earlier regulations.

Funding Sources Captured Under Control-Based Test

Under the draft rules, persons who fund direct or indirect major shareholders’ acquisition of shares in a licensed operator would be deemed “controlling persons” and subject to SEC approval as major shareholders. This extends beyond traditional lenders to include guarantors, counterparties to derivatives or structured products, and any arrangement that results in a person being, directly or indirectly, a source of funding to a major shareholder.

The SEC proposes to exempt three categories of funding arrangements from approval:

  • Loans from Thai licensed financial institutions or BCBS (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision)-jurisdiction foreign banks;
  • Margin loans for securities trading under Thai securities law; and
  • Repurchase agreements under Thai securities law.

Exemptions for Funding Sources of Government-Linked Entities

The consultation proposes to stop look-through beyond the level of certain government-linked shareholders, including, without limitation, ministries, departments, bureaus, public organizations, independent agencies, and certain state enterprises. The SEC reasons that these entities’ mandates, duties, and funding sources are already subject to government oversight and audit, presenting minimal ownership-structure risk.

Practical Implications

Licensed securities and digital asset business operators should begin mapping their funding chains under the expanded definition in preparation for filing approval applications for any newly captured funding providers within the 180-day window established by the notification of the Ministry of Finance. This is particularly relevant for structures involving back-to-back financings, guarantees, or other derivative or structured arrangements that result in a person being, or effectively being, a source of funding to a major shareholder of the licensed operator.

While the proposed amendment does not specify how and to what extent the SEC will review the funding sources and related documentation, licensed operators should conduct detailed due diligence on funding arrangements and counterparties, gather documentation, and potentially renegotiate or restructure arrangements that inadvertently create approval obligations.

Operators whose shareholders rely on ordinary margin credit, repurchase agreements, or loans from Thai banks or BCBS-jurisdiction foreign banks can take comfort in the carve-outs, but the burden of proof lies with the operator. Any funding instrument that resembles equity economically, even if formally documented as debt, may require approval.

The scope of “source of funding” under the proposed amendment is notably broad and may require more detailed definition or interpretation from the SEC. Operators with concerns about definitional ambiguity, such as whether certain indirect funding arrangements fall within the expanded scope, should consider raising these issues during the public hearing stage. The SEC may lessen this ambiguity by issuing supplementary guidance that clarifies:

  • The types of arrangements that constitute indirect funding,
  • Thresholds or materiality standards for triggering approval requirements, and
  • Broader safe harbors for common commercial financing structures that are not intended to confer economic ownership, beyond the specific exemptions currently prescribed in the hearing.

Next Steps

The SEC has compressed the public hearing period to 15 days because the issue is urgent and operators need adequate lead time to comply within the broader 180-day transitional deadline. Operators may submit comments on the proposed expansion by April 22, 2026, and should simultaneously begin internal audits of shareholder funding structures and engage with lenders and counterparties to confirm exemption eligibility or prepare approval filings, as appropriate.

Early engagement with the SEC may help clarify ambiguous arrangements before the rules take effect. Operators can contact us for more information or assistance with submitting comments on their behalf.

Related Professionals

Practices

Capital Markets

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 5, 2025
Exchangeable bonds (EBs) are uncommon financial instruments in the Thai market and differ from convertible bonds, which allow conversion into newly issued shares. EBs, on the other hand, are an alternative way of raising funds but are not defined under Thai rules and are typically not offered in Thailand. Instead, a major shareholder of a Thai-listed company uses an offshore vehicle company to issue EBs backed by its trading shares in a Thai-listed company. The exchange price usually includes a premium over the reference price. This method enables the major shareholder to monetize holdings efficiently while maintaining flexibility in financial management through funds raised without relying on traditional loans. Share Price Impact In one recent case involving the issuance of EBs backed by Thai listed shares, the share price of the underlying company got hit significantly. Some critics may view EB issuance as harmful to minority investors while providing advantages to the EB issuer because the potential conversion can lead to an increase in the supply of the company’s shares in the market, since the bondholders converting EBs often sell those shares in the market. This may exert downward pressure on the share price due to the higher supply of shares available for trading. Meanwhile, the advantages of issuing EBs seem to be fundraising at a lower cost for the major shareholders to the detriment of minority investors in a listed company. The anticipation regarding impending conversions can also affect investor sentiment, leading to increased volatility in the share price. Some may view the issuance of EBs as having a positive side since this typically offers a higher conversion price compared to the current trading price, but whether it will undergo future growth would still largely depend on the market’s confidence in the stock price, and disclosures play a
Read More
January 9, 2025
Thailand’s Fiscal Policy Office (FPO) has released a draft of its planned Financial Business Hub Act, which is in line with the government’s aim of positioning Thailand as a regional financial hub and a critical player in the global economy. The draft act, on which the FPO is accepting comments until January 9, 2025, details the framework for promoting and attracting international financial businesses and related services to operate in Thailand, proposes various incentives, and outlines supervisory guidelines. This article examines key elements of the draft Financial Business Hub Act relevant to financial business operators. Incentivized Financial Businesses The draft act identifies the financial businesses to be promoted and incentivized. These target businesses include: Commercial banking businesses, Payment service businesses, Securities businesses, Derivatives businesses, Digital assets businesses, Insurance and reinsurance brokerage businesses, and Other financial-related businesses as determined by the Committee for the Supervision and Promotion of Financial Centers. Thailand’s finance minister explained that initially, the draft law intends to target businesses using an “out-out” model, which describes the raising of capital abroad for investment abroad, before expanding to an “out-in” model, in which capital is raised abroad for investment domestically. Therefore, the draft law currently specifies that the target businesses must only provide services to nonresidents without soliciting residents of Thailand to use their services. Authorization Targeted financial business operators will need to receive authorization from the Committee for the Supervision and Promotion of Financial Centers. The main eligibility criteria for authorization are the incorporation an entity (e.g., a company registered in Thailand, a branch of a foreign juristic person) with an office in designated areas to be specified in a royal decree (currently expected to be Bangkok and adjacent provinces) and the possession of other qualifications as prescribed in the draft act. Target businesses in Thailand will
Read More
November 19, 2024
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has announced a public hearing on proposed amendments to takeover regulations under Thailand’s Security and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (and the regulations issued thereunder) that have the potential to reshape the country’s market for takeovers. The proposed changes, which have not yet been compiled in a formal draft regulation, may affect acquisition planning but could also help reduce unnecessary regulatory and administrative burdens. The SEC is accepting comments on the proposed changes through its website until November 30, 2024. The key proposed changes are detailed below. Alignment of tender offers and reporting under Section 246: Previously, Section 246 (reporting of acquisition/disposition upon reaching or crossing any multiple of 5% shareholding) focused only on group shareholding changes, while Section 247 (tender offer obligation) looked at both groups and individuals to trigger tender offering obligations. The proposed amendment aligns these requirements by considering only group-level triggers for both sections. Another change addresses situations where an entity acquires another entity (persons under Section 258) that already holds shares in a listed company. Currently, actions of shareholders in a listed company resulting in a person under Section 258 and such shareholders as a group holding shares in a listed company in aggregate and triggering the tender offer threshold only result in reporting under Section 246 while having no tender offer obligation. Under the proposed amendment, such actions will trigger a tender offer obligation—not immediately upon the acquisition of persons under Section 258 and reaching or crossing the relevant threshold, but once there is any increase (even a single share) in the shareholding in the listed company, unless the circumstances fall into an exemption (e.g., disposal of the additional shares within seven business days) or a waiver is obtained. Currently, obligations are triggered at the next threshold,
Read More
October 30, 2024
On September 18, 2024, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued comprehensive guidelines to make it easier for foreign business operators to provide investment services in Thailand. These guidelines are designed to support Thailand’s goal of becoming a global financial hub and align with government efforts to enhance the ease of doing business. The guidelines primarily focus on streamlining the process for foreign firms applying for securities and derivatives licenses, and ensuring quicker and more transparent entry into the Thai market for businesses offering securities (such as shares, mutual funds, and collective investment schemes) and derivatives (such as futures and options). Fast-Track Licensing Under the new guidelines, the SEC will provide support to foreign companies wishing to operate securities businesses in Thailand. This support includes a fast-track licensing process for foreign operators that meet certain qualifications, such as having a company incorporated in Thailand, having operated a system of group companies for at least five consecutive years, and being supervised by a regulator under the IOSCO MMoU (International Organization of Securities Commissions Multilateral Memorandum of Understanding). The SEC will also collaborate with the Ministry of Commerce to grant exemptions from the requirement of a foreign business license for companies providing certain services relating to or supporting securities or derivatives businesses, such as net asset value calculation/confirmation for mutual funds, and promotion of capital market products. Applying for foreign business licenses has long been a complicated process for foreign operators, and this exemption can help reduce such complications. Targeted License Exemptions to Reduce Regulatory Burdens Foreign operators providing specific investment services may be exempt from full securities and derivatives licensing requirements, saving time and costs associated with the full licensing process, and allowing them to start their businesses quickly and efficiently. Key exemptions include: Foreign operators providing derivatives services solely
Read More