You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 9, 2025

Thai SEC Eases Rules on Fundraising, but Risks Remain

Subscribe to Updates

Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently amended its regulation on the definition of professional investors, which aids in the issuance of notes to broader private funds by not requiring looking through to the qualifications of the actual investors. However, issuers of notes will still need to take care to comply with existing regulations.

Notes under the Thai Regulatory Framework

The topic of promissory notes was recently in the Thai news after being raised in a no-confidence debate against the government, so this is a fitting time to review the use of notes (in particular bills of exchange and promissory notes) as commonly used financial tools for lending in commercial transactions. These instruments serve as a means of debt settlement and can also be used for fundraising purposes. When using notes, issuers must consider not only tax laws but also fundraising regulations under the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992).

The SEC has classified notes issued to raise funds from more than 10 persons as securities requiring approval from the SEC and an effective filing of a prospectus, with certain exemptions. These exemptions include instances that are not considered “public fundraising,” such as notes issued:

  • For debt settlement,
  • For management of cash flow, which is common in commercial transactions,
  • As evidence for lending within group companies (intragroup issuance), or
  • For lending from financial institutions.

In addition, private placement of notes is another route considered as having been deemed approved (i.e., not requiring an approval process if the required criteria have been met) and may be exempt from filing requirements, depending on the types of investors being offered notes.

Private placement includes offering notes with a minimum face value of THB 10 million for each and maturity not exceeding 270 days from the issue date to professional investors, which will be considered as having been deemed approved, with a filing exemption for foreign professional investors and only minimal disclosure required for Thai professional investors. Professional investors are limited to persons specified in the SEC Notification No. GorJor. 39/2564.

Recent Regulatory Amendment

Prior to the regulatory amendment from the SEC, professional investors included private funds with look-through criteria ensuring that the actual investors were qualified, being financial institutions or having financial status equivalent to ultra-high-net-worth or high-net-worth investors.

The regulatory amendment that came into force May 1, 2025, amended SEC Notification No. GorJor. 39/2564 to simply designate private funds as one of the specified types of professional investors, eliminating the need to scrutinize the actual investors. The SEC considers fund managers as possessing the necessary expertise and a fiduciary duty to manage investments appropriately on behalf of their clients, making additional look-through requirements unnecessary. This can better accommodate issuance of notes to private funds without requiring another layer of scrutiny of funds’ beneficial owners, which can also apply to both domestic and international private funds.

This regulatory change makes funding more accessible for issuers, as private funds alone can be considered professional investors, making them qualified for private placements. This approach aligns more closely with standard loans, facilitates shorter negotiations by eliminating the need for detailed loan agreements, and allows for commercially agreeable terms with private funds through the issuance of notes.

Related Professionals

Practices

Capital Markets

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
Read More
February 18, 2021
As you will no doubt know, on February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military declared a state of emergency in Myanmar for a period of one year. State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Su Kyi was detained, as were the president and various significant political and civil leaders. Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw (Myanmar armed forces) has installed himself as chairman of the State Administration Council, the current administration. New sanctions The reaction of the Biden administration has been swift. On February 10, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which provides bases to impose sanctions on individuals and companies deemed by the US to, among other things: operate in the defense sector of Myanmar; be responsible for policies that undermine democratic processes in Myanmar; have taken actions to undermine democratic processes or institutions, or prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of free speech, in Myanmar; or be a spouse or child of the foregoing. On the next day, February 11, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), imposed sanctions under the new executive order on ten individuals—including General Min Aung Hlaing—and three companies, including Cancri Gems & Jewelry Co, Myanmar Imperial Jade Co, and Myanmar Ruby Enterprise.  All such individuals and companies have now been designated on the US list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). Effect of sanctions As a result of such sanctions, the property of these individuals or companies that is located in the US or is under the possession or control of US companies and citizens is frozen, and US companies and citizens are generally prohibited from dealing deal with any such property.  Reportedly, roughly USD 1 billion of funds belonging to the individuals and companies blocked on February 11 are located in the US and thus now frozen. The SDN list As many
Read More
February 17, 2021
The Bank of Thailand (BOT) has amended foreign exchange (FX) controls, as part of its roadmap toward a “new Thai FX ecosystem,” to further relax limitations and restrictions on outbound investments remitted by investors in Thailand. This latest move follows a prior relaxation of foreign trading and exchange regulations in November 2019. The new developments primarily relate to the thresholds for outbound investment, types of foreign investment products that investors may participate in, and foreign currency deposit accounts. These are detailed below.   Outbound Investment Thresholds The new measures ease the individual and group limits for outbound investment as shown in the table below.   Types of Investment Products The previous FX measures allowed investors to process FX transactions for investment in various types of inbound and outbound products; however, inbound products were limited to only debt instruments (e.g., bonds and structured notes) issued in foreign currency. The new FX measures expand the scope of products to include all types of investment products that reference foreign variables, such as foreign stocks, exchange traded funds, commodities, gold futures, and foreign indexes. FX derivatives and other investment products (e.g., endowment life insurance, unit-linked life policies, and universal life insurance) are still open to outbound investment.   Foreign Currency Deposit (FCD) Accounts The BOT also amended the requirements pertaining to foreign currency deposit (FCD) accounts. Previously, an FCD account for investment (i.e., portfolio foreign currency deposit) had to be separated from investors’ other FCD accounts. Separation of FCD accounts is no longer required, and a single FCD account can now be used for any transaction permitted by the BOT.
Read More
February 3, 2021
On January 20, 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission of Thailand (SEC) and the Securities & Futures Commission of Hong Kong (SFC) entered into a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on mutual recognition of funds. The MOU aims to facilitate the process for eligible funds set up in one country to be marketed and offered to investors in the other country by streamlining qualifications and processes for registration with the regulators. The key elements of the MOU are outlined below. Covered Funds The MOU generally only covers funds in the form of collective investment schemes (CIS), set up in Thailand or Hong Kong and managed by a covered management company that is authorized or licensed in its home country, (i.e., Thailand or Hong Kong) that is seeking approval to offer these funds to the public in the other country (the “host country”). Apart from the regulatory requirements prescribed by the regulator of the home country, the covered funds must also meet certain eligibility requirements, dependent on the type of fund offering, set by the regulator of the inbound jurisdiction (i.e. the SEC or the SFC). These funds must fall within one or more fund types specified in the MOU, including general equity funds, bond funds, mixed funds, feeder funds, unlisted index funds, and exchange-traded funds. Note that the SEC has agreed to expedite approval for Thai feeder funds that invest in Hong Kong master funds by streamlining certain processes. Covered Management Companies Generally, an asset management company that is authorized in its home jurisdiction (i.e., Thailand or Hong Kong) will be able to conduct cross-border marketing and fund offering activities under this MOU. Requirements for Fund Offerings Apart from meeting certain qualifications prescribed by the host country, fund offerings must be conducted in accordance with the host country’s requirements. In
Read More