You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 15, 2020

Thai Customs Department Eases Certificate of Origin Submission Requirements

On April 16, 2020, the director general of the Thai Customs Department issued Notification No. 81/2563, which introduces new customs measures intended to facilitate the operations of importers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The new notification replaces and expands on a previous one (Notification No. 47/2563), issued in March 2020, which allowed importers of goods from China to submit photocopies of certificates of origin in certain circumstances, rather than originals, in order to qualify for a decrease in customs duties or duty exemption. Those who avail themselves of these measures must submit the original certificates of origin within 30 days of customs releasing their goods. However, the first notification only allowed the use of such copies for limited kinds of customs and duty exemptions, and after a month was found to be insufficiently flexible in practice to provide relief, given the unforeseeable length and severity of the crisis. The director general therefore issued Notification No. 81/2563 to replace and expand upon the older notification. Although similar in process and requirements, the new notification includes applications for exemption under numerous free trade area agreements and provides a mechanism for extension if 30 days is found to be insufficient. The measures are applicable between April 16 and September 30, 2020.

The new free trade and related agreements that are  included under the scope of the new notification are as follows:

  1. ASEAN-China Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement;
  2. Agreement on Accelerated Tariff Elimination under the Early Harvest Programme of the ASEAN-China Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement;
  3. Accession of Singapore to the Agreement on Accelerated Tariff Elimination under the Early Harvest Pro- gramme of the ASEAN-China Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement;
  4. ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement;
  5. ASEAN-Korea Free Trade Agreement;
  6. ASEAN-Japan Comprehensive Economic Partnership;
  7. Japan-Thailand Economic Partnership Agreement;
  8. ASEAN-India Comprehensive Economic Cooperation;
  9. Thailand-India Free Trade Agreement;
  10. ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement;
  11. ASEAN-Hong Kong Free Trade Agreement;
  12. Thailand-Chile Free Trade Agreement; and

For practical customs clearance matters, such as obtaining duty exemptions and reductions under the new notification, the importer can present a copy of a certificate of origin from any institute that issues certificates of origin in the country of exportation. This applies to any institute that already issued an authorized certificate of origin but was unable to send the original to the importer in Thailand due to the COVID-19 pandemic. To submit a copy in these circumstances, the importer must include an explanatory remark in the import entries accompanying the goods stating that the importer “[r]equests to use [a] copy of the certificate of origin for a temporary period and will present its original thereafter.” The importer also needs to submit a petition, using the form appended to the notification, along with a copy of the certificate of origin. These should be submitted to the customs office or customs port, where officers will examine each copy of the certificate of origin and determine the customs tariffs and values applicable to the goods in light of the conditions and requirements for each relevant free trade area. If all requirements are met, customs will clear the goods for release from their custody and require importers to submit the original certificate of origin within 30 days. However, if further delays related to the COVID-19 pandemic prevent timely submission of the original certificate of origin, importers can secure an additional extension of up to 30 days by submitting a petition at least seven days in advance of the original deadline.

Further, a summary of all deadlines must be submitted by the importer within sixty days of removing the items from customs’ custody. Importers who fail to present the original certificate of origin within these deadlines will be deemed in default under the Ministry of Finance notifications for the qualifying free trade areas, and will not be entitled to duty reductions or exemptions. Failure to properly support requests for duty reductions or exemptions, even under the more liberal standards allowed under the new notification, will result in the Customs Department issuing assessment of duty letters to the importer in order to collect customs duty shortfalls. This can also result in additional liabilities for an importer and could impede resolution of the resulting customs disputes. In addition, if a certificate of origin expires before a deadline for submission expires, the importer will not be entitled to receive a reduction in customs duties or exemptions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed increased burdens on importers and the Thai Customs Department, and Notification No. 81/2563 seeks to lessen these burdens while providing flexibility to importers who may face uncertainty over whether they can meet documentary obligations during this time. This is a welcome accommodation, but importers and their representatives should nonetheless remain diligent to ensure that they meet all documentary and procedural requirements to qualify for duty reductions or exemptions. Failure to do so, even under the new more flexible rules, could lead to unnecessary liability, delays, and expenses.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

November 26, 2025
On November 21, 2025, Myanmar’s Ministry of Commerce (MOC) issued Notification No. 103/2025 promulgating the Geographical Indication Rules (GI Rules), establishing a comprehensive framework for the registration and administration of geographical indications (GI), which are primarily governed by the Trademark Law of 2019. On the same day, the MOC released Notification No. 104/2025 specifying the required forms for GI-related matters. The GI Rules establish a comprehensive set of procedures for the entire GI application process, including filing applications, oppositions, cancellations, and invalidations, and appointing a local representative for GI-related matters. Under the Trademark Law and the GI Rules, domestic and foreign legal entities (organizations) that formally represent a defined group of stakeholders (such as producers or manufacturers of natural products or resources, agricultural products, handicrafts, or industrial products) and other competent authorities from government departments are eligible to apply for GI registration with the Intellectual Property Department (IPD) in Myanmar. Application A GI application can be submitted in either English or Myanmar language electronically, in person, or via post. Foreign applicants seeking to register a GI in Myanmar are required to submit a copy of the registration certificate from their country of origin with the GI application. This certificate must explicitly state the GI name of the protected product. Notably, foreign applicants are mandated to appoint a local representative in Myanmar to act on their behalf for GI-related matters with the IPD and appeal-related matters with the IP Agency. The form for appointing the local representative must be duly notarized in the applicant’s home country to ensure its legal validity and acceptance in accordance with the GI Rules. Application for Use of GI Logo Pursuant to the GI Rules, any interested individual, local or foreign, may submit an application to the IPD for authorization to use the GI logo,
November 12, 2025
Thailand’s Customs Department has announced the cancellation of the longstanding de minimis exemption, which waives import duties on goods valued at THB 1,500 or less, as of January 1, 2026. This policy shift will directly impact e-commerce, logistics, and retail sectors, and will have wide-ranging implications for any company involved in cross-border trade with Thailand. Background Under current regulations, imported goods with a customs value (cost, insurance, and freight, or “CIF”) of THB 1,500 or less are exempt from import duties. This has been a cornerstone of the cross-border e-commerce model, allowing for the duty-free import of millions of small parcels. Under the new policy effective January 1, 2026, all imported goods, regardless of value, will be subject to assessment for import duties upon entry into Thailand. The stated rationale for this change is to create fair competition for Thai small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), which must pay VAT and other costs on their goods, putting them at a price disadvantage against foreign sellers who utilize the de minimis loophole. Business Implications This policy change will create new costs, compliance burdens, and operational challenges. For foreign e-commerce sellers and platforms: The most direct impact will be the addition of import duties to low-value items. Assuming the costs are passed on to the consumer, the higher prices and potentially more complex or slower customs clearance processes could lead to increased cart abandonment and reduced consumer demand. Businesses should review their pricing models and develop a clear strategy for calculating, declaring, and paying these new duties. For logistics providers and customs brokers: The administrative burden will be considerable. Carriers that previously handled millions of nondutiable parcels will now be required to process them for duty assessment and collection. This may necessitate new IT systems and streamlined processes to avoid delays at
November 7, 2025
Thailand and the United States signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) titled “Cooperation to Diversify Global Critical Minerals Supply Chains and Promote Investments” on October 26, 2025, signaling a new strategic alignment aimed at developing Thailand’s mineral sector, particularly in rare earth elements (REEs). The MOU has implications for investments in technology, manufacturing, and other related sectors. This update outlines the key provisions of the MOU and the potential opportunities and legal navigating points for businesses. Objectives The primary driver of this agreement is the US initiative to diversify global supply chains for critical minerals and reduce reliance on current market leaders, particularly China. For Thailand, it represents a major opportunity to attract high-tech investment and develop its downstream processing industries. The cooperation is set to focus on five main areas: Technical knowledge: Exchange of technical expertise and international best practices to strengthen Thailand’s mining and processing sector. Joint cooperation: Establishing workshops, seminars, and scientific collaboration to boost innovation. Regulatory practice: Promoting good governance and streamlining regulatory and licensing procedures. Information sharing: Sharing data on potential projects and global market prices. Full-value chain: The MOU covers the entire mineral lifecycle, from exploration and extraction to processing, refining, and recycling. “First Opportunity to Invest” Clause The most debated provision within the MOU states that “participants expect to have the first opportunity to invest . . . in critical minerals assets that may be sold in Thailand.” Business implications: This clause is widely interpreted as granting US companies a first look or preferential access to investment opportunities in Thailand’s critical minerals sector. This could be a significant advantage for US-based or affiliated companies in mining, technology, and energy seeking to secure a foothold in a developing REE supply chain. Thai government position: Thai officials, including the prime minister, have publicly clarified
October 24, 2025
Thailand currently lacks a specific franchise act. Consequently, the legality of any franchise agreement is determined by its compliance with various existing laws, such as the Civil and Commercial Code, the Trademark Act B.E. 2534 (1991) (as amended), and the Unfair Contract Terms Act B.E. 2530 (1997). Thailand is a freedom-to-contract jurisdiction. This allows for a high degree of flexibility and autonomy in contractual arrangements, provided that the terms do not violate any laws or public policy and do not fall under the scope of unfair contract terms. Given this, the requirement for fairness in franchise agreement terms often leads to uncertainty, but decisions from the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT) can provide guidance on whether specific contentious terms are in fact fair.  One issue worth examining in this light is the inclusion of terms on nonrefundable franchise fees and strict purchasing conditions. Franchise Fee: Unfair to Refuse Refund? Nonrefundable franchise fees represent a significant upfront investment for franchisees, often becoming a point of contention if the franchise relationship deteriorates or the franchisor ceases operations. Their fairness and enforceability are frequently scrutinized by regulatory bodies like the TCCT, highlighting the critical balance between contractual freedom and franchisee protection. Faced with one such case, the TCCT considered whether it was unfair for the franchisor to refuse to refund the franchise fee after the franchisor ceased operations.  The franchisee had entered into a service agreement on August 2, 2021, and begun operating on October 9, 2021. However, by November 21, 2023, the franchisee was notified that the system would be shut down for maintenance, and by December 26, 2023, the franchisor announced the cessation of operations due to financial losses. The franchisee then requested a refund of the franchise fee. Unfortunately for the franchisee, the TCCT found that the franchisor’s