You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 15, 2020

Thai Customs Department Eases Certificate of Origin Submission Requirements

Subscribe to Updates

On April 16, 2020, the director general of the Thai Customs Department issued Notification No. 81/2563, which introduces new customs measures intended to facilitate the operations of importers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The new notification replaces and expands on a previous one (Notification No. 47/2563), issued in March 2020, which allowed importers of goods from China to submit photocopies of certificates of origin in certain circumstances, rather than originals, in order to qualify for a decrease in customs duties or duty exemption. Those who avail themselves of these measures must submit the original certificates of origin within 30 days of customs releasing their goods. However, the first notification only allowed the use of such copies for limited kinds of customs and duty exemptions, and after a month was found to be insufficiently flexible in practice to provide relief, given the unforeseeable length and severity of the crisis. The director general therefore issued Notification No. 81/2563 to replace and expand upon the older notification. Although similar in process and requirements, the new notification includes applications for exemption under numerous free trade area agreements and provides a mechanism for extension if 30 days is found to be insufficient. The measures are applicable between April 16 and September 30, 2020.

The new free trade and related agreements that are  included under the scope of the new notification are as follows:

  1. ASEAN-China Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement;
  2. Agreement on Accelerated Tariff Elimination under the Early Harvest Programme of the ASEAN-China Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement;
  3. Accession of Singapore to the Agreement on Accelerated Tariff Elimination under the Early Harvest Pro- gramme of the ASEAN-China Comprehensive Economic Cooperation Agreement;
  4. ASEAN Trade in Goods Agreement;
  5. ASEAN-Korea Free Trade Agreement;
  6. ASEAN-Japan Comprehensive Economic Partnership;
  7. Japan-Thailand Economic Partnership Agreement;
  8. ASEAN-India Comprehensive Economic Cooperation;
  9. Thailand-India Free Trade Agreement;
  10. ASEAN-Australia-New Zealand Free Trade Agreement;
  11. ASEAN-Hong Kong Free Trade Agreement;
  12. Thailand-Chile Free Trade Agreement; and

For practical customs clearance matters, such as obtaining duty exemptions and reductions under the new notification, the importer can present a copy of a certificate of origin from any institute that issues certificates of origin in the country of exportation. This applies to any institute that already issued an authorized certificate of origin but was unable to send the original to the importer in Thailand due to the COVID-19 pandemic. To submit a copy in these circumstances, the importer must include an explanatory remark in the import entries accompanying the goods stating that the importer “[r]equests to use [a] copy of the certificate of origin for a temporary period and will present its original thereafter.” The importer also needs to submit a petition, using the form appended to the notification, along with a copy of the certificate of origin. These should be submitted to the customs office or customs port, where officers will examine each copy of the certificate of origin and determine the customs tariffs and values applicable to the goods in light of the conditions and requirements for each relevant free trade area. If all requirements are met, customs will clear the goods for release from their custody and require importers to submit the original certificate of origin within 30 days. However, if further delays related to the COVID-19 pandemic prevent timely submission of the original certificate of origin, importers can secure an additional extension of up to 30 days by submitting a petition at least seven days in advance of the original deadline.

Further, a summary of all deadlines must be submitted by the importer within sixty days of removing the items from customs’ custody. Importers who fail to present the original certificate of origin within these deadlines will be deemed in default under the Ministry of Finance notifications for the qualifying free trade areas, and will not be entitled to duty reductions or exemptions. Failure to properly support requests for duty reductions or exemptions, even under the more liberal standards allowed under the new notification, will result in the Customs Department issuing assessment of duty letters to the importer in order to collect customs duty shortfalls. This can also result in additional liabilities for an importer and could impede resolution of the resulting customs disputes. In addition, if a certificate of origin expires before a deadline for submission expires, the importer will not be entitled to receive a reduction in customs duties or exemptions.

The COVID-19 pandemic has placed increased burdens on importers and the Thai Customs Department, and Notification No. 81/2563 seeks to lessen these burdens while providing flexibility to importers who may face uncertainty over whether they can meet documentary obligations during this time. This is a welcome accommodation, but importers and their representatives should nonetheless remain diligent to ensure that they meet all documentary and procedural requirements to qualify for duty reductions or exemptions. Failure to do so, even under the new more flexible rules, could lead to unnecessary liability, delays, and expenses.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Customs and International Trade

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
Read More
February 18, 2021
As you will no doubt know, on February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military declared a state of emergency in Myanmar for a period of one year. State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Su Kyi was detained, as were the president and various significant political and civil leaders. Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw (Myanmar armed forces) has installed himself as chairman of the State Administration Council, the current administration. New sanctions The reaction of the Biden administration has been swift. On February 10, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which provides bases to impose sanctions on individuals and companies deemed by the US to, among other things: operate in the defense sector of Myanmar; be responsible for policies that undermine democratic processes in Myanmar; have taken actions to undermine democratic processes or institutions, or prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of free speech, in Myanmar; or be a spouse or child of the foregoing. On the next day, February 11, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), imposed sanctions under the new executive order on ten individuals—including General Min Aung Hlaing—and three companies, including Cancri Gems & Jewelry Co, Myanmar Imperial Jade Co, and Myanmar Ruby Enterprise.  All such individuals and companies have now been designated on the US list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). Effect of sanctions As a result of such sanctions, the property of these individuals or companies that is located in the US or is under the possession or control of US companies and citizens is frozen, and US companies and citizens are generally prohibited from dealing deal with any such property.  Reportedly, roughly USD 1 billion of funds belonging to the individuals and companies blocked on February 11 are located in the US and thus now frozen. The SDN list As many
Read More
December 9, 2020
Thailand’s Trade Competition Commission (TCC) has issued new rules governing business relations between food delivery platform operators and the restaurants operating through those platforms. The guidelines identify various arrangements, that are sometimes imposed upon restaurants by digital platforms, as unfair and damaging to restaurant operators, and restrict them accordingly. This is the fourth time that the TCC has deemed it necessary to intervene in a specific industry by restricting certain unfair trade practices in accordance with the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017) (TCA), and is indicative of the TCC’s greater drive to quell unfair practices using its powers under the TCA. It also shows their willingness to react quickly to new developments in the market—in this case, the substantial increase in restaurant operators selling their products through online platforms in recent months. The Guidelines on Unfair Trade Practices between Digital Platform Operators for Food Delivery and Restaurants were published in the Government Gazette on November 23, 2020, and take effect on December 23, 2020. Key Definitions Digital platforms mean online services which establish a trade linkage between restaurant businesses, food deliverers, and consumers—in other words, applications or websites that allow consumers to use restaurants via food deliverers. Digital platform operators for food delivery means the business operators that provide digital platform services, acting as an intermediary to accept the purchase order and deliver food between restaurant operators, food delivery service providers, and consumers; or between restaurant operators and consumers in accepting the purchase order for food. Put simply, they are the companies operating food delivery platforms. Unfair Conduct  The main principle set forth in the TCC’s food delivery guidelines is that business conduct between food delivery platform operators and restaurant operators must respect the freedom of each party; must be fair, noncompulsory, and nondiscriminatory; and must not obstruct another
Read More