You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

May 9, 2024

Thai Capital Markets Rules Recap for Q1/2024

This is the first in a series of quarterly articles prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins’ capital markets practice group in Thailand, with a view to providing periodic updates on material changes to the relevant rules and regulations pertaining to securities laws in Thailand. Here are some of the key updates for the first quarter of 2024.

Amendments to “investment company” prohibition

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has amended the rules on the offering of securities and information disclosure where listed companies operating as an investment company would face consequences from regulatory arbitrage. The amended rules, which took effect on January 1, 2024, can be summarized as follows:

  • A company (excluding financial institutions) will be deemed an investment company if it invests in securities, derivatives, or digital assets without active participation in the management of the target business, and the total of the passive portfolio exceeds 40 percent of the company’s total assets according to its most recent financials.
  • Listed companies falling under the above definition of an investment company must disclose information related to their investments in the notes to their financial statements until the passive investment portfolio is less than 40 percent of their total assets.
  • The Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) will publish a warning label (either “C” for caution or “SP” for trading suspension) next to the ticker symbol of any listed company that is deemed an investment company. Once this is done, the company will be unable to offer any securities under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (as amended) (SEC Act), such as shares, warrants, and underlying shares, as well as debt instruments.

Amendments on offering of newly issued bonds by foreign issuers

Rules on the offering of newly issued bonds in Thailand by foreign issuers were revised by the SEC with a view to ensuring that the risk profiles of foreign issuers, as well as the change in the landscape of the bond markets, are suitable. The amended rules, which took effect on January 1, 2024, can be summarized as follows:

  • Foreign issuers can now file an application for sale of bonds denominated in Thai baht (THB) in Thailand with the SEC directly without having to obtain prior approval from the Ministry of Finance.
  • Foreign issuers of THB-denominated bonds must (1) obtain an investment grade issue rating from an international credit rating agency, (2) appoint a bondholder representative, and (3) register the THB-denominated bonds with the Thai Bond Market Association. If an existing foreign issuer would like to roll over the outstanding non-investment grade bonds issued as of December 31, 2023, the SEC can grant a temporary exemption to mitigate the impact on the issuer, as well as the relevant investors and the bond market.
  • The criteria for issuance and offering of foreign currency-denominated bonds (or FX bonds) by foreign entities in Thailand were also amended to be in line with the amendments to the rules for offering THB-denominated bonds.

Amendments on bills deemed as securities and offering of bills

The SEC amended a few rules governing the issuance of bills to be in line with the Thai private sector’s current practices so that only certain types of bills are now deemed as securities that fall under the regime of Thailand’s SEC Act. Effective from February 1, 2024, the amended rules stipulate that bills deemed as “securities” are bills of exchange or promissory notes payable or issued by a company and given to the lender or payee to evidence the rights under the bills, with the objective of raising funds from more than 10 investors (including all issued and unredeemed bills) at any given period, as well as solicitation or advertisement thereof.

The SEC also amended the relevant rules on the offering of bills to be in line with the amended definition of bills, with effect from March 16, 2024. Accordingly, an offering of bills via private placement to up to 10 placees (or PP10) is no longer deemed an offering of securities, resulting in PP10 offerings of bills falling outside of the SEC’s authority.

Amendments to audit committee and free-float requirements

The SET started implementing new rules on audit committees and free-float requirements from March 25 and 29, 2024, respectively. Listed companies must have at least three audit committee members (any vacancy in the committee must be rectified within three months with a possible extension for up to another six months) and must maintain their free float by having at least 150 nonstrategic shareholders holding at least 15 percent of the total issued shares. Noncompliance with these requirements may lead to the SET publishing warning labels, such as “CC” for “Caution—Noncompliance” or “CF” for “Caution—Free Float,” which could be further escalated to “SP” for trading suspension. If the SET has published the SP sign for two years (for audit committee noncompliance) or one year (for free-float noncompliance), then the listed company will be subject to delisting. During the period of noncompliance, the listed company must report on the rectification progress every quarter when it submits its quarterly financials to the SET.

Amendments on results reporting for initial public offerings (IPOs)

In order to allow investors to make an informed decision before investing in an IPO, the SEC amended the rules on the reporting of the results of the IPO, effective from March 1, 2024. Issuers are now required to submit a supplemental report (81-1 Short-Form), which includes two key pieces of information: (1) post-IPO shareholders, their shareholdings, and their locked-up shares (if any), and (2) the top 40 investors in the IPO shares, their shareholdings in comparison to the total offering, and the allocation details. This information must be reported to the Office of the SEC (via the SET’s electronic system) at least two business days prior to the first trading day or within 30 days after the closing of the offering, whichever is earlier.

Amendments on reporting of securities and derivatives held by directors, executives, and auditors of listed companies

As part of its regulatory guillotine initiatives, the SEC amended the rules on reporting of securities and derivatives held by directors, executives, and auditors of listed companies to streamline the reporting process and allow for more flexibility while still ensuring that information on key movements of such securities and derivatives is sufficiently and readily available. Key amendments to the rules include:

  • Extension of the reporting period for small transactions and consolidation of the report of such small transactions (to every six months or when the total value exceeds THB 3 million, whichever happens first);
  • Exemptions for any director or executive who is the spouse or cohabiting partner of another director or executive of the same listed company if one of them has already submitted a report to the SEC; and
  • Further clarification of the reporting deadline for acquisition of newly issued shares (date of paid-up registration with the registrar of public companies) and convertible securities (date of issuance of the convertible securities).

Amendments on provision of non-voting depository receipt (NVDR) transaction services by securities companies

To ensure that NVDRs are only invested in by foreign investors and not misused by Thai investors in order to circumvent relevant rules, the SEC has amended the regulations related to the provision of NVDR transaction services by securities companies. With effect from April 1, 2024, securities companies are now prohibited from accepting orders for purchase, transfer, or exchange of securities that would result in any Thai investors acquiring an NVDR, unless the transaction is as a result of NVDRs acquired before the amendment came into effect or any transfer of NVDRs by the operation of law. Moreover, local securities companies must give notice to clients who are foreign securities companies, foreign custodians, or service providers to other parties of this new limitation and require that these clients disclose the identity of all beneficiaries involved in the NVDR transactions who are Thai nationals or entities. In addition, the local securities companies must file a report with the SEC at the end of every month and upon closing the share register.

For more information on any of these updates, or on any aspect of capital markets law and regulations in Thailand, please contact Yaowarote Klinboon at [email protected] or Karinevidch Olivero at [email protected].

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 30, 2025
Recent events at a Thai listed company, where a proposal to remove the director was not successful, amid claims that a competitor was attempting to gain control of the company, illustrate how disputes over corporate control can unfold differently at the board level and shareholder level. At the board level, removing directors of a listed company mid-term to gain corporate control is not an easy task under Thai law, as it requires a higher threshold than appointing a new director, which typically only requires a simple majority vote in a listed company. At the shareholder level, Thailand’s tender offer and competition regimes add complexity where different shareholder groups act in concert to remove opposing board representatives or otherwise influence control. In this article, we will explore why the attempted removal of a director may fail, and how the tender offer regime may apply. Key Issues at a Glance Shareholder groups may seek to convene meetings to propose changes to board composition or company authority. Such proposals can be delayed or complicated by regulatory requirements and the need for additional disclosures. Regulatory authorities and minority shareholders may raise concerns when major shareholders coordinate to influence board control, especially if such actions could trigger tender offer or merger control obligations. Companies often respond by seeking further information on shareholder relationships and potential conflicts before proceeding. Why the Director Removal Failed Under Section 76 of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (as amended), the early removal of a director requires two conditions to be satisfied at the same meeting of shareholders: Headcount test: At least 75% of shareholders attending and entitled to vote must vote in favor. If multiple shareholders appoint the same person as proxy, each proxy is counted as a separate head for the purpose of the headcount test,
October 1, 2025
In September 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), including its current and former directors, of concealing material information in connection with its filing registration and draft prospectus. This recent enforcement action demonstrates the serious consequences of making false statements or appearing to conceal material information in IPO filings and ongoing disclosures. In addition to being subject to criminal penalties, such actions can impact the eligibility of directors and executives to serve and may cause lasting reputational damage. Key Legal Risks The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (as amended) imposes strict liability for making false statements or concealing material information in IPO registration statements and draft prospectuses. In such cases, investors can claim for damages, and there are also criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years and substantial fines, may apply to the company, its directors, and responsible officers. However, misstatements or omissions in IPO filings do not, by themselves, disqualify directors or executives from holding office, whether arising from an SEC accusation or even a final court judgment. In contrast, for ongoing disclosures after listing, such as financial statements, annual reports, and meeting notices, false or misleading statements or concealment of material information can result in not only criminal liability but also immediate disqualification of directors and executives. If the SEC accuses a listed company or its directors or executives of such misstatements or omissions, those directors or executives are immediately disqualified from their positions, even before a final court judgment. Director and Executive Qualifications Directors and executives must meet the SEC’s specified standards of trustworthiness, as set out in the relevant rules. The SEC clearly defines characteristics that are considered to demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness. For ongoing disclosures, being involved in
July 2, 2025
On June 17, 2025, Cambodia’s Ministry of Economy and Finance issued Instruction No. 18574 on Tax Obligations for Share Premiums to clarify that enterprises are not required to pay any income tax on share premiums that meet the conditions set out in the instruction. As outlined in the relevant provisions of the Law on Taxation (Royal Kram No. NS/RKM/0523/004) and Prakas No. 578 MEF.PrK.GDT on Tax on Income, taxable income is the difference between an asset’s value at the beginning and end of a period. This calculation deducts capital contributions, which are not taxable. A share premium is the amount of money that a company receives in excess of the par value of a share when the company issues new shares to a shareholder through a share subscription. In other words, share premiums are capital contributions made by shareholders into the equity of the company and, as a result, are not taxable. However, the government may nevertheless view share premiums as taxable if the company fails to meet certain legal conditions. Cambodian law requires share subscriptions to be properly recorded in the company’s accounting books and supported by documentary evidence. The recent instruction states that if an enterprise does not have proper documentation, any increase in equity, such as a capital increase through share premiums, will be treated as taxable income in accordance with the law. The instruction provides the following example: Enterprise A issues 200,000 new shares to an investor. The shares were registered with a par value of KHR 4,000 per share and were sold for a sale price of KHR 10,000 per share. The share premium of KHR 1.2 billion, which is calculated by subtracting the total par value (KHR 800 million) from the total value of the new capital (KHR 2 billion), is a capital
May 28, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins attorneys in Vietnam have contributed the 2025 edition of Doing Business in Vietnam, a comprehensive Q&A-style resource from Thomson Reuters Practical Law that provides essential insights for companies navigating business operations in Vietnam. The guide presents a detailed overview of the country’s legal framework and regulatory environment, reflecting recent updates in Vietnamese legislation and practice. This annually updated guide offers key information on the following areas: Legal system: Structure of the Vietnamese judiciary and the role of codified law. Foreign investment: Conditions for market access, licensing requirements, foreign ownership restrictions, and investment incentives. Business vehicles: Formation and operation of legal entities, including limited liability companies, joint-stock companies, and representative offices. Employment: Employment contracts, social insurance, labor rights, and procedures for hiring foreign nationals. Tax: Overview of corporate income tax, personal income tax, value-added tax, and other tax obligations. Intellectual property: Procedures for protecting and enforcing patents, trademarks, copyrights, and other IP rights. Data protection: Compliance requirements under Vietnam’s data privacy laws, including the Personal Data Protection Decree. Competition law: Antitrust rules and regulatory oversight under the Law on Competition. Anti-bribery and corruption: Legal framework and enforcement practices aimed at curbing corrupt activities. E-commerce and digital business: Regulations governing online platforms, digital content, and cross-border services. Marketing and advertising: Laws and guidelines on advertising standards and consumer protection. Product regulation and liability: Safety requirements, product liability issues, and roles of relevant authorities. Doing Business in Vietnam is part of Practical Law’s global series of legal guides designed to support international practitioners and businesses. To access the most recent edition of the Vietnam guide, visit the Practical Law website and sign up for a free trial.