You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 19, 2017

Technological Disruptions in the Insurance Industry

T-AB: Thai-American Business, Journal of the American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand

“InsurTech” is a term that people may not be able to find a definition for, even in modern dictionaries. There is no Thai translation of it, or for its sister term “FinTech.” The popular opinion is that the term InsurTech was inspired by FinTech, and it should generally be used to refer to the use of technological innovation which enhances the economic efficiency of the insurance industry.

If InsurTech’s primary goal is to drive efficiency through the use of technology, thus creating a cheaper model for conducting insurance business, the traditional way of carrying out insurance business will need to evolve in order to absorb these new technological innovations, or risk becoming obsolete.

There are a wide range of InsurTech models, especially in more developed markets such as the U.S. and some European countries. In the Asia Pacific region—especially Southeast Asia—InsurTech startups are fast entering the market and beginning to grow rapidly. The Thai insurance market is steadily growing with strong upside potential in the penetration rate, which is complimented by the national “Thailand 4.0” policy of digitally transforming the country. These factors fuel the interest in how InsurTech will transform the country’s insurance industry.

InsurTech Tools

Aggregators, comparison tools, and marketplaces are a few types of InsurTech that are already prevalent in Thailand, and which have altered typical insurance market practices. Thailand has already seen the emergence of a number of international and local online aggregators, such as Easy Compare and gobear.com. The aggregator concept is simple: cut out the middle man by allowing customers to quickly compare insurance products (car insurance being the most common in Thailand) with a few clicks. To use an aggregator website, the user merely has to input their requirements and information. The aggregator will then analyze them to provide product quotations in a way that makes it possible to easily see and compare premium rates, summarized coverage, and exclusions. The process can be completed instantly by making an online payment, and the insurance policy will then be emailed to the customer.

Although the process sounds very simple, it significantly impacts the industry by changing customer behavior. With all the compared products easily visible, customers will focus heavily on the premium rates and will usually purchase the cheapest product that provides their required coverage. Consequently, insurers will need to offer their products at the lowest possible margin if they are to be selected. In other words, aggregators drive down prices and increase efficiency. These insurance intermediaries and online platforms will surely become one of the most important distribution channels, to the detriment of bancassurance or agents/broker.

A more sophisticated InsurTech business structure exists in the UK, where an interesting InsurTech innovation called “Spixii” has been developed. The concept behind Spixii is also simple: a chatbot for insurance. It claims to be an “automated insurance agent” that will eventually allow you to make enquiries, buy insurance, and even manage your policy through a chatbot. Although still in a beta version, the full version of Spixii is expected to allow customers to enquire about anything concerning insurance, and its AI technology will automate the response and give customers the correct answers and solutions. If this InsurTech chatbot becomes the new automated insurance agent in the future, what will become of traditional agents?

Technology for Insurers

Transformations to the market will not be limited to distribution channels. For example, another type of InsurTech known as “telematics” could change the concept of underwriting insurance. Telematics involve the use of devices which track data relevant to underwriters, for example in the form of a wearable device that keeps track of your health habits (and your location), or a small black box hidden in your car to capture data relating to usage and driving behavior. These technologies will allow the insurer to analyze individual behavior, in order to personalize tailor-made insurance that fits a customer’s personal risks.

A health telematic device can capture your health statistics, exercise habits, or even locate your travel habits, which could enable an insurer to offer a combination of health, travel and life insurance in a single, bundled, tailor-made policy. This means the expenses pertaining to insurance risks can be focused on the areas that are most needed. Ultimately, with this telematic technology, and the “internet of things” revolution, it will be possible to see increasingly more tailor-made products until insurance eventually becomes simply another utility, like water or electricity, for which customers only pay for what they use.

Peer-to-Peer Insurance Platforms

InsurTech also offers solutions for people who have lost confidence in the concept of insurance. Some people believe that when companies keep all the premiums as their own capital, and only pay a fraction when claims are successfully made, then technically, these people believe that if the money is safely in the pockets of insurers, there is an incentive for them not to pay, or to slowly make payments, or to pay insufficient amounts. InsurTech however allows for the concept of a peer-to-peer (P2P) insurance platforms that people contribute to pooled funds are generally paid back if there are no claims. This allows participants to share the risk of an accident/damage with other people in a manner in which the facilitator, which is the insurance company, will only earn a service fee when it processes the P2P transactions.

One of the successful U.S.-based P2P InsurTech companies is Lemonade, which allows each participant to pay a fee into a pooling fund. If no claims, the funds will be given back to a charity of the participant’s choice. Lemonade only charges the facilitation fee, and offers a “fast, affordable and hassle-free insurance experience.” It offers zero paperwork and instantly provides all services relating to buying and claiming insurance through the Lemonade app, which claims it takes “90 seconds to get insured and just three minutes to get paid.”

In Thailand, to date, the InsurTech era is not far-reaching. “Claim Di,” which originated in Bangkok, is a networked claims process InsurTech service that enables car drivers involved in a car accident to submit real-time claims directly to the insurer, using handheld devices to capture photos or videos and then upload them through the application platform. This networked claims process InsurTech reflects the same concept (i.e., driving efficiency). In a heavy-traffic environment such as Bangkok, it offers a much more pleasant process for drivers than having to call a contact center and wait 30 minutes before communicating with the agent, then submit their claims through “surveyors,” and later still have to wait until their transactions are completed at a later stage. In contrast, the transaction time could be reduced to less than 10 to 15 minutes by using the networked InsurTech claims process. Therefore, customer experience, when transacting using these types of InsurTech claims, will be substantially and positively changed.

Regulatory Environment

In theory, InsurTech concepts sound constructive, positive, and promising for customers. However, the question remains as to how Thailand will further open up and embrace InsurTech. With the government’s Thailand 4.0 project aiming to digitally transform the country, would Thailand be the right forum for an InsurTech revolution? If Thailand hypothetically changed immediately and dramatically, would consumers be ready for this evolution, and what would the collateral damage of such a change be? As these elements remain unclear, they may represent the unforeseen cons of introducing InsurTech in Thailand.

The Thai insurance industry, as in other countries, is heavily-regulated by the government. As insurance businesses have a wide-scale public impact, without proper controls, and with bad governance, they would be unsustainable, and the industry would not be able to provide adequate risk management tools to cover losses, especially for losses on a catastrophic scale, such as tsunamis or the 2011 mega flooding in Thailand.

InsurTech businesses are not yet widespread in Thailand, as the new InsurTech business models do not easily fit in with the current regulatory environment. However, it is visible that current, modern types of regulatory bodies do not move at an old fashioned, slow pace. In 2017, we saw the launch of a regulatory sandbox; a significant amount of new legislation aimed at supervising and regulating the relatively new concept of online business, e-insurance, and the evolution of InsurTech. However, the regulatory changes may not come quickly enough to permit more sophisticated InsurTech businesses to appear in Thailand in the immediate future.

It is not realistic to expect regulatory requirements for the insurance industry to be fully lifted in the near future to freely allow new InsurTech startups to conduct insurance related business in Thailand without controls. However, the regulatory bodies should take the opportunity to use their supervisory authority to free up regulatory barriers in the focused businesses that fit with Thailand. The hope is that the regulatory sandbox will be utilized efficiently to intensively screen, and promote InsurTech companies with new innovations, which have a low disruptive impact, in order to enable them to enter the market quickly and the sandbox is also utilized to capture the anticipated high impact InsurTech players, so that their business models can be analyzed and fully assessed. This would, in turn, enable the market entry process to be formulated into stages, so that the industry can evolve at the right pace to be most beneficial to both customers and business players in the market.

Eventually, the Thai insurance industry will be transformed by the InsurTech revolution. When people start to execute all their transactions through online platforms, insurance transactions can no longer be undertaken in the traditional way. Whether insurers, intermediaries, or even customers are ready for the transformation or not, the InsurTech revolution will impact all of us. We are now entering a new era where technology companies are conducting insurance business too, instead of just the same group of old-style players. Inevitably in such an environment, those business players that are not prepared to develop with these changes will unavoidably be forced out of the market.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 14, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Insurance Commission (OIC) has issued guidelines clarifying the boundaries between permissible and prohibited activities for unlicensed individuals—including influencers, bloggers, and content creators—when communicating about insurance products on social media. The Good Practice Guidelines for Persons Not Licensed as Insurance Agents or Brokers Regarding the Dissemination of Insurance Content Through Digital Media B.E. 2569 (2026) took effect on July 24, 2026. Activities Requiring a License The guidelines reserve the following activities for licensed agents and brokers: Soliciting or facilitating insurance contracts. Providing personalized advice on product suitability. Recommending policy cancellation to purchase promoted products. Creating links that facilitate contract formation. Receiving performance-based compensation tied to policies or premiums generated. Importantly, boilerplate disclaimers such as “this is not a recommendation to buy insurance” will not shield individuals from liability if the OIC views the content as personalized advice or solicitation. Permitted Activities Unlicensed persons may present general educational content about insurance—such as explaining terminology, sharing industry statistics, reporting news, or sharing personal experiences—provided the content does not target specific individuals to purchase from specific companies. The guidelines also set out best practices for communication, including presenting information in a fair and balanced manner that covers both benefits and limitations, encouraging consumers to read policy terms and consult licensed professionals, verifying information from credible sources before dissemination, and exercising special care when the audience may include vulnerable groups such as persons aged 60 and older. Prohibited Practices Prohibited practices include fear-based marketing, creating artificial urgency, omitting material limitations, making exaggerated claims, falsely claiming professional credentials, using fake engagement mechanisms, and sharing false or misleading content. The guidelines also reinforce the prohibitions under section 83 of the Life Insurance Act B.E. 2535 and section 78 of the Non-Life Insurance Act B.E. 2535 against soliciting insurance contracts with foreign operators
August 11, 2026
On July 27, 2026, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) released a draft decree proposing amendments to Decree No. 52/2024/ND-CP dated May 15, 2024, on non-cash payments (Decree 52). The draft decree would amend 17 of Decree 52’s 38 articles, with several key changes directly affecting providers of intermediary payment service (IPS). The key proposed changes affecting IPS providers are outlined below. Streamlining IPS Licensing Procedures A central objective of the draft decree is to simplify regulatory procedures for IPS providers. Notably, it would significantly reduce IPS licensing documentation requirements by removing the need to submit enterprise registration certificates, investment registration certificates, and documents evidencing the qualifications of the legal representative and general director. Instead, the SBV would retrieve this information directly from national business registration and other specialized databases, requesting additional documents only where the relevant information cannot be verified electronically or is incomplete. The draft decree also removes the current limit of two rounds for dossier supplementation and shortens processing timelines for several IPS licensing procedures such as issuance, amendment, and reissuance of IPS licenses. The processing time for new IPS license applications would be thereby reduced from 90 to 60 working days. In addition, several continuing IPS business conditions would be removed. For example, IPS providers would no longer be required to maintain certain representations relating to corporate restructuring or the legality of contributed capital. Likewise, the IPS project plan (đề án) would become a one-time application document rather than an ongoing licensing condition. If retained in the final decree, this change could provide IPS providers with significantly greater flexibility to implement post-licensing technology upgrades, system integrations, and corporate restructuring transactions without needing to revisit the originally approved project plan. The draft decree also removes the requirement for the SBV to consult the Ministry of Public
August 10, 2026
Thailand has finalized its social media KYC (“know your customer”) rules under Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers (No. 2), which was published in the Government Gazette on May 5, 2026, and will take effect on November 1, 2026. While an early draft of the notification proposed requiring social media platforms to arrange identification of every user account, the final notification is significantly more targeted, focusing on paid online advertising and advertiser identity verification. Though the regulatory initiative primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes, it also has important consequences for intellectual property enforcement, because the verified platform records that will be generated under the new requirements can help IP rights holders to identify anonymous online infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The notification requires social media service providers to verify the identity of advertisers before their paid advertisements are published and disseminated in Thailand through social media, regardless of whether the advertising fees come from the advertisers or third parties. Verification of an advertiser is valid for one year, after which verification would have to be performed again before the platform could publish additional paid advertisements from the advertiser. Permitted verification methods are specified under the notification. A platform may verify an advertiser by checking identity evidence and confirming the connection between the advertiser and that identity evidence, with the notification giving facial comparison against certain government-issued identity documents as an example. Alternatively, platforms may verify advertisers through a digital identity verification and authentication system with an identity-proofing assurance level not lower than the level prescribed by Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Commission. The notification further requires platforms to retain only the advertiser’s information necessary to identify the advertiser, beginning from the start of the advertising activity and for
August 10, 2026
On July 31, 2026, Thailand’s Big Data Institute (BDI) launched a public consultation on the principles of a proposed new data-sharing law, with comments accepted until August 31, 2026. If enacted, the law would establish Thailand’s first comprehensive framework for government and private-sector data sharing, creating a systematic, secure, and transparent regime to support analytics, policymaking, research, and innovation. Central Data-Sharing Platform The draft law establishes a central system for data sharing, managed by the BDI. Government agencies would be required to connect to the BDI’s Data Integration and Intelligence Platform (also referred to as D2), in accordance with the BDI’s rules and procedures. Five Dimensions of Data Sharing The draft law covers five key types of data sharing between government (G), businesses (B), and consumers (C): G2B: Private organizations may request government data specifically for research and development purposes. The BDI will assess the applicant’s data governance, security, and privacy capabilities whether such measures meet prescribed standards before forwarding the request to the relevant government agency within 90 days. Any dispute may be escalated to a newly established Data-Sharing Promotion Committee for final determination. G2G: Government agencies may request data from other agencies through the central system. The data-holding agency must respond within 90 days, taking legality, necessity, proportionality, public interest, and personal data protection into account. Disputes may be referred to the Data-Sharing Promotion Committee for adjudication. B2G: In emergency situations involving public safety, economic security, or disaster response, the Minister of Digital Economy and Society may require private entities to provide data through the central data-sharing system. Government agencies must specify the data requested, demonstrate its necessity and expected benefits, and request only data reasonably available to the data holder. Requests for personal data must be limited to the minimum amount necessary. B2C: Royal decrees may