You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

September 19, 2017

Technological Disruptions in the Insurance Industry

T-AB: Thai-American Business, Journal of the American Chamber of Commerce in Thailand

“InsurTech” is a term that people may not be able to find a definition for, even in modern dictionaries. There is no Thai translation of it, or for its sister term “FinTech.” The popular opinion is that the term InsurTech was inspired by FinTech, and it should generally be used to refer to the use of technological innovation which enhances the economic efficiency of the insurance industry.

If InsurTech’s primary goal is to drive efficiency through the use of technology, thus creating a cheaper model for conducting insurance business, the traditional way of carrying out insurance business will need to evolve in order to absorb these new technological innovations, or risk becoming obsolete.

There are a wide range of InsurTech models, especially in more developed markets such as the U.S. and some European countries. In the Asia Pacific region—especially Southeast Asia—InsurTech startups are fast entering the market and beginning to grow rapidly. The Thai insurance market is steadily growing with strong upside potential in the penetration rate, which is complimented by the national “Thailand 4.0” policy of digitally transforming the country. These factors fuel the interest in how InsurTech will transform the country’s insurance industry.

InsurTech Tools

Aggregators, comparison tools, and marketplaces are a few types of InsurTech that are already prevalent in Thailand, and which have altered typical insurance market practices. Thailand has already seen the emergence of a number of international and local online aggregators, such as Easy Compare and gobear.com. The aggregator concept is simple: cut out the middle man by allowing customers to quickly compare insurance products (car insurance being the most common in Thailand) with a few clicks. To use an aggregator website, the user merely has to input their requirements and information. The aggregator will then analyze them to provide product quotations in a way that makes it possible to easily see and compare premium rates, summarized coverage, and exclusions. The process can be completed instantly by making an online payment, and the insurance policy will then be emailed to the customer.

Although the process sounds very simple, it significantly impacts the industry by changing customer behavior. With all the compared products easily visible, customers will focus heavily on the premium rates and will usually purchase the cheapest product that provides their required coverage. Consequently, insurers will need to offer their products at the lowest possible margin if they are to be selected. In other words, aggregators drive down prices and increase efficiency. These insurance intermediaries and online platforms will surely become one of the most important distribution channels, to the detriment of bancassurance or agents/broker.

A more sophisticated InsurTech business structure exists in the UK, where an interesting InsurTech innovation called “Spixii” has been developed. The concept behind Spixii is also simple: a chatbot for insurance. It claims to be an “automated insurance agent” that will eventually allow you to make enquiries, buy insurance, and even manage your policy through a chatbot. Although still in a beta version, the full version of Spixii is expected to allow customers to enquire about anything concerning insurance, and its AI technology will automate the response and give customers the correct answers and solutions. If this InsurTech chatbot becomes the new automated insurance agent in the future, what will become of traditional agents?

Technology for Insurers

Transformations to the market will not be limited to distribution channels. For example, another type of InsurTech known as “telematics” could change the concept of underwriting insurance. Telematics involve the use of devices which track data relevant to underwriters, for example in the form of a wearable device that keeps track of your health habits (and your location), or a small black box hidden in your car to capture data relating to usage and driving behavior. These technologies will allow the insurer to analyze individual behavior, in order to personalize tailor-made insurance that fits a customer’s personal risks.

A health telematic device can capture your health statistics, exercise habits, or even locate your travel habits, which could enable an insurer to offer a combination of health, travel and life insurance in a single, bundled, tailor-made policy. This means the expenses pertaining to insurance risks can be focused on the areas that are most needed. Ultimately, with this telematic technology, and the “internet of things” revolution, it will be possible to see increasingly more tailor-made products until insurance eventually becomes simply another utility, like water or electricity, for which customers only pay for what they use.

Peer-to-Peer Insurance Platforms

InsurTech also offers solutions for people who have lost confidence in the concept of insurance. Some people believe that when companies keep all the premiums as their own capital, and only pay a fraction when claims are successfully made, then technically, these people believe that if the money is safely in the pockets of insurers, there is an incentive for them not to pay, or to slowly make payments, or to pay insufficient amounts. InsurTech however allows for the concept of a peer-to-peer (P2P) insurance platforms that people contribute to pooled funds are generally paid back if there are no claims. This allows participants to share the risk of an accident/damage with other people in a manner in which the facilitator, which is the insurance company, will only earn a service fee when it processes the P2P transactions.

One of the successful U.S.-based P2P InsurTech companies is Lemonade, which allows each participant to pay a fee into a pooling fund. If no claims, the funds will be given back to a charity of the participant’s choice. Lemonade only charges the facilitation fee, and offers a “fast, affordable and hassle-free insurance experience.” It offers zero paperwork and instantly provides all services relating to buying and claiming insurance through the Lemonade app, which claims it takes “90 seconds to get insured and just three minutes to get paid.”

In Thailand, to date, the InsurTech era is not far-reaching. “Claim Di,” which originated in Bangkok, is a networked claims process InsurTech service that enables car drivers involved in a car accident to submit real-time claims directly to the insurer, using handheld devices to capture photos or videos and then upload them through the application platform. This networked claims process InsurTech reflects the same concept (i.e., driving efficiency). In a heavy-traffic environment such as Bangkok, it offers a much more pleasant process for drivers than having to call a contact center and wait 30 minutes before communicating with the agent, then submit their claims through “surveyors,” and later still have to wait until their transactions are completed at a later stage. In contrast, the transaction time could be reduced to less than 10 to 15 minutes by using the networked InsurTech claims process. Therefore, customer experience, when transacting using these types of InsurTech claims, will be substantially and positively changed.

Regulatory Environment

In theory, InsurTech concepts sound constructive, positive, and promising for customers. However, the question remains as to how Thailand will further open up and embrace InsurTech. With the government’s Thailand 4.0 project aiming to digitally transform the country, would Thailand be the right forum for an InsurTech revolution? If Thailand hypothetically changed immediately and dramatically, would consumers be ready for this evolution, and what would the collateral damage of such a change be? As these elements remain unclear, they may represent the unforeseen cons of introducing InsurTech in Thailand.

The Thai insurance industry, as in other countries, is heavily-regulated by the government. As insurance businesses have a wide-scale public impact, without proper controls, and with bad governance, they would be unsustainable, and the industry would not be able to provide adequate risk management tools to cover losses, especially for losses on a catastrophic scale, such as tsunamis or the 2011 mega flooding in Thailand.

InsurTech businesses are not yet widespread in Thailand, as the new InsurTech business models do not easily fit in with the current regulatory environment. However, it is visible that current, modern types of regulatory bodies do not move at an old fashioned, slow pace. In 2017, we saw the launch of a regulatory sandbox; a significant amount of new legislation aimed at supervising and regulating the relatively new concept of online business, e-insurance, and the evolution of InsurTech. However, the regulatory changes may not come quickly enough to permit more sophisticated InsurTech businesses to appear in Thailand in the immediate future.

It is not realistic to expect regulatory requirements for the insurance industry to be fully lifted in the near future to freely allow new InsurTech startups to conduct insurance related business in Thailand without controls. However, the regulatory bodies should take the opportunity to use their supervisory authority to free up regulatory barriers in the focused businesses that fit with Thailand. The hope is that the regulatory sandbox will be utilized efficiently to intensively screen, and promote InsurTech companies with new innovations, which have a low disruptive impact, in order to enable them to enter the market quickly and the sandbox is also utilized to capture the anticipated high impact InsurTech players, so that their business models can be analyzed and fully assessed. This would, in turn, enable the market entry process to be formulated into stages, so that the industry can evolve at the right pace to be most beneficial to both customers and business players in the market.

Eventually, the Thai insurance industry will be transformed by the InsurTech revolution. When people start to execute all their transactions through online platforms, insurance transactions can no longer be undertaken in the traditional way. Whether insurers, intermediaries, or even customers are ready for the transformation or not, the InsurTech revolution will impact all of us. We are now entering a new era where technology companies are conducting insurance business too, instead of just the same group of old-style players. Inevitably in such an environment, those business players that are not prepared to develop with these changes will unavoidably be forced out of the market.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 30, 2026
On September 15, 2026, Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance (MOF) released for public consultation a draft circular on reporting and information disclosure in the pilot crypto asset market. The draft implements Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP on the Pilot Implementation of the Crypto Asset Market in Vietnam and provides further detail on how licensed crypto asset service providers (“CASPs”) will be supervised once the market becomes operational. The draft indicates a data-intensive supervisory model, with licensed CASPs serving as the first line of market oversight. Public Disclosure Requirements The draft imposes detailed public disclosure requirements on CASPs, aimed primarily at market transparency. CASPs and crypto asset issuers must make disclosures in both Vietnamese and English, retain reported and disclosed information for at least 10 years, and keep information published on their websites accessible for at least five years. For CASPs, disclosure obligations arise both periodically and when specific events occur. A CASP must announce any crypto asset to be admitted to trading on its website at least seven days before trading begins and publish periodic financial statements. Certain extraordinary events and information requested by the MOF must generally be disclosed within 24 hours. CASPs must also provide ongoing market information. During trading hours, they must publish key trading data, including prices and volumes, daily highs and lows, average prices, the three best bid and offer levels, and transactions by foreign investors. By 9:00 a.m. each trading day, they must publish specified information on the previous day’s trading activity. Regulatory Reporting Requirements Separate from public disclosure, the draft requires CASPs to provide regulators with detailed information enabling ongoing supervision of their operations and the market. For market activity, CASPs must report decisions to admit or remove a crypto asset from trading within 24 hours, submit previous-day trading data to the State Securities Commission
September 24, 2026
Vietnam is implementing and developing a broad package of regulatory reforms that could reshape how IP, data, digital platforms, and product authenticity are regulated and enforced. Several of the key measures have been led by the Ministry of Public Security in its legislative and administrative capacity, as part of a broader government effort. The core reform package consists of four key legal instruments: proposed amendments to the Criminal Code, a proposed new Data Security Law, a draft Decree on Product Identification, Authentication and Traceability, and the newly enacted Decree No. 330/2026/ND-CP. These instruments include rules on criminal enforcement, data security, electronic identification, product identification and traceability, administrative violations, and cybersecurity sanctions. Combined, these measures will affect copyright enforcement, industrial property rights, trade secrets, AI training data, product provenance, online takedowns, valuation of counterfeit goods and electronic evidence. It is worth noting that, in addition to strengthening criminal penalties for IP crimes, Vietnam’s emerging regulatory framework increasingly treats infringement, data misuse, product authentication, and platform-enabled violations as interconnected regulatory and enforcement challenges. For rights holders and foreign investors, this could mean stronger tools against counterfeiting and online infringement, but also more compliance obligations around data, traceability, AI, platform controls and government-facing reporting. Expansion of Criminal IP Enforcement Proposed amendments to Article 225 of the Criminal Code would expand criminal copyright exposure beyond reproduction and distribution to cover large-scale commercial public performance and online communication of works, phonograms and video recordings. This is important because piracy is increasingly about streaming, unauthorized communication, and platform access models rather than physical copying. Aggravated copyright infringement could be subject to up to 10 years in prison for individuals and fines of up to VND 6 billion (about USD 228,300) for commercial legal entities. The amended Article 226 would expand criminal industrial property liability beyond
September 24, 2026
On September 15, 2026, Thailand’s Office of Insurance Commission (OIC) issued two notifications—one for life insurance and one for non-life insurance—amending the 2020 regulatory framework governing policy issuance and offering, agent and broker conduct, premium collection, and advertising. The amendments take effect on January 1, 2027. Electronic Policy Delivery and OIC Reporting Insurers must now deliver policies electronically by default, with printed copies required only where the policyholder opts out of electronic delivery. For life insurance, this requirement extends to coverage summaries and exclusion documents. Insurers must also electronically submit issued policies to the OIC immediately upon issuance. This is a significant new data-reporting obligation that requires system integration with the OIC’s platform. Risk Management, Sales Conduct, and License Misuse The notifications introduce several amendments and additional requirements in the areas of risk management, sales conduct, and license misuse: Internal risk management must now expressly cover advertising, policy offering, and sales agent information, including market conduct risk and reputational risk. Sales conducted through employees, agents, or brokers are subject to enhanced requirements, including verification of the seller’s identity and authority, disclosure of the purpose of contacting the customer, provision of complete and accurate policy information, customer assistance with application forms, and notification of the expected timing for policy delivery or insurer follow-up. For life insurance, customers must also be informed of their right to cancel the policy. For life insurance specifically, employees, agents, and brokers must submit insurance applications to the insurer at the earliest opportunity, and no later than the next business day. Using another person’s name or license, or allowing another person to use one’s own name or license, for the purpose of offering insurance for sale, listing in sales-related documents, or recording in the insurance policy is now expressly prohibited for both life and non-life insurance.
September 17, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) has released for public comment a draft bill to amend the Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979), the country’s foundational consumer protection legislation. The draft amendment aims to modernize the nearly five-decade-old framework to address the rapid growth of digital commerce, online advertising, influencer marketing, and new business models. The public consultation period is open until October 10, 2026. Expanded Definitions Covering Digital Commerce The draft significantly broadens several core definitions to capture modern commercial activities: “Consumer” is expanded to include natural persons and nonprofit juristic persons who purchase or receive services, including those solicited by businesses and end users who do not directly pay for the goods or services. “Business operator” now explicitly covers advertising business operators and hired advertising persons, such as influencers and content creators. “Advertising media” is expanded to include digital platforms, social media, and social media user accounts. “Label” now encompasses electronic labels—symbols, codes, or other electronic formats displaying product information. Influencer and Advertising Disclosure Requirements In addition to these expanded definitions, “hired advertising person for selling goods or services” is a new definition covering influencers, content creators, live streamers, affiliate marketers, and virtual online media operators who receive monetary compensation or other benefits for advertising goods or services. Hired advertising persons—including influencers and content creators—must disclose to consumers that content is advertising and reveal their relationship with the business owner. Disclosure is required when the business owner employs the advertiser, pays or provides other benefits for the advertisement, or provides free or discounted products or services. These requirements apply where consumers would not otherwise know that the business has a connection to the person presenting the content. Labeling Requirements for Importers The draft introduces a clearer labeling obligation for importers of label-controlled goods, who must