You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 24, 2020

Tax Incentives for Investment in Thailand’s Super Savings Fund Scheme

Subscribe to Updates

On March 13, 2020, the Revenue Department of Thailand issued Notification of the Director General of Revenue Concerning Income Tax (No. 369) Re: Criteria, Methods and Conditions for Income Tax Exemption on the Purchase of Investment Units of Super Savings Funds (SSFs).

The tax incentives for investment in SSFs are intended as a substitute for the tax incentives for investment in Long-Term Equity Funds (LTFs), which were discontinued at the end of last year. The criteria and conditions for tax exemption under the SSF scheme are summarized below:

  • In any tax year, a taxpayer may not make SSF investments in excess of 30% of their total taxable income for that year, capped at THB 200,000.
  • The taxpayer’s total SSF, Provident Fund, Government Pension Fund, Private Teacher Aid Fund, Retirement Mutual Fund (RMF), Annuity Insurance Premium, and National Savings Fund investments and contributions must not exceed THB 500,000 in a single tax year.
  • Taxpayers may invest in an SSF from January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2024 (5 years). There is no requirement for continual purchase of SSF units, unlike the rules for LTF or RMF investments. Taxpayers are eligible to receive tax incentives in any year that they invest in an SSF.
  • There is no restriction on the holding period for SSF units. However, to enjoy tax benefits, the taxpayer must hold SSF units for a continual period of not less than 10 years from the date of purchase (except where the taxpayer becomes incompetent or deceased). If a taxpayer sells the SSF units before 10 years have elapsed, they will have to file an amended personal income tax return for the period that the tax exemption was claimed and pay additional tax with a surcharge of 1.5% per month (capped at the additional tax payment amount). Capital gains derived from the sale of SSF units will also be subject to tax in the year that they are sold.
  • The taxpayer must retain the certificate of investment in the SSF issued by the asset management company to support the tax exemption.
  • The taxpayer may transfer an investment in one SSF to another SSF. The transfer must be made within five working days of the SSF receiving an order to transfer from the taxpayer; otherwise, the investment period of 10 years will not be continued.

The major differences in the tax incentive conditions of SSF, LTF, and RMF investments are summarized in the table below.

Related Professionals

Practices

Tax

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 9, 2021
Lawyers from Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok have updated the Thailand section of the Digital Business Global Guide, a Q&A-style guide from Thomson Reuters Practical Law that provides detailed information on the regulatory environment surrounding digital business operations in 38 countries around the world. The Thailand overview covers the following main topics: Regulatory overview Setting up and running a business online Cybersecurity, data privacy, and data protection implications Linking Domain names Jurisdiction and governing law Advertising/marketing Tax Protecting an online business Liability for products/services supplied online Insurance Reform Practical Law, produced by Thomson Reuters, is the world’s leading legal know-how resource for business lawyers, publishing a huge range of guides covering hundreds of jurisdictions and practice areas. The full Digital Business in Thailand: Overview is available on the Practical Law website.
Read More
March 2, 2021
Like many countries, Thailand requires stamp duty to be paid on the execution of certain legal instruments. A liable person who fails to pay stamp duty on a required instrument can be subject to a maximum surcharge of six times the applicable stamp duty, and an instrument on which stamp duty has not been paid will not be admissible as evidence in civil cases (that is, it will have limited legal weight and enforceability). Before July 2019, there were three methods for paying stamp duty: Affixing adhesive stamps on the instrument (and canceling it by the liable person in order to make sure that the adhesive stamp duty cannot be reused); Having a stamp impressed on the paper instrument; or Filing a prescribed form and paying the duty by cash or cashiers cheque at an area revenue office. In addition to paying the correct amount of stamp duty, the law also requires that stamp duty on certain instruments be paid using a specific prescribed method from the list above. Failure to use the prescribed method would be considered as that the stamp duty not having been paid. For example, a hire-of-work instrument is subject to stamp duty, but if the remuneration stated within the agreement is at least THB 1,000,000 (approximately USD 33,500), the stamp duty must be paid by filing a prescribed form and paying by cash or cashier’s cheque at an area revenue office. Affixing adhesive stamp duty is not allowed in that circumstance. E-Stamp Duty In June 2019, the Revenue Department introduced a fourth method of paying stamp duty, allowing online payments in specific circumstances (e-Stamp Duty). After the launch of the e-Stamp Duty system, the Revenue Department issued a notification (Notification of the Director-General of Revenue concerning Stamp Duty (No. 58)) requiring stamp duty on
Read More
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More