You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 29, 2017

Spam and the Computer Crimes Act 2017: What Do Businesses Need to Know?

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

As the government seeks to elevate Thailand to the status of a high-income nation, the formation of a digital platform through the “Thailand 4.0” project is seen as an essential element of economic transformation, with the focus now fixed firmly on enhancing research and development, science and technology, and creative thinking and innovation.

To facilitate this economic change, the government and the National Legislative Assembly have made a number of changes to the law, including updates to the Computer Crimes Act (CCA) which were enacted earlier this year. The Ministry of Digital Economy and Society is responsible for issuing subordinate regulations under the CCA.

Spam e-Message Offense

Section 11 of the old CCA previously prohibited sending to another person any email or computer data that concealed or forged its source in a manner that disturbed the normal use of another’s computer system. However, it did not apply to disturbing or bothering the recipient themselves. The new version has been amended in direct response to developments in tech-related activities, and now makes it an offense to send an email, or computer data, in a manner that disturbs the recipient and that does not allow the recipient to opt out or unsubscribe.

In addition, the Minister of Digital Economy and Society has issued a notification under the new section 11 that sets out the characteristics and methods of sending emails and data, and characteristics of computer data or e-mails, which are not considered to cause a disturbance to the recipient. This notification acts as a set of “Safe Harbor Rules” for business operators when sending e-messages to their customers, prospective customers, or even to business partners or third parties.

The notification defines a “sender” as any person who intends to send company data or emails primarily for commercial purposes, and any website, application, and social media operators that advertise or support the sending of such data or emails. However, it does not include telecommunications business operators that act as intermediaries for transmitting such data or emails.

Safe Harbor Rules

The following types of e-messages are assumed not to cause a disturbance to the recipient.

  1. An e-message sent to another person as evidence of an agreed contractual transaction, or for compliance with law, or for expressing a relationship or a legal relationship between each other.
  2. An e-message sent by a government body that enforces the law, for the purpose of providing communications that are not for commercial purposes.
  3. An e-message sent by an educational institution, a charitable body, or other organizations, which is not for commercial purposes.
  4. An e-message sent in a legal manner which does not violate any individual rights and which is not for commercial purposes.

The notification states that e-messages for commercial purposes (and not within the scope of 1– 4 above) are only permissible when consent has been obtained from the recipient, and the following conditions are met:

  • E-messages must specify the signs, details, and processes that will enable the recipient to opt out of or unsubscribe from receiving such e-messages, including technical measures allowing the recipient to do so quickly.
  • After a request to unsubscribe has been made, the sender must suspend the sending of e-messages to the recipient immediately or, in certain circumstances, within seven days from the receipt of the request.
  • It is strictly prohibited for the process or request form for opting out/unsubscribing to be conditional or to divert for any additional commercial purposes (for example, if clicking the opt-out request routes the user to other websites or other sales distribution channels).
  • If the sender continues to send e-messages to the recipient after a request has been made, the recipient may send another request, in writing, by way of an email, registered mail with return receipt, or any other way by which they can confirm receipt. If the sender continues to send e-messages after receiving a request of this nature, the sender is deemed to be committing the spam offense under section 11 of the CCA.

Practical Issues

It remains to be seen how the requirements can be complied with in practice. For example, some businesses have asked how they should get consent from the recipient and whether implied consent could be acceptable.

Since this spam e-message offense could attract a maximum fine of THB 200,000 per spam communication, companies that engage in online business activities need to proceed with caution in their electronic marketing and adhere to the safe harbor rules in order to avoid exposure to potential regulatory penalties.

Though the notification provides further guidance and clarification on the spam e-message offense and what business operators should do to avoid committing it, there will still be a number of practical issues on compliance, going forward, that will require further interpretation. The notification grants the Permanent Secretary of the Minister of Digital Economy and Society the power to interpret and consider any issues resulting from any actions that arise from the notification, and companies would be well advised to be alert for any such interpretations in the near future.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 17, 2026
Thailand’s Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) has released for public comment a draft bill to amend the Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979), the country’s foundational consumer protection legislation. The draft amendment aims to modernize the nearly five-decade-old framework to address the rapid growth of digital commerce, online advertising, influencer marketing, and new business models. The public consultation period is open until October 10, 2026. Expanded Definitions Covering Digital Commerce The draft significantly broadens several core definitions to capture modern commercial activities: “Consumer” is expanded to include natural persons and nonprofit juristic persons who purchase or receive services, including those solicited by businesses and end users who do not directly pay for the goods or services. “Business operator” now explicitly covers advertising business operators and hired advertising persons, such as influencers and content creators. “Advertising media” is expanded to include digital platforms, social media, and social media user accounts. “Label” now encompasses electronic labels—symbols, codes, or other electronic formats displaying product information. Influencer and Advertising Disclosure Requirements In addition to these expanded definitions, “hired advertising person for selling goods or services” is a new definition covering influencers, content creators, live streamers, affiliate marketers, and virtual online media operators who receive monetary compensation or other benefits for advertising goods or services. Hired advertising persons—including influencers and content creators—must disclose to consumers that content is advertising and reveal their relationship with the business owner. Disclosure is required when the business owner employs the advertiser, pays or provides other benefits for the advertisement, or provides free or discounted products or services. These requirements apply where consumers would not otherwise know that the business has a connection to the person presenting the content. Labeling Requirements for Importers The draft introduces a clearer labeling obligation for importers of label-controlled goods, who must
Read More
September 11, 2026
Thailand’s National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) has published a new five-year master plan that will bring significant regulatory changes to the broadcasting and digital media sectors, including formal licensing requirements for internet-based audiovisual services. The Master Plan for Broadcasting and Television, 3rd Edition (B.E. 2569–2573/2026–2030) was published in the Government Gazette on September 1, 2026, and will affect OTT platforms, internet-based audiovisual service providers, and traditional broadcasters. Licensing Reform The NBTC will develop new licensing frameworks ahead of existing digital television license expirations, which are slated to occur between 2028 and 2030. This creates both uncertainty and opportunity for incumbents and new market entrants. New licensing criteria will also be developed for audiovisual services delivered over the internet, meaning previously unregulated internet-based providers may face licensing, fee, and content obligations for the first time. The plan also calls for a new law to govern converged communications services. OTT Regulation and Content Oversight The plan explicitly acknowledges and aims to lessen the regulatory asymmetry between traditional broadcasters—which are subject to licensing, fees, and content regulation—and internet-based services that currently face fewer obligations. The NBTC intends to develop regulatory frameworks to bring internet-based audiovisual services, including OTT platforms, streaming services, and user-generated content platforms, under content, consumer protection, and licensing requirements. Consumer Protection and Digital Rights The NBTC will strengthen its oversight of broadcasting, television, and telecommunications operators to ensure compliance with consumer protection and personal data protection requirements. This includes updating relevant notifications and orders and more strictly enforcing rules against practices that unfairly exploit consumers. These measures may layer NBTC-specific requirements on top of Thailand’s existing Personal Data Protection Act obligations. Stricter enforcement against practices that exploit consumers is a priority, with particular scrutiny on advertising practices. The NBTC will modernize complaint resolution processes, meaning service providers should
Read More
September 7, 2026
On September 4, 2026, Thailand’s prime minister convened the first meeting of the Data Center Business Policy Committee. The committee endorsed a draft policy framework for the data center industry and tasked four subcommittees with developing the standards that would sit beneath it, shifting away from fragmented, agency-by-agency approvals toward a unified national strategy aiming to maximize economic value while managing environmental and infrastructure concerns. Proposed Scope and Pillars of the National Data Center Policy Framework The proposed framework would cover all types of data centers, including internal or captive facilities operated within a company or its affiliates, rather than only commercial third-party providers. If adopted in this form, companies running private data centers purely for internal purposes would also become subject to regulatory oversight. Minimum safety and operational standards would be established, with uniform enforcement across all categories. The committee endorsed a draft policy framework with four key pillars: Industrial classification: Data centers exceeding 2 MW would be classified as industrial operations, which may require factory licenses and environmental impact assessments under the Factory Act. Resource pricing: Utility rates would be structured to reflect both direct and indirect costs, supporting green energy and green data center standards. Centralized screening: A centralized review would evaluate project suitability and resource allocation. Operators may be required to submit proposals through periodic “pitching” rounds, where projects are competitively assessed on their potential economic and strategic benefits to Thailand. Digital ecosystem: The framework would prioritize data sovereignty, tax incentives, and conditions promoting domestic digital businesses, AI, and cloud infrastructure. Multidimensional Evaluation Criteria and Subcommittees Four subcommittees will be established to develop standards responsible for the following dimensions: Economic: Criteria for assessing the economic viability of data center projects, for use in prioritizing data centers based on infrastructure readiness, demand type (including AI factories),
Read More
September 4, 2026
Foreign business restrictions on telecommunications, treasury center businesses, and intragroup support services were eased when Thailand published the Ministerial Regulation Prescribing Service Businesses Not Requiring Permission for Foreign Business Operations (No. 5) B.E. 2569 (2026) in the Government Gazette on August 28, 2026. The ministerial regulation expands the categories of service businesses that foreign investors may operate without a foreign business license (FBL) under the Foreign Business Act B.E. 2542 (1999) (FBA). Of particular relevance to the telecommunications, fintech, and technology sectors, the ministerial regulation exempts: Type 1 telecommunications licensees, which do not have their own networks; Treasury center businesses operated in accordance with Thailand’s exchange control regulations; and Certain intragroup administrative, human resources, and information technology management services. Telecommunications Services Foreign-owned businesses providing telecommunications services under a type 1 telecommunications license may now operate without obtaining an FBL. This may streamline market entry for qualifying telecommunications and digital infrastructure businesses. The exemption applies only to the FBA licensing requirement. Operators must continue to comply with applicable requirements under the Telecommunications Business Act and the regulations of the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission, and the change does not affect foreign ownership restrictions applicable to type 2 or type 3 telecommunications businesses. Treasury Center Businesses The ministerial regulation also exempts qualifying treasury center businesses from the FBL requirement. This may facilitate centralized treasury functions in Thailand, including liquidity management, foreign exchange management, and intragroup funding arrangements. Treasury center operations remain subject to applicable requirements of the Bank of Thailand and other competent authorities. Intragroup Administrative, HR, and IT Services Certain administrative, human resources, and information technology management services provided between affiliated entities are also exempt, provided the relevant entities satisfy prescribed ownership or management criteria. The exemption is available where the service provider and recipient are related through specified ownership
Read More