You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 23, 2018

Significant Changes Introduced by the Myanmar Companies Law 2017

Informed Counsel

The much-anticipated Myanmar Companies Bill was passed by the Pyidaungsu Hluttaw and assented to by President U Htin Kyaw on December 6, 2017. The newly enacted Myanmar Companies Law 2017 (MCL 2017) effectively repeals the archaic Myanmar Companies Act 1914 (MCA 1914), and will come into effect at a date to be designated by the president, currently anticipated to be no later than August 1, 2018. In the meantime, the MCA 1914 remains in effect. The main changes introduced by the MCL 2017 are detailed below.

Up to 35% Foreign Shareholding in Local Companies

The most significant change introduced by the MCL 2017 is the new definition of a foreign company. Under the MCA 1914, a locally incorporated entity with any foreign shareholding is considered a foreign company in Myanmar. The MCL 2017 changes this legal definition, allowing companies to have up to 35% of their shares held by foreign nationals before being considered a foreign company. This allows foreign investors to partake in business activities that were previously restricted to companies with 100% of shares held by Myanmar citizens.

Sole Shareholders

Based on the existing practice of the Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA), the principal government body regulating company affairs in Myanmar, locally incorporated companies must have a minimum of two shareholders. The MCL 2017 changes this position, allowing companies to be incorporated with a minimum of one share and a single shareholder. This brings Myanmar’s company law practices more in line with international standards, and it allows companies to incorporate wholly-owned subsidiaries in the country.

Number of Directors and Residency Requirements

Under the MCL 2017, only one director has to be appointed for each company. This is different from the current practice of the DICA, which requires locally incorporated companies to have at least two directors. However, the MCL 2017 requires at least one director of the company to be ordinarily resident in Myanmar—that is, resident in Myanmar for at least 183 days in each year (but not necessarily a Myanmar national). Public companies must have at least three directors, one of whom must be a Myanmar citizen ordinarily resident in the country.

Replacement of Memorandum and Articles of Association with a Constitution

The DICA’s practice under the MCA 1914 is to require companies to have a memorandum and articles of association in accordance with sample templates provided by the DICA during incorporation. The MCL 2017 replaces this requirement with a single company constitution. The memorandum of association, articles of association, and any other constituent documents of an existing company in Myanmar will collectively regarded as its constitution, provided that they are consistent with the MCL 2017.

Abolition of Company Objectives

The MCL 2017 abolishes the requirement for companies incorporated in Myanmar to stipulate their company objectives, which effectively limit the type of business activities that a company can undertake. Under the current MCA 1914 framework, persons wishing to incorporate a company in Myanmar are required to have the intended company objectives approved by the DICA before filing a company incorporation application. Registered objectives of an existing company will cease to exist 12 months after the enactment of the MCL 2017.

Removal of Permit to Trade Requirement for Foreign Companies

The MCL 2017 removes the requirement for foreign companies to obtain a permit to trade when applying for company incorporation. The removal of this regulatory hurdle, which, despite its name, does not permit foreign companies to engage in trading activities, expedites the company incorporation process.

Abolition of Authorized Capital and Par Value

The MCA 1914 only allows a company to hold shares up to the amount of authorized capital stated in the memorandum of association, with any capitalization beyond that requiring a formal amendment to the memorandum. This requirement changes under the MCL 2017, which states that shares shall not have a nominal or par value. This allows companies to have more flexibility in pricing shares.

Different Classes of Shares Permitted

The MCL 2017 allows companies to issue different classes of shares and securities, thereby permitting companies to distinguish the rights of different shareholders. Companies can therefore issue preferential shares and shares with weighed voting rights.

Exemptions for Small Companies

Under the MCL 2017, companies with less than 30 employees and annual revenues lower than MMK 50 million (approx. USD 38,500) are exempted from certain reporting and meeting requirements. For example, unless required by the company’s constitution, the DICA, or an ordinary shareholders’ resolution, a qualifying company does not need to hold an annual general meeting or file an annual balance sheet, directors’ report, or financial statements.

Directors’ Duties Codified 

In line with common law principles and modern legislation governing companies internationally, the MCL 2017 lays down a comprehensive set of directors’ duties. This includes the duty to act with care and diligence, the duty to act in good faith in the company’s best interest, the duty to avoid reckless trading, and more.

Clarification on the Regulation of Overseas Corporations

The MCL 2017 states that all overseas corporations (i.e., foreign-incorporated entities) must register themselves in order to “carry on business” in Myanmar. While the MCL 2017 does not define activities which constitute the carrying on of a business in Myanmar, it states that an overseas corporation is not deemed to be carrying on business in Myanmar merely because it maintains a bank account, conducts an isolated transaction completed within a period of 30 days (not being one of a number of similar transactions repeated from time to time), holds property, becomes a party to legal proceedings, or lends money. Under the MCA 1914, foreign-incorporated entities are actually able to register their branch offices or representative offices in Myanmar with the DICA, though neither branch offices nor representative offices are recognized as distinct legal entities from the foreign-incorporated entities, and are regarded as nonresident foreigner entities in Myanmar. It is therefore important for foreign businesses with regular business transactions in Myanmar to consider these new provisions to determine whether registration under the MCL 2017 is indeed required.

Ongoing Modernization

The enactment of the MCL 2017 is a much welcomed move as Myanmar strives to modernize its legislative framework, signifying the country’s commitment to continuing the liberalization of its economy. The DICA has also indicated that the launch of an online companies’ registry is in the pipeline, the introduction of which will certainly boost transparency in the country’s company administration framework. The DICA has also announced that all existing companies incorporated under the MCA 1914 will be required to re-register themselves online within six months from the entry into force of the MCL 2017.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 30, 2025
Vietnam’s higher education system is at a pivotal stage of reform, with the government taking decisive steps to strengthen its policy and regulatory framework. In response to obstacles encountered during the implementation of the Law on Higher Education, issued in 2012 and amended in 2018, the third draft of the amended Law on Higher Education (Draft Law) is scheduled for submission to the National Assembly in October 2025. The Draft Law reflects the state’s commitment to aligning the education sector with international standards while addressing persistent structural challenges. The Draft Law emphasizes clarifying institutional mandates, enhancing accountability, and modernizing governance models to enable higher education institutions to operate with greater autonomy and efficiency. Against this backdrop, we outline below several notable provisions of the third draft and their potential implications for higher education institutions (HEIs) in Vietnam. Applicable Entities In addition to HEIs as defined and covered under existing legislation, the Draft Law extends its scope of applicable entities. The current Law on Higher Education does not regulate training institutions under state agencies, the armed forces, or political and social organizations, nor does it provide specific provisions for institutions offering only postgraduate education. To address this, the Draft Law introduces the term “institutions with higher education activities,” expanding its scope to include: (a) academies and research institutes established by the prime minister, mandated to provide doctoral-level training; (b) educational institutions affiliated with state agencies, political organizations, socio-political organizations, and the people’s armed forces, authorized to offer higher education programs in their specialized fields; and (c) institutions established pursuant to international treaties or by decision of the prime minister, with authorization to deliver certain levels of higher education. The inclusion of “institutions with higher education activities” represents a significant development both legally and institutionally. In an increasingly diversified higher education
September 29, 2025
In September 2019, the government of Vietnam issued Decree No. 75/2019/ND-CP on Administrative Sanctions in the Field of Competition (Decree 75) to address the urgent need for clear sanctioning mechanisms following the implementation of the new Law on Competition in July 2019. However, after five years of enforcement, various gaps and inconsistencies have been exposed that hinder its application. These shortcomings have reduced the deterrent effect of the sanctioning regime, and created legal uncertainty for market participants. A recent case involving Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals’ acquisition of another chemical company—one of the first cases of economic concentration violation to be sanctioned by the National Competition Commission (NCC) since the Law on Competition took effect—highlights the practical difficulties under Vietnam’s competition law enforcement regime. In this case, although the transaction exceeded the statutory notification thresholds of economic concentration set out in the law, the parties failed to submit the required notification. This violation resulted in the NCC imposing aggregate fines of VND 1,423,982,880 (approximately USD 54,770) on the companies in September 2024. On appeal, Duc Giang – Lao Cai Chemicals argued that the chairman of the NCC was legally entitled to issue a warning as the key punishment instead of a monetary penalty. However, the chairman rejected the appeal, citing Article 14 of Decree 75, under which the specific penalty and level for “failure to notify economic concentration” is a fine, not a warning. While the chairman of the NCC is generally empowered to impose penalties, a warning cannot be applied if the specific regulation for a particular violation does not provide for it as a sanction. This example shows the inadequacy and inconsistency of the regulations on penalties for violations of competition law, and underscores the need for an amendment of Decree 75 to resolve such conflicts
September 26, 2025
As Vietnam accelerates its digital transformation, data centers have emerged as critical infrastructure supporting the shift toward a digital government, digital economy, and digital society. For businesses targeting Vietnam’s rapidly growing data center market, a clear understanding of the evolving regulatory landscape, compliance obligations, and government incentives is key to successful market entry and operation. This article provides a strategic overview of investment opportunities and key compliance requirements in Vietnam’s dynamic data center sector. Investment Incentives to Boost Data Center Growth Since July 1, 2024, organizations and individuals across all economic sectors have been encouraged to invest in and contribute to the development of data centers. By law, there are no restrictions on shareholding ratios, capital contributions, or foreign investor participation in data center and cloud computing services under business cooperation contracts. Currently, investment in AI data centers is classified as a specially incentivized industry, qualifying for preferential treatments and incentives in terms of investment, taxation, land use, and other related areas. Large-scale data centers, together with AI and cloud computing, are currently considered as strategic technologies and products for which Vietnam offers significant fiscal, tax, and land incentives to promote investment. Additionally, these large-scale projects may receive direct financial support from local development budgets for facility construction, technical infrastructure, and equipment procurement, subject to state budget provisions and applicable laws. AI data center construction projects also enjoy preferential treatment under customs regulations. Regulatory Approvals for Providing Data Center Services The 2023 Telecom Law and its guiding documents marked a significant milestone by classifying data center services as value-added telecom services. Under the law, a data center service is defined as a telecom service that enables users to process, store, and retrieve information via a telecom network through the leasing of part or all of a data center. A
September 19, 2025
Over the past two years—particularly since Thailand announced incentives for EVs, including tax exemptions and reductions—there has been a clear trend of manufacturers relocating their facilities to Thailand. This shift is reshaping the country’s industrial landscape and creating significant opportunities in the real estate sector for companies looking to establish or expand EV manufacturing operations in Southeast Asia. Incentive-Driven Market Transformation The government’s tax exemptions and reductions have proven effective in attracting foreign investment, with Chinese manufacturers currently dominating the market. Most EV parts and car manufacturers operating in Thailand are from China, reflecting the prominence of Chinese EV brands that have already established a presence in the country. The sector encompasses manufacturers of electrical equipment as well as companies seeking to establish facilities for producing electric vehicle components, parts, and accessories. The surge in activity is evident across Thailand’s EV manufacturing sector, with legal practices handling these transactions experiencing unprecedented demand. Industrial Real Estate Framework and Market Dynamics Thailand’s industrial real estate framework provides compelling advantages for foreign manufacturers, who typically face restrictions on foreign land ownership under the Land Code. However, foreign investors can benefit from exemptions to these restrictions if the land is located within industrial real estate zones designated by the Industrial Estate Authority of Thailand (IEAT) or they obtain investment promotion from the Board of Investment (BOI) if the land is located outside an industrial estate area governed by the IEAT. Both the IEAT and BOI provide special tax and nontax incentives, including foreign land ownership, with even greater incentives available for land situated within the country’s Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). This regulatory advantage has sparked a parallel trend in land development. Industrial real estate developers in the EEC are actively consolidating land into large plots to develop new industrial estate projects, recognizing that