You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 19, 2014

Shifting Ground: Foreign Developers to Be Affected by Vietnam’s New Land Law

Vietnam Economic Times

The new Land Law was ratified by the National Assembly on November 29, 2013, and came into effect on July 1 this year (the 2014 Land Law). It replaces the previous Land Law of 2003 (the 2003 Land Law). Following the 2014 Land Law, the government issued Decrees No 43, 44, 45, 46, and 47, which also came into effect on July 1. In guiding some of these decrees, the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment and the Ministry of Finance issued several guiding circulars. The new Land Law may well bring about love-hate feelings for foreign developers in Vietnam.

More Equal Footing

Under the 2003 Land Law, the most common form of land acquisition by foreign investors was direct lease from the government. Foreign investors paid rentals either on a yearly or upfront basis. In contrast, local investors were allowed to acquire land via land allocation (i.e., land grants from the government for agricultural, commercial, or residential land, etc.) under which they paid a land use fee (the legal term for the payment for land allocation by local investors to the government) on a definite- or indefinite-term basis. In addition, local investors were also able to lease land from the government and pay rentals on a yearly basis.

The 2014 Land Law removes all of these differences between local and foreign investors. Now, both can lease land from the government and pay rentals on a yearly or upfront basis. They can also acquire land via land allocation. It is worth noting that land allocation is now available for residential land for the sale of houses or apartments constructed on the land only.

However, foreign investors are still not able to directly acquire land via land transfer or land lease from local individuals or companies (except for those who are industrial zone developers).

More Conditions for Land Acquisition

The 2014 Land Law sets out new strict requirements for developers (both local and foreign) who want to lease or obtain land allocation from the government. These new requirements include:

The lease (or allocation) of the land must have been provided for in the annual land use plan (the plan for using each specific piece of land, such as for commercial or residential purposes, within the district) issued by the district-level people’s committee on January 1 each year. In other words, foreign developers must ensure that the land they intend to acquire has been specified in the annual land use plan or else they are unable to obtain it.

Developers must also meet a minimum level of statutory equity capital (i.e., their pocket money, or retained profit). In particular, for a project whose land area is less than 20 hectares, the developer’s equity capital must be at least 20 percent of the total estimated investment capital of the project. For a project of 20 hectares or more, the equity capital must be at least 15 percent. This requirement is inherited from the Law on Real Estate Business of 2006. However, the 2014 Land Law takes it a step further. The requirements on equity capital are applicable to all corporate land users who wish to obtain land in Vietnam—not just real estate companies, as contemplated under the current Law on Real Estate Business.

Developers must pay deposits to the government to ensure that they will pay the land rentals (or land use fees) and develop the projects in a timely manner. The 2014 Land Law refers the deposit requirement to the investment laws of Vietnam. However, the Law on Investment of 2005 does not mention anything about the deposit requirement. The most recent draft of the revised Law on Investment also fails to mention this requirement. This raises the question as to how the requirement will be implemented.

Uncertainty Over Price

Under the 2003 Land Law, the land price (i.e., the land rentals or land use fees) for a specific piece of land could be calculated based on the table of land prices published annually by provincial people’s committees, except for cases where a people’s committee thought that the price of a land plot under the table did not reflect the market price. However, the 2014 Land Law requires the land price be determined on a case-by-case basis by the provincial people’s committee, except for land plots valued at less than approximately $1.4 million located in the central area of the province. The provincial people’s committee may hire land valuation firms to determine and advise on the land price. In determining the land price of a certain plot of land, a land valuation board is set up, headed by the chair of the provincial people’s committee. Members of the valuation board include representatives of the provincial Department of Natural Resources and Environment and Department of Finance, and the relevant land valuation firm.

However, in major cities and provinces such as Hanoi, Da Nang, Ho Chi Minh City, and Binh Duong, at least several hundred applications for leasing or allocating land are submitted by investors to the relevant people’s committee each year. Given this fact, and considering their limited resources and personnel, how will the land valuation boards ensure that applications are addressed appropriately?

It seems this new land price determination method leaves much uncertainty about the land price as well as the timing issue of the local government in determining land prices.

More Restrictions on Land Withdrawal

Under the 2003 Land Law, the grounds for land withdrawal (akin to eminent domain) by the government for the development of a commercial or residential project were very broad. Developers had been able to ask the government for land withdrawal from individual land users for their development of a three-star hotel or any residential project. This is no longer the case under the 2014 Land Law. Land withdrawal for a commercial or residential project must satisfy two conditions: (i) it must be for a significant project such as the construction of a new township or the improvement of an urban area; and (ii) it must have prior approval for land withdrawal from the provincial people’s council.

More Options for Residential Projects

For the first time, the 2014 Land Law allows a developer of a residential project to transfer part of its project to another developer, though the law fails to define what it means by “transfer part of a residential project”. However, this definition is given under the draft revised Law on Real Estate Business (albeit in an ambiguous manner).

The conditions for such transfers include: (i) the land price has been fully paid by the selling developer and the land has been issued a land use right certificate (akin to the title deed); (ii) the project has been fully constructed; and (iii) the new buyer is licensed for real estate business and entitled to acquire land in Vietnam (see above for the conditions on land acquisition). Regrettably, thus far it is still unclear as to the procedures and documentation for the transfer of part of a residential project.

Also for the first time, the 2014 Land Law allows the developer of a residential project to transfer individual plots of land in the project (without any houses constructed on them). Previously, this form of transfer was strictly prohibited for fear that if the developer failed to construct the houses in its project in a timely manner and following an approved design, then the entire city would look unsightly. However, in response to the recent downturn of the real estate market in Vietnam, the 2014 Land Law allows a developer to transfer bare land to buyers as long as the following conditions are met: (i) the developer must have fully paid the land price for the project land; (ii) it has constructed the infrastructure of the project; (iii) the project is not located in the central districts of a city or province; and (iv) the provincial people’s committee where the project land is situated agrees to the transfer.

More Requirements for Industrial Zone Developers

Under the 2014 Land Law, developers who pay land rentals on an annual basis may only sublease the land on the same basis (i.e., the land rentals paid by tenants are also on an annual basis). If they already subleased certain land plots to the tenants on the basis of upfront payment for the entire lease term (before the effective date of the 2014 Land Law), they must pay the government their unpaid land rentals for such subleased land plots.

There are some signs that Vietnam’s real estate market has been warming up recently in certain segments. It seems too early to judge if the new Land Law may further thaw the market with its liberal provisions on land transfer or whether it will worsen the situation with its new strict criteria for land acquisition and pricing .

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
February 9, 2021
On January 26, 2021, the Thai government passed a resolution to reduce the government fees that are generally collected for the registration of a sale and mortgage of immovable property. The details of this were subsequently set out in two notifications issued by the Ministry of Interior and published in the Government Gazette on February 2, 2021, taking effect the following day. The notifications will remain in effect through December 31, 2021. These two notifications, which are part of the government’s relief efforts to soften the economic fallout of the COVID-19 pandemic, specify that government fees for the registration of a sale and mortgage of immovable property are reduced to 0.01% of the official assessed sale price (reduced from 2%) and 0.01% of the mortgage amount (reduced from 1%). In order to qualify for the reduced rates, the sale and mortgage must be registered at the same time, and the sale price and mortgage amount must not exceed THB 3 million (approximately USD 100,000). The reduced rates only apply to the sale and mortgage of detached houses, semi-detached houses, row houses, commercial buildings, and condominium units, and they must be sold by a licensed developer or authorized government authority. For more information on these notifications, or on any aspect of the Thai government’s COVID-19 relief measures, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected] or +66 2056 5555.
February 2, 2021
The Royal Decree on Land and Building Tax Reduction (No. 2) B.E. 2564, which we previously noted was under consideration, has been officially promulgated. The royal decree, which was announced and published in Thailand’s Government Gazette on January 31, 2021, and came into effect the following day, will effectively reduce land and building tax payments by 90% in 2021 for the following types of land and buildings: Land or buildings used for agricultural purposes; Land or buildings used for residential purposes; Land or buildings used for other purposes; and Vacant or unused land or buildings. Owners of the above types of land or buildings are therefore only required to pay 10% of the land and building tax normally owed for 2021. The royal decree follows the Ministry of Interior’s recent announcement of an extension for the payment of land and building tax in 2021, which will now be due by June 30, 2021 (extended from April 30, 2021). For more details on these measures, or on any aspect relating to Thailand’s land and building tax, please contact Chaiwat Keratisuthisathorn at [email protected] or +66 2056 5507.