You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 11, 2013

Regulation of Investment Advisors in Thailand

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Many people in Thailand are now focused on their personal investments. Investors want to know the products in which to invest and how to plan their finances. They are therefore increasingly turning to investment advisors. Given the increasing demand for these services, it is worthwhile to examine how investment advisors are regulated.

The Securities and Exchange Act includes investment advisory services within the scope of the securities business, which is subject to regulation by the Finance Ministry and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Act defines “investment advisory service” as giving advice to the public, whether directly or indirectly, about the value of securities or the suitability of investing in those securities and the purchase or sale of any securities, for a fee or other remuneration. Specific SEC notifications may specify ways in which advice can or cannot be given.

Subject to certain exceptions, the law stipulates that securities business can be undertaken only by a limited or a public limited company, or by a financial institution established under other laws, and holding a license granted by the finance minister, on the SEC’s recommendation.

The licensing process is rigorous. The applicant must show the SEC that it meets all relevant requirements, such as not having financial hardship or any deficiencies in necessary controls and sound business conduct. The applicant must also show how it will maintain capital funds and set aside reserve capital as required.

The licensing process also gives consideration to the characteristics of the major shareholder(s) and any director, manager, or person with managerial authority. For example, such managerial personnel must not be or have been bankrupt, nor imprisoned by a final judgment for an offense related to property.

A securities company must comply with the rules, conditions, and procedures specified in the notification of the Capital Markets Supervisory Board. The board may also specify fees and/or service charges that the company may charge its customers.

Once licensed, the company’s appointment of personnel to perform the duties of analyzing investments and giving investment advice is subject to SEC approval. Such investor contacts must meet criteria with respect to education, experience, and/or examination requirements. As with management personnel, investor contacts must have good character. They must not have any record of deceitful, fraudulent, or dishonest management of assets or any improper behavior that materially affected any clients, investors, companies, shareholders, or the money or capital market as a whole. The relevant regulations go into greater depth as to the specifics.

The company must also have in place systems that demonstrate its readiness to undertake the business, including internal controls for the giving of advice and a system for monitoring investments of the advisory company and its employees. It must also have a compliance supervisor in charge of rules related to prevention of conflicts of interest and internal controls as well as to supervise investor contacts for compliance with the law, notifications, and standards of professional conduct.

An investment advisory company, in contacting and soliciting clients, must prepare client information and take into account each client’s investment objectives, knowledge, and understanding related to investment, acceptable risks, and other factors when providing expertise. An agreement to provide advisory services must specify the client’s right to receive clear and sufficient information relating to the provision of those services.

Any term or condition that may cause any conflict of interest between the client and the advisory company and its related persons requires the client’s consent. Advisors must disclose the information necessary for making investment decisions sufficiently and within an appropriate period of time. In this regard, the information must be correct and up to date and must not have any characteristics that mislead or distort facts. There are also extensive record-keeping requirements.

The company must also maintain a system for handling complaints about services promptly and must fulfill reporting obligations to the SEC.

Collateral and/or liquid assets must also be maintained to compensate customers for damage arising from incorrect or incomplete performance of the advisory service. This can include, for example, an insurance policy, a letter of guarantee issued by a financial institution, or other collateral as prescribed by the SEC.

In brief, Thai investment advisors are subject to a robust regulatory regime, which features substantial protection for investors. But it is important to bear in mind that SEC regulations provide a number of exceptions and additional requirements. Derivatives advisors are also subject to a regulatory regime, analogous to the above, when advising on derivatives.

Anyone intending to provide investment advisory services or giving advice on derivatives in Thailand should consult counsel to ensure compliance with applicable laws. As for individual investors, they should make certain they are doing business with licensed advisors so that they benefit from the SEC’s protection.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 20, 2024
On September 12, 2024, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) Notification Re: Virtual Bank Supervision Criteria took effect. According to this notification, virtual banks must adhere to standards for traditional commercial banks, along with additional requirements tailored to address virtual banks’ digital nature and corporate structure. Specific Requirements The concepts of supervision remain unchanged from the consultation paper titled “Criteria for Supervising Virtual Banks”. Some of the key additional provisions and details on supervision criteria relate to the following: Financial business groups: The notification identifies virtual banks as financial businesses, subject to the BOT’s regulations on financial business group supervision. If a virtual bank is a part of another financial institution’s financial business group, the virtual bank must be under a solo consolidated group. After the “initial phase” (see below), other financial institutions and companies within the financial business group are prohibited from extending credit to or engaging in transactions similar to lending activities with the virtual bank. Capital fund requirements: If other financial institutions’ investment in a virtual bank increases the capital fund in the financial system beyond a safe level and this poses a risk to other financial institutions, the BOT may order the relevant financial institution to maintain capital funds as the BOT deems appropriate. Service channels and outsourcing: Virtual banks must provide services solely through digital channels, except when necessary. For example, with the BOT’s approval, a virtual bank may use other commercial bank electronic branches via an ATM pool system, use a banking agent to serve customer needs for cash, or occasionally provide on-site services. Initial Phase The “initial phase” runs from the date that the virtual bank commences its operations until it receives the BOT’s approval to become fully operational. During this period, certain BOT supervisory requirements are relaxed as follows: Governance: Virtual banks in the initial phase may request
September 16, 2024
On July 23, 2024, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) published a draft circular regulating the implementation of open (publicly available) application programming interfaces, or Open APIs, in the banking industry (Draft Circular) to collect public comments. Open APIs in the banking sector are APIs of banks that allow third parties to process data for their own use or to provide products and services to customers. Urgent need Currently, the development of Open APIs in Vietnam is fragmented, with each bank using different API standards and security standards. There is no common standard for information technology systems, information storage, security, connectivity, or legal frameworks. Therefore, the promulgation of a regulation on Open APIs is urgently needed to create a clear legal basis and guidance for electronic banking transactions, especially in connecting to bank information systems and processing customer data safely, and creating new, innovative products and services to meet the increasing needs of customers. Cooperation of banks required The Draft Circular requires banks to provide Open API services to third parties for connection to the bank system and data processing. Banks have the right to refuse or suspend Open API services if third parties do not meet specified conditions. However, banks will be responsible for ensuring the quality and security of data, providing tools for customer data queries and revocation of third-party data processing rights, and coordinating with third parties and authorities to resolve issues. The Draft Circular standardizes Open API functions for all banks according to the Open API function list and the technical standards list specified in the Draft Circular. Open API service contract The template Open API service contract between banks and third parties using Open API services must have certain required contents such as provisions regarding confidentiality, data use purpose, and that the security level
August 20, 2024
On June 28, 2024, the State Bank of Vietnam (SBV) issued Circular No. 19/2024/TT-NHNN to amend certain regulations of Circular No. 08/2023/TT-NHNN dated June 30, 2023 (‘Circular 08”), on conditions for foreign loans not guaranteed by the government (“Circular 19”). Circular 19 took effect on July 1, 2024, and provides changes in relation to, among other things, foreign loans to pay for goods import contracts and letters of credit. Foreign Loans to Pay for Goods Import Contracts Circular 08 exempts foreign loans in the form of deferred payment for imported goods (a buyer-seller relationship) from applicable foreign loan conditions. Circular 19 adds provisions regarding foreign loans taken out by non-bank borrowers (a buyer-seller-lender relationship) to make the deferred payments for goods import contracts for the implementation of an investment project, production or business plan, or other project. In this case, the foreign loan’s purpose is determined to be for implementing an investment project, production or business plan, or other project; and the borrower can exclude medium- and long-term foreign loan balances arising from the deferred payment in the import contracts when calculating the foreign loan limit. In addition, the borrower is allowed to borrow from foreign lenders to pay for the goods import contract via letters of credit. However, it is worth noting that other requirements relating to the loans are still applied to the borrower, such as foreign loan agreement, currency, and records/reporting obligations Letters of Credit Following the reclassification of letter of credit (L/C) activities from a “payment service” to “extension of credit” under the Law on Credit Institutions 2024, Circular 19 supplements L/C activities into the current foreign loan regulatory framework, including adding foreign loans between credit institutions and branches of foreign banks (as issuing banks) and non-resident banks (as reimbursing banks) where issuing banks are
July 5, 2024
In April 2024, Vietnam’s Ministry of Finance published a draft circular concerning securities transactions, clearing and settlement of securities transactions, activities of securities companies, and information disclosure on the securities market (the “Draft Circular”) for public feedback. The Draft Circular, if adopted, will amend several regulations impacting public companies and the securities market. Some of the more notable amendments are discussed below. Relaxing Pre-Funding Requirement for Foreign Institutional Investors To place orders to purchase securities, investors are currently required to have sufficient cash in their securities trading accounts to pay 100% of the cost of the transaction, except in cases of: Margin trading (applicable to Vietnamese investors only); and Transactions in which there is a settlement guarantee or confirmation from the custodian bank on accepting the settlement request. The Draft Circular allows foreign institutional investors (“FIIs”) to purchase securities without 100% pre-funding their securities trading accounts, based on a signed agreement with a securities company. However, the State Securities Commission of Vietnam (“SSC”) has the right to temporarily reinstate the 100% pre-funding requirement if measures for securities market stabilization are required. The Draft Circular also specifies that securities companies must (i) assess the capacity of FIIs to determine the pre-funding requirement under relevant agreements signed between them, and (ii) be responsible to settle the shortfall of a securities purchase order through their proprietary trading account(s) if the FIIs are unable to fully pay for such securities purchase order, except in certain circumstances. Further, a securities company cannot directly exempt or authorize other entities to exempt an FII from the 100% pre-funding requirement if the FII purchases securities of (i) such securities company, (ii) a company in which such securities company is a majority shareholder, or (iii) the parent company of such securities company. The 100% pre-funding requirement for FIIs