You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 11, 2013

Regulation of Investment Advisors in Thailand

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Many people in Thailand are now focused on their personal investments. Investors want to know the products in which to invest and how to plan their finances. They are therefore increasingly turning to investment advisors. Given the increasing demand for these services, it is worthwhile to examine how investment advisors are regulated.

The Securities and Exchange Act includes investment advisory services within the scope of the securities business, which is subject to regulation by the Finance Ministry and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Act defines “investment advisory service” as giving advice to the public, whether directly or indirectly, about the value of securities or the suitability of investing in those securities and the purchase or sale of any securities, for a fee or other remuneration. Specific SEC notifications may specify ways in which advice can or cannot be given.

Subject to certain exceptions, the law stipulates that securities business can be undertaken only by a limited or a public limited company, or by a financial institution established under other laws, and holding a license granted by the finance minister, on the SEC’s recommendation.

The licensing process is rigorous. The applicant must show the SEC that it meets all relevant requirements, such as not having financial hardship or any deficiencies in necessary controls and sound business conduct. The applicant must also show how it will maintain capital funds and set aside reserve capital as required.

The licensing process also gives consideration to the characteristics of the major shareholder(s) and any director, manager, or person with managerial authority. For example, such managerial personnel must not be or have been bankrupt, nor imprisoned by a final judgment for an offense related to property.

A securities company must comply with the rules, conditions, and procedures specified in the notification of the Capital Markets Supervisory Board. The board may also specify fees and/or service charges that the company may charge its customers.

Once licensed, the company’s appointment of personnel to perform the duties of analyzing investments and giving investment advice is subject to SEC approval. Such investor contacts must meet criteria with respect to education, experience, and/or examination requirements. As with management personnel, investor contacts must have good character. They must not have any record of deceitful, fraudulent, or dishonest management of assets or any improper behavior that materially affected any clients, investors, companies, shareholders, or the money or capital market as a whole. The relevant regulations go into greater depth as to the specifics.

The company must also have in place systems that demonstrate its readiness to undertake the business, including internal controls for the giving of advice and a system for monitoring investments of the advisory company and its employees. It must also have a compliance supervisor in charge of rules related to prevention of conflicts of interest and internal controls as well as to supervise investor contacts for compliance with the law, notifications, and standards of professional conduct.

An investment advisory company, in contacting and soliciting clients, must prepare client information and take into account each client’s investment objectives, knowledge, and understanding related to investment, acceptable risks, and other factors when providing expertise. An agreement to provide advisory services must specify the client’s right to receive clear and sufficient information relating to the provision of those services.

Any term or condition that may cause any conflict of interest between the client and the advisory company and its related persons requires the client’s consent. Advisors must disclose the information necessary for making investment decisions sufficiently and within an appropriate period of time. In this regard, the information must be correct and up to date and must not have any characteristics that mislead or distort facts. There are also extensive record-keeping requirements.

The company must also maintain a system for handling complaints about services promptly and must fulfill reporting obligations to the SEC.

Collateral and/or liquid assets must also be maintained to compensate customers for damage arising from incorrect or incomplete performance of the advisory service. This can include, for example, an insurance policy, a letter of guarantee issued by a financial institution, or other collateral as prescribed by the SEC.

In brief, Thai investment advisors are subject to a robust regulatory regime, which features substantial protection for investors. But it is important to bear in mind that SEC regulations provide a number of exceptions and additional requirements. Derivatives advisors are also subject to a regulatory regime, analogous to the above, when advising on derivatives.

Anyone intending to provide investment advisory services or giving advice on derivatives in Thailand should consult counsel to ensure compliance with applicable laws. As for individual investors, they should make certain they are doing business with licensed advisors so that they benefit from the SEC’s protection.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 17, 2025
Thailand’s draft Emergency Decree on Technology Crimes Suppression, which we covered in a client alert in January 2025 primarily addressed to telecom operators and financial institutions, is expected to have significant implications for a wide range of business operators.  The draft emergency decree has already been approved by the cabinet but may undergo further developments as it continues in the legislative process. In this article, we will highlight the material impacts of the draft emergency decree on overseas and local fintech operators. Expanded Definition of “Technology Crimes” The definition of “technology crimes” now includes the following acts of forgery or alteration: Forging or altering the identity of individuals and biometric characteristics by utilizing computer or communication systems or other electronic means to commit offenses. Forging or altering symbols, trademarks, or seals of groups (e.g., foundations, community enterprises) or juristic persons, including acts by juristic persons using individuals or juristic persons as nominal directors or shareholders, regardless of whether such individuals or legal juristic persons reside in Thailand. Forging or altering digital or online platforms, regardless of the platform’s location or legal status. Individuals who conspire, utilize, assist, or support the commission of these offenses will face the same penalties as the principal offender. Business Operator Definition The scope of “business operators” is now expanded to cover various fintech and digital asset operators beyond those under the Payment Systems Act (PSA). The draft emergency decree now includes the following operators, whether they are legally authorized or not: Business operators under the PSA and business operators who operate “as if” they are payment system operators Business operators under the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses or business operators who operate “as if” they are digital asset business operators. Foreign exchange business operators. Disclosure and Exchange of Information Business operators must disclose
January 30, 2025
The Thai cabinet has approved a draft amendment of the Emergency Decree on Measures for the Prevention and Suppression of Technological Crimes as proposed by the Ministry of Digital Economy and Society to strengthen measures against technological crimes, particularly targeting call center scams and cyber fraud. Following the Council of State’s review, the emergency decree will be become effective immediately upon its enactment and publication in the Government Gazette. While the draft amendment is not yet publicly available, the government recently indicated that the emergency decree aims to empower authorities with decisive measures to combat cybercrime effectively. It underscores the shared responsibility among various sectors, including banking, telecommunications, and online platforms, in safeguarding against technological crimes. Key provisions of the draft amendment of the emergency decree include: Telecommunications provider obligations: Telecommunications service providers must suspend SIM cards associated with criminal activities. The National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission and mobile service providers themselves are authorized to temporarily suspend mobile phone numbers if there is reasonable suspicion of involvement in criminal activities. Banking responsibilities: Financial institutions are required to promptly report mule accounts to the Anti-Money Laundering Office to facilitate quick restitution to victims. The Anti-Money Laundering Transaction Committee is empowered to order the return of funds to victims without requiring a final court ruling. Penalties for noncompliance: The amended emergency decree introduces penalties for noncompliance by regulated entities that fail to prevent criminal activities for offenses related to technology crimes in the following cases: Digital asset services: Those engaged in the buying, selling, or exchanging of digital assets, such as cryptocurrencies and digital tokens, as well as digital asset businesses that launder money obtained from online crimes by converting it into digital currency, will be subject to imprisonment for up to one year, a fine of up to THB 100,000,
January 22, 2025
Tasked with implementing the Politburo’s policy outlined in Notice No. 47-TB/TW dated November 15, 2024, the prime minister of Vietnam issued Decision No. 1718/QD-TTg on December 31, 2024, appointing himself as the head of a steering committee dedicated to the establishment of an international financial center in Ho Chi Minh City and a regional financial center in Da Nang by 2025. The Ministry of Planning and Investment has subsequently drafted an outline for the National Assembly’s Resolution on the Establishment of Regional and International Financial Centers in Vietnam (“Draft Resolution”). This Draft Resolution introduces two key policy groups: (i) policies governing the quantity, location, structure, organization, functions, and responsibilities of the financial centers; and (ii) policies applicable to various areas and matters within the financial centers. Notably, under the Draft Resolution, fintech has been identified as a key sector, with a specific focus on the implementation of a “controlled sandbox” policy for business models involving virtual assets and cryptocurrencies. Under this framework, transactions related to virtual assets and cryptocurrencies will be permitted from July 1, 2026, subject to licensing, management, impact assessment, and risk oversight by the financial centers’ Management and Operations Committee. Scope of Application and Key Principles The Draft Resolution applies to a wide range of stakeholders, including investors, regulatory agencies, organizations, and individuals involved in the establishment, organization, and operation of regional and international financial centers in Vietnam. These financial centers will have clearly defined geographical boundaries and specific locations, which will be further specified and detailed by the People’s Committees of Ho Chi Minh City and Da Nang. Companies successfully registered as members of these financial centers will benefit from special investor-friendly policy principles, which may differ from the general legal and regulatory framework applicable in other parts of Vietnam. Most notably, the state will
January 13, 2025
The State Bank of Vietnam’s Circular No. 50/2024/TT-NHNN regulating safety and security for the provision of online services in the banking sector (“Circular 50”), issued on October 31, 2024, took effect on January 1, 2025, with delayed effectiveness for certain provisions on (i) network, communication, and security systems, online banking application software, and mobile banking application software (July 1, 2025); (ii) transaction confirmation for payment transactions conducted via the straight-through processing method (January 1, 2026); and (iii) authentication forms and reporting obligations (July 1, 2026). The cybersecurity situation in Vietnam is complicated, and the banking and finance sector has been one of the top targets of high-tech criminals. Circular 50 seeks to enhance user protection by expanding the technical requirements to more services in the banking sector as well as standardizing how transactions are authenticated. Expanded Scope of Services Covered Previous regulations on safety and security of online services in the banking sector only covered banking services and intermediary payment services. Circular 50 expands the scope to include other services of credit institutions and foreign bank branches such as credit information services, foreign exchange services, securities depository services, and services related to factoring and letters of credit, which now need to comply with technical requirements and standards for online services such as firewalls and DMZ network barriers. Risk-Based Approach to Authentication Circular 50 sets out standards for payment transactions and card transactions by: Classifying various online transactions based on the type of client, the purpose of the transfer, the value of the specific transaction, and the total value of certain transactions during the day; and Applying various types of authentication for the corresponding types of online transactions, e.g., using passwords or PINs for small-value online transactions, and using OTPs (through SMS, voice, or email), biometric matching, or e-signatures for