You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

January 11, 2013

Regulation of Investment Advisors in Thailand

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

Many people in Thailand are now focused on their personal investments. Investors want to know the products in which to invest and how to plan their finances. They are therefore increasingly turning to investment advisors. Given the increasing demand for these services, it is worthwhile to examine how investment advisors are regulated.

The Securities and Exchange Act includes investment advisory services within the scope of the securities business, which is subject to regulation by the Finance Ministry and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The Act defines “investment advisory service” as giving advice to the public, whether directly or indirectly, about the value of securities or the suitability of investing in those securities and the purchase or sale of any securities, for a fee or other remuneration. Specific SEC notifications may specify ways in which advice can or cannot be given.

Subject to certain exceptions, the law stipulates that securities business can be undertaken only by a limited or a public limited company, or by a financial institution established under other laws, and holding a license granted by the finance minister, on the SEC’s recommendation.

The licensing process is rigorous. The applicant must show the SEC that it meets all relevant requirements, such as not having financial hardship or any deficiencies in necessary controls and sound business conduct. The applicant must also show how it will maintain capital funds and set aside reserve capital as required.

The licensing process also gives consideration to the characteristics of the major shareholder(s) and any director, manager, or person with managerial authority. For example, such managerial personnel must not be or have been bankrupt, nor imprisoned by a final judgment for an offense related to property.

A securities company must comply with the rules, conditions, and procedures specified in the notification of the Capital Markets Supervisory Board. The board may also specify fees and/or service charges that the company may charge its customers.

Once licensed, the company’s appointment of personnel to perform the duties of analyzing investments and giving investment advice is subject to SEC approval. Such investor contacts must meet criteria with respect to education, experience, and/or examination requirements. As with management personnel, investor contacts must have good character. They must not have any record of deceitful, fraudulent, or dishonest management of assets or any improper behavior that materially affected any clients, investors, companies, shareholders, or the money or capital market as a whole. The relevant regulations go into greater depth as to the specifics.

The company must also have in place systems that demonstrate its readiness to undertake the business, including internal controls for the giving of advice and a system for monitoring investments of the advisory company and its employees. It must also have a compliance supervisor in charge of rules related to prevention of conflicts of interest and internal controls as well as to supervise investor contacts for compliance with the law, notifications, and standards of professional conduct.

An investment advisory company, in contacting and soliciting clients, must prepare client information and take into account each client’s investment objectives, knowledge, and understanding related to investment, acceptable risks, and other factors when providing expertise. An agreement to provide advisory services must specify the client’s right to receive clear and sufficient information relating to the provision of those services.

Any term or condition that may cause any conflict of interest between the client and the advisory company and its related persons requires the client’s consent. Advisors must disclose the information necessary for making investment decisions sufficiently and within an appropriate period of time. In this regard, the information must be correct and up to date and must not have any characteristics that mislead or distort facts. There are also extensive record-keeping requirements.

The company must also maintain a system for handling complaints about services promptly and must fulfill reporting obligations to the SEC.

Collateral and/or liquid assets must also be maintained to compensate customers for damage arising from incorrect or incomplete performance of the advisory service. This can include, for example, an insurance policy, a letter of guarantee issued by a financial institution, or other collateral as prescribed by the SEC.

In brief, Thai investment advisors are subject to a robust regulatory regime, which features substantial protection for investors. But it is important to bear in mind that SEC regulations provide a number of exceptions and additional requirements. Derivatives advisors are also subject to a regulatory regime, analogous to the above, when advising on derivatives.

Anyone intending to provide investment advisory services or giving advice on derivatives in Thailand should consult counsel to ensure compliance with applicable laws. As for individual investors, they should make certain they are doing business with licensed advisors so that they benefit from the SEC’s protection.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 3, 2026
On July 23, 2026, the Bank of Thailand (BOT) released for public comment its draft Notification on Digital Channel Security, which would significantly expand the scope and stringency of Thailand’s existing mobile banking security framework. If finalized in its current form, the draft notification would extend mandatory security requirements to credit card providers and credit providers, cover internet banking in addition to mobile applications, phase out SMS one-time passwords (OTPs) for transaction authentication, and introduce biometric verification requirements for high-value transactions. The public comment period is open through August 24, 2026. Background The BOT’s existing Mobile Banking Security Notification, issued in 2024, sets minimum security standards for financial institutions, specialized financial institutions (SFIs), and e-money providers, significantly reducing “money-draining app” fraud. However, fraudsters have since shifted to nonbank providers and internet banking channels, prompting the BOT to propose broader security requirements. Expanded Scope of Regulated Entities and Channels The existing Mobile Banking Security Notification covers only financial institutions, SFIs, and e-money providers offering mobile banking services. The draft expands coverage in two key areas: entities and channels. On the entity side, it adds credit card providers and credit providers that offer fund transfers to third parties at other financial service providers or that provide cash withdrawal services to individual retail customers. On the channel side, it broadens coverage to include internet banking in addition to mobile banking. Strengthened Customer Authentication The draft introduces enhanced authentication requirements in three areas: Service enrollment and device changes. Providers must implement rigorous identity verification, notify customers of enrollment results through out-of-band communication channels, and adopt risk-mitigation measures such as cooling-off periods and temporary transaction limits. Transaction-level authentication. Providers must use two-factor authentication for fund transfers, cardless ATM withdrawals, and transaction limit increases. Secure authentication factors. Key requirements include the following: “What-you-know” factors must
July 27, 2026
A new decree on penalties for violations related to the crypto asset market creates compliance risks for offshore crypto asset exchanges in Vietnam that do not hold, and practically cannot obtain, a Vietnamese license, and for Vietnamese users who continue to transact on those platforms. Decree No. 284/2026/ND-CP (Decree 284), issued by the government of Vietnam on July 16, 2026, formally establishes an administrative penalty framework for violations related to crypto assets and the crypto asset market. The decree takes effect on September 1, 2026, and will remain in force for the duration of the five-year pilot program under Resolution No. 05/2025/NQ-CP, which is scheduled to end in September 2030. Direct Penalties on Vietnamese Users The most immediate commercial risk to offshore platforms is that their Vietnamese users now face direct personal liability for using their exchanges. Vietnamese users who trade crypto assets outside of a Ministry of Finance-licensed service provider face fines of up to VND 50 million (approximately USD 1,900). Vietnamese users trading in crypto assets that are offered or issued to foreign users face higher penalties of up to VND 100 million (approximately USD 3,800). It is expected that Vietnamese users will be more willing to migrate away from offshore platforms now that there is a risk of real enforcement against them. Penalties on Unlicensed Service Providers Violations of providing crypto asset services or advertising crypto-related services without a license face fines of up to VND 200 million (approximately USD 7,700). Operating a crypto asset trading market without proper authorization falls within the same highest penalty bands. Organizations that violate issuance, provision, or disclosure rules may face fines of up to VND 200 million. Although the maximum administrative fine per violation is capped at VND 200 million for organizations and VND 100 million for individuals, these
July 17, 2026
On July 11, 2026, media reports conveyed key messages from Bank of Thailand (BOT) Governor Vitai Ratanakorn’s announcement of a sweeping regulatory crackdown on grey capital activities. The measures target high-value cash transactions, gold trading, and stablecoin flows, with new requirements set to take effect in the fourth quarter of 2026. The initiative aims to prevent financial institutions from facilitating shadow economy activity, money laundering—particularly through stablecoins—and capital flight, through enhanced compliance obligations on commercial banks across multiple transaction channels. Expanded Cash Controls Close the Deposit–Withdrawal Circuit New fourth-quarter guidelines will require individuals depositing THB 5 million or more in cash to formally verify the source of their funds. This builds on restrictions introduced in April 2026, which required anyone withdrawing 5 million baht or more in cash to provide their bank with verified commercial justification for why electronic transfers or checks could not be used. That initial measure caused high-value physical cash withdrawals to drop by 35 percent nationwide. The upcoming deposit-side requirement closes the circuit on large cash movements. The BOT is also assessing tracking mechanisms for high-value banknote swaps, specifically targeting individuals seeking to exchange large volumes of THB 1,000 notes into smaller THB 100 or THB 500 denominations without clear business justification. Governor Vitai emphasized that these measures require continuous deployment of multiple parallel strategies rather than short-term fixes. Tightened Bullion Reporting Frameworks Restrict Money Laundering Channels The BOT has also tightened reporting frameworks for gold trading to close money laundering loopholes and shield the Thai baht from speculative bullion volatility. Regulators identified a recurring pattern in which buyers purchased large quantities of gold through digital applications in the morning and then made same-day physical withdrawals from retail gold shops in the afternoon. Gold shops are reminded of their duties to flag and report cash
June 23, 2026
On May 14, 2026, Thailand published a ministerial regulation in the Government Gazette to prescribe measures for prevention and suppression of technology crimes. The regulation creates a comprehensive procedural framework for returning money and digital assets to victims of technology crimes. It will take effect 90 days after publication (in mid-August 2026), giving affected entities a limited window to prepare. Mandatory Reporting Obligations for Financial Institutions When a deposit account, e-money account, or digital asset wallet is frozen in connection with a technology crime, the relevant financial institution or business operator must report transaction data to the Anti-Money Laundering Office (AMLO) via AMLO’s designated electronic system. Required data elements include account numbers (sender and receiver), names, identification or passport numbers, legal entity registration numbers, phone numbers, remaining balance, damage amount, transaction reference numbers, and the bank case ID. Institutions that already share data through the information-sharing system under the emergency decree are deemed to have satisfied this reporting obligation, creating an incentive for platform participation. When the Royal Thai Police or the Department of Special Investigation seize or freeze assets related to technology crimes, they must provide AMLO with investigation reports, complaint evidence, money-trail data, and account statements. Notification and Claims Process Once the AMLO secretary-general approves verified reports of a technology crime, the account information of persons connected to the crime will be published in the Government Gazette, triggering a 90-day window for victims to file claims and for related persons to file objections. Officers will also publish details on AMLO’s electronic media and send registered mail to identified victims, which will be deemed received after 7 days domestically or 15 days internationally. Victims have 90 days from the date the crime is published in the Government Gazette to file claims through AMLO’s electronic system. Claims must include