You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 2, 2020

Regulation and Planned Taxation of Sodium in Thailand

Informed Counsel

Non-communicable diseases (NCDs) mainly consist of cardiovascular diseases, cancers, chronic respiratory diseases, and diabetes, and are the most frequent causes of death worldwide. A 2018 World Health Organization (WHO) fact sheet on NCDs notes that 41 million people die annually from NCDs (71% of global deaths), including 15 million people who die before the age of 70.

Of the total deaths in Thailand every year, 60% are from NCDs, principally hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, kidney disease, and so on. Many of these deaths are caused by unhygienic food intake, not exercising, smoking, or drinking, which are public health problems that the WHO and the Thai government are working to resolve and prevent.

Research conducted by the Kidney Foundation of Thailand found that of the 7 million patients with kidney disease found at an early stage, most could be treated by prescribing medication and recommending changes in eating habits to reduce salt intake, thus preventing kidney disease from increasing in severity. In the adult group, up to 17% were found to have early-stage kidney disease but did not know about it or did not experience symptoms of the disease. If patients in such cases do not see a doctor or undergo health checkups regularly, the symptoms will deteriorate until kidney failure. Because people have two kidneys, if one kidney has any problems, with a 50% loss of function, the patients will not exhibit symptoms as the healthier kidney can still perform waste disposal and blood filtering functions as normal. If the problem continues unabated until a 70% loss of function is reached, the patient will begin to exhibit symptoms of kidney failure, which requires dialysis.

The WHO was relatively early to recognize the importance of solving this problem. An awareness campaign advised the public of the danger of the consumption of high-sodium foods leading to various diseases later on, and the WHO is aiming to reduce hypertension worldwide. The WHO requested the cooperation of member countries, asking them to participate in this targeted campaign and encourage local populations to consume no more than five grams of salt per person per day, or no more than 2,000 mg of sodium, in order to reduce the prevalence of chronic diseases. They also set out strategies for the following actions to reduce sodium intake in the population.

  • Product reformulation
  • Consumer awareness and education campaigns
  • Environmental changes

Finland was the first country to start reducing salt consumption in 1978. The country issued regulations requiring warnings to be displayed on the labels of products that have a high sodium content, together with communicating to consumers, by any media, the dangers of high sodium intake, and promoting the use of reduced-sodium salt for cooking. This policy has been successful. The Finnish population reduced its average daily sodium intake from 5,600 mg per capita in 1970 to 3,200 mg in 2002.

The United Kingdom has used the strategy of affixing easy-to-understand nutrition labels to food products with the cooperation of producers in the food industry. This initiative is controlled by the Food Standards Agency, which set up the Consensus Action on Salt and Health (CASH) project. The UK population reduced its average daily sodium intake from 3,800 mg per capita in 2004 to 3,400 mg in 2008.   

The United States government has long supported the campaign to reduce sodium, going back to 1980. However, the U.S. population has not changed its salt consumption habits.

Other countries (e.g., Australia, Canada, France, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, and South Korea) also have campaigns to reduce salt intake in their populations.
t the meeting of the Codex Committee on Nutrition and Foods for Special Dietary Uses (CCNFSDU) No. 31 in Germany in November 2009, the committee agreed that sodium should be the first nutrient to be limited in its Nutrient Reference Value, which is 2,000 mg following the WHO recommendation.    

For Thailand’s part, Thai government agencies have agreed to cooperate in solving this global issue. Along with campaigns for Thais to realize the importance of the ingredients they take in when consuming food, there are mobilization efforts for the private sector to turn its attention to food so that consumers get less sodium in their daily diets. There has also been an increase in radio, television, billboard, and online advertising about the benefits of limiting sodium consumption. In addition, the government has encouraged public health personnel at all levels to advise the public about reducing their sodium intake, and in October 2018, the Thai FDA changed the Thai recommended daily intake (Thai RDI) of sodium from 2,400 mg to 2,000 mg, following WHO and CCNFSDU recommendations.   

The Department of Disease Control of the Ministry of Public Health launched “SALTS,” its strategy for reducing salt and sodium consumption in Thailand (2016–2025), in October 2016. It comprises the following initiatives:

S:    Stakeholder network. Establishing, developing, and expanding partnerships.

A:    Awareness. Increasing knowledge, awareness and skills among the public, communities, producers/entrepreneurs, relevant professional personnel, and policy makers.

L:    Legislation and environmental reform. Environmental changes for the production and improvement of current products until low-sodium options increase in the market and the public has access to food with low-sodium content.

T:    Technology and innovation. Research and knowledge development, leading to the implementation of practical solutions.

S:    Surveillance, monitoring, and evaluation. Development of surveillance, monitoring, and evaluation systems, focusing on the entire process, output, and results.
   
In April 2016, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (Thai FDA) issued regulations regarding required nutrition labeling and guideline daily amounts (GDA), including GDA labeling for bakery products, biscuits, chocolates, cookies, popcorn, semi-processed foods, snacks, and wafers (e.g., instant noodles, boiled rice, and congee). A GDA-compliant label is an easy-to-read nutrition label displaying the GDA of the ingredients. It contains information about energy, sodium, sugar, and fat values of the entire product and the serving recommendation for daily intake. Also in 2016, the Thai FDA created a “healthier choice” logo to provide a quick visual image to assist consumers in decision-making for more balanced nutrition. Product manufacturers and importers that wish to affix the logo to a product must seek permission to do so from the Nutrition Promotion Foundation under the Institute of Nutrition of Mahidol University, which assesses nutritional values carefully in determining whether to grant permission.    

With the cooperation of several government agencies (e.g., the Thai FDA, Consumer Protection Board Office, Department of Disease Control, Department of Health, and others) and private parties (e.g., Thai Health Promotion Foundation, Federation of Thai Industries, Kidney Foundation of Thailand, Foundation for Consumers, and others) the Less Salt Network campaign was created to reduce sodium consumption in Thailand by setting targets for reducing salt intake by one, two, and three grams by 2016, 2019, and 2022, respectively. By 2025, the campaign aims for people to consume not more than seven grams of salt per person per day, or no more than 2,000 mg of sodium per day.   

The Less Salt Network and related parties have made a strong effort to persuade food companies in Thailand to reduce salt and sodium additives in food, and several food companies are following the campaign and have agreed to reformulate their products. However, many companies are not yet on board and refuse to cooperate. Therefore, the government’s voluntary sodium-reduction target, expected to be implemented by the food industry, has not yet been achieved. The government will continue to explore other strategies for salt reduction in Thailand.   

Salt is not the only culprit that contributes to NCDs. Sugar must also take a portion of the blame, especially in respect of diabetes and obesity. To combat this, Thailand launched a sugar tax on October 1, 2019, as a strategy to reduce people’s sugar intake, which many consider to be the likely model for the future imposition of a similar salt tax. Studies of the impact of a salt tax in Hungary show that such measures can be effective at changing consumers’ eating habits. According to the WHO data, in Hungary, the introduction of a tax on certain foods with very high salt content caused people to turn to less salty food that is not subject to the salt tax.    

The Thai government is thus aiming to set up a salt tax in the coming years. The priority target product is instant noodles, and other products will be included in future phases. However, such a tax is just one available tool, and even after it comes into effect, government agencies and other private parties will still need to find other ways to influence consumers into eating healthier alternatives and to support sustainable consumption habits.  

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 22, 2026
A new decree in Vietnam brings significant implementation clarity to the country’s existing extended producer responsibility (EPR) legal framework. An EPR mechanism was first codified in Vietnam in the 2020 Law on Environmental Protection amid ongoing challenges surrounding the collection and treatment of product and packaging waste. The mechanism was progressively detailed through Decree No. 08/2022/ND‑CP and its successive amendments, but the regulatory framework remained insufficiently developed, notably in terms of support mechanisms for waste collection, recycling, and treatment. The newly launched regulations in Decree No. 110/2026/ND-CP (Decree 110), issued on April 1, 2026, and taking effect on May 25, 2026, stipulate fully and clearly the responsibility of manufacturers and importers to recycle products and packaging and to treat waste. Some key provisions of Decree 110 for manufacturers, importers, and related stakeholders are presented below. Subjects of EPR The Law on Environmental Protection assigns responsibility to manufacturers and importers for product and packaging recycling (under Article 54) or waste collection and treatment (under Article 55), depending on the type of products and packaging they produce or import. Decree 110 elaborates on these EPR provisions by specifying the responsible entities and listing out the types of products and packaging subject to recycling and waste treatment responsibilities. Decree 110 clarifies the responsible entities in special cases, such as when products under the same brand are made by multiple manufacturers, when there is a contract manufacturing or entrusted import relationship, and when the manufacturer or importer is part of a corporate group. Notably, exemptions may be applied in some scenarios, such as for manufacturers and importers of products and packaging exclusively for export, temporary import and re-export, or research and testing purposes, as well as for entities with annual revenue from related products not exceeding VND 30 billion. Recycling Responsibilities Decree 110
March 30, 2026
In response to an emerging crisis on food safety, the government of Vietnam promulgated Decree No. 46/2026/ND-CP (Decree 46) on January 26, 2026, and Resolution No. 66.13/2026/NQ-CP (Resolution 66.13) on January 27, 2026, setting out a number of substantive changes to the procedure and strict requirements for the declaration, registration, and importation of food products. Both instruments took effect upon issuance. However, shortly after they entered into force, food businesses encountered significant implementation challenges, particularly with respect to state inspection procedures at the customs clearance stage for imported products. In response, the government issued Resolution No. 09/2026/NQ-CP (Resolution 09) on February 4, 2026, temporarily suspending Decree 46 and Resolution 66.13 until a new effective date of April 16, 2026. Continued Suspension of Implementation of Decree 46 and Resolution 66.13 After considering feedback gathered by the Ministry of Health from food businesses and other stakeholders during the suspension period, the Vietnam Government Office issued a notice on March 20, 2026, agreeing to extend the suspension until the issuance of an amended Law on Food Safety and its guiding decree. Following this notice, on March 22, 2026, the Ministry of Health prepared a draft resolution to implement the notice and replace Resolution 09. Under the draft resolution, the effectiveness of Decree 46 and Resolution No. 66.13 would continue to be suspended until the amended Law on Food Safety takes effect, except for the provisions under Resolution 66.13 allowing flexibility in documents evidencing product efficacy, which would take effect on April 16, 2026, and remain effective until the Law on Food Safety is replaced (but not later than February 28, 2027). Accordingly, for products subject to the registration declaration procedure, such as health supplements, efficacy may be substantiated by either (i) scientific evidence supporting the declared function and effects of the product
February 26, 2026
Laos’ Food and Drug Department (FDD) has been using a new online registration system for drugs since the beginning of the year. The system, which was implemented following the November 2025 issuance of Notice No. 5960/FDD, became the official pathway for submissions on January 1, 2026. Since that date, paper-based registrations have no longer been accepted. This marks a significant advancement in the digitalization of regulatory processes in Laos. As the online system is now the exclusive platform for registration, renewal, and amendments, companies that have not yet aligned their processes to the new system should act promptly to ensure a smooth transition. To assist with this, the FDD will conduct periodic training sessions on the use of the online registration system, which will be delivered either in person or remotely, depending on operator demand. To start using the system, drug and medical device manufacturers, as well as import-export companies, that have not yet registered must submit a formal request identifying the authorized personnel who will access the platform, after which they will be issued user accounts and access codes. Each request must be accompanied by the company’s enterprise registration certificate (incorporation certificate), a copy of the identity card or passport of each designated user, and a scanned copy of their signature. There is no restriction on the number of users per company, allowing flexibility to meet operational needs. Companies that already hold accounts and access codes from the trial phase may continue using them and may apply for additional accounts if needed. Additional Requirements The new system also introduces a standardized format for drug registration numbers. For example, an import drug registration number such as 06 I 4040/15 will be changed to 06-IM-04040-15, and a domestic drug registration number such as 06 L 4040/15 will be changed to
January 21, 2026
Spurred by global geopolitics and Canada’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, which aims to forge deeper ties with ASEAN, Canadian companies have been showing growing interest in Thailand and Southeast Asia in recent years. To understand the opportunities offered by the region, we sat down with Andrew Stoutley, a Toronto native and the chief operating officer of Tilleke & Gibbins, a leading Southeast Asian regional law firm with over 130 years of history in Thailand. Q: Why are Canadian companies looking at Thailand and Southeast Asia right now? A: Two reasons stand out. First, diversification has moved up the agenda. Many Canadian companies want options outside North America due to tariff volatility and policy uncertainty in the United States, as well as questions around the next Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement mandatory joint review. At the same time, the shift of global production from China to Southeast Asia is accelerating, driven by rising costs, geopolitics, and the need to avoid overreliance on a single market. As a result, Canadian companies are looking for a second production base or a regional hub, and Thailand and its neighbors are natural choices given their manufacturing depth, location, and established supply chains. Second, Canada’s own efforts in the region are gaining traction. The Indo-Pacific Strategy has led to more on-the-ground support, including larger trade missions, upgraded diplomatic posts, and new financing options. Export Development Canada (EDC) now has a presence in Bangkok, giving Canadian companies a direct line to financing and insurance in Thailand. There’s also steady progress on trade frameworks like the recently signed Canada–Indonesia Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (which will come into effect pending domestic procedures), ongoing negotiations of a Canada–ASEAN FTA, and the exciting announcement about the launch of negotiations of a Canada–Thailand FTA. Together, these developments have the potential to make it much easier