You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

August 19, 2020

PTIT Focus: Providing Reports and Plans in Accordance with Environmental Management Procedures for the Decommissioning of Installations Used in the Petroleum Industry

Subscribe to Updates
Petroleum Institute of Thailand: PTIT Focus

Providing Reports and Plans in Accordance with Environmental Management Procedures for the Decommissioning of Installations Used in the Petroleum Industry

Clause 4 of the Ministerial Regulations Prescribing the Plan, Estimated Cost and Security for Decommissioning Installations Used in the Petroleum Industry B.E. 2559 (2016), which is issued under Section 14 (5), Section 80/1, and Section 80/2 of the Petroleum Act B.E. 2514 (1971), as amended by the Petroleum Act B.E.2514 (1971) (No.6) B.E.2550 (2007), provides that a concessionaire has the responsibility to proceed with environmental management procedures for the decommissioning of installations used in the petroleum industry, in order to effectively promote and preserve the quality of the environment. In addition, the procedures also cover research on environmental impact. The principles, procedures, and conditions of such reports and plans must be pursuant to the announcement of the Department of Mineral Fuels (DMF).

On 26 June 2018, the DMF issued the Announcement Prescribing the Principles, Procedures and Conditions for Providing the Reports and Plans in Regard to the Environmental Management Procedures for the Decommissioning of Installations Used. This announcement aims to ensure that the quality of the environment is effectively nurtured and preserved in the event that the installations or the area used for petroleum operations is decommissioned; it also covers research on environmental impact. The announcement prescribes that the concessionaire has the responsibility to provide a report and plan in accordance with a set of four environmental management procedures to the director-general of the DMF for approval, as follows:

  1. Decommissioning Environmental Assessment Report (DEA report): The DEA report must include (1) the installations that will be decommissioned; (2) procedures; (3) duration; (4) environmental information; (5) impact; and (6) the protection policy and monitoring plan. The DEA report must be prepared by a person who is licensed by the Office of Natural Resources and Environmental Policy and Planning to provide environmental impact assessment reports. Prior to providing the DEA report, the concessionaire will have to provide a report defining the scope of the research and the stakeholder plan for the approval of the director-general of the DMF.
  2. Best Practical Environmental Option Report (BPEO report): The concessionaire must consider the best and most suitable option for proceeding with the decommissioning, from all the options prescribed in the DEA report that was approved by the director-general of the DMF. The BPEO report must include important details such as the options and methods for decommissioning, procedures and criteria, and a summary of the most suitable option for proceeding with the decommissioning.
  3. Decommissioning Activity Environmental Management Plan (DEM plan): The DEM plan is related to the permanent closure and abandonment of the well, or the decommissioning, withdrawal, transportation, or demolition of the unused installation. The concessionaire has to lay out, among other things, (1) measures for protection and mitigation of environmental impact, (2) a cleaning plan, (3) removal of any contamination, and (4) a waste management plan. During the decommissioning process, the concessionaire must deliver an audit report on the operations in accordance with the aforementioned plans to the General Director of the DMF within 180 days of finishing the decommissioning activities.
  4. Post-Decommissioning Activity Monitoring Plan: When the decommissioning activities have been completed and the concessionaire has received general environmental information relating to Post-Decommissioning Activity Monitoring, the concessionaire must submit the Progress of Post-Decommissioning Activity Monitoring Report of environmental quality to the director-general of the DMF within the specified time limit. Moreover, the concessionaire also has to deliver the Post-Decommissioning Activity Monitoring Report for the DMF’s approval within the time limit specified in the above plan.

In conclusion, the government agencies not only stipulate the principles for decommissioning and security, but they also stipulate the responsibilities for the concessionaire in respect to providing the research and environmental impact assessment reports, which cover the pre-decommissioning assessment of environmental impact and the management plan during the decommissioning, as well as follow-up, auditing, and post-decommissioning assessment. These helpful measures protecting against environmental impacts help to ensure that decommissioning activities are carried out in a manner that promotes efficient and sustainable environmental protection in the future.

 

This article first appeared in the July 2019 edition of PTIT Focus, the Petroleum Institute of Thailand’s monthly newsletter. The article was published in both English and Thai. 

Related Professionals

Industries

Energy

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 8, 2021
On March 24, 2021, the Prime Minister of Vietnam issued Decision No. 12/2021/QD-TTg issuing regulations on oil spill response. One of the more notable changes is the introduction of templates for oil spill response plans.
Read More
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
Read More
February 18, 2021
As you will no doubt know, on February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military declared a state of emergency in Myanmar for a period of one year. State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Su Kyi was detained, as were the president and various significant political and civil leaders. Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw (Myanmar armed forces) has installed himself as chairman of the State Administration Council, the current administration. New sanctions The reaction of the Biden administration has been swift. On February 10, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which provides bases to impose sanctions on individuals and companies deemed by the US to, among other things: operate in the defense sector of Myanmar; be responsible for policies that undermine democratic processes in Myanmar; have taken actions to undermine democratic processes or institutions, or prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of free speech, in Myanmar; or be a spouse or child of the foregoing. On the next day, February 11, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), imposed sanctions under the new executive order on ten individuals—including General Min Aung Hlaing—and three companies, including Cancri Gems & Jewelry Co, Myanmar Imperial Jade Co, and Myanmar Ruby Enterprise.  All such individuals and companies have now been designated on the US list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). Effect of sanctions As a result of such sanctions, the property of these individuals or companies that is located in the US or is under the possession or control of US companies and citizens is frozen, and US companies and citizens are generally prohibited from dealing deal with any such property.  Reportedly, roughly USD 1 billion of funds belonging to the individuals and companies blocked on February 11 are located in the US and thus now frozen. The SDN list As many
Read More