You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 23, 2012

Preparation for the AEC: Free Flow of Goods

Subscribe to Updates
Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

The year 2015 will be a year of special importance for Thailand as well as all Asean member states, as it marks the establishment of the Asean Economic Community (AEC) as agreed on by country leaders at the 2007 Asean Summit.

Section 9 of the AEC Blueprint clearly lays out the five core elements to attain the goal of having a single market and production base for the Asean region—the free flow of goods, services, investment, capital, and skilled labor.

But with less than three years until the AEC is to be formed, are individual countries ready? Have respective governments been taking the proper measures in preparation for inclusion in the AEC?

Let us take a look at the issue of free flow of goods. Certain international protocols are already in effect that help facilitate movement of goods within Asean. The Asean Free Trade Agreement, Common Effective Preferential Tariffs, and the Asean Trade in Goods Agreement (ATIGA) greatly reduce or eliminate tariff rates for most goods traded among Asean member states.

For example, under ATIGA, import duties are effectively eliminated for all products (with exceptions of certain “sensitive” goods) traded intra-regionally among the more developed Asean-6 (Brunei, Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, and Thailand). Import duties are scheduled for elimination between 2015 and 2018 for the four less-developed CLMV states (Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, and Vietnam).

ATIGA also requires member states to eliminate “qualitative restrictions,” which are defined under Article 2 as “measures intended to prohibit or restrict quantity of trade with other member states, whether made effective through quotas, licenses, or other measures with equivalent effect, including administrative measures and requirements which restrict trade.”

But there is more to reaching the objective of free flow of goods than tariff elimination. A commercial importer is affected not only by the costs of import duties but also by the time and costs related to customs clearance. Data must be compiled and paperwork submitted to various government agencies, resulting in administrative and labor expenditures. Increased delays in customs clearance also mean greater storage costs for logistics service providers.

Therefore, reducing non-tariff barriers to enhance transparency, fixing rules of origin to respond to global changes in production, and simplifying and standardizing customs procedures to facilitate trade are all additional key points to the AEC Blueprint, as is the establishment of the Asean Single Window (ASW).

This last goal, however, is contingent on each member state setting up its own National Single Window (NSW), something only the Asean-6 have completed so far. The establishment of NSWs is important because, once in place, they allow traders to submit one set of documents or information, linking the multitude of government agencies and private-sector enterprises involved and thereby improving overall trade efficiency. The implementation of the ASW will further increase trade efficiency by coordinating among respective NSWs, allowing for both automatic preparation of documents and transmission of data intra-regionally.

Has Thailand taken adequate steps to prepare for the AEC regarding the free flow of goods? One need only look back at recent economic and trade data to illustrate the significance of implementing an NSW. The World Bank’s Doing Business 2007 report said Thailand ranked 108th out of 183 countries in the category of Trading across Borders. Its ranking jumped to 50th in 2008 and 10th in 2009, a dramatic change reflecting the adoption of a paperless customs system (e-customs) in addition to an NSW.

Other World Bank indicators further show the importance of streamlining customs procedures. From 2007 to 2009, the number of documents in Thailand required to export fell from 9 to 5 for exports (bill of lading, certificate of origin, commercial invoice, customs export declaration, and terminal handling receipts) and from 12 to 5 for imports (bill of lading, commercial invoice, customs import declaration, packing list, and terminal handling receipts for import). During the same period, the number of days and costs for exports fell from 24 and US$848 to 14 and $625 for exports and from 22 and $1,042 to 13 and $795 for imports. (The figures in the Doing Business 2012 report remain the same, with a slight reduction in import costs to $750.)

Thailand’s example clearly shows the importance of e-customs systems and NSWs in addition to multilateral trade agreements on tariffs. With the Asean-6 NSWs already in place and the CLMV working toward establishing their own, the economic future looks bright for the Asean region.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Corporate/M&A

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 25, 2025
In Thailand, in-court business rehabilitation is a legal proceeding that enhances a debtor’s chance to restructure business operations for corporate debtors who are unable to repay their debts. The purpose of this proceeding is to allow the debtor to continue operating the business and generate income to repay creditors. The amounts that creditors receive in the rehabilitation proceeding are greater than the amounts creditors would receive if the debtor went bankrupt. The law is not designed to allow debtors or creditors to use the business rehabilitation process in bad faith for their benefit or to defraud another party. Accordingly, the Business Rehabilitation Law, which is included in the Thai Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 (1940), provides criminal liability for actions taken before or during the process. This article addresses the key points regarding criminal liability for safeguarding debtors and creditors in business rehabilitation proceedings from any parties who act in bad faith. Criminal Liability in Business Rehabilitation The following provisions establish the framework for criminal liability in business rehabilitation cases, ensuring that all parties act with integrity throughout the process. The Bankruptcy Act of Thailand B.E. 2483 (1940) provides the relevant provisions regarding the business rehabilitation process. Additionally, if a company debtor or its authorized directors are found to have committed fraud or malfeasance under the Bankruptcy Act, they can also be held criminally liable under the Penal Code or related criminal statutes. The rehabilitation process aims to help a business recover financially under the supervision of the court. When the court approves the rehabilitation plan, the court appoints a business rehabilitation plan administrator to manage and implement the process. However, if it is discovered that the debtor, its executives, or even the plan administrator engaged in illegal activities prior to or during the rehabilitation process—such as tax evasion, embezzlement,
Read More
June 6, 2025
As from July 1, 2025, as part of its ongoing efforts to digitalize and streamline the delivery of public services, the Vietnamese government will officially conduct administrative procedures, both online and offline, only via electronic identity (“e-ID”) accounts on the VNeID platform. In particular: Online administrative procedures carried out via the National Public Service Portal or via information systems for administrative procedures at the ministerial or provincial level are required to be implemented by using e-ID accounts only. When receiving dossiers, authorities will be required to check and verify the e-IDs of companies or individuals responsible for conducting administrative procedures. Further, it is worth noting that to complete the registration of an e-ID account for a company, the legal representative of the company must hold a level-2 e-ID account. Compliance Considerations Vietnam’s first regulation of e-ID accounts for individuals and organizations was issued in Decree No. 59/2022/ND-CP dated September 5, 2022, on electronic authentication and identification. This decree was subsequently replaced by Decree No. 69/2024/ND-CP dated June 25, 2024, which governs the same matters. Registration and operation of e-ID accounts are centralized through VNeID, a digital ID app developed by the National Population Data Center under the Ministry of Public Security of Vietnam. Although the registration of e-ID accounts for companies is not explicitly mandated by law, the absence of an e-ID account may hinder companies from completing administrative procedures, including licensing and reporting obligations. Such non-compliance could consequently result in administrative penalties. To mitigate unexpected non-compliance and administrative fines due to the lack of an e-ID account, companies should be well prepared for and implement the registration of a company e-ID account as soon as possible.
Read More
June 4, 2025
On April 2, 2024, the Cambodian Competition Commission (CCC) issued Decision No. 087 on Requirements and Procedures of Exemptions under the Law on Competition, outlining the requirements and procedures for requesting exemptions for agreements or activities that could prevent, restrict, or distort competition in Cambodia. Franchise agreements often include clauses such as price fixing, exclusive supply arrangements, or territorial restrictions, which could potentially raise concerns under the Law on Competition. Therefore, it is necessary for both franchisors and franchisees to understand how the law applies to their agreements and whether an exemption request may be required. Some arrangements under franchise agreements may fall within the scope of prohibited practices under the Law on Competition. These include horizontal and vertical agreements, abuse of dominant position, and anti-competitive business combination. If a business owner contemplates that their franchise agreement could be interpreted as anti-competitive, they must assess whether to apply for an exemption. Key Criteria for Exemption Under Decision No. 087, the CCC may grant an exemption if the applicant can demonstrate that the proposed agreement or activity meets all four of the following conditions: Significant and identifiable benefits: The agreement must provide clear technological, social, or economic benefits such as cost efficiencies, qualitative efficiencies, initiations of new technologies, or environmental and sustainable benefits. Necessity of the agreement/activities: These benefits must not be achievable without the proposed agreement or activity. The applicant must show that prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition are essential to realizing the benefits. Benefits outweigh harm: The positive impacts must significantly outweigh any adverse effects caused by the prevention, restriction, or distortion of competition, and the benefits should be likely to materialize within one year. No elimination of competition: The agreement must not eliminate competition in any substantial aspect of goods or services. Application and Supporting Documents
Read More
June 4, 2025
On June 1, 2025, Thailand’s Office of Central Company and Partnership Registration of the Department of Business Development opened a public hearing period on its draft notification regarding criteria and supporting documents for establishment of partnerships and limited companies in which foreign nationals are involved as investors or have signing authority. The draft notification requires applicants for registration of establishment of partnerships and limited companies to submit financial evidence of the capital contributions made by each Thai partner or shareholder in the following cases: When a partnership or limited company has partners or shareholders who are foreign nationals holding shares or equity amounting to less than 50% of the total capital contribution or registered capital in the partnership or company; or When a limited company has no foreign shareholders but has a non-Thai director who is an authorized or co-authorized signatory. The amounts shown in this financial evidence must be in accordance with the capital contribution or shareholding amount of each Thai partner or shareholder. Evidence can be provided in one of the following forms: Financial evidence issued by a bank to verify or demonstrate financial status. Copy of bank statement for the past six months. Copy of personal income tax or corporate income tax document (Form PorNgorDor.90 or PorNgorDor.91 for individuals; Form PorNgorDor.50 or PorNgorDor.51 for corporate shareholders). Any other supporting document showing the source of funds used for the capital contribution. The consultation period will be open until June 20, 2025, and the draft may be subject to additional revisions before it is finalized and made legally binding.
Read More