You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 6, 2024

Potential Impact of Vietnam’s New Land Law on the Energy Sector

Subscribe to Updates

On January 18, 2024, Vietnam’s National Assembly passed a new Land Law (“Land Law 2024”) that is scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2025, replacing the current Land Law 2013. To mitigate challenges faced by the real estate market, in late May 2024, the government proposed amendments to the Land Law that would move the effective date up five months, to August 1, 2024, pending approval by the National Assembly.

One of the key sectors to be impacted by the Land Law 2024 is the energy sector, which requires large land areas for power plants and infrastructure, especially given Vietnam’s 2050 net zero emissions commitment. Below are highlights of how the new Land Law 2024 will affect Vietnam’s energy sector.

Annual payment of land rental

Under the Land Law 2013, investors implementing energy projects (e.g., solar power projects) are entitled to choose to lease land with either (i) an annual rental payment or (ii) a single upfront payment for the entire term of use. Under the Land Law 2024, these investors are only allowed to use land in the form of an annual rental payment.

As the annual land rental is calculated in five-year cycles, based on the land price table decided by the state, this new restriction means that investors in energy projects will face an additional risk of a sudden increase in land rental, disrupting their financial planning.

Investors using land sites leased with annual rental payments are also not allowed to mortgage their land-use rights, but can only mortgage assets attached to the land, at credit institutions licensed to operate in Vietnam. Accordingly, this may affect the ability of energy projects to obtain financing during the development stage, because they no longer have assets that can be mortgaged.

Obtaining land

Under the Land Law 2024, investors can obtain land through a lease without any auction or bidding process; through an auction process (for selecting the land user of a land site); or through a bidding process (for selecting the investor implementing an investment project with the need to use land).

Investors in energy projects using public investment capital and public-private partnership (PPP) projects can lease a land site from the state without an auction or bidding process. Further details on these conditions are to be provided by the government.

An auction process will apply to energy projects that intend to use land obtained from the land fund managed by the state if the following conditions are satisfied: (i) the land site is clean and does not require compensation or site-clearance work; (ii) the land site is included in the annual land-use plans approved for auction; and (iii) a 1/500 plan and auction plan are approved by the competent authorities.

A bidding process will apply to energy projects that must conduct bidding to select investors according to specialized laws, such as the laws on electricity, if the following conditions are satisfied: (i) the land is on the list of land sites subject to bidding for selection of investors for an investment project as decided by the provincial People’s Council; (ii) a detailed plan or a 1/2000 zoning plan is approved by the competent authorities; and (iii) other conditions under the laws on bidding are met.

Compared to the Land Law 2013, the Land Law 2024 supplements the bidding for projects using land as a new method for investors to gain access to land. This addition aims to increase competition and fairness for investors.

Compensation, support, and resettlement procedure

If the land for implementing an energy project is currently occupied, a compensation, support and resettlement procedure must be carried out. Under the current Land Law 2013, the decision on land recovery and the decision on the plan for compensation, support and resettlement are issued concurrently. Under the new Land Law 2024, the decision on land recovery will only be issued within 10 days after, among other conditions, the plan on compensation, support, and resettlement has been issued, if resettlement is not required; or the person whose land is recovered has had another land site allocated or handed over by a competent authority to build their own resettlement housing.

These new regulations will extend the length of the land clearance procedure considerably when the recovered land requires resettlement, as the decision on land recovery will only be issued after the resettlement is deemed completed.

Commercial arbitration as a dispute resolution mechanism

Another crucial aspect of the new law is that commercial arbitration is clearly recognized as a dispute resolution mechanism for land-related disputes. Previously, there was uncertainty surrounding whether disputes relating to land could be adjudicated by arbitration. Pursuant to the Land Law 2024, Vietnamese commercial arbitration can resolve disputes arising from commercial activities related to land in accordance with the law on commercial arbitration.

Outlook

The new Land Law aims to address overlapping and conflicting issues of related land policies and laws, while tackling practical challenges in land management and land use. It promotes the commercialization of land-use rights, fostering transparent real estate markets, modernizing land management systems, and implementing administrative and digital reforms to improve land accessibility, especially for energy projects.

Related Professionals

Industries

Energy

Practices

Real Estate

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
Read More
February 18, 2021
As you will no doubt know, on February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military declared a state of emergency in Myanmar for a period of one year. State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Su Kyi was detained, as were the president and various significant political and civil leaders. Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw (Myanmar armed forces) has installed himself as chairman of the State Administration Council, the current administration. New sanctions The reaction of the Biden administration has been swift. On February 10, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which provides bases to impose sanctions on individuals and companies deemed by the US to, among other things: operate in the defense sector of Myanmar; be responsible for policies that undermine democratic processes in Myanmar; have taken actions to undermine democratic processes or institutions, or prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of free speech, in Myanmar; or be a spouse or child of the foregoing. On the next day, February 11, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), imposed sanctions under the new executive order on ten individuals—including General Min Aung Hlaing—and three companies, including Cancri Gems & Jewelry Co, Myanmar Imperial Jade Co, and Myanmar Ruby Enterprise.  All such individuals and companies have now been designated on the US list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). Effect of sanctions As a result of such sanctions, the property of these individuals or companies that is located in the US or is under the possession or control of US companies and citizens is frozen, and US companies and citizens are generally prohibited from dealing deal with any such property.  Reportedly, roughly USD 1 billion of funds belonging to the individuals and companies blocked on February 11 are located in the US and thus now frozen. The SDN list As many
Read More
February 2, 2021
The application period for very small power producers (VSPPs) aiming to participate in the community power plant project is fast drawing to a close, with the deadline set for February 4, 2021. February 4 is also the closing date of the period for public comments on the two draft regulations outlining the pilot project to procure electricity from community power plants. These draft regulations are being finalized by the Energy Regulation Commission (ERC)  as part of an effort to boost the economy at a grassroots level. The community power plant project will procure 150 MW from VSPPs producing electricity from either biomass or biogas. 75 MW will be obtained from biomass VSPPs, with a limit of 6 MW to each biomass VSPP, while 75 MW of the electricity procurement will be obtained from biogas VSPPs with a limit of 3 MW each. VSPPs wishing to apply for the community power plant project must be 90%-owned by a private company, while 10% of ownership must be under a community enterprise or community enterprise network—consisting of at least 200 households—registered with the Department of Agricultural Extension. Furthermore, the fuel used by the VSPP must be either biogas or biomass obtained from the community enterprise or community enterprise network, and must not include fossil fuels. Once VSPPs have submitted their applications, they will be subject to a technical assessment to determine power production readiness, and will undergo a process of competitive bidding. VSPPs will be compared and selected based on a number of factors, including power production capacity, ability to operate for duration of the 20-year project, and the proposed fixed feed-in tariff (FiT). VSPPs that are chosen to participate in this pilot project will be subject to the following FiTs per unit of electricity, based on the type of fuel and
Read More