You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 28, 2014

Pharmaceutical Marketing in Vietnam: Regulatory Restrictions and Permissible Activities

Informed Counsel

Vietnam has one of the world’s top growth rates in pharmaceutical spending, with Thanh Nien newspaper estimating that spending for 2013 would exceed USD 3.3 billion, an increase of 17% from 2012. Vietnamese consumers have additionally demonstrated that they are willing to pay more for the reliability of a foreign brand. However, connecting foreign supply to domestic demand continues to pose challenges, despite restrictions being relaxed in recent years.

In its World Trade Organization commitments, Vietnam did not commit to opening up the distribution market of pharmaceutical products to foreign companies. Thus, representative offices (ROs), liaising with Vietnamese distributors, have traditionally been the favored form of establishment for foreign market entrants. Since January 1, 2009, however, domestic legislation has allowed foreign investors to incorporate a Vietnamese wholly foreign-owned enterprise (WFOE) to import their own pharmaceutical products and then sell their imported products to licensed domestic distributors. The WFOE structure offers a number of advantages over an RO, including additional avenues for the marketing of drugs.

Drug Marketing Options

As in most countries, the marketing of drugs in Vietnam is subject to strict regulation. While nonprescription drugs may be marketed to the general public, prescription drugs may not; they may only be marketed to medical professionals (MPs)—including pharmacists and administrators—through certain approved methods. Chief among these is marketing through licensed medical representatives (called “drug introducers” in Vietnam). Other methods include the distribution of drug information documents, introduction seminars for MPs, and promotion programs. WFOEs that are licensed to import drugs may engage in all of these activities, whereas ROs are technically prohibited from all marketing activities, save seminars and the distribution of informative material to MPs.

A summary of the types of marketing activities allowed for a WFOE and an RO is set out below. (Note that this chart assumes that the RO’s parent company has been authorized to circulate its drugs in Vietnam by the Ministry of Health.)

 

Advertisement of prescription drugs

Advertisement of nonprescription drugs

Introduction through drug introducers

Distribution of drug information documents to MPs

Drug introduction seminars for MPs

Display of drugs at seminars

Sales promotion

WFOE (Vietnam Subsidiary) Prohibited Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed
Rep. Office Prohibited Prohibited† Prohibited† Allowed† Allowed Allowed Prohibited

† Vietnamese legislation is inconsistent on this matter; see details below.

Advertising of Drugs

WFOEs engaged in pharmaceutical importing and exporting have the right to directly advertise their business activities and (nonprescription) products, or to hire an advertising service provider to advertise on their behalf. Nonprescription drugs with valid registration numbers for circulation in Vietnam may be advertised in printed material, online, via signs and billboards, and on radio and television. For radio and television, an additional stipulation is that the active ingredients of the drugs must be on the list of ingredients approved by the Ministry of Health, in a specific dosage form and/or strength.

In the Commercial Law, ROs are specifically prohibited from directly conducting commercial advertising anywhere, with the exception of some activities allowed on the RO premises. If there is a specific authorization from the parent company, however, the RO may enter into a contract on the parent company’s behalf with an advertising company in Vietnam to carry out the advertising for the parent company.

Prescription drugs, vaccines, and nonprescription drugs for the treatment of certain specified conditions, such as diabetes and sexually transmitted diseases, are prohibited from being advertised to the general public in any form whatsoever.

Introduction and Provision of Information to Medical Professionals

While the advertising of prescription drugs to the general public is prohibited, “pharmaceutical trading companies” are permitted to introduce and provide information on prescription drugs that they have registered, manufactured, imported, and distributed to MPs. Under the Pharmacy Law, a WFOE legally importing drugs would qualify as a “pharmaceutical trading company” and would therefore be entitled to introduce and provide information on its drugs to MPs. It is unclear whether an RO would qualify as such.

The introduction of and the provision of information on drugs to MPs may be conducted through one of the following channels:

1. Through “Drug Introducers” (Medical Representatives). Circular 13/2009/TT-BYT (Circular 13) of the Ministry of Health defines a “drug introducer” as a staff member of a pharmaceutical trading establishment in Vietnam who has been appointed by the establishment to introduce its drugs to MPs. Drug introducers must have drug introduction cards issued by the provincial-level Department of Health and must meet certain criteria, such as having at least a two-year vocational postsecondary education, having completed a training program, and having worked at least two years for a lawful medical or pharmaceutical establishment.

In practice, the Ministry of Health (MOH) has routinely allowed drug introducers to be registered at ROs. However, though there is some inconsistency in the legislation, we believe that the more correct interpretation of the law is that only WFOEs or domestic companies may employ drug introducers, because this would be more consistent with the general principle that ROs are liaisons only and may not engage in profit-making or marketing activities.

2. By Distribution of Drug Information Documents to MPs. In the Commercial Law, ROs are specifically prohibited from introducing goods outside the premises of the RO. The “introduction of goods” is defined as activities of commercial enhancement conducted by a business entity using goods, and materials about the goods, to introduce the same goods to customers. Given the broad scope of the prohibition, ROs may not distribute drug information introduction documents to MPs. Under Article 30.2(e) of Circular 13, however, an RO of a foreign pharmaceutical company that has been authorized to circulate its drugs in Vietnam by the MOH may apply for approval from the MOH for the provision of drug information introduction documents to MPs.

3. At Drug Introduction Seminars for MPs. Interestingly, Circular 13 specifically authorizes an RO to organize seminars for MPs to introduce drugs that have been licensed for manufacturing and circulation in other countries.

4. Through the Display and Introduction of Drugs at Specialized Health Conferences or Seminars for MPs. While an RO is not allowed to directly display and introduce its parent company’s products outside of the RO’s premises, Article 17 of Circular 13 seems to specifically allow organizers or hosts of specialized health conferences and seminars to display and introduce drugs at such events. Due to the fact that an RO is allowed to organize seminars to introduce drugs, an RO should also have the right to display and introduce its drugs there.

Sales Promotion

The Commercial Law provides a broad definition of “sales promotion” as an act of commercial enhancement by a business entity aimed at enhancing the purchase and sale of goods and/or the provision of services by giving specified benefits to customers. Only Vietnamese business entities, branches of Vietnamese business entities, or branches of foreign business entities in Vietnam are authorized to hold their own sales promotions or engage a third party to do so in Vietnam. ROs of foreign business entities are notably excluded.

A sales promotion program in Vietnam may be conducted in various forms, including the use of samples or gifts, discounts, vouchers, contests, lucky draws, and customer reward programs. Promotion programs for pharmaceuticals cannot be directed at consumers, but must be directed only at pharmaceutical traders.

Technical Barrier to Operating as a WFOE

Given the clear advantages that WFOEs have over ROs in the modes of available marketing activities, and, in particular, in the right to employ medical representatives and conduct promotion programs, one would think that most foreign pharmaceutical companies would be operating in the legal form of a WFOE. But this is not the case. At present, most foreign pharmaceutical companies are still operating in RO form, because, according to Circular 47/2010/TT-BYT issued by the MOH in 2010 (and amended a year later), while WFOEs permitted to import drugs are allowed to incorporate, they may not engage in drug importing activity until new legislation, which will likely be joint legislation between the MOH and another body, is passed into law detailing importing procedures and storage practices.

This technical barrier has effectively halted an incorporated WFOE from becoming operational, because the common interpretation dictates that if a WFOE cannot operationally engage in importing, and hence cannot be a “trader,” then it may not conduct marketing activities. Nevertheless, an increasing number of foreign pharmaceutical companies are choosing to create WFOEs and wait for the joint legislation to pass into law, in part, because it normally takes a year or more to incorporate a WFOE engaged in “drug trading” and, also, because of the belief that the joint legislation that has been promised for the past three years must eventually become law.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 20, 2022
What does “digital health” include within each jurisdiction? Thailand: For the most part, the idea of “digital health” or “telemedicine” has generally fallen within the area of medical device regulation in Thailand. The normal sort of digital health components you would think of—like software and device accessories for diagnosis, monitoring, prevention, or treatment of illnesses—would fall into medical device classification, so long as they do not achieve their intended function by immunological, metabolic, or pharmacological means. The “digital health” devices you commonly think of, like mobile medical apps, wearable technologies and software, fall mainly within this definition. After the last update to the Medical Device Act in 2008, Thailand next looked at digital health in 2019, with the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA)—which is largely aligned with GDPR principles—and the Cybersecurity Act. These deal with important issues arising from “digital health” and “telemedicine” like personal data protection, consent to use and consent to transfer data, and privacy. Vietnam: Similarly, in Vietnam, while there’s not a clear definition of “digital health” in the law, it is understood to include various types of medical devices, software, and online services used for healthcare purposes—including diagnosis and treatment as well as medical records and telemedicine. There’s no law on digital health, per se, but many of these areas are covered by separate circulars issued by the Ministry of Health. There’s a circular (referred to as “Circular 49”) from late 2017 on telemedicine, for example, that actually uses the term “telemedicine” to identify the industry and sets out licensing and technical requirements. Indicators such as this show that Vietnam is definitely embracing the concept. Indonesia: In Indonesia, there is also no precise definition of “digital health.” Digital health is regulated under several laws and regulations, such as provisions concerning medical devices under the health
July 6, 2022
Patent is an essential piece of the amended Law on Intellectual Property (“Amended IP Law”), which was passed by the National Assembly of Vietnam on June 16, 2022, and will take effect on January 1, 2023 (except for the regulation on protection of experimental data for agrochemical products, which will take delayed effect on January 14, 2024). Among the amended and supplemented contents of the Amended IP Law, there are notable patent-related amendments to Article 60 on assessing the novelty of inventions and Article 96 on grounds for invalidating patent protection titles. We discuss these changes below. Secret Prior Art Under Article 60.1 A significant amendment to Clause 1, Article 60 of the Amended IP Law on the novelty of inventions is to broaden the scope under which an invention can be considered to have lost its novelty. For the first time in Vietnam, “secret prior art” –a patent application with an earlier filing date or priority date but published on or after the filing date or priority date of an examined patent application – is introduced as a prior art document. In the diagram above, at the time of filing of the A2 application, secret prior art A1 has been filed but not yet published, making it inaccessible to the public. At this point, only the A1 applicant and the IP Office are aware of the A1 application. Under the current provisions of the 2005 IP Law, as amended in 2009 and 2019, the A1 patent application is not eligible to be a prior art document when assessing the novelty of A2. However, based on the “first-to-file principle” and the principle of priority, the IP Office has still had other approaches to bar the patentability of an A2 patent application if there is such an A1 application. By
June 13, 2022
Thailand’s cannabis cultivation licensing scheme for the country’s transition toward legalization of the plant has now come to an end. The Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) announced in the Government Gazette that from June 9, 2022, “only cannabis extract with tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) of more than 0.2% by weight will be considered a narcotic.” This means that now anyone can grow, sell, or purchase cannabis seeds, plants, and inflorescence freely in Thailand, and licenses for the cultivation, possession, and distribution of cannabis are no longer required. Neither the number of cannabis plants nor the place of cultivation is restricted. It is thus the beginning of a new chapter for cannabis cultivation in Thailand, with many opining that now is a good time to enter this exciting and growing industry. The journey to this point began in 2019, when Thailand amended its laws on cannabis to allow for treatment for medical purposes, with one of the prerequisite conditions being that the cannabis must be grown in Thailand. The law was further amended to promote commercialization of the cannabis industry, allowing for cannabis to be added to food and beverages, cosmetics, and herbal products. In addition, three traditional cannabis-based formulas were listed in the universal healthcare coverage scheme, which means that almost all Thais have access to traditional cannabis recipes without cost. The successful launch of medical cannabis and its applications, and its viability as an economic industry, have become a national agenda and priority policy of the MOPH. In order to achieve the above outcomes, several legal frameworks and guidelines throughout the product’s lifecycle have been developed. For example, the Thai Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has so far granted licenses to cultivate cannabis (also known as a license to manufacture a narcotic) on more than 1,977 acres (around 800 hectares).
April 19, 2022
New technologies and production processes in the food industry have led to novel foods becoming increasingly important to both food manufacturers and the consuming public worldwide. This is very much the case across a number of jurisdictions in Southeast Asia. “Novel foods” refer to new food production processes, foods, and ingredients that have not yet been commonly used for human consumption, so these innovative foods require safety assessments before companies can produce and market them. While rules for these safety assessments are already part of novel food regulations in several other jurisdictions—such as the novel food regulations in the United Kingdom and European Union adopted in 2003, and the major reform of food safety laws in the United States passed in 2011 under the Food Modernization Act—similar rules governing the assessment of novel foods are relatively new or yet to be introduced in many parts of Asia. Nevertheless, it is important to understand the laws and practices that apply to safety assessments and the process of bringing novel foods to market in jurisdictions in the region. This article provides some clarity in this regard by summarizing important practical information on novel foods and the relevant required safety assessments in Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam.   Indonesia Regulator National Agency for Drug and Food Control (NADFC); frequently referred to as BPOM (Badan Pengawas Obat dan Makanan). Relevant Measures BPOM Regulation No. 27 Year 2018 concerning Public Service Standards in BPOM; Decision of the Director of Processed Food Standardization No. HK.02.02.51.511.06.21.21 Year 2021 concerning Public Service Standard Directorate Processed Food Standardization Definitions General “food ingredients” are basic fresh or processed ingredients that can be used to produce food; novel food is any food ingredient not listed in BPOM’s positive list of ingredients. Official Fees None   Process and Timeline Before submitting an