You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

February 28, 2014

Pharmaceutical Marketing in Vietnam: Regulatory Restrictions and Permissible Activities

Informed Counsel

Vietnam has one of the world’s top growth rates in pharmaceutical spending, with Thanh Nien newspaper estimating that spending for 2013 would exceed USD 3.3 billion, an increase of 17% from 2012. Vietnamese consumers have additionally demonstrated that they are willing to pay more for the reliability of a foreign brand. However, connecting foreign supply to domestic demand continues to pose challenges, despite restrictions being relaxed in recent years.

In its World Trade Organization commitments, Vietnam did not commit to opening up the distribution market of pharmaceutical products to foreign companies. Thus, representative offices (ROs), liaising with Vietnamese distributors, have traditionally been the favored form of establishment for foreign market entrants. Since January 1, 2009, however, domestic legislation has allowed foreign investors to incorporate a Vietnamese wholly foreign-owned enterprise (WFOE) to import their own pharmaceutical products and then sell their imported products to licensed domestic distributors. The WFOE structure offers a number of advantages over an RO, including additional avenues for the marketing of drugs.

Drug Marketing Options

As in most countries, the marketing of drugs in Vietnam is subject to strict regulation. While nonprescription drugs may be marketed to the general public, prescription drugs may not; they may only be marketed to medical professionals (MPs)—including pharmacists and administrators—through certain approved methods. Chief among these is marketing through licensed medical representatives (called “drug introducers” in Vietnam). Other methods include the distribution of drug information documents, introduction seminars for MPs, and promotion programs. WFOEs that are licensed to import drugs may engage in all of these activities, whereas ROs are technically prohibited from all marketing activities, save seminars and the distribution of informative material to MPs.

A summary of the types of marketing activities allowed for a WFOE and an RO is set out below. (Note that this chart assumes that the RO’s parent company has been authorized to circulate its drugs in Vietnam by the Ministry of Health.)

 

Advertisement of prescription drugs

Advertisement of nonprescription drugs

Introduction through drug introducers

Distribution of drug information documents to MPs

Drug introduction seminars for MPs

Display of drugs at seminars

Sales promotion

WFOE (Vietnam Subsidiary) Prohibited Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed Allowed
Rep. Office Prohibited Prohibited† Prohibited† Allowed† Allowed Allowed Prohibited

† Vietnamese legislation is inconsistent on this matter; see details below.

Advertising of Drugs

WFOEs engaged in pharmaceutical importing and exporting have the right to directly advertise their business activities and (nonprescription) products, or to hire an advertising service provider to advertise on their behalf. Nonprescription drugs with valid registration numbers for circulation in Vietnam may be advertised in printed material, online, via signs and billboards, and on radio and television. For radio and television, an additional stipulation is that the active ingredients of the drugs must be on the list of ingredients approved by the Ministry of Health, in a specific dosage form and/or strength.

In the Commercial Law, ROs are specifically prohibited from directly conducting commercial advertising anywhere, with the exception of some activities allowed on the RO premises. If there is a specific authorization from the parent company, however, the RO may enter into a contract on the parent company’s behalf with an advertising company in Vietnam to carry out the advertising for the parent company.

Prescription drugs, vaccines, and nonprescription drugs for the treatment of certain specified conditions, such as diabetes and sexually transmitted diseases, are prohibited from being advertised to the general public in any form whatsoever.

Introduction and Provision of Information to Medical Professionals

While the advertising of prescription drugs to the general public is prohibited, “pharmaceutical trading companies” are permitted to introduce and provide information on prescription drugs that they have registered, manufactured, imported, and distributed to MPs. Under the Pharmacy Law, a WFOE legally importing drugs would qualify as a “pharmaceutical trading company” and would therefore be entitled to introduce and provide information on its drugs to MPs. It is unclear whether an RO would qualify as such.

The introduction of and the provision of information on drugs to MPs may be conducted through one of the following channels:

1. Through “Drug Introducers” (Medical Representatives). Circular 13/2009/TT-BYT (Circular 13) of the Ministry of Health defines a “drug introducer” as a staff member of a pharmaceutical trading establishment in Vietnam who has been appointed by the establishment to introduce its drugs to MPs. Drug introducers must have drug introduction cards issued by the provincial-level Department of Health and must meet certain criteria, such as having at least a two-year vocational postsecondary education, having completed a training program, and having worked at least two years for a lawful medical or pharmaceutical establishment.

In practice, the Ministry of Health (MOH) has routinely allowed drug introducers to be registered at ROs. However, though there is some inconsistency in the legislation, we believe that the more correct interpretation of the law is that only WFOEs or domestic companies may employ drug introducers, because this would be more consistent with the general principle that ROs are liaisons only and may not engage in profit-making or marketing activities.

2. By Distribution of Drug Information Documents to MPs. In the Commercial Law, ROs are specifically prohibited from introducing goods outside the premises of the RO. The “introduction of goods” is defined as activities of commercial enhancement conducted by a business entity using goods, and materials about the goods, to introduce the same goods to customers. Given the broad scope of the prohibition, ROs may not distribute drug information introduction documents to MPs. Under Article 30.2(e) of Circular 13, however, an RO of a foreign pharmaceutical company that has been authorized to circulate its drugs in Vietnam by the MOH may apply for approval from the MOH for the provision of drug information introduction documents to MPs.

3. At Drug Introduction Seminars for MPs. Interestingly, Circular 13 specifically authorizes an RO to organize seminars for MPs to introduce drugs that have been licensed for manufacturing and circulation in other countries.

4. Through the Display and Introduction of Drugs at Specialized Health Conferences or Seminars for MPs. While an RO is not allowed to directly display and introduce its parent company’s products outside of the RO’s premises, Article 17 of Circular 13 seems to specifically allow organizers or hosts of specialized health conferences and seminars to display and introduce drugs at such events. Due to the fact that an RO is allowed to organize seminars to introduce drugs, an RO should also have the right to display and introduce its drugs there.

Sales Promotion

The Commercial Law provides a broad definition of “sales promotion” as an act of commercial enhancement by a business entity aimed at enhancing the purchase and sale of goods and/or the provision of services by giving specified benefits to customers. Only Vietnamese business entities, branches of Vietnamese business entities, or branches of foreign business entities in Vietnam are authorized to hold their own sales promotions or engage a third party to do so in Vietnam. ROs of foreign business entities are notably excluded.

A sales promotion program in Vietnam may be conducted in various forms, including the use of samples or gifts, discounts, vouchers, contests, lucky draws, and customer reward programs. Promotion programs for pharmaceuticals cannot be directed at consumers, but must be directed only at pharmaceutical traders.

Technical Barrier to Operating as a WFOE

Given the clear advantages that WFOEs have over ROs in the modes of available marketing activities, and, in particular, in the right to employ medical representatives and conduct promotion programs, one would think that most foreign pharmaceutical companies would be operating in the legal form of a WFOE. But this is not the case. At present, most foreign pharmaceutical companies are still operating in RO form, because, according to Circular 47/2010/TT-BYT issued by the MOH in 2010 (and amended a year later), while WFOEs permitted to import drugs are allowed to incorporate, they may not engage in drug importing activity until new legislation, which will likely be joint legislation between the MOH and another body, is passed into law detailing importing procedures and storage practices.

This technical barrier has effectively halted an incorporated WFOE from becoming operational, because the common interpretation dictates that if a WFOE cannot operationally engage in importing, and hence cannot be a “trader,” then it may not conduct marketing activities. Nevertheless, an increasing number of foreign pharmaceutical companies are choosing to create WFOEs and wait for the joint legislation to pass into law, in part, because it normally takes a year or more to incorporate a WFOE engaged in “drug trading” and, also, because of the belief that the joint legislation that has been promised for the past three years must eventually become law.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

November 23, 2022
The delisting of cannabis as a controlled narcotic in Thailand on June 9, 2022, was a breakthrough moment for the industry.  Not only are farmers and others in the industry elated that such a step was taken, it has triggered the establishment of an abundance of cannabis dispensaries in Bangkok and other popular domestic and international tourist destinations in Thailand, including Chiang Mai, Pattaya, Phuket, and many islands. Vulnerable populations, such as children, accessing cannabis has also become a hot-button issue. Thailand’s Ministry of Public Health (MOPH) was initially criticized by some for its policy of allowing cannabis to be sold with few restrictions. On June 17, 2022, the MOPH followed up with the Announcement Re: Controlled Herbs (Cannabis) under the Thai Traditional Medical Knowledge Act, which seemed to implement a viable mechanism to regulate cannabis dispensaries. This announcement contained prohibitions on selling cannabis to vulnerable populations (minors, expectant women, and breastfeeding mothers) and on smoking cannabis in public. Furthermore, the draft Cannabis and Hemp Act includes provisions related to sales and distribution channels and advertisements for particular dispensaries. However, the draft act has been delayed due to disagreements among some political parties during the reading of the legislation, and is unlikely to be implemented in 2022 as had been widely expected.  The tug-of-war among the political parties has caused concerns about whether the country’s recent liberalized cannabis policy will be revisited and cannabis relisted as a narcotic. With this uncertainty over when the draft Cannabis and Hemp Act will be implemented, the MOPH has focused on identifying gaps in current regulation that might allow the misuse of cannabis. The minister of the MOPH has announced that the MOPH announcement of June 17, 2022, will be repealed and replaced by the November 11, 2022, Announcement Re: Controlled Herbs (Cannabis).
November 14, 2022
Following the delisting of cannabis grown in Thailand as a narcotic substance on June 9, 2022, many have explored the applications of cannabis in various fields, including medicine, healthcare, food products, cosmetics, and animal feed. For example, a poultry farm in northern Thailand conducted an experiment jointly with Chiang Mai University, mixing crushed cannabis into poultry feed and water. The experiment showed several benefits of this cannabis feed. Birds that were fed cannabis had lower mortality rates and achieved superior body mass, with increased levels of protein, fat, and moisture in the meat, leading to this method of organic bird farming yielding higher profits. Despite the results of this experiment, the mechanisms and action of cannabis in animal feed are still not yet fully understood, and there are concerns about the possible effects on human health of consuming cannabis-fed poultry. Until recently, cannabis regulations focused solely on the safety of use by humans, and there were no regulations on the use of cannabis in animals. However, on October 11, 2022, the Department of Livestock Development (DLD) published Notification Re: Guidelines on the Use of Hemp and Marijuana as Especially Controlled Animal Feed or Their Use as Ingredients in Especially Controlled Animal Feed in the Government Gazette. In general, the DLD notification requires that animal feed containing cannabis be shown to benefit the animals without causing concern for their safety. According to the Animal Feed Quality Control Act B.E. 2558 (2015), especially controlled animal feed must be registered before it can be manufactured domestically or imported into Thailand. The DLD notification lays down the following evaluation criteria for registration of animal feed containing cannabis: It is prohibited to use cannabis (both hemp and marijuana) apexes (i.e., leaf tips), inflorescence, or seeds—including extracts from apexes, inflorescence, or seeds—as especially controlled animal
October 14, 2022
Interest in organic farming, soil health, and regenerative agriculture has increased rapidly in recent years, and the demand for biological and organic fertilizers has accordingly undergone dramatic growth. Biological fertilizers contain specific levels of microorganisms (such as nitrogen-fixing bacteria); organic fertilizers similarly contain microorganisms and typically come from animals and plants, such as livestock manure and crop residues. Although responsible fertilizer use is still necessary to prevent unintended effects, these “living fertilizers” can boost yields and promote plant productivity without many of the adverse environmental effects and safety concerns of chemical fertilizers. This makes them highly sought after for organic farming, and prized by agricultural operators looking to promote soil health as a bedrock of sustainable agricultural practices. As the global trade for organic and biological fertilizers has scaled up, producers and agribusiness companies have expanded organic and biological fertilizer offerings to new markets. Not only do different countries have their own regulations for fertilizers in general, but they also often have specific requirements and rules for biological and organic fertilizers. This guide provides fertilizer producers and traders with an overview of the legal landscape for these fertilizers in three major Southeast Asian markets so that businesses can make their fertilizers available and foster sustainable agricultural practices in the region. The full Biological and Organic Fertilizers in Indonesia, Thailand, and Vietnam guide can be downloaded through the button below.
August 25, 2022
On July 27, 2022, Myanmar’s Ministry of Commerce (MOC) issued Newsletter No. 8/2022 to effectively ban foreign companies and foreign joint ventures from exporting value-added beans, corn, and sesame. This newsletter repealed Newsletter No. 2/2020, which had prescribed the criteria for beans, corn, and sesame to be considered “value-added” crops. These criteria had to be fulfilled in order for these commodities to be exported in accordance with Notification No. 24/2019, which had permitted foreign companies and foreign joint ventures to purchase seven categories of commodities from local manufacturers for export, subject to certain terms and conditions. These include: Meat and fish; Value-added crops; Pulp and paper; Seeds; Refined metals; Semi-finished or finished valued-added fruit products; and Timber-based furniture. With the repeal of the conditions in Newsletter No. 2/2020, foreign exporters are left with no reference criteria for how to achieve “value-added” status for beans, corn, and sesame, and thus will not be able to submit a complete application for the necessary export license. However, exportation of the other items in the list above remains unaffected and open to foreign exporters who meet the applicable requirements. The MOC explained their decision to revoke the permitted criteria by noting that some foreign companies were not actually producing beans, corn, and sesame that fulfilled the criteria for value-added status as laid out in Newsletter No. 2/2020, but were falsely exporting their goods as “value-added crops.” The revocation of the export criteria for beans, corn, and sesame took immediate effect. For more details on these export restrictions, or on any aspect of importation and exportation regulations in Myanmar, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].