You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 25, 2023

Personal Data Protection and Healthcare Services in Indonesia

One significant development in the health sector in Indonesia is the use of information technology and communication in the implementation of health efforts—particularly digital health services such as telehealth and telemedicine integrated into the country’s National Health Information System.

This development was addressed in a major new piece of legislation for the healthcare sector in Indonesia. Enacted in August 2023, Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health (the “Health Law”) provides the updates needed to support the development of healthcare services in Indonesia.

Under the Health Law, health information system (HIS) providers must:

  • Carry out processing of data and health information in the territory of Indonesia, except for certain limited and specific processing activities that may be conducted outside Indonesia when permitted by the relevant authorities and in compliance with relevant regulations.
  • Ensure the reliability of its HIS, including availability, security, maintenance, and integration with Indonesia’s National Health Information System.
  • Provide quality health data and information.
  • Process data and health information, which includes planning, collection, storage, inspection, transfer, utilization, and destruction.
  • Record its data- and information-processing history.
  • Protect every person’s data and health information.
  • Obtain approval from the relevant personal data subject or comply with relevant regulations if the processing of data and health information involves an individual’s health data.
  • Inform the data owner if there is a failure to protect data and individual health information.

The Health Law’s personal data protection requirements listed above appear to be aligned with the provisions in Law No. 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (the “PDP Law”). Under this law, data and information relating to health are identified as “specific personal data,” the processing of which carries a high potential risk of impacting the relevant personal data subject.

In the implementation of digital health services, patients’ personal data or medical records must be generated by a health service facility. Health service facilities are responsible for the maintenance of the security, integrity, confidentiality, and availability of the data in Medical Records.

Regulatory Implementation of the PDP Law

In preparation for the implementation of the PDP Law, in September 2023 Indonesia’s Ministry of Communication and Information published the Draft Government Regulation regarding Implementation of PDP Law (the “Draft GR PDP”).

The provisions in the Draft GR PDP most relevant to digital health services and medical records are described below.

Personal Data Subject Rights

According to the Draft GR PDP, personal data subjects have the right to:

  • Terminate processing of personal data about themselves in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.
  • Delete personal data about themselves in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.
  • Destroy personal data about themselves in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.
  • Withdraw their previously given consent to the processing of personal data.
  • Object to decision-making actions based solely on automated processing (including profiling) that have legal consequences or a significant impact on the personal data subject.
  • Suspend or limit the processing of personal data proportionately in accordance with the purpose of processing the personal data.
  • Obtain and use personal data about themselves from the personal data controller in a form that fits a structure or format commonly used or readable by electronic systems.
  • Use and transmit personal data about themselves to other personal data controllers if the systems used can communicate with each other securely in accordance with the personal data protection principles.

Personal Data Controller Obligations

Among personal data controllers’ many obligations related to the protection of personal data in general, there are two related to health. Under the Draft GR PDP, personal data subjects have the right to complete, update, and correct errors or inaccuracies in personal data about them through the means provided by the personal data controller, either independently or by submitting a written request to the personal data controller, who must reject such a request if it:

  • Jeopardizes the security or physical or mental health of the personal data subject or others;
  • Impacts the disclosure of personal data belonging to others; or
  • Is contrary to the interests of national defense and security.

Personal data controllers must assess the impact of their processing of personal data related to health, because processing this type of data carries a high potential risk of impacting the relevant personal data subject.

Other than the obligations mentioned above, personal data controllers are also required to do the following, among others:

  • Have a basis for processing personal data;
  • Present evidence of personal data subjects’ consent to the processing of their personal data;
  • Carry out the processing of personal data in a limited, specific, legally valid, and transparent manner;
  • Carry out the processing of personal data in accordance with the declared purpose for processing the personal data;
  • Ensure the accuracy, completeness, and consistency of personal data in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations;
  • Update or fix any errors or inaccuracies in personal data under their control;
  • Record all personal data processing activities; and
  • Provide personal data subjects with access to the processed personal data along with a record of processing activities during the period for which the personal data is retained.

Personal Data Processing

Besides identifying personal data subjects and personal data controllers as relevant parties in the processing of personal data, the Draft GR PDP also details the role of personal data processors. A personal data processor is a party who carries out personal data processing activities, appointed by through an agreement with the personal data controller.

The Draft GR PDP lays out criteria that must be followed in processing personal data. The collection of personal data must be done in a limited, specific, lawful, and transparent manner, and the processing of personal data must be conducted:

  • In accordance with the declared purpose for processing the personal data;
  • In a manner that guarantees the rights of the personal data subject;
  • In a manner that is accurate, complete, not misleading, up-to-date, and reliable.
  • In a manner that protects the security of personal data by preventing unauthorized access, unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized alteration, misuse, destruction, and erasure of the personal data;
  • By informing the personal data subject of its purpose and activities of processing, as well as any failure in protecting the personal data; and
  • Responsibly, as supported by clear evidence of the personal data processing activities.

Personal data must be destroyed or erased after the retention period ends or upon the request of the personal data subject, unless otherwise stipulated by laws or regulations.

Cross-Border Transfers of Personal Data

According to the Draft GR PDP, personal data controllers are allowed to transfer personal data to another personal data controller or personal data processor outside of Indonesia only after the personal data controller ensures that the intended receiver of the personal data has an equivalent or higher level of personal data protection. Personal data controllers must also ensure that there are adequate and binding personal data protection mechanisms in the receiver’s country. If the receiver’s country does not meet the requirements mentioned in Indonesia’s data protection laws and regulations, the personal data controller must obtain the personal data subject’s approval to transfer the data.

Next Steps

The publication of the Draft GR PDP suggests that the final implementing regulation will align with the Health Law and its implementing regulation in relation to the storage, processing, and transfer of health and medical data. This alignment is essential in order to enforce the protection of personal data in healthcare services in Indonesia. With these strong protections in place, patients and providers will benefit from greater security and privacy, leading to an overall better standard of care in Indonesia’s rapidly advancing digital and other health services.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

May 27, 2025
On May 16, 2025, Vietnam’s Ministry of Health (MOH) issued Circular No. 12/2025/TT-BYT on registration of drugs and drug materials (Circular 12). Circular 12 will come into effect on July 1, 2025, replacing Circular No. 08/2022/TT-BYT (as amended), which provides the current regulations on drug registration, along with Circular No. 16/2023/TT-BYT on registration of drugs under toll manufacturing and technology transfer, and Circular No. 07/2017/TT promulgating the list of non-prescription drugs. Some of the key stipulations of Circular 12 are outlined below. Regulation of non-prescription drugs Circular 12 abolishes the detailed list of over-the-counter (OTC) drugs previously stipulated in Circular No. 07/2017/TT-BYT. Instead of relying on a fixed list for classification, Circular 12 introduces a new framework based on principles, criteria, and specific methods for determining the status of non-prescription/OTC drugs. This approach aims to enhance safety, ensure timely access, reflect actual usage and supply conditions, and align with international standards. Drugs that have already been approved will retain their classification (i.e., as prescription or non-prescription) throughout the validity of their marketing authorization (MA), and reclassification will be considered when the MA is renewed. If a change in classification is requested, the MA holder must submit a variation registration dossier to the Drug Administration of Vietnam (DAV). For drug registration dossiers currently under evaluation by the DAV, the classification will be assessed in accordance with the new provisions set out in Circular 12. Drug registration The new regulations under Circular 12 loosen the requirements on providing a Certificate of Pharmaceutical Product (CPP). For all drug registration cases, a single CPP will suffice, provided it is issued by the competent authority of the manufacturing country or by an authority from a country that is a member of the European Medicines Agency (EMA) or a Stringent Regulatory Authority (SRA), and confirms
May 26, 2025
On May 21, 2025, the Trade Competition Commission of Thailand (TCCT) published a press release signaling heightened regulation of digital platforms in response to the influx of products from foreign countries being sold in Thailand via e-commerce platforms. In recent years, the rapid expansion of cross-border multi-sided e-commerce platforms has unlocked unprecedented growth, but it has also flooded Thailand’s digital marketplaces with low-cost imports sold by unregulated foreign vendors via these platforms, unfairly undercutting local merchants’ market share and exposing consumers to uneven product quality. According to the press release, the TCCT announced progress on drafting new guidelines on unfair trade practices, monopolistic conduct, and competition restraint by multi-sided e-commerce platforms at a recent meeting of the Management Committee for Addressing Issues of Foreign Goods and Businesses Violating Laws. This regulatory push is part of a broader governmental effort to tackle issues stemming from the foregoing that create uneven playing fields and undermine consumer welfare. The draft guidelines are designed to regulate platform operators and their complex and multidimensional trade relations that cause network effects and distort competition. The forthcoming guidelines, to be issued under the Trade Competition Act B.E. 2560 (2017), will undergo public consultation to ensure platform operators, the public, and other stakeholders will have an opportunity to provide input before they are finalized and enforced. The guidelines are seen as an important priority, with the minister of commerce urging swift implementation of the measures to achieve the government’s objectives. In addition to the legislative advancement, one of the TCCT commissioners has been appointed to advise a subcommittee on preventing nominee arrangements by foreign investors and a subcommittee dedicated to promoting Thai SMEs and eliminating poor-quality imports. The appointee will also support the nationwide task force against illegal foreign products in overseeing proactive field operations and comprehensive
May 22, 2025
While digital technologies have significantly enhanced communication and information sharing, they have also created new opportunities for misuse, particularly for children, who are especially vulnerable to online abuse and exploitation. These risks are often difficult for parents and guardians to detect or prevent in a timely manner. To address these concerns, Thailand has drafted an amendment to the Criminal Code to introduce new provisions targeting offenses against children committed via online platforms. The objective is to close existing legal gaps and to provide more robust protections for children in the digital environment. The draft amendment focuses primarily on addressing online offenses against children and enhancing legal protections for children. The draft amendment proposed changes regarding the following issues: Jurisdiction and media misuse Expanding Thailand’s jurisdiction to cover sexual and liberty-related offenses committed against children outside the country. Adding offenses for misuse of media, including recording, publishing, or transmitting text, images, or sounds for unlawful or exploitative purposes. Offenses involving child exploitation Adding penalties for persuading, luring, or enticing children to engage in sexual or indecent conduct. Imposing harsher penalties for aggravated cases relating to child exploitation that result in serious harm or death. Adding penalties for sending or forwarding inappropriate sexual content to children with exploitative intent. Adding penalties for using threats involving sexual conduct to pressure or coerce victims. Removing ignorance of a child’s age as a possible defense for certain offenses (e.g., luring children or sending inappropriate content) when the child is under 13 years old. Special protections for vulnerable individuals Imposing harsher penalties for offenses committed against parents, persons under legal guardianship or parental authority, or individuals unable to protect themselves. Adding penalties to offenses such as luring children, sending inappropriate content, and cases involving serious harm or death. Child pornography Increasing liability for possession and
May 15, 2025
Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) held an explanatory session on the draft principles and regulatory approaches of the country’s planned artificial intelligence (AI) law on May 2, 2025. This came after a lull of two years following the initial release of draft legislation on AI. In the session, the ETDA explained that the earlier drafts were modeled after the EU’s legal framework for AI, but given the evolving Thai legal and technological landscape, it is now necessary to revisit and refine the drafts to ensure they remain relevant and effective in the local context. To aid in this process, the ETDA will accept public comments on the draft principles of the AI law until June 9, 2025. Based on gap analysis and a comparative study of how different countries have addressed AI issues, the ETDA’s draft AI law principles are structured into five key areas. These are described below. 1. Risk-Based Requirements The draft principles outline a set of approaches that the legislation will take toward mitigating risk: Delegation of powers to enforcement agency or sectoral regulators The primary legislation will not directly specify a list of prohibited risks or high-risk types of AI. Instead, it will empower an enforcement agency or relevant sectoral regulators to determine and issue such lists. This approach allows regulators in each specific industry to assess the necessity of risk classifications within their respective sectors, based on the principle that sectoral regulators are best positioned to understand the specific risks in their domains. These regulators are expected to issue subordinate legislation in alignment with the overall framework. Meanwhile, the central enforcement agency will coordinate oversight across sectors and cover areas not under the jurisdiction of any specific regulator. Duties of high-risk AI providers Providers of AI deemed by the enforcement agency or sectoral