You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

October 25, 2023

Personal Data Protection and Healthcare Services in Indonesia

Subscribe to Updates

One significant development in the health sector in Indonesia is the use of information technology and communication in the implementation of health efforts—particularly digital health services such as telehealth and telemedicine integrated into the country’s National Health Information System.

This development was addressed in a major new piece of legislation for the healthcare sector in Indonesia. Enacted in August 2023, Law No. 17 of 2023 concerning Health (the “Health Law”) provides the updates needed to support the development of healthcare services in Indonesia.

Under the Health Law, health information system (HIS) providers must:

  • Carry out processing of data and health information in the territory of Indonesia, except for certain limited and specific processing activities that may be conducted outside Indonesia when permitted by the relevant authorities and in compliance with relevant regulations.
  • Ensure the reliability of its HIS, including availability, security, maintenance, and integration with Indonesia’s National Health Information System.
  • Provide quality health data and information.
  • Process data and health information, which includes planning, collection, storage, inspection, transfer, utilization, and destruction.
  • Record its data- and information-processing history.
  • Protect every person’s data and health information.
  • Obtain approval from the relevant personal data subject or comply with relevant regulations if the processing of data and health information involves an individual’s health data.
  • Inform the data owner if there is a failure to protect data and individual health information.

The Health Law’s personal data protection requirements listed above appear to be aligned with the provisions in Law No. 27 of 2022 concerning Personal Data Protection (the “PDP Law”). Under this law, data and information relating to health are identified as “specific personal data,” the processing of which carries a high potential risk of impacting the relevant personal data subject.

In the implementation of digital health services, patients’ personal data or medical records must be generated by a health service facility. Health service facilities are responsible for the maintenance of the security, integrity, confidentiality, and availability of the data in Medical Records.

Regulatory Implementation of the PDP Law

In preparation for the implementation of the PDP Law, in September 2023 Indonesia’s Ministry of Communication and Information published the Draft Government Regulation regarding Implementation of PDP Law (the “Draft GR PDP”).

The provisions in the Draft GR PDP most relevant to digital health services and medical records are described below.

Personal Data Subject Rights

According to the Draft GR PDP, personal data subjects have the right to:

  • Terminate processing of personal data about themselves in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.
  • Delete personal data about themselves in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.
  • Destroy personal data about themselves in accordance with relevant laws and regulations.
  • Withdraw their previously given consent to the processing of personal data.
  • Object to decision-making actions based solely on automated processing (including profiling) that have legal consequences or a significant impact on the personal data subject.
  • Suspend or limit the processing of personal data proportionately in accordance with the purpose of processing the personal data.
  • Obtain and use personal data about themselves from the personal data controller in a form that fits a structure or format commonly used or readable by electronic systems.
  • Use and transmit personal data about themselves to other personal data controllers if the systems used can communicate with each other securely in accordance with the personal data protection principles.

Personal Data Controller Obligations

Among personal data controllers’ many obligations related to the protection of personal data in general, there are two related to health. Under the Draft GR PDP, personal data subjects have the right to complete, update, and correct errors or inaccuracies in personal data about them through the means provided by the personal data controller, either independently or by submitting a written request to the personal data controller, who must reject such a request if it:

  • Jeopardizes the security or physical or mental health of the personal data subject or others;
  • Impacts the disclosure of personal data belonging to others; or
  • Is contrary to the interests of national defense and security.

Personal data controllers must assess the impact of their processing of personal data related to health, because processing this type of data carries a high potential risk of impacting the relevant personal data subject.

Other than the obligations mentioned above, personal data controllers are also required to do the following, among others:

  • Have a basis for processing personal data;
  • Present evidence of personal data subjects’ consent to the processing of their personal data;
  • Carry out the processing of personal data in a limited, specific, legally valid, and transparent manner;
  • Carry out the processing of personal data in accordance with the declared purpose for processing the personal data;
  • Ensure the accuracy, completeness, and consistency of personal data in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations;
  • Update or fix any errors or inaccuracies in personal data under their control;
  • Record all personal data processing activities; and
  • Provide personal data subjects with access to the processed personal data along with a record of processing activities during the period for which the personal data is retained.

Personal Data Processing

Besides identifying personal data subjects and personal data controllers as relevant parties in the processing of personal data, the Draft GR PDP also details the role of personal data processors. A personal data processor is a party who carries out personal data processing activities, appointed by through an agreement with the personal data controller.

The Draft GR PDP lays out criteria that must be followed in processing personal data. The collection of personal data must be done in a limited, specific, lawful, and transparent manner, and the processing of personal data must be conducted:

  • In accordance with the declared purpose for processing the personal data;
  • In a manner that guarantees the rights of the personal data subject;
  • In a manner that is accurate, complete, not misleading, up-to-date, and reliable.
  • In a manner that protects the security of personal data by preventing unauthorized access, unauthorized disclosure, unauthorized alteration, misuse, destruction, and erasure of the personal data;
  • By informing the personal data subject of its purpose and activities of processing, as well as any failure in protecting the personal data; and
  • Responsibly, as supported by clear evidence of the personal data processing activities.

Personal data must be destroyed or erased after the retention period ends or upon the request of the personal data subject, unless otherwise stipulated by laws or regulations.

Cross-Border Transfers of Personal Data

According to the Draft GR PDP, personal data controllers are allowed to transfer personal data to another personal data controller or personal data processor outside of Indonesia only after the personal data controller ensures that the intended receiver of the personal data has an equivalent or higher level of personal data protection. Personal data controllers must also ensure that there are adequate and binding personal data protection mechanisms in the receiver’s country. If the receiver’s country does not meet the requirements mentioned in Indonesia’s data protection laws and regulations, the personal data controller must obtain the personal data subject’s approval to transfer the data.

Next Steps

The publication of the Draft GR PDP suggests that the final implementing regulation will align with the Health Law and its implementing regulation in relation to the storage, processing, and transfer of health and medical data. This alignment is essential in order to enforce the protection of personal data in healthcare services in Indonesia. With these strong protections in place, patients and providers will benefit from greater security and privacy, leading to an overall better standard of care in Indonesia’s rapidly advancing digital and other health services.

Related Professionals

Industries

Life Sciences

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

July 11, 2025
Vietnam’s recent embrace of “regulatory sandboxes” reflects a deliberate policy choice to balance the need for robust oversight with an equally pressing imperative to catalyze innovation. A sandbox is a controlled, time-bound framework in which businesses may pilot emerging technologies, products, or business models under relaxed or tailor-made regulatory requirements, thereby allowing regulators to observe risks in real time while innovators validate commercial viability without bearing the full weight of the traditional compliance regime. By issuing sandbox regulations, the government of Vietnam is signaling its commitment to accelerating digital transformation, attracting investment, and developing a knowledge-based economy, all while safeguarding financial stability, consumer protection, and national security. This strategy is embodied in a suite of instruments that together establish sector-specific sandboxes: Decree No. 94/2025/ND-CP on the Regulatory Sandbox in the Banking Sector (Fintech Sandbox Decree), effective July 1, 2025. Law on Digital Technology Industry (DTI Law), effective January 1, 2026, and Law on Science, Technology and Innovation (STI Law), effective October 1, 2025. Resolution No. 222/2025/QH15 on International Financial Centers (IFC Resolution), effective September 1, 2025. In addition, a draft resolution on the pilot implementation of the crypto-asset market (Draft Crypto Pilot Resolution) is expected to introduce a dedicated sandbox for crypto-asset service providers later this year, further underscoring Vietnam’s holistic, forward-looking approach to regulating emerging technologies. Below is a brief summary of all the regulatory sandboxes, who they are open for, and what businesses are attracted. Fintech Sandbox Decree Under the Fintech Sandbox Decree, besides credit institutions and foreign bank branches, fintech companies operating in Vietnam can apply for a Certificate of Sandbox Participation issued by the State Bank of Vietnam to operate any of the following services in Vietnam: Credit scoring: A solution applicable to information technology systems of credit institutions, branches of foreign banks, and fintech
Read More
July 11, 2025
On June 10, 2025, Thailand’s Supreme Administrative Court accepted for consideration a pivotal lawsuit concerning the regulatory obligations of administrative agencies over internet-based television broadcasting services, commonly referred to as over-the-top (OTT) services. This court’s decision in the case may set important precedents for how OTT platforms are regulated, especially regarding consumer protections and advertising practices. Background A user of an OTT television application initiated legal action against the National Broadcasting and Telecommunications Commission (NBTC) and related officials, alleging that the lack of clear regulatory criteria and oversight allowed OTT operators to broadcast general television content while compelling users to view advertisements before and during programming. The plaintiff argued this constituted consumer exploitation and claimed that the responsible authorities neglected or delayed their statutory duties under the Act on the Organization to Assign Radio Frequencies and Regulate Broadcasting, Television, and Telecommunications Services B.E. 2553 (2010). Initially, the Central Administrative Court declined to accept the lawsuit. However, on appeal, the Supreme Administrative Court determined that the claim fell within its jurisdiction, noting that OTT television services—defined under section 4 of the governing act—are subject to the same regulatory framework as traditional television services, regardless of the transmission method (frequency, cable, internet, or other system). Implications for OTT Services The key implications for OTT services concern the following issues: Regulatory oversight: The court recognized that OTT television services are explicitly covered under Thailand’s broadcast regulatory regime. Regulatory agencies may be compelled to establish clear operational rules and oversight mechanisms for OTT providers. Consumer protections: The plaintiff’s claim that excessive or unavoidable in-program advertising constitutes consumer exploitation was acknowledged as a matter of public interest. This may prompt stricter advertising standards for OTT platforms. Licensing requirements: The case raises the prospect that OTT operators may be required to obtain licenses from the
Read More
July 10, 2025
For companies and individuals doing business in Vietnam, a common question is whether electronic signatures (e-signatures) are legally recognized under Vietnamese law. This matter is governed by Law No. 20/2023/QH15 on Electronic Transactions issued on June 22, 2023 (ETL 2023) and its guiding legal documents such as Decree No. 23/2025/ND-CP dated February 21, 2025, and Circular 06/2024/TT-BTTTT dated July 1, 2024 (Circular 06). Recognition of Validity of E-signatures in Vietnam As a general principle, the ETL 2023 confirms that an e-signature cannot be denied legal validity solely due to its electronic form. The law categorizes e-signatures into three types: Type 1: Specialized e-signatures for organizations Type 2: Public digital signatures for individuals and organizations Type 3: Specialized digital signatures for government agencies Among these types, only secure specialized e-signatures (a secure e-signature of type 1) and digital signatures (type 2) are explicitly granted the same legal validity as handwritten (wet) signatures. This distinction is particularly important in legal disputes and for transactions with government agencies. (For more details, please refer to our previous article.) Domestic e-signatures A domestic organization can choose to use secure specialized e-signatures (type 1) and/or digital signatures (type 2) while a Vietnam-based individual can choose digital signatures (type 2) for their transactions—particularly for those involving government agencies and transactions of high value and complexity which require stronger legal protection. Specialized e-signatures (type 1) can be created by the organizations themselves, and additionally must be “secure” to be explicitly recognized as having the same legal validity as handwritten signatures. For clarity, “secure” specialized e-signatures are those certified (granted a safety certificate) by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MST). (This was formerly the responsibility of the Ministry of Information and Communications, which was merged with MST under Vietnam’s 2025 administrative restructuring.) Digital signatures (type 2) are
Read More
July 9, 2025
On June 16, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law No. 75/2025/QH15 amending and supplementing a number of articles of the 2012 Advertising Law, with an effective date of January 1, 2026. The amended Advertising Law was enacted to further refine the legal framework for advertising activities in the modern era. Online Advertising Under the amended Advertising Law, “online advertising” is defined to encompass not only advertising on electronic newspapers and electronic information pages (as provided under the 2012 Advertising Law) but also advertising on other electronic venues, including social media, online applications, and digital platforms with internet connection. The amended Advertising Law also imposes new requirements for online advertising, including: Identification signs: Advertisements must have clear identifiable signs in numbers, letters, symbols, images, or sounds to distinguish them from non-advertising content. Control features: For advertisements not in fixed areas, there must be easily recognizable features and icons that allow recipients to turn off the advertisement, notify the service provider of violating advertising content, and refuse to view inappropriate advertising content. Linked content: Content in the links embedded in advertisements must comply with the law. Advertising service providers and publishers must have measures to check and monitor the linked content. Advertising on social media: Organizations and enterprises providing social media services must offer users features to distinguish advertising content from other content. Signage for sponsored content: When advertising, users of social media services must use signs to differentiate advertising or sponsored content from other content they provide. In response to the above requirements for online advertising, the amended Advertising Law sets out obligations of advertisers, advertising service providers, advertising publishers, and advertising conveyors in relation to online advertising. Among these, it is notably the responsibility of individuals and organizations engaging in online advertising to prevent and remove violating
Read More