You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 30, 2020

Patent Filing Statistics in the Food & Beverage Sector in Vietnam

Vietnamese cuisine has a growing reputation internationally, and a visit to Vietnam will quickly reveal that food plays a very important role in the country’s identity and culture, as well as its economy. More than 80% of the population makes a living through some form of agriculture, and approximately 35% of household income in Vietnam is spent on food and beverages. As food is the most essential of necessities, and thus the first priority in household spending, this percentage tends to be high in developing countries, declining as incomes rise. In Vietnam, however, even as the country has ascended from one of the poorest in the world to middle-income status, the percentage of income spent on food has remained high—an indication that Vietnamese people don’t just eat to live, they live to eat.

With a population approaching 100 million, Vietnam represents an appetizing market for investors in the food and beverage (F&B) sector. According to an October 2019 assessment from market research firm Vietnam Report, the F&B sector has the highest gross output and the second highest total revenue of all economic sectors in the country, and is expected to maintain its momentum with an average annual growth rate of more than 10% in the coming years, due to rising disposable income and shifting consumer tastes.

In this promising but also competitive market, many foreign and domestic F&B companies are directing investment into research and development activities, and protecting their new products through patents and other methods.

What are the special features of patent protection in this sector? We take a look at some patent filing statistics in F&B in Vietnam—please click the link below to view the entire report.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 26, 2021
In April 2021, the Vietnamese government made public a draft decree to amend Decree No. 43/2017/ND-CP of the Government dated April 14, 2017, on goods labeling (“Decree 43”), which is the primary legislation in Vietnam on the labeling requirements for domestically circulating goods and imported goods. Some noteworthy differences between the draft and the current Decree 43 include the following: 1. Original labels for imported products For imported goods, the draft adds a requirement on compulsory information for original labels, which is not mentioned in Decree 43. In particular, the original product label for goods being imported to circulate on the Vietnam market must contain the following compulsory information in a foreign language or in Vietnamese before customs clearance: Product name; Name and address of the entities responsible for the products; Product origin or place where the final production stage to complete the product was conducted. (If this information is not presented on the original product label, it must be included in the import documents accompanying the product.) 2. Vietnamese labels for imported products Under the draft, if it is impossible to determine the product origin under rules/guidance on determining product origin in Vietnam, it is acceptable to instead indicate on the product label the place(s) where the final production stage to complete the product was conducted. 3. Nutritional information for food Instead of being optional information as mentioned in Decree 43, “nutritional value” is compulsory information on labels for some food products under the draft. The Ministry of Health will have a roadmap for carrying out nutritional labeling and will provide appropriate guidance to manufacturers and importers, as well as issue regulations on types of food that are partially or entirely exempt from declaration of nutritional value. The draft has not yet been finalized and is subject to
July 26, 2021
Laos’ first law specifically addressing contracts for electronic transactions comes as a relief to operators who had previously been left to interpret laws on contracts generally in a context for which they were not designed.