You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 6, 2021

Options for Vietnam Market Entry for International Educational Brands

As international integration has been one of Vietnam’s principal economic goals, the country’s demand for a highly educated labor force equipped with international-standard education has become higher and higher. As studying abroad may be financially burdensome, international-standard education offered by local entities has become a reasonable choice for many Vietnamese students. As a result, the sector has attracted more and more investors, both local and foreign.

Some popular options for global brands to enter the promising education market of Vietnam are discussed below.

1. Establishing a Foreign-Invested Educational Institution

Foreign-invested educational institutions (FIEI) include (i) short-term training institutions such as foreign language centers; (ii) kindergartens; (iii) compulsory educational institutions (primary, intermediate, or high schools or combined schools); (iv) universities; or (v) branches of foreign universities). To establish a FIEI in Vietnam, a foreign investor needs to either establish a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (WFOE) or form a joint venture company with a local partner.

The established company must have in its license a business line of providing educational services (e.g., primary education services or university education services) because Vietnam practices the doctrine of corporate ultra vires, meaning that all enterprises, including WFOEs and joint ventures, may only engage in activities (business lines) which are approved by the licensing authorities. Moreover, under Vietnamese laws, educational services are a conditional business line; thus, the established company must obtain required sublicenses for providing these services in Vietnam.

Typically, some or all of the following steps will need to be carried out for a FIEI to be established and start operating in Vietnam:

  1. Obtaining an Investment Registration Certificate (IRC). The IRC will recognize the contents relating to the investment project, such as the investor(s), project location, objectives and scale of the project, investment capital, investment incentives and restrictions, etc.
  2. Obtaining an Enterprise Registration Certificate (ERC). The ERC will provide for the corporate details such as the company name, registered office address, charter capital, owner’s details, and legal representative(s) of the company.
  3. Obtaining a decision on establishment of an educational institution.
  4. Obtaining an approval for providing educational operations.

The above licenses are granted subject to certain conditions regarding educational planning, investment capital, facilities, teachers, and the ratio of Vietnamese students.

Establishing a FIEI may be a good choice for foreign investors who want to do long-term business with stability. This method also gives investors the ability to manage and operate their businesses directly. However, the investor would likely face greater expenses in establishing, maintaining, and expanding its business in Vietnam as compared to the other methods discussed below. Moreover, establishing a company would require a greater outlay of time and resources for the foreign investor to sufficiently acquire or develop knowledge of the local market.

2. Acquisition

Acquiring equity in an existing education company is suitable for foreign investors who wish to access the Vietnam market without the need to go through the cumbersome and time-consuming process of obtaining all the licenses for establishing an FIEI as set out above. Instead, the existing education company may need to carry out procedures relating to equity investment registration, amendment of investment and corporate registration, and amendments of sublicenses regarding the establishment and operation of the educational institution.

However, Vietnamese laws currently remain silent on amendments of sublicenses regarding the establishment and operation of an educational institution due to equity acquisition by foreign investors. Thus, the required procedures may be carried out on a case-by-case basis upon obtaining guidance from the relevant authorities.

3. Franchising

Franchising is one of the fastest ways for foreign brands to have their goods or services sold in the Vietnam market. As of mid-2021, more than 260 foreign franchisors had registered to carry out franchising activities in Vietnam, mainly in the business sectors of food and beverages (42%); fashion (21%); education (9%), and retail stores (8%).

Franchising in educational services has certain advantages compared to establishing a Vietnam subsidiary. The most obvious benefit of franchising is the ability to expand a business by using the manpower, capital, and local market knowledge of franchisees, while still maintaining the ability to control the quality of the educational services. A franchisor is also able to direct how it would like the local franchisees to develop the business, such as by setting up minimum targets for opening campuses.

A foreign franchisor entering Vietnam through a franchising arrangement with a Vietnamese partner does not need to have a legal presence in Vietnam. However, the franchised business system must have been operating for at least one year in any country in the world prior to franchising.

In Vietnam, a foreign franchisor needs to register its franchising activities with the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT). In practice, for franchises in educational services, the MOIT expects foreign franchisors to prove their experience in the education sector, their education method that they offer prospective franchisees, as well as their legitimate ownership over trademarks and other IP rights related to the educational franchise systems.

4. Licensing Coupled with Provision of Management Services

A foreign education company may also get brand presence in Vietnam through contractual arrangements with a local partner, including a license agreement and a management agreement. The most advantageous factor of these arrangements is that no registration procedures are required.

With regard to the license agreement, a foreign licensor might grant to the licensee in Vietnam the rights to use its brands and trademarks in connection with the educational services. For protection of the licensor’s ownership of trademarks relating to educational services, the licensor should register for protection of such trademarks in Vietnam at the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam or through the World Intellectual Property Office as soon as possible.

In addition to granting the rights to use its brands and trademarks, the foreign licensor may enter into a management agreement with the local licensee to provide its services of management of the school bearing its brands and trademarks. It is recommended that foreign investors should conduct sufficient due diligence on potential local partners to ensure that they have the requisite licenses, facilities, manpower, capital, and other requirements necessary to meet their responsibilities and ensure the reputation and quality of the school brands. Moreover, management agreements should clearly set out the rights and obligations of each party to ensure the operation of the school in compliance with the method of the manager, the provisions on the school body (e.g., school board, head of school) and dispute resolution mechanisms, among other matters.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

March 20, 2026
Thailand’s Board of Investment (BOI) now requires data center projects to demonstrate measurable benefits for local workforce development, R&D, SME capability, and domestic supply chains to qualify for corporate income tax (CIT) exemptions. BOI Notification No. Por. 3/2569, issued on February 6, 2026, updates the requirements for projects seeking promotion under BOI category 8.2.1 (data centers). All data center projects must now submit and implement plans covering development of Thai human resources and domestic supply chain support before benefiting from any CIT exemption. Human Resources Development Plan The BOI seeks to promote local talent development beyond basic training. Plans must include the following elements: Training for data center design, construction, and operations targeting vocational students, engineering and ICT undergraduates and postgraduates, and energy and building personnel in Thailand. Joint curricula with Thai universities and technical institutes. Collaborative R&D with Thai nationals or institutions in areas including AI, resource allocation, high-performance computing, and data center hardware and systems. Thai SME upskilling in electrical and energy systems and IT services. Domestic Supply Chain Support Plan Plans must demonstrate knowledge transfer in design, construction, cooling, security, and power and water management. Projects must also include usage or installation of domestically manufactured equipment or engage specialist domestic entities. Criteria for BOI Evaluation The BOI will assess data center operators’ eligibility for CIT incentives based on two criteria: Scale requirement: Training and joint-curriculum initiatives must reach a total participants equal to at least 10 times the project headcount and run for the duration of the CIT incentive. If this threshold is not met, the applicant must also implement continuous R&D or SME skills-development plans throughout the incentive period. Substantiality test: Supply-chain plans must be substantive, meet industry standards, and show measurable development of the domestic digital and data center supply base. To ensure compliance,
February 25, 2026
Tilleke & Gibbins has updated the Vietnam chapter in the newly released Licensing 2026 guide, published by Lexology Panoramic. The comparative guide provides companies and other interested readers with information on licensing law and practice in various countries around the world. Licensing 2026 provides detailed information on the following topics: Restrictions, laws and licensing arrangements Intellectual property issues: Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property, contesting the validity of licensor’s IP rights, invalidity and expiry of IP rights, security interests, proceedings against third parties, sublicensing, jointly owned IP, first to file, scope of patent protection, trade secrets, copyright Software licensing: Perpetual licensing, legal requirements, user restrictions Royalties and payments, currency conversion, and taxes: Relevant legislation, restrictions, taxation of foreign licensors Competition law issues: Restrictions on trade, legal restrictions, and IP-related court rulings Indemnification, disclaimers, and damages: Prevalence and enforceability of indemnity provisions and contractual waivers of damages Termination: Right to terminate, impact of termination Bankruptcy: Impact of licensee or licensor bankruptcy Dispute resolution: Governing law, arbitration, enforceability, injunctive relief, contractual waivers The Vietnam chapter is available below as a PDF. Readers can gain 30 days of complementary access to the full Licensing 2026 guide and the rest of Lexology Panoramic’s varied offerings through this link.
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has overhauled its approach to related-party transactions (RPTs) by issuing new rules that simplify approval processes while expanding oversight. Capital Market Supervisory Board Notification No. TorJor. 46/2568 will replace the longstanding Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551, which has governed RPT compliance for over a decade. The new regulation takes effect on July 1, 2026. Any RPT matters approved by a company’s board of directors or approved for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 21/2551. The new RPT rules will introduce significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Consolidated Definitions Under the previous framework, key definitions relevant to RPT compliance were dispersed across multiple sources, including SEC notifications, Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) regulations, and provisions of the Securities and Exchange Act (before amendments). The new regulation consolidates these definitions into a single notification. Concepts such as “related party” and “connected person,” as well as relevant transaction categories, are now more systematically organized and written in greater detail. The SET has yet to issue corresponding regulations, which should include more detailed related disclosure requirements. Unified Threshold and Mandatory Board Approval The most significant change under the new regulation is the elimination of the multitiered approval framework based on transaction type. Instead of various categories, transactions are now classified as either (1) financial assistance provided to related persons, or (2) other RPTs in order to determine the level of corporate approvals and disclosures for each transaction size in these categories, but the concept remains the same. Under the previous regulation, RPTs were divided into small, medium, and large transactions, with differing approval requirements. The new regulation effectively merges the small and medium categories. As a result, all RPTs must now be approved by the board of directors as a baseline
February 19, 2026
Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has issued a new regulation on material transactions (MTs) to govern asset acquisitions and disposals by listed companies and their subsidiaries. The new notification on MT criteria (No. TorJor. 45/2568) from the Capital Market Supervisory Board replaces the long-standing notification (No. TorJor. 20/2551) that has governed such matters. The SEC has also introduced parallel amendments to the country’s related-party transaction rules. The new regulation will take effect on July 1, 2026. Any MT matters approved by a company’s board of directors for shareholders’ approval before that date remain subject to Notification No. TorJor. 20/2551. Following that date, the new MT rules will introduce several significant changes that market participants should carefully consider. Expanded Scope of Material Transactions One of the key changes under the new regulation is the expansion of the definition of MTs, which now expressly covers financial assistance and certain lease and business lease arrangements that are not in the ordinary course of business of the listed company or its subsidiaries. For financial assistance, this includes lending, granting credit, providing guarantees, or entering into any arrangement that increases the company’s financial obligations, particularly where the recipient is facing liquidity issues or unable to repay debts. Other forms of financial support also fall within scope. However, whether the provision of collateral for others qualifies as an MT remains somewhat unclear, since no disposal of assets occurs for the provider of collateral. This issue remains to be carefully considered. For lease-related transactions, the MT rules now specifically include the lease or hire-purchase of all or part of a business or assets operated by or belonging to a listed company or its subsidiaries. New Exemptions The new regulation introduces clearer exemptions for transactions between a listed company and its subsidiaries or among subsidiaries, which