You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 6, 2021

Options for Vietnam Market Entry for International Educational Brands

As international integration has been one of Vietnam’s principal economic goals, the country’s demand for a highly educated labor force equipped with international-standard education has become higher and higher. As studying abroad may be financially burdensome, international-standard education offered by local entities has become a reasonable choice for many Vietnamese students. As a result, the sector has attracted more and more investors, both local and foreign.

Some popular options for global brands to enter the promising education market of Vietnam are discussed below.

1. Establishing a Foreign-Invested Educational Institution

Foreign-invested educational institutions (FIEI) include (i) short-term training institutions such as foreign language centers; (ii) kindergartens; (iii) compulsory educational institutions (primary, intermediate, or high schools or combined schools); (iv) universities; or (v) branches of foreign universities). To establish a FIEI in Vietnam, a foreign investor needs to either establish a wholly foreign-owned enterprise (WFOE) or form a joint venture company with a local partner.

The established company must have in its license a business line of providing educational services (e.g., primary education services or university education services) because Vietnam practices the doctrine of corporate ultra vires, meaning that all enterprises, including WFOEs and joint ventures, may only engage in activities (business lines) which are approved by the licensing authorities. Moreover, under Vietnamese laws, educational services are a conditional business line; thus, the established company must obtain required sublicenses for providing these services in Vietnam.

Typically, some or all of the following steps will need to be carried out for a FIEI to be established and start operating in Vietnam:

  1. Obtaining an Investment Registration Certificate (IRC). The IRC will recognize the contents relating to the investment project, such as the investor(s), project location, objectives and scale of the project, investment capital, investment incentives and restrictions, etc.
  2. Obtaining an Enterprise Registration Certificate (ERC). The ERC will provide for the corporate details such as the company name, registered office address, charter capital, owner’s details, and legal representative(s) of the company.
  3. Obtaining a decision on establishment of an educational institution.
  4. Obtaining an approval for providing educational operations.

The above licenses are granted subject to certain conditions regarding educational planning, investment capital, facilities, teachers, and the ratio of Vietnamese students.

Establishing a FIEI may be a good choice for foreign investors who want to do long-term business with stability. This method also gives investors the ability to manage and operate their businesses directly. However, the investor would likely face greater expenses in establishing, maintaining, and expanding its business in Vietnam as compared to the other methods discussed below. Moreover, establishing a company would require a greater outlay of time and resources for the foreign investor to sufficiently acquire or develop knowledge of the local market.

2. Acquisition

Acquiring equity in an existing education company is suitable for foreign investors who wish to access the Vietnam market without the need to go through the cumbersome and time-consuming process of obtaining all the licenses for establishing an FIEI as set out above. Instead, the existing education company may need to carry out procedures relating to equity investment registration, amendment of investment and corporate registration, and amendments of sublicenses regarding the establishment and operation of the educational institution.

However, Vietnamese laws currently remain silent on amendments of sublicenses regarding the establishment and operation of an educational institution due to equity acquisition by foreign investors. Thus, the required procedures may be carried out on a case-by-case basis upon obtaining guidance from the relevant authorities.

3. Franchising

Franchising is one of the fastest ways for foreign brands to have their goods or services sold in the Vietnam market. As of mid-2021, more than 260 foreign franchisors had registered to carry out franchising activities in Vietnam, mainly in the business sectors of food and beverages (42%); fashion (21%); education (9%), and retail stores (8%).

Franchising in educational services has certain advantages compared to establishing a Vietnam subsidiary. The most obvious benefit of franchising is the ability to expand a business by using the manpower, capital, and local market knowledge of franchisees, while still maintaining the ability to control the quality of the educational services. A franchisor is also able to direct how it would like the local franchisees to develop the business, such as by setting up minimum targets for opening campuses.

A foreign franchisor entering Vietnam through a franchising arrangement with a Vietnamese partner does not need to have a legal presence in Vietnam. However, the franchised business system must have been operating for at least one year in any country in the world prior to franchising.

In Vietnam, a foreign franchisor needs to register its franchising activities with the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT). In practice, for franchises in educational services, the MOIT expects foreign franchisors to prove their experience in the education sector, their education method that they offer prospective franchisees, as well as their legitimate ownership over trademarks and other IP rights related to the educational franchise systems.

4. Licensing Coupled with Provision of Management Services

A foreign education company may also get brand presence in Vietnam through contractual arrangements with a local partner, including a license agreement and a management agreement. The most advantageous factor of these arrangements is that no registration procedures are required.

With regard to the license agreement, a foreign licensor might grant to the licensee in Vietnam the rights to use its brands and trademarks in connection with the educational services. For protection of the licensor’s ownership of trademarks relating to educational services, the licensor should register for protection of such trademarks in Vietnam at the Intellectual Property Office of Vietnam or through the World Intellectual Property Office as soon as possible.

In addition to granting the rights to use its brands and trademarks, the foreign licensor may enter into a management agreement with the local licensee to provide its services of management of the school bearing its brands and trademarks. It is recommended that foreign investors should conduct sufficient due diligence on potential local partners to ensure that they have the requisite licenses, facilities, manpower, capital, and other requirements necessary to meet their responsibilities and ensure the reputation and quality of the school brands. Moreover, management agreements should clearly set out the rights and obligations of each party to ensure the operation of the school in compliance with the method of the manager, the provisions on the school body (e.g., school board, head of school) and dispute resolution mechanisms, among other matters.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 27, 2025
Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) has issued an announcement reinforcing compliance obligations under the Myanmar Companies Law (MCL). This follows recent updates to reporting requirements and signals increased regulatory scrutiny regarding registered office addresses and directors’ residential information submitted online via MyCO, Myanmar’s company registration system. Key Compliance Areas Under the MCL, every company must maintain a registered office for official communication and legal correspondence. Any change to this address must be reported to the DICA registrar. In April 2023, DICA introduced additional reporting obligations for newly incorporated companies. The additional rules require companies to submit their Annual Return accompanied by verification documents within two months of incorporation. These documents include a recommendation letter from the relevant township police station or ward administrator confirming the operational status and physical location of the registered office. Directors’ residential addresses must also be verified through similar documentation, and foreign directors are required to submit the arrival notification form issued by the Immigration Department. For companies operating through a virtual office, clarification from a DICA official indicates that the virtual office address must correspond with the registered address submitted via MyCO. A recommendation letter confirming the validity and operational status of the virtual office must be submitted. Legal Consequences The recent announcement signals that DICA will begin enforcing these requirements in earnest. Failure to comply with the additional reporting obligations may result in inspections and enforcement actions by the DICA registrar, or complaints from third parties. It may also lead to penalties or other legal consequences as prescribed under the MCL. Recommended Actions It is strongly advised that all newly incorporated companies and their directors: Review their MyCO submissions for accuracy. Secure the required supporting documents within the Annual Return deadline. Ensure that all address information reflects the company’s actual
August 19, 2025
On August 6, 2025, Myanmar’s National Defence and Security Council (NDSC) issued Order No. 20/2025, announcing a change in the composition of the country’s Foreign Exchange Supervisory Committee (FESC). The prime minister has been appointed committee chair of the FESC, and five other individuals were appointed to the committee. The order took immediate effect. Originally established in April 2022, the FESC is responsible for approving foreign currency conversion, granting exemptions to foreign exchange restrictions, and permitting overseas transfers of foreign currency. The FESC supervises the flow of foreign currencies for domestic and foreign investment, manufacturing, exports and imports, and service businesses (including education- and health-related initiatives). The FESC is specifically responsible for considering and approving the use of foreign currency for the following: Importing machinery, vehicles, equipment, and raw materials essential for foreign investment and manufacturing projects; Importing fuel, medicine, cooking oil, fertilizer, insecticide, and construction materials not readily available on the domestic market; Covering Myanmar citizens’ needs abroad, such as medical treatment, education, or religious activities; Facilitating imports of general goods, loan repayments, interest payments to foreign lenders, service payments, and profit repatriation from investments; and Importing luxury products, including brand-name goods, jewelry, sports cars, and watches. The FESC is empowered to carry out further duties related to foreign exchange management as assigned by the NDSC Importers, exporters, investors, and business owners are encouraged to consult the most current FESC guidelines and approval lists before conducting transactions in Myanmar. For more details on these FESC composition developments, or on any aspect of financial regulations in Myanmar, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
August 1, 2025
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Vietnam chapter to Corporate Governance 2025, part of the International Comparative Legal Guides (ICLG) series published by Global Legal Group. This respected guide offers comprehensive, jurisdiction-specific overviews of corporate governance laws and practices around the world. Each jurisdictional chapter follows a clear Q&A format, providing practical insights into critical issues such as: Sources of corporate governance regulation Shareholders’ rights, powers, and responsibilities Structure and duties of management bodies Stakeholder involvement in governance Transparency and reporting requirements ESG and sustainability-related obligations Cybersecurity and technology-related disclosures The Vietnam chapter was authored by Tram Ngoc Bich Nguyen, Truc Thi Thanh Tran, Dung Thi Phuong Le, and Quang Minh Vu, members of Tilleke & Gibbins’ corporate and commercial team in Ho Chi Minh City. The authors provide detailed analysis of Vietnam’s corporate governance framework, including recent developments such as the 2025 amendments to the Law on Enterprises requiring disclosure of ultimate beneficial ownership and the increasing emphasis on sustainable business practices and responsible corporate conduct. The chapter also discusses practical considerations for foreign investors in Vietnam, such as overlapping signing authorities between key company officers, enforcement of shareholders’ agreements, and disclosure obligations related to ownership and management roles. The complete Vietnam chapter is available as a PDF below. The Vietnam chapter—and the full Corporate Governance 2025 guide—are also freely available on the ICLG website.
July 25, 2025
On June 17, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law No. 76/2025/QH15 (Amended LOE) amending and supplementing the 2020 Law on Enterprises, which aims to reshape the legal framework to enhance transparency and alignment with international standards. The Amended LOE took effect from July 1, 2025. Below are key notes on the Amended LOE. Recognition of Beneficial Owners The beneficial owner (BO) concept was previously addressed under Vietnam’s anti-money laundering framework. However, the formal recognition of a BO in the Amended LOE marks a pivotal advancement in embedding ownership transparency into corporate governance, in line with the G7 Financial Action Task Force’s standards on anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing. Under the Amended LOE and Decree No. 168/2025/ND-CP of the government dated June 30, 2025, on enterprise registration (Decree 168), a BO is identified through either equity ownership or control rights. Equity ownership: Individuals holding 25% or more of a company’s charter capital or voting shares, either directly or indirectly, qualify as BOs. Indirect ownership is further defined as ownership of at least 25% of charter capital or voting shares through an intermediary organization. Control rights: Individuals with the authority to make or influence major decisions are considered BOs. The actual control over a company includes the power (i) to appoint or remove most or all members of the board of directors or the members’ council or the general director of a company; (ii) to amend the charter; or (iii) to decide other key matters specified in the company’s charter. Notably, individuals representing state ownership in state-owned enterprises are excluded from the scope of the BO concept. Companies are responsible for collecting, updating, and retaining information about BOs and cooperating with authorities when requested to identify BOs, among other obligations. Additionally, any companies registered before July 1, 2025, must