You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 27, 2020

Options for Employers in Laos during the COVID-19 Outbreak

The adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have led employers to look for ways to mitigate the losses being wrought by the turmoil. While working remotely from home is a viable option for some, economic slowdown or to the nature of some industries make it unfeasible for others.

This article considers the legality of some measures to mitigate employment costs in Laos.

Can an employer suspend an employment contract?

No. Lao labor law currently only allows employment contracts to be suspended for national military service, or in the case of that employee being detained, held, or restricted in a certain area by a government authority. Hardship facing the company—even of the scale faced under the current pandemic—is, for now, not a valid reason for suspending an employment contract in Laos. If the contract itself has a specific provision for suspension under circumstances such as this, suspension might be possible, but the opinion of the local authorities should be sought first.

Can an employer unilaterally reduce an employee’s salary?

There is no such provision under Lao labor law. However, the law provides that, in the event of a temporary suspension of the business (not merely a slowdown of any degree) ordered by relevant local authorities or resulting from a decision of the employer, the employer must continue to pay employee salaries at a rate of at least 50% of their regular salary. The law does not limit the duration of the suspension, and does not address whether any reason (such as force majeure) must be demonstrated by the employer. Based on our experience, and discussions with the authorities, the current situation may fall under the scope of the temporary suspension provision, offering some potential relief to affected companies.

Can an employer terminate a contract?

An employer may terminate an employment contract for “business reasons,” as defined under Lao labor law, which includes instances where economic conditions make reducing employee numbers necessary. To do so, a number of requirements must be met:

  • The employer must consult the trade union, the employees’ representative, or the majority of the employees to explain the reasons for the termination in advance. 
  • Minutes of the above meeting must be taken and signed by all attendees, and reported to the Labor Administration Agency.
  • Advance notice (30 or 45 days, depending on the nature of the work) must be given to all employees.
  • Severance payment, as laid out by the law, must be paid.

Employers may also agree on termination of the employment contract by mutual consent with the employees.

We note that many companies are considering use of the term force majeure to justify termination of relationships under the outbreak across multiple jurisdictions. Please note that Lao labor law does not define force majeure, and it is therefore not yet a statutory reason for terminating an employment contract in Laos. However, further developments on this may soon be provided by the local authorities.

Can employees refuse to work, citing concerns of an unsafe environment?

Yes. Under Lao law, employers generally have a duty to provide a safe workplace for employees, and the Decree on Occupational Safety and Health further allows employees to refuse to work if they judge that the conditions are not sufficiently safe. However, this provision is relatively new (implemented in February 2019), so there is a lack of guiding precedent.

Breaches of regulations relating to labor safety, labor hygiene, and workplace safety are also punishable under the new Penal Code published in October 2018. Workplace health and safety obligations are thus an important consideration for employers at this time. At the very least, employers should comply with the notice recently issued by the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare (No. 0709, dated March 11, 2020), which requires employers to provide equipment (such as soap, hand sanitizer gel, masks, etc.) at their own expense to protect employees from COVID-19. The notice also asks employers to stay up to date on their employees’ health, monitoring whether any of them exhibit symptoms associated with COVID-19 and taking appropriate measures if they do so.

The situation is evolving day by day. Employers should always be sure they are acting on the most up-to-date information, as exceptional measures may be taken by the authorities to cope with this exceptional situation. In this shifting environment, it is always possible that some of the above observations of the law may be affected by forthcoming special measures, so employers should closely monitor the developments to ensure they are acting on the most up-to-date information.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.