You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 27, 2020

Options for Employers in Laos during the COVID-19 Outbreak

Subscribe to Updates

The adverse impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic have led employers to look for ways to mitigate the losses being wrought by the turmoil. While working remotely from home is a viable option for some, economic slowdown or to the nature of some industries make it unfeasible for others.

This article considers the legality of some measures to mitigate employment costs in Laos.

Can an employer suspend an employment contract?

No. Lao labor law currently only allows employment contracts to be suspended for national military service, or in the case of that employee being detained, held, or restricted in a certain area by a government authority. Hardship facing the company—even of the scale faced under the current pandemic—is, for now, not a valid reason for suspending an employment contract in Laos. If the contract itself has a specific provision for suspension under circumstances such as this, suspension might be possible, but the opinion of the local authorities should be sought first.

Can an employer unilaterally reduce an employee’s salary?

There is no such provision under Lao labor law. However, the law provides that, in the event of a temporary suspension of the business (not merely a slowdown of any degree) ordered by relevant local authorities or resulting from a decision of the employer, the employer must continue to pay employee salaries at a rate of at least 50% of their regular salary. The law does not limit the duration of the suspension, and does not address whether any reason (such as force majeure) must be demonstrated by the employer. Based on our experience, and discussions with the authorities, the current situation may fall under the scope of the temporary suspension provision, offering some potential relief to affected companies.

Can an employer terminate a contract?

An employer may terminate an employment contract for “business reasons,” as defined under Lao labor law, which includes instances where economic conditions make reducing employee numbers necessary. To do so, a number of requirements must be met:

  • The employer must consult the trade union, the employees’ representative, or the majority of the employees to explain the reasons for the termination in advance. 
  • Minutes of the above meeting must be taken and signed by all attendees, and reported to the Labor Administration Agency.
  • Advance notice (30 or 45 days, depending on the nature of the work) must be given to all employees.
  • Severance payment, as laid out by the law, must be paid.

Employers may also agree on termination of the employment contract by mutual consent with the employees.

We note that many companies are considering use of the term force majeure to justify termination of relationships under the outbreak across multiple jurisdictions. Please note that Lao labor law does not define force majeure, and it is therefore not yet a statutory reason for terminating an employment contract in Laos. However, further developments on this may soon be provided by the local authorities.

Can employees refuse to work, citing concerns of an unsafe environment?

Yes. Under Lao law, employers generally have a duty to provide a safe workplace for employees, and the Decree on Occupational Safety and Health further allows employees to refuse to work if they judge that the conditions are not sufficiently safe. However, this provision is relatively new (implemented in February 2019), so there is a lack of guiding precedent.

Breaches of regulations relating to labor safety, labor hygiene, and workplace safety are also punishable under the new Penal Code published in October 2018. Workplace health and safety obligations are thus an important consideration for employers at this time. At the very least, employers should comply with the notice recently issued by the Ministry of Labor and Social Welfare (No. 0709, dated March 11, 2020), which requires employers to provide equipment (such as soap, hand sanitizer gel, masks, etc.) at their own expense to protect employees from COVID-19. The notice also asks employers to stay up to date on their employees’ health, monitoring whether any of them exhibit symptoms associated with COVID-19 and taking appropriate measures if they do so.

The situation is evolving day by day. Employers should always be sure they are acting on the most up-to-date information, as exceptional measures may be taken by the authorities to cope with this exceptional situation. In this shifting environment, it is always possible that some of the above observations of the law may be affected by forthcoming special measures, so employers should closely monitor the developments to ensure they are acting on the most up-to-date information.

Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 3, 2023
Most employers know that terminating employees for poor job performance is not easy. But it is actually legally possible—if employers have the right approach and take specific precautionary measures. However, failing to take these precautions can mean that an employer is either stuck with an incompetent employee or on the losing end of a lawsuit for unfair termination. This article will lay out some essential considerations for employers in Thailand regarding termination of employment for poor performance. First, understand that “poor work performance” is a lack of performance or ability, or an inability to work with other employees. It does not constitute a violation of work rules or regulations. In some cases, however, an employee’s failure to act in accordance with lawful instructions or commands of the employer, resulting in poor work performance, could also be considered a violation of work rules or regulations. This may be the case if the work rules or regulations clearly state that an employee must strictly comply with the employer’s instructions or commands. Second, an employer can, in fact, terminate an employee due to poor work performance. For example, this may be possible in the following scenarios: Records show that an employee’s work performance has fallen below the employer’s required standards, and the employee has not tried to improve his or her work performance for three consecutive years. In addition, it does not appear that the employer was biased when giving ratings or scores for the employee’s work performance. The job description of the employee includes coordination with employees in other departments, but the employee has not been able to do so. Therefore, the employee was reassigned to a new job function, but the employee still did not improve. This suggests that the employee has a lack of interpersonal skills and is not
Read More
March 23, 2023
On March 19, 2023, Thailand’s new work-from-home (WFH) legislation amending the Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023) was published in the Government Gazette. It will come into effect on April 18, 2023. The amendment aims to enhance employee protections to accord with current global standards, provide alternative working arrangements for employers and employees, increase workforce efficiency, and strengthen employees’ job security and a better quality of life. As we detailed previously, the new WFH legislation allows employers and employees to reach agreements that permit employees to work remotely. Since there are no accompanying criminal punishments relating to this new provision, and the legislation incorporates the term “may agree,” it appears that this WFH provision is not mandatory but is primarily intended to facilitate and encourage remote working agreements between employers and employees. For more details on the WFH legislation, or on any aspect of employment law in Thailand, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
Read More
February 24, 2023
Many companies have moved to Southeast Asia to benefit from the advantages of this vibrant and diverse market. The region is already a manufacturing hub for a multitude of industries—computer and automotive products in Thailand, textiles in Cambodia, and footwear and electrical goods in Vietnam, to name a few—and an increasing number of companies worldwide are reconfiguring their supply chains to include regional suppliers. A key challenge is keeping up to date with employment law trends in these jurisdictions to ensure compliance with local regulations—and avoid costly, time-consuming business interruption. Here we outline trends and recent regulatory developments in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam, and consider what they mean for employers. Cambodia The Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training (MLVT) is likely to pursue a more proactive enforcement strategy in 2023. Last May, the MLVT announced companies would be required to submit a twice yearly self-declaration on labour compliance through a new online system. The self-declaration form requires companies to confirm and upload evidence of compliance, and the MLVT online system—through which the ministry can easily determine if a company is compliant –generates a report that lists all fines. Companies should comply with the self-declaration requirement and carefully review the form to understand what fines will apply for non-compliance. On 1 October 2022, regulations relating to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) pension system came into effect, and employers and employees began making NSSF pension contributions. Over the next five years, total compulsory pension contributions will amount to 4% of an employee’s wage, half of which is paid by the employer and half deducted from the employee’s salary. The contribution wage is capped at KHR 1.2m (USD 300). Employers are currently required to pay a relatively small amount (KHR 24,000, or around USD 6). This will increase to 10.75% over
Read More
January 19, 2023
The Thai parliament has passed the so-called Work from Home Bill—formally known as Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023)—which amends the country’s Labour Protection Act (LPA) to reflect current circumstances. The accompanying legislative remark states that the proposed amendments to the LPA will provide additional options for work arrangements between employers and employees, upgrade the level of labor protection, increase work stability, and improve quality of life for employees in Thailand. The legislation adds a single section to the LPA providing that an employer and an employee “may agree in the employment contract” that the employee is allowed “to bring work . . . to perform at home or at the residence of the employee or anywhere that the employee can work remotely through information technology, if the nature of the work permits.” The provision further provides that employers are responsible for ensuring that remote work agreements are in writing, either physically or electronically, and may include the following details: Period of the agreement; Normal working hours, rest periods, and overtime work; Criteria for overtime work, holiday work, and various types of leave; Scope of work and control or supervision by the employer; and Responsibility for arranging supplies and equipment, including necessary costs relating to the work. The amended LPA gives employees who work from home the right to refuse contact from the employer or the supervisor beyond working hours. In addition, employers must treat remote employees equally to on-premise employees. The most notable question surrounding this legislation is whether employers must allow employees to work remotely. The phrase “may agree” suggests that employers do not have to agree to allow an employee to work remotely. Another important aspect of the amendment is that there is no criminal punishment attached to it, which suggests that the legislation
Read More