You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 23, 2020

Options for Employers in Cambodia During the COVID-19 Outbreak

Subscribe to Updates

The tragic increase in COVID-19 cases worldwide has changed how we live and work the world over, and Cambodia has not escaped the severe business impact being seen elsewhere. As a result of these changes, many businesses in Cambodia are seeking to understand what options they have for managing their employees during this time, and the consequences of various courses of actions. The purpose of this article is to address these issues.

Suspension

Overview

Cambodia’s Labor Law allows an employer to suspend both fixed duration and undetermined duration employment contracts in certain circumstances. While the employment contract is suspended, the employer is not required to pay wages and the employee is not required to work unless there are provisions to the contrary in an employee’s employment contract. At the end of the suspension period, the employment relationship typically returns to normal.

The Labor Law allows an employer or an employee to suspend an employment contract in the following situations:

In light of COVID-19, an employer may be able to suspend employees on the basis of serious economic or material difficultly, or force majeure. Likewise, if an employee were sick because of COVID-19, an employee could seek to suspend the employment contract on the basis of being sick.

Notwithstanding the suspension of an employment contract, employers must continue providing accommodation to employees (if this benefit is already being provided). Employees, on the other hand, are still required to keep the company’s information confidential.

Lastly, the suspension of an employment contract will not affect the determination of length of continuous service of the employee for the purposes of calculating seniority (unless the employment contract or collective bargaining agreement states otherwise) and annual leave for the employee.

Grounds for Suspension

Serious Economic or Material Difficulty

An employer can only suspend an employee’s contract on the grounds of serious economic or material difficulty if the below criteria are satisfied:

  • the employer can prove that it has encountered a difficult situation, such as serious economic and material difficulty, that requires the employer to suspend work; and
  • the suspension will not exceed two months.

From a procedural standpoint, the employer must obtain approval from the Ministry of Labor and Vocational Training (MLVT)’s labor inspector before suspending any employees. To obtain approval, the employer must submit a request for suspension detailing the reasons for the suspension to the labor inspector. The labor inspector will grant the company permission to suspend employment contracts if it determines the reasons to be valid.

If an employer fails to follow the correct procedure when suspending an employment contract, then the employer will still likely have an obligation to pay wages to the employees even if the employees are not working. Such an approach has been adopted by the Arbitration Council in a recent decision (please refer to Award No.011/20 issued on 12 March 2020).

Force Majeure

An employer can also suspend a contract on the basis of force majeure  for a maximum of three months under Article 71(10) of the Labor Law. However, neither the Labor Law nor Cambodia’s Civil Code defines what constitutes a force majeure  event under Cambodian law.

As force majeure  is typically defined as an unforeseeable and unavoidable event that prevents a party to a contract from performing its contractual obligations, we recommend that any employers seeking to suspend employees on the basis of force majeure  document how COVID-19 is impacting their businesses. Such evidence of force majeure will be necessary in the event that employees later challenge the basis for the suspension.

Provisions Relating to Certain Employees That Were Enacted in Response to COVID-19

In February, the MLVT issued a regulations entitled Instruction on the Suspension of Employment Contracts, Soft Skills Enrollment, Suspension of Payment to NSSF for Textile, Garment, and Footwear Sectors Affected by Lack of Raw Materials due to COVID-19. This instruction required employers in the textile, garment, and footwear sectors to pay 40% of the wages of suspended employees, while the government would provide another 20% of the USD 190 minimum wage.

However, on April 7, 2020, the government made an unofficial announcement that changes the above instruction for suspended employees in the textile, garment, and footwear sectors, and extends certain benefits to employees in the tourism sector as well. Under the announcement, the following benefits should be provided to suspended employees in the textile, garment, footwear, and tourism sectors:

  • Suspended employees in the textile, garment, and footwear sectors will no longer receive 60% of the minimum wage, but will instead receive a flat benefit of USD 70, of which the government would pay USD 40 and employers would pay USD 30.
  • Suspended employees in the tourism sector will receive a flat benefit of USD 40 from the government. Employers have the discretion to pay an amount of wages to employees on a voluntary basis and based on the employers’ actual financial position.

Employees are only eligible for the above payments if the employer satisfies the following conditions:

  • the employment suspension was approved by the MLVT;
  • the employees have been legally registered with MLVT; and
  • the employees are already registered with the National Social Security Fund.

Termination

Overview

Cambodia’s Labor Law also allows employers to terminate employment contracts. The procedures for terminating an employment contract, and the consequences of doing so, will depend on whether the employment contract is structured as a fixed duration contract (FDC) or an undetermined duration contract (UDC). In general, an FDC must be in writing and must have clear starting and expiration dates that do not exceed an initial term of two years. After the first expiration of an FDC, it can be renewed one or more times so long as the total renewal duration, excluding the first period, does not exceed another two years. If a contract fails to meet these requirements, it would be deemed a UDC.

Fixed Duration Contracts

Basis for Termination of the Contract

The Labor Law recognizes three grounds for terminating an FDC before the end date and without the payment of severance:

  • by mutual agreement between employer and employee, in which case the termination must be in writing and signed in the presence of a Labor Inspector;
  • serious misconduct by either party; and
  • force majeure.

Notice Periods

Absent one of the grounds discussed above, an FDC cannot be unilaterally terminated by the employer without the need to pay severance (as discussed below). The below notice periods relate to the amount of notice that must be granted to an employee if the employer wants to let the contract to expire.

Failure to give an employee due notice will result in the contract being renewed for a duration equal to the original contract. If the renewal periods exceed two years in total, the contract will be deemed to a UDC.

Amount of Payments

An employee with an FDC would be entitled to the following compensation upon the expiration of the employee’s contract.

  • A severance payment equal to at least 5% of the wages paid to the employee during the length of the contract (Article 73 of the Labor Law);
  • Unused and unpaid annual leave through to the termination date (Article 167 of Labor Law);
  • Any other benefits agreed to between the employer and the employee in an employment contract, internal work rules, employee manual/HR handbook or collective bargaining agreement, if any.

If the employee is terminated before the expiration date of the employee’s contract, the employee is also entitled to the following payment:

  • Damages for being laid off before the expiration date of the FDC, which equals the wages the employee would have received had he or she completed the original contracted term of employment (Article 73 of Labor Law).

Undetermined Duration Contracts

Basis for Termination of the Contract

The Labor Law recognizes two grounds for terminating a UDC without notice and without payment of severance:

  • serious misconduct by either party; and
  • force majeure.

Otherwise, a UDC can be terminated by either party provided:

  • due notice of the termination is given in writing; and
  • in the case of an employer giving notice, the employer has a valid reason for terminating the contract, such as deficiencies in the employee’s aptitude or behavior, or business operation requirements of the employer.

Notice Periods

Minimum notice requirements under the Labor Law for terminating an UDC are based on the employee’s length of service as follows:

During the notice period, an employee is entitled to receive full wages and benefits, and is entitled to two days’ paid leave per week to look for new employment.

Amounts of Payments

An employee under a UDC would be entitled to the following compensation upon termination:

  • seniority back payments that remain unpaid for employment periods before 2019 at a rate of 15 days of wages and benefits for each year of service before 2019 (subject to a payment cap equivalent to six months of the employee’s actual wages);
  • final seniority payment of seven days of wages and benefits if the employee has worked for at least one month since the last seniority payment;
  • compensation in lieu of notice required;
  • unused and unpaid annual leave through to the termination date;
  • damages for being laid off in an amount equal to the seniority payment received during the employment contract; and
  • any other benefits agreed to between the employer and the employee in an employment contract, internal work rules, employee manual, HR handbook, or collective bargaining agreement, if any.

Damages

Regarding damages, Article 91 of the Labor Law provides that termination of an employment contract without a “proper reason or cause” entitles the employee to damages.

In order to avoid this liability, the employer must have a proper reason or cause for the termination, and generally comply with the procedures for terminating an employee under the Labor Law. The Labor Law does not to define “proper reason or cause,” so employers have a certain amount of discretion to argue that they have a proper reason or cause. However, it may be inferred from Article 74 (2) of the Labor Law that a “proper reason or cause” refers to the employee’s ability or behavior based on the employer’s business operation requirements.

Mass Layoff

The Labor Law allows a mass layoff resulting from a reduction in an establishment’s activity or an internal reorganization that is foreseen by the employer. An employer seeking to carry out a mass layoff of employees must:

  • establish the order of the layoffs in light of professional qualifications, seniority within the establishment, and family burdens of the workers;
  • inform the workers’ representatives in writing in order to solicit their suggestions, primarily, on the measures for a prior announcement of the reduction in staff and the measures taken to minimize the effects of the reduction on the affected workers; and
  • layoff first employees with the least professional ability, followed by employees with the least seniority. Seniority must be increased by one year for a married employee and by an additional year for each dependent child.

Dismissed employees have priority to be re-hired for the same position for two years. Employees who have priority for re-hire are required to inform their employer of any change in address during this layoff period. If there is a vacancy, the employer must inform the concerned employee by sending a registered letter to his last address. The employee must appear at the establishment within one week after receiving the letter.

While employers have a number of options to manage their workforce during these difficult times, employers should ensure that they are aware of and compliant with all relevant procedures for these options in order to minimize their liabilities.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Vientiane have contributed the Laos chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Laos chapter was prepared by associates Naiyane Xaechao and Sayphin Singsouvong. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Laos chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 16, 2026
Employment law specialists from Tilleke & Gibbins’ office in Phnom Penh have contributed the Cambodia chapter to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce from International Employment Lawyer. This comprehensive global guide, covering 50 jurisdictions worldwide, addresses the complex issue of workplace restructurings, with a particular focus on the needs of multinational companies. The Cambodia chapter was authored by Jay Cohen, partner and director of Tilleke & Gibbins’ Phnom Penh office, and Chanvisal Lok, associate. The Q&A-style chapter provides in-depth analysis of key areas related to workplace restructuring, including: Reduction in workforce; Restructuring or reorganization of the business; Changing terms and conditions; and Areas to watch. A PDF of the Cambodia chapter can be downloaded through the button below. Tilleke & Gibbins also contributed the Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to the Guide to Restructuring a Cross-Border Workforce 2026. To browse the full guide for all 45 jurisdictions, please visit the International Employment Lawyer website.
Read More
January 14, 2026
Employers operating in Thailand can enforce post-employment noncompete covenants, but success depends on precise drafting and strong evidentiary support. Thai courts will uphold restraints that protect legitimate employer interests and are fair and reasonable in duration, geographic reach, and substantive scope. Overbroad covenants, however, draw judicial skepticism and may fail unless they are drafted in severable, defensible components tied to the employee’s actual role. This article synthesizes recent trends in Thai case practice, explains how Thai courts assess reasonableness in employment restraints, and provides a practical litigation-focused framework for drafting enforceable covenants, preparing evidence, and pursuing relief through the Labor Court. The Legal Framework and Its Practical Implications Thai courts evaluate noncompete covenants under general principles of contract enforceability and public policy, with particular focus on whether a restraint is necessary to protect a legitimate employer interest and proportionate to that objective. In employment matters, this analysis is shaped by the employee-protective tenor of Thai labor law and by the Labor Court’s equitable discretion in determining appropriate remedies. The practical takeaway is that standardized or broadly drafted covenants rarely survive scrutiny. Courts look for a demonstrable nexus between the employee’s actual exposure to confidential information, trade secrets, or customer relationships and the scope of the restraint. Where that nexus is weak or the restraint operates as a blanket prohibition, courts are inclined to decline enforcement or limit relief to a narrowly tailored prohibition. The employer interests most commonly recognized as legitimate in Thai practice include the protection of trade secrets, confidential business information, and goodwill tied to identifiable customer segments or territories. Courts are more likely to enforce restraints where employers can clearly document what information is at risk, why particular customer relationships matter, and how the employee was involved with those assets. Judges also look closely at the
Read More
December 19, 2025
On December 12, 2025, Thailand’s Ministry of Labor published a ministerial regulation prescribing the minimum and maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions. The regulation, which takes effect on January 1, 2026, sets a flat minimum base wage of THB 1,650 per month and a phased increase of the maximum base wage over the following six years, as outlined in the table below. Impact on Social Security Benefits Not only will monthly contributions increase as a result of the adjustment to the maximum wages used as a base for calculating social security contributions, but the maximum benefits available to insured persons will also be enhanced, as shown in the next table. Employer Obligations From January 1, 2026, employers must correctly withhold wages and remit social security contributions for both the employer’s and employees’ portions in compliance with the revised thresholds. Failure to comply may expose employers to penalties under the Social Security Act B.E. 2533 (1990). Employers should ensure that payroll systems are updated as necessary to reflect these changes to the wage ceiling used for social security contribution calculations.
Read More