You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 15, 2020

Options and Obligations for Employers in Myanmar During the COVID-19 Outbreak

Subscribe to Updates

Since the first reported case of COVID-19 on March 23, 2020, the Myanmar government has announced several notifications and preventive guidelines. On March 25, the Office of the President of Myanmar issued rules for government personnel and offices with the aim of guarding against the spread of the virus. For the private sector, the Ministry of Health and Sports (MOHS) issued mandatory factory and workplace measures for employers and employees, focusing on health and hygiene practices as well as the spreading of awareness and information on the outbreak.

As businesses determine their strategies for weathering the crisis and dealing with the socioeconomic impact of the pandemic, it is crucial for every employer to understand their options and obligations in compliance with Myanmar’s employment laws.

Options for Reducing Workforce Costs

Considering Layoffs and Severance Pay

In Myanmar, it is not possible for an employer to unilaterally lower salaries, reduce the number of workers, furlough employees, or terminate employees without compensation—all of these measures require the consent of the employee.

Under section 15 of the standard employment contract currently enforced in Myanmar, an employer may terminate employment by providing at least one month’s prior notice, with valid reasons for termination, to an employee. It would seem that serious impact on the business from the COVID-19 outbreak would be such a valid reason. The employer would also have to pay the required amount of severance pay, calculated based on the employee’s length of employment (assuming that the termination is not due to resignation or repeated misconduct beyond the allowed threshold).

Handling Disputes and Grievances

Employment disputes during the COVID-19 outbreak should be referred to the workplace coordinating committee if applicable.

Under the Settlement of Labor Disputes Law 2012, every workplace with more than 30 employees should have a workplace coordinating committee, comprised of two members representing the employer and two members representing the employees. The committee is tasked with hearing individual disputes and overseeing negotiations to reach a solution, and conducting negotiations on collective employment dispute matters, such as disputes over employment conditions, general welfare, or salary payment. Grievances should be settled within five days, or escalated to the township conciliation body. If the township conciliation body cannot reach a settlement within three days, it will refer the dispute to the regional or state arbitration body for settlement. The regional or state arbitration body will reach its decision within seven days and will send its decision to relevant parties within two days.

If either party is not satisfied with the decision, they may either submit the dispute to the arbitration council, or a lock-out or strike may be carried out in accordance with the law.

If the dispute is submitted to the arbitration council, the arbitration council will form a tribunal, which will arrive at a decision within seven days for matters involving essential services or within fourteen days for other matters.

Obligations

Ensuring Occupational Safety and Health

A crucial issue addressed in recent legislation is health and safety in the workplace. The Occupational Safety and Health Law 2019 (OSH 2019) governs all aspects of health and safety, and prescribes the duties and responsibilities of an employer, which include:

  • arranging medical check-ups for employees to ensure that they are not suffering from any occupational disease;
  • freely providing employees with sufficient personal protective clothing, materials, and facilities, and seeing that they makes use of them; and
  • publishing occupational safety manuals, health manuals, and guidelines issued by the relevant government authorities at the workplace to raise employees’ awareness.

Under the OSH 2019, employers are required to appoint a person to closely supervise occupational health and safety procedures at the workplace.

Moreover, section 18 of the OSH 2019 authorizes inspection officers, who are appointed by the Factories and General Labour Laws Inspection Department, to enter the workplace without a warrant and to inspect the occupational health and safety conditions—including those prescribed by the MOHS. If the inspection officer believes that there is an occurrence of any occupational disease, or that it is not appropriate to continue doing the business due to noncompliance with the OSH 2019, the inspection officer, with the approval of the chief inspection officer, may order the employer to temporarily close the workplace, partially or as a whole, and to notify the respective governmental authorities of the situation. 

Abiding by Prevention Measures

Myanmar defines COVID-19 as a communicable disease under the Prevention and Control of Communicable Diseases Law 1995 (PCCDL 1995), which prescribes a person’s duty to report any suspected disease outbreak to the appropriate health officer. This obligation also applies to employers at any workplace. The PCCDL 1995 also authorizes health officers to carry out investigations to prevent an outbreak and to order persons suspected of infection to undergo self-quarantine at home. Failure to comply with an order is punishable by imprisonment for up to six months, a fine of up to MMK 10,000, or both.

Granting Medical Leave

According to the Leave and Holidays Act 1951, employees who have completed six months of service are entitled to 30 days of paid medical leave per year. Employees covered under the Social Security Law 2012 are also granted additional leave and treatment benefits for certain work injuries and sicknesses. Medical leave cannot be carried forward to the following year.

Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 3, 2023
Most employers know that terminating employees for poor job performance is not easy. But it is actually legally possible—if employers have the right approach and take specific precautionary measures. However, failing to take these precautions can mean that an employer is either stuck with an incompetent employee or on the losing end of a lawsuit for unfair termination. This article will lay out some essential considerations for employers in Thailand regarding termination of employment for poor performance. First, understand that “poor work performance” is a lack of performance or ability, or an inability to work with other employees. It does not constitute a violation of work rules or regulations. In some cases, however, an employee’s failure to act in accordance with lawful instructions or commands of the employer, resulting in poor work performance, could also be considered a violation of work rules or regulations. This may be the case if the work rules or regulations clearly state that an employee must strictly comply with the employer’s instructions or commands. Second, an employer can, in fact, terminate an employee due to poor work performance. For example, this may be possible in the following scenarios: Records show that an employee’s work performance has fallen below the employer’s required standards, and the employee has not tried to improve his or her work performance for three consecutive years. In addition, it does not appear that the employer was biased when giving ratings or scores for the employee’s work performance. The job description of the employee includes coordination with employees in other departments, but the employee has not been able to do so. Therefore, the employee was reassigned to a new job function, but the employee still did not improve. This suggests that the employee has a lack of interpersonal skills and is not
Read More
March 23, 2023
On March 19, 2023, Thailand’s new work-from-home (WFH) legislation amending the Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023) was published in the Government Gazette. It will come into effect on April 18, 2023. The amendment aims to enhance employee protections to accord with current global standards, provide alternative working arrangements for employers and employees, increase workforce efficiency, and strengthen employees’ job security and a better quality of life. As we detailed previously, the new WFH legislation allows employers and employees to reach agreements that permit employees to work remotely. Since there are no accompanying criminal punishments relating to this new provision, and the legislation incorporates the term “may agree,” it appears that this WFH provision is not mandatory but is primarily intended to facilitate and encourage remote working agreements between employers and employees. For more details on the WFH legislation, or on any aspect of employment law in Thailand, please contact Tilleke & Gibbins at [email protected].
Read More
February 24, 2023
Many companies have moved to Southeast Asia to benefit from the advantages of this vibrant and diverse market. The region is already a manufacturing hub for a multitude of industries—computer and automotive products in Thailand, textiles in Cambodia, and footwear and electrical goods in Vietnam, to name a few—and an increasing number of companies worldwide are reconfiguring their supply chains to include regional suppliers. A key challenge is keeping up to date with employment law trends in these jurisdictions to ensure compliance with local regulations—and avoid costly, time-consuming business interruption. Here we outline trends and recent regulatory developments in Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam, and consider what they mean for employers. Cambodia The Ministry of Labour and Vocational Training (MLVT) is likely to pursue a more proactive enforcement strategy in 2023. Last May, the MLVT announced companies would be required to submit a twice yearly self-declaration on labour compliance through a new online system. The self-declaration form requires companies to confirm and upload evidence of compliance, and the MLVT online system—through which the ministry can easily determine if a company is compliant –generates a report that lists all fines. Companies should comply with the self-declaration requirement and carefully review the form to understand what fines will apply for non-compliance. On 1 October 2022, regulations relating to the National Social Security Fund (NSSF) pension system came into effect, and employers and employees began making NSSF pension contributions. Over the next five years, total compulsory pension contributions will amount to 4% of an employee’s wage, half of which is paid by the employer and half deducted from the employee’s salary. The contribution wage is capped at KHR 1.2m (USD 300). Employers are currently required to pay a relatively small amount (KHR 24,000, or around USD 6). This will increase to 10.75% over
Read More
January 19, 2023
The Thai parliament has passed the so-called Work from Home Bill—formally known as Labour Protection Act (No. 8) B.E. 2566 (2023)—which amends the country’s Labour Protection Act (LPA) to reflect current circumstances. The accompanying legislative remark states that the proposed amendments to the LPA will provide additional options for work arrangements between employers and employees, upgrade the level of labor protection, increase work stability, and improve quality of life for employees in Thailand. The legislation adds a single section to the LPA providing that an employer and an employee “may agree in the employment contract” that the employee is allowed “to bring work . . . to perform at home or at the residence of the employee or anywhere that the employee can work remotely through information technology, if the nature of the work permits.” The provision further provides that employers are responsible for ensuring that remote work agreements are in writing, either physically or electronically, and may include the following details: Period of the agreement; Normal working hours, rest periods, and overtime work; Criteria for overtime work, holiday work, and various types of leave; Scope of work and control or supervision by the employer; and Responsibility for arranging supplies and equipment, including necessary costs relating to the work. The amended LPA gives employees who work from home the right to refuse contact from the employer or the supervisor beyond working hours. In addition, employers must treat remote employees equally to on-premise employees. The most notable question surrounding this legislation is whether employers must allow employees to work remotely. The phrase “may agree” suggests that employers do not have to agree to allow an employee to work remotely. Another important aspect of the amendment is that there is no criminal punishment attached to it, which suggests that the legislation
Read More