You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 15, 2020

Options and Obligations for Employers in Myanmar During the COVID-19 Outbreak

Subscribe to Updates

Since the first reported case of COVID-19 on March 23, 2020, the Myanmar government has announced several notifications and preventive guidelines. On March 25, the Office of the President of Myanmar issued rules for government personnel and offices with the aim of guarding against the spread of the virus. For the private sector, the Ministry of Health and Sports (MOHS) issued mandatory factory and workplace measures for employers and employees, focusing on health and hygiene practices as well as the spreading of awareness and information on the outbreak.

As businesses determine their strategies for weathering the crisis and dealing with the socioeconomic impact of the pandemic, it is crucial for every employer to understand their options and obligations in compliance with Myanmar’s employment laws.

Options for Reducing Workforce Costs

Considering Layoffs and Severance Pay

In Myanmar, it is not possible for an employer to unilaterally lower salaries, reduce the number of workers, furlough employees, or terminate employees without compensation—all of these measures require the consent of the employee.

Under section 15 of the standard employment contract currently enforced in Myanmar, an employer may terminate employment by providing at least one month’s prior notice, with valid reasons for termination, to an employee. It would seem that serious impact on the business from the COVID-19 outbreak would be such a valid reason. The employer would also have to pay the required amount of severance pay, calculated based on the employee’s length of employment (assuming that the termination is not due to resignation or repeated misconduct beyond the allowed threshold).

Handling Disputes and Grievances

Employment disputes during the COVID-19 outbreak should be referred to the workplace coordinating committee if applicable.

Under the Settlement of Labor Disputes Law 2012, every workplace with more than 30 employees should have a workplace coordinating committee, comprised of two members representing the employer and two members representing the employees. The committee is tasked with hearing individual disputes and overseeing negotiations to reach a solution, and conducting negotiations on collective employment dispute matters, such as disputes over employment conditions, general welfare, or salary payment. Grievances should be settled within five days, or escalated to the township conciliation body. If the township conciliation body cannot reach a settlement within three days, it will refer the dispute to the regional or state arbitration body for settlement. The regional or state arbitration body will reach its decision within seven days and will send its decision to relevant parties within two days.

If either party is not satisfied with the decision, they may either submit the dispute to the arbitration council, or a lock-out or strike may be carried out in accordance with the law.

If the dispute is submitted to the arbitration council, the arbitration council will form a tribunal, which will arrive at a decision within seven days for matters involving essential services or within fourteen days for other matters.

Obligations

Ensuring Occupational Safety and Health

A crucial issue addressed in recent legislation is health and safety in the workplace. The Occupational Safety and Health Law 2019 (OSH 2019) governs all aspects of health and safety, and prescribes the duties and responsibilities of an employer, which include:

  • arranging medical check-ups for employees to ensure that they are not suffering from any occupational disease;
  • freely providing employees with sufficient personal protective clothing, materials, and facilities, and seeing that they makes use of them; and
  • publishing occupational safety manuals, health manuals, and guidelines issued by the relevant government authorities at the workplace to raise employees’ awareness.

Under the OSH 2019, employers are required to appoint a person to closely supervise occupational health and safety procedures at the workplace.

Moreover, section 18 of the OSH 2019 authorizes inspection officers, who are appointed by the Factories and General Labour Laws Inspection Department, to enter the workplace without a warrant and to inspect the occupational health and safety conditions—including those prescribed by the MOHS. If the inspection officer believes that there is an occurrence of any occupational disease, or that it is not appropriate to continue doing the business due to noncompliance with the OSH 2019, the inspection officer, with the approval of the chief inspection officer, may order the employer to temporarily close the workplace, partially or as a whole, and to notify the respective governmental authorities of the situation. 

Abiding by Prevention Measures

Myanmar defines COVID-19 as a communicable disease under the Prevention and Control of Communicable Diseases Law 1995 (PCCDL 1995), which prescribes a person’s duty to report any suspected disease outbreak to the appropriate health officer. This obligation also applies to employers at any workplace. The PCCDL 1995 also authorizes health officers to carry out investigations to prevent an outbreak and to order persons suspected of infection to undergo self-quarantine at home. Failure to comply with an order is punishable by imprisonment for up to six months, a fine of up to MMK 10,000, or both.

Granting Medical Leave

According to the Leave and Holidays Act 1951, employees who have completed six months of service are entitled to 30 days of paid medical leave per year. Employees covered under the Social Security Law 2012 are also granted additional leave and treatment benefits for certain work injuries and sicknesses. Medical leave cannot be carried forward to the following year.

Related Professionals

Practices

Employment

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 13, 2021
With COVID-19 cases continuing to pose a significant threat throughout Thailand, many employers have ordered their employees to work exclusively from home in order to minimize their chances of contracting the virus. However, this luxury is not afforded to all employees—some are unable to work from home due to the nature of their work, and consequently they are placed in the precarious position of being exposed to possible infection. Thailand’s Social Security Office (SSO) understood these risks early in the pandemic and, in March 2020, issued guidelines through the Workmen’s Compensation Fund Office on employees’ entitlement to claim benefits from the workers’ compensation fund (WCF) if they contract the virus as a result of their work. The WCF provides medical-related assistance and compensation to employees who directly suffer from a work-related injury or sickness (subject to certain conditions). Falling ill with COVID-19 during the performance of work duties may constitute suffering work-related sickness, thereby allowing employees to claim compensation from the WCF by submitting the Kor Thor 16 form, a medical certificate, treatment records, records of the employee’s working hours, and other relevant documentation. Upon receiving a claim, the SSO will investigate by collecting facts and evidence from the employer, the infected employee and his or her colleagues, and any witnesses. The official will examine the employee’s duties and working conditions in detail, taking into consideration any relevant information, such as evidence regarding the employee’s travel or movements prior to falling sick. Once all the facts and evidence are gathered, the matter will be submitted to a medical subcommittee responsible for determining whether the employee’s onset of COVID-19 is due to his or her work. If the subcommittee finds that the employee’s contraction of the virus did indeed result from the performance of his or her work duties, the
Read More
August 26, 2021
Around the world, COVID-19 is continuing to threaten the health of millions, interrupt daily life, and throttle business activity. In Thailand, the latest wave of infections has been more intense than any since the beginning of the pandemic, and many businesses have been forced to close down once again. There are reasons for hope though—chief among them the increasing pace of vaccinations. Not only are the vaccines effective at preventing serious health issues, they are helping keep both employees and customers safe in business settings so that commerce, trade, and tourism can resume once again. Many in Thailand have already been vaccinated, and struggling employers are looking ahead to safely resuming full business activities, from reopening offices for employees who have been working from home, to welcoming customers and clients back to an environment that minimizes the risk of COVID-19 exposure. In anticipation of such a return to business at full capacity, many Thai employers are taking note of companies and organizations overseas boosting COVID-19 safety in workplaces by mandating vaccines and other measures, and asking whether such mandates could be imposed here in Thailand. The main legal concept to consider here is the provision in the Labor Protection Act B.E. 2541 (1998), which authorizes employers to issue “lawful and just” orders to employees. For an order to be “lawful and just,” it must be proportionate to the circumstance. In the current context of the COVID-19 pandemic, employers can refer to the Communicable Diseases Act B.E. 2558 (2015), as well as other local regulations, to provide grounds when asserting that their risk-mitigation orders are proportionate, lawful, and just. It is doubtful that a Thai court would rule that the circumstances we find ourselves in now would justify an employer requiring employees to be vaccinated, but this legal standard can
Read More
August 25, 2021
Multilaw has published the latest edition of How to Hire and Fire, a guide to the rules and regulations governing employment relationships in over 90 jurisdictions around the world. Lawyers at Tilleke & Gibbins prepared the Cambodia, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters of the guide, which covers the following main topics: General principles: Forums for adjudicating employment disputes, main sources of employment law, employees working for foreign companies in Cambodia or abroad for domestic companies, and data privacy. Hiring the employee: Legal requirements for employment agreements, types of agreement, secrecy and confidentiality, ownership of inventions and other IP rights, pre-employment considerations, hiring of non-nationals, hiring specified categories of individuals, and outsourcing and sub-contracting. Maintaining the employment relationship: Changes to the contract, changes in business ownership, social security, accidents at work, discipline and grievances, harassment, discrimination, equal pay, compulsory training obligations, offsetting earnings, maternity and disability leave, insurance, absence for military or public service duties, trade unions, employee strikes, and employers’ liability for actions of employees. Firing the employee: Procedures for terminating employment agreements, instant dismissal, employee resignation, termination on notice, age-related termination, force majeure automatic termination, collective dismissals, termination by agreement, directors and senior officers, rules for companies facing financial difficulties, restriction of future activities, whistleblowers, garden leave, severance payments and tax considerations, allowances, and time limits for post-termination claims. General: Specific matters unique or important to each jurisdiction. Multilaw is a global network of carefully selected, independent law firms consisting of over 10,000 commercial lawyers in more than 100 countries, able to provide expert legal advice in complex environments around the globe. The full guide is available for free on the Multilaw website.
Read More