You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

April 15, 2020

Options and Obligations for Employers in Myanmar During the COVID-19 Outbreak

Since the first reported case of COVID-19 on March 23, 2020, the Myanmar government has announced several notifications and preventive guidelines. On March 25, the Office of the President of Myanmar issued rules for government personnel and offices with the aim of guarding against the spread of the virus. For the private sector, the Ministry of Health and Sports (MOHS) issued mandatory factory and workplace measures for employers and employees, focusing on health and hygiene practices as well as the spreading of awareness and information on the outbreak.

As businesses determine their strategies for weathering the crisis and dealing with the socioeconomic impact of the pandemic, it is crucial for every employer to understand their options and obligations in compliance with Myanmar’s employment laws.

Options for Reducing Workforce Costs

Considering Layoffs and Severance Pay

In Myanmar, it is not possible for an employer to unilaterally lower salaries, reduce the number of workers, furlough employees, or terminate employees without compensation—all of these measures require the consent of the employee.

Under section 15 of the standard employment contract currently enforced in Myanmar, an employer may terminate employment by providing at least one month’s prior notice, with valid reasons for termination, to an employee. It would seem that serious impact on the business from the COVID-19 outbreak would be such a valid reason. The employer would also have to pay the required amount of severance pay, calculated based on the employee’s length of employment (assuming that the termination is not due to resignation or repeated misconduct beyond the allowed threshold).

Handling Disputes and Grievances

Employment disputes during the COVID-19 outbreak should be referred to the workplace coordinating committee if applicable.

Under the Settlement of Labor Disputes Law 2012, every workplace with more than 30 employees should have a workplace coordinating committee, comprised of two members representing the employer and two members representing the employees. The committee is tasked with hearing individual disputes and overseeing negotiations to reach a solution, and conducting negotiations on collective employment dispute matters, such as disputes over employment conditions, general welfare, or salary payment. Grievances should be settled within five days, or escalated to the township conciliation body. If the township conciliation body cannot reach a settlement within three days, it will refer the dispute to the regional or state arbitration body for settlement. The regional or state arbitration body will reach its decision within seven days and will send its decision to relevant parties within two days.

If either party is not satisfied with the decision, they may either submit the dispute to the arbitration council, or a lock-out or strike may be carried out in accordance with the law.

If the dispute is submitted to the arbitration council, the arbitration council will form a tribunal, which will arrive at a decision within seven days for matters involving essential services or within fourteen days for other matters.

Obligations

Ensuring Occupational Safety and Health

A crucial issue addressed in recent legislation is health and safety in the workplace. The Occupational Safety and Health Law 2019 (OSH 2019) governs all aspects of health and safety, and prescribes the duties and responsibilities of an employer, which include:

  • arranging medical check-ups for employees to ensure that they are not suffering from any occupational disease;
  • freely providing employees with sufficient personal protective clothing, materials, and facilities, and seeing that they makes use of them; and
  • publishing occupational safety manuals, health manuals, and guidelines issued by the relevant government authorities at the workplace to raise employees’ awareness.

Under the OSH 2019, employers are required to appoint a person to closely supervise occupational health and safety procedures at the workplace.

Moreover, section 18 of the OSH 2019 authorizes inspection officers, who are appointed by the Factories and General Labour Laws Inspection Department, to enter the workplace without a warrant and to inspect the occupational health and safety conditions—including those prescribed by the MOHS. If the inspection officer believes that there is an occurrence of any occupational disease, or that it is not appropriate to continue doing the business due to noncompliance with the OSH 2019, the inspection officer, with the approval of the chief inspection officer, may order the employer to temporarily close the workplace, partially or as a whole, and to notify the respective governmental authorities of the situation. 

Abiding by Prevention Measures

Myanmar defines COVID-19 as a communicable disease under the Prevention and Control of Communicable Diseases Law 1995 (PCCDL 1995), which prescribes a person’s duty to report any suspected disease outbreak to the appropriate health officer. This obligation also applies to employers at any workplace. The PCCDL 1995 also authorizes health officers to carry out investigations to prevent an outbreak and to order persons suspected of infection to undergo self-quarantine at home. Failure to comply with an order is punishable by imprisonment for up to six months, a fine of up to MMK 10,000, or both.

Granting Medical Leave

According to the Leave and Holidays Act 1951, employees who have completed six months of service are entitled to 30 days of paid medical leave per year. Employees covered under the Social Security Law 2012 are also granted additional leave and treatment benefits for certain work injuries and sicknesses. Medical leave cannot be carried forward to the following year.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

June 4, 2026
On May 19, 2026, the Cabinet of the Royal Thai Government approved, in principle, revisions to Thailand’s visa exemption scheme and visa on arrival (VOA) program, as proposed by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Ministry of Tourism and Sports. The revisions represent a tightening of Thailand’s immigration framework and will affect a broad range of short-term visitors. Background On July 15, 2024, Thailand expanded its visa exemption scheme by increasing the permitted period of visa-exempt stay from 30 days to 60 days in order to promote tourism, support the country’s post-pandemic economic recovery, and facilitate international travel. Under this revised scheme, passport holders from 93 countries and territories (an increase from the previous 57 countries and territories) have been permitted to enter Thailand without a visa and remain in the country for up to 60 days per entry for purposes including tourism, business engagements, urgent work, and ad hoc assignments. In addition, eligible visitors may apply at the Thai Immigration Bureau for a further 30-day extension of stay. Key Changes The proposed revisions would revoke the current 60-day exemption and reinstate the previous stay period, thereby reducing the maximum permitted stay for eligible travelers to 30 days per entry. In addition, the number of countries and territories eligible under the 30-day visa-exemption scheme is expected to be reduced to 54. The scope of the VOA scheme would likewise be significantly narrowed, with the number of eligible countries reduced from 31 countries to just four (Azerbaijan, Belarus, Serbia, and India). Further, Thailand is expected to introduce a new 15-day visa exemption category for nationals of Seychelles, the Maldives, and Mauritius. The revised framework would also limit each country or territory to a single visa exemption privilege in order to simplify Thailand’s immigration framework and reduce overlapping immigration privileges.
April 29, 2026
Vietnam’s education sector is entering a new regulatory era. On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly adopted a series of new and amended laws in the field of education, including the 2025 Law on Vocational Education, the 2025 Law on Higher Education, and the amended Law on Education No. 123/2025/QH15 (Amended Law on Education). These laws together took effect on January 1, 2026, marking a significant reform of Vietnam’s legal framework governing the education sector. The legislative package introduces a new lawmaking approach under which foundational and principle-based provisions are codified in the Amended Law on Education, while the Law on Higher Education and the Law on Vocational Education serve as specialized statutes providing supplementary, sector-specific regulatory detail tailored to their respective subsectors. The Amended Law on Education fundamentally restructures how educational institutions are established, governed, and licensed, with direct implications for private investors, foreign-invested entities, and education service providers operating in Vietnam. Below are several highlights of the key changes under the amended law, especially in the private sector, that stakeholders should understand: Change in the National Education System In addition to primary education, lower secondary (junior high school) education is now compulsory in Vietnam. Accordingly, diplomas are no longer awarded upon completion of lower secondary school but only for upper education levels. The national education system is also expanded through the introduction of vocational high school as a new level of vocational education. Such reform creates additional learning pathways that not only enable learners to pursue both further education and participate in the labor market, but also better align education and training with socioeconomic development needs. New Hurdle for Joint Investors: Mandatory Corporate Entity Requirement Where two or more investors jointly establish an education institution, the investors are no longer permitted to directly establish such an institution.
March 31, 2026
Against the backdrop of Vietnam’s rapid economic and technological transformation and its ambition to build a knowledge-driven economy, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Higher Education No. 125/2025/QH15 on December 10, 2025, The new law took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Higher Education No. 08/2012/QH13 of 2012 and its subsequent amendments after more than a decade of implementation. The new law reflects a significant policy shift toward enhancing the institutional autonomy of higher education institutions (“HEIs”)—universities and other university-level institutions. By granting broader autonomy, Vietnam aims to enable HEIs to operate more proactively, better respond to market needs, and improve the quality and efficiency of education and research activities. Comprehensive Institutional Autonomy in HEIs The new law marks a significant shift by granting HEIs comprehensive autonomy as a statutory right, within the bounds of the licensed scope of educational operation and the legal framework, rather than a conditional right as provided under the former law. Under the new law, HEIs are empowered to exercise autonomy over their academic expertise, training, scientific research, international cooperation, organizational structure, personnel, finance, and other higher education activities. The expansion of institutional autonomy is also accompanied by a correspondingly strengthened framework of institutional accountability. However, Vietnam maintains a certain degree of control and imposes restrictions on institutional autonomy in sensitive and strategically important areas. These controls and restrictions include limitations on training autonomy in the majors of teacher training, national defense, and security; and restrictions on financial and personnel management autonomy for HEIs under the administration of the Ministry of National Defense and the Ministry of Public Security. New Model for Curriculum Development The new law removes the concept of “opening a training major” and focuses regulation on how training programs are developed and delivered. Under the previous regime,
March 31, 2026
On December 10, 2025, the National Assembly of Vietnam adopted Law on Vocational Education No. 124/2025/QH15, which took effect on January 1, 2026, replacing Law on Vocational Education No. 74/2014/QH13 of 2014. The new law broadens the categories of institutions eligible to deliver vocational training, introduces vocational upper secondary schools, and shifts governance structures for private institutions from ownership-representative boards of management to stakeholder-based school councils. These reforms aim to diversify training providers, align programs with labor market needs, and create a more flexible, open vocational education ecosystem, offering expanded opportunities for foreign and domestic investors, universities, and enterprises. Some highlights of the new Law on Vocational Education are presented below. Expansion of Vocational Training Levels and Programs In addition to elementary, intermediate, and college—the three levels of vocational training program set out under the 2014 Law on Vocational Education—the new law expands the structure by introducing two new levels: Vocational high school training programs are placed between elementary and intermediate levels, and are aimed at combining upper secondary education with vocational training, expanding options for learners after graduating from the lower secondary level. Other vocational training programs are not specified in detail under the new law, but aim to equip learners with the capability to perform and handle one or several simple tasks of an occupation. Expansion of Vocational Education Providers The new law reclassifies and extends vocational education providers by classifying them into two distinct categories: Vocational education institutions, which include colleges, intermediate schools, and vocational high schools. Establishments participating in vocational education activities, which include vocational education centers, vocational-continuing education centers, continuing education centers, other centers with vocational education functions, enterprises, cooperatives, and higher education institutions. Vocational education providers may provide one vocational training level only, or several/all levels, depending on the type of provider. The