You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

December 2, 2014

Online Investigation Leads to Successful Raid for WWE

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

As part of Tilleke & Gibbins’ one-stop intellectual property service in Thailand, our in-house investigation team periodically conducts market surveys in key areas in Bangkok and upcountry. The team also performs online sightings to evaluate the situation of counterfeit goods as it relates to our clients’ brands and to obtain leads on individuals and businesses involved in trading fake products in the country.

Several months ago, Tilleke & Gibbins’ investigators discovered a number of local websites and Facebook pages advertising and selling counterfeit World Wrestling Entertainment (WWE) T-shirts and merchandise. In all likelihood, these local websites and Facebook pages would not have been found by global watch services, as they are predominantly written in the Thai language.

Photographs of WWE’s Superstars and events and images of counterfeit T-shirts and merchandise bearing pictures of WWE’s Superstars and trademarks were among the counterfeit goods being offered for sale on these local websites and Facebook pages. On behalf of our client, WWE, the Tilleke & Gibbins investigation team conducted a preliminary investigation into the infringers to gather information about the websites’ operators, business addresses, value of the counterfeit goods, and payment methods, among other things. Thereafter, we reported the findings to our client and issued recommendations that the client authorize a more in-depth investigation into the infringement and pursue enforcement actions suitable to the infringement.

The client agreed with the course of action set out by our recommendations. Acting on the client’s authorization, our investigation team immediately launched an in-depth investigation into the owners of the local websites and Facebook pages and obtained additional information relevant to their illegal activities, including samples and sources of the counterfeit goods and other entities involved in the operation such as shipping companies, etc.

Subsequent to the completion of the investigation, our client made the decision to perform a raid on one of the more egregious infringers. This infringer operated its business through the <hereshirt.com> website, as well as via a Facebook page, which had amassed more than 20,000 “Likes” within the past two years. Based on the Facebook page’s popularity, and the results of our sample purchases made through our investigator, the assumption was made that this infringer had received significant profits from selling counterfeit WWE T-shirts and merchandise. In addition, our investigation had revealed that this infringer was linked to a number of suppliers of counterfeit goods in China.

On August 20, 2014, the Tilleke & Gibbins raid team, together with the Economic Crime Division (ECD) of the Royal Thai Police, obtained a Search Warrant from the Central Intellectual Property & International Trade Court (IP&IT Court) to raid the residence of the infringer, who was located in a suburb of Bangkok.

The raid began with every room in the residence being subject to a search. Our raid team found that the infringer was indeed stocking counterfeit WWE T-shirts. The infringer admitted to looking for suppliers in China, ordering the counterfeit goods through a well-known Chinese sourcing website, and then contacting a shipping company in Bangkok to facilitate the import of the counterfeit goods. The infringer also mentioned that the aforementioned method is, nowadays, a typical means through which to trade counterfeit goods, owing to the following factors: the business model is simple, it requires a lower investment, and it is less risky than vending counterfeit goods in a shop or on the street.

As a result of this successful raid action, almost 300 counterfeit WWE T-shirts and other merchandise were seized, and the infringer’s Facebook page was terminated. The infringer was arrested, and will be prosecuted at the IP&IT Court for criminal offenses in violation of the Trademark Act. In this case, the ECD police also confiscated several folders containing business documents, such as purchase orders, shipping documents, and lists of customers, all of which will help to track down the sources providing the counterfeit goods from overseas. Our lawyer was also able to negotiate with the infringer to disclose information about other traders in Thailand who advertise and sell counterfeit WWE T-shirts and merchandise on the Internet, which will assist in further suppressing such counterfeiting activities.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Practices

Intellectual Property

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

August 20, 2026
As part of its membership in Lex Mundi, Tilleke & Gibbins has released the latest edition of its Guide to Doing Business in Thailand, providing an overview of the legal, regulatory, and commercial considerations for companies establishing or expanding operations in Thailand. The 2026 edition offers practical insight into the country’s business environment, investment framework, and operational requirements. The guide covers a wide range of topics relevant to foreign and domestic investors, including: Investment incentives and promotion schemes Financial facilities and banking regulations Exchange controls and money transfers Import and export regulations Business structures and incorporation options Requirements for establishing a business Operational and compliance considerations Business cessation and insolvency procedures Employment and labor laws Taxation Immigration and visa requirements Prepared by Tilleke & Gibbins lawyers across multiple practice areas, the publication outlines key aspects of doing business in Thailand, including foreign investment restrictions, regulatory compliance obligations, corporate structures, employment requirements, and recent legal and economic developments affecting investors. The publication forms part of Lex Mundi’s Country Guides series, a global collection of jurisdiction-specific reference materials prepared by member firms around the world. Together, these guides help companies evaluate opportunities, compare regulatory environments, and plan international business activities across multiple markets. The full Guide to Doing Business in Thailand 2026 is available through the button below.
Read More
August 13, 2026
Modern agricultural machinery is no longer purely mechanical but instead technology dependent. Modern tractors, harvesters, and other farm equipment increasingly incorporate embedded software, electronic control units, sensors, and digital diagnostic systems. While such technologies enhance efficiency, productivity, and precision farming, they also affect the manner of equipment repair and maintenance. As a result, farmers and independent repair providers may have little practical choice but to rely on authorized dealers, even for routine maintenance and repairs. Section 36 of Thailand’s Patent Act reflects the principle that the authorized sale of a patented invention usually exhausts the exclusive right of the patent owner over the specific product. This means that upon legal sale of the patented product, it can typically be used or resold without further authorization from the patent holder. This principle is relatively straightforward when applied to traditional mechanical equipment. Ownership of a machine ordinarily carries with it the practical ability to diagnose faults, replace worn parts, and restore the equipment to working order. Modern agricultural machinery, however, increasingly depends on embedded software, proprietary diagnostic systems, firmware updates, and other digital resources that may remain under the control of the manufacturer or patent holder. This tension lies within the “right to repair” debate. In the United States, on July 8, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission and five states announced a settlement with Deere & Company resolving allegations that Deere had unlawfully restricted farmers’ and independent repair providers’ ability to repair their equipment. Under the terms of the settlement, for the next ten years, Deere must provide repair resources, including software capabilities, on terms equivalent to those provided to authorized dealers. The Deere settlement highlights that the nature of ownership is changing, but legal concepts have not kept pace. Traditional patent-law concepts, including patent exhaustion, were developed with physical products
Read More
August 10, 2026
Thailand has finalized its social media KYC (“know your customer”) rules under Notification of the Electronic Transactions Commission on Measures to Prevent Technological Crimes for Social Media Service Providers (No. 2), which was published in the Government Gazette on May 5, 2026, and will take effect on November 1, 2026. While an early draft of the notification proposed requiring social media platforms to arrange identification of every user account, the final notification is significantly more targeted, focusing on paid online advertising and advertiser identity verification. Though the regulatory initiative primarily aims to combat online fraud and technology-related crimes, it also has important consequences for intellectual property enforcement, because the verified platform records that will be generated under the new requirements can help IP rights holders to identify anonymous online infringers. Key Regulatory Mandates The notification requires social media service providers to verify the identity of advertisers before their paid advertisements are published and disseminated in Thailand through social media, regardless of whether the advertising fees come from the advertisers or third parties. Verification of an advertiser is valid for one year, after which verification would have to be performed again before the platform could publish additional paid advertisements from the advertiser. Permitted verification methods are specified under the notification. A platform may verify an advertiser by checking identity evidence and confirming the connection between the advertiser and that identity evidence, with the notification giving facial comparison against certain government-issued identity documents as an example. Alternatively, platforms may verify advertisers through a digital identity verification and authentication system with an identity-proofing assurance level not lower than the level prescribed by Thailand’s Electronic Transactions Commission. The notification further requires platforms to retain only the advertiser’s information necessary to identify the advertiser, beginning from the start of the advertising activity and for
Read More
August 6, 2026
Introduction: A Trademark Paradox in Sustainable Packaging Walk into any Thai supermarket, and the label-free water bottle is no longer a novelty. Thailand’s packaging market, valued at approximately USD 15.68 billion in 2025, is shifting toward minimalist, plastic-light designs as ESG pressures reshape how brands present their products. The country generated roughly 5.68 million tons of plastic waste in 2021, with a recycling rate of only 19 percent, and regulators are now considering rules that would allow label-free bottled water relying on embossing, laser printing, or QR codes instead of wrap-around labels. As packaging itself becomes the brand identifier, a paradox emerges: designs built to say the least often struggle hardest for protection under Thai intellectual property law. The Trademark Barrier: When Shape Is Not Enough Section 7, paragraph 2(10) of the Thai Trademark Act deems a shape distinctive only if it is not the natural form of the goods, is not necessary to achieve a technical result, and does not add value to the goods. The Department of Intellectual Property’s 2022 examination guidelines apply this test conservatively, as the following examples illustrate. A plain water bottle relying on subtle contours to signal its brand is typically read as just another bottle, not a source identifier. Acquired distinctiveness offers a theoretical escape route, but it demands extensive evidence of sales, advertising, and consumer recognition—an especially heavy burden for new entrants whose minimalist packaging has not yet achieved market prominence. The result is a structural bias against precisely the design innovation that sustainability goals are meant to encourage. Design Patents: A Partial, Imperfect Substitute Design patent protection, covering a product’s shape, configuration, or ornamentation, appears to offer an alternative route. In practice, it is constrained by the same forces driving the minimalist trend. Because many brands converge on similar solutions—clear
Read More