You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 15, 2012

Offenses Related to Private Limited Companies

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

A substantial number of private limited companies in Thailand are run by foreign managing directors, who often prefer to leave the task of dealing with the legal formalities of Thai corporate law to their accountants or to outsource it to legal service providers and accounting offices.

However, for any managing director it is important to personally know and heed the duties and requirements stipulated by the Thai Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) in order to avoid inadvertently committing an offense. Such an action could make one liable for criminal penalties under the “Act Determining Offenses Relating to the Registered Partnership, Limited Partnership, Limited Company, Association, and Foundation of 1956,” to give it its full English name.

Even though this law has been in force since 1956, not all managing directors are aware of its existence and may suffer an unpleasant surprise when they find out that not only is their company criminally liable, but as managing directors, they may face even higher fines than their company.

For all managing directors who have not paid much attention to these matters until now, here are a few pointers to help you ensure that your private limited company is set up and run in compliance with Thai corporate laws and the rules of good corporate governance.

One obligation that is sometimes neglected by private limited companies is the duty to keep a register of shareholders at the company’s registered office. Should the company not have such a register or fail to provide its shareholders access to it, or should the company’s shareholder register not contain the particulars required by law, the company may be fined up to THB 20,000. The company’s directors, however, face an additional fine of up to THB 50,000 for this offense.

The same fines may be imposed if your private limited company has moved to a new office location without giving notice to the Registrar of Companies to register the new company address.

These penalties also apply not only if your company did not hold any annual general shareholders’ meeting, but even if your board of directors failed to publish the notice summoning the shareholders to the general meeting in a newspaper seven days in advance of the meeting as required by law.

Since a change of Section 1,175 of the CCC a few years ago, the board must now both summon the shareholders’ general meeting by registered mail and additionally publish the notice in a local newspaper by a specified number of days in advance. Unfortunately, due to an editorial error, a widely used bilingual Thai-English edition of the CCC still contains the now-outdated version of the law in its English translation, according to which the summons can be either published or alternatively sent by mail. However, if your Thai reading skills are sufficiently advanced, a quick look at the original Thai version of the law will show that now both means of notification are required.

In a private limited company, the civil liability of its members/shareholders to creditors of the company is limited to the remaining amount unpaid, if any, of the registered capital due on the shares respectively held by them. Many foreign-run companies only register company capital of THB 2 million when setting up initially, as this is usually the minimum required for obtaining a work permit for a foreigner.

By law, at least 25% of the company capital must be actually paid up. As long as the registered capital has not been paid up 100%, the company is not allowed to mention its company capital in any notice, letter, or other document without also mentioning the percentage of the paid-up capital. In case of non-compliance, the company will be liable for a fine of up to THB 20,000, while its directors will be liable for up to THB 50,000.

Most managing directors are aware of their obligation to submit an annual balance sheet to the Registrar and to keep all minutes and resolutions of their board and shareholder meetings in their books at their registered office. But did you know that if you allow any falsification of your company’s accounts or any false statement or omission of important issues in your company documents, and if a Thai Criminal Court deems that you acted with the intention to deceive the company or the shareholders about their benefits, you may face a prison term of up to seven years?

One should always keep in mind that a person is known by the company he keeps.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

October 31, 2025
On September 29, 2025, Thailand’s Office of the Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC Office) published its Regulations on the Review and Certification of Binding Corporate Rules B.E. 2568 (2025) (the Regulations). The Regulations provide clarity on the PDPC Office’s approach to reviewing and certifying binding corporate rules (BCRs) under Section 29 of the Personal Data Protection Act B.E. 2562 (2019) (PDPA), and aim to facilitate international data transfers within a group of undertakings or enterprises (a “corporate group”). In conjunction with this development, the PDPC Office also approved BCRs for two companies operating in Thailand on September 30, 2025. This milestone represents the first concrete progress since the PDPC’s Notification on Criteria for the Protection of Personal Data Sent or Transferred to a Foreign Country pursuant to Section 29 of the PDPA B.E. 2566 (2023) came into effect in March 2024. Some key features of the Regulations are set out below. Categorization of BCRs BCRs are classified into two types: (1) BCRs for Controllers (BCR-C) and (2) BCRs for Processors (BCR-P). The category must be clearly specified when submitting the BCRs to the PDPC Office. Documentation Requirement The applicant must prepare and submit the application (a standard template may be provided by the PDPC Office in the future) along with supporting documents for review and certification in the Thai language. If the supporting documents are in a foreign language, a certified Thai translation should be provided. The translation must be notarized by a notary public or qualified person. Supporting documents may include, among others, a binding instrument such as an intra-group agreement, or a list of entities subject to the BCRs. Expedited Process Requirement Organizations with existing BCR approvals under the EU or UK GDPR, or from countries announced by the PDPC under Section 28, may apply through an
October 30, 2025
Recent events at a Thai listed company, where a proposal to remove the director was not successful, amid claims that a competitor was attempting to gain control of the company, illustrate how disputes over corporate control can unfold differently at the board level and shareholder level. At the board level, removing directors of a listed company mid-term to gain corporate control is not an easy task under Thai law, as it requires a higher threshold than appointing a new director, which typically only requires a simple majority vote in a listed company. At the shareholder level, Thailand’s tender offer and competition regimes add complexity where different shareholder groups act in concert to remove opposing board representatives or otherwise influence control. In this article, we will explore why the attempted removal of a director may fail, and how the tender offer regime may apply. Key Issues at a Glance Shareholder groups may seek to convene meetings to propose changes to board composition or company authority. Such proposals can be delayed or complicated by regulatory requirements and the need for additional disclosures. Regulatory authorities and minority shareholders may raise concerns when major shareholders coordinate to influence board control, especially if such actions could trigger tender offer or merger control obligations. Companies often respond by seeking further information on shareholder relationships and potential conflicts before proceeding. Why the Director Removal Failed Under Section 76 of the Public Limited Companies Act B.E. 2535 (as amended), the early removal of a director requires two conditions to be satisfied at the same meeting of shareholders: Headcount test: At least 75% of shareholders attending and entitled to vote must vote in favor. If multiple shareholders appoint the same person as proxy, each proxy is counted as a separate head for the purpose of the headcount test,
October 24, 2025
On October 22, 2025, the Thai government posted a directive not to grant gambling licenses for gambling involving poker nationwide to crack down on illegal gambling activities. The directive was issued by Thailand’s Ministry of Interior to align with government policies to prevent the legalization of all types of gambling businesses, including poker as a sporting activity. This will result in the revocation of poker activities as sport and institute a strict ban on such activities nationwide. Businesses should note the new government’s strict approach toward gambling activities as the legal situation regarding gambling in the country continues to draw close attention.
October 1, 2025
In September 2025, Thailand’s Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) accused a company listed on the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET), including its current and former directors, of concealing material information in connection with its filing registration and draft prospectus. This recent enforcement action demonstrates the serious consequences of making false statements or appearing to conceal material information in IPO filings and ongoing disclosures. In addition to being subject to criminal penalties, such actions can impact the eligibility of directors and executives to serve and may cause lasting reputational damage. Key Legal Risks The Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (as amended) imposes strict liability for making false statements or concealing material information in IPO registration statements and draft prospectuses. In such cases, investors can claim for damages, and there are also criminal penalties, including imprisonment for up to five years and substantial fines, may apply to the company, its directors, and responsible officers. However, misstatements or omissions in IPO filings do not, by themselves, disqualify directors or executives from holding office, whether arising from an SEC accusation or even a final court judgment. In contrast, for ongoing disclosures after listing, such as financial statements, annual reports, and meeting notices, false or misleading statements or concealment of material information can result in not only criminal liability but also immediate disqualification of directors and executives. If the SEC accuses a listed company or its directors or executives of such misstatements or omissions, those directors or executives are immediately disqualified from their positions, even before a final court judgment. Director and Executive Qualifications Directors and executives must meet the SEC’s specified standards of trustworthiness, as set out in the relevant rules. The SEC clearly defines characteristics that are considered to demonstrate a lack of trustworthiness. For ongoing disclosures, being involved in