You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 15, 2012

Offenses Related to Private Limited Companies

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

A substantial number of private limited companies in Thailand are run by foreign managing directors, who often prefer to leave the task of dealing with the legal formalities of Thai corporate law to their accountants or to outsource it to legal service providers and accounting offices.

However, for any managing director it is important to personally know and heed the duties and requirements stipulated by the Thai Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) in order to avoid inadvertently committing an offense. Such an action could make one liable for criminal penalties under the “Act Determining Offenses Relating to the Registered Partnership, Limited Partnership, Limited Company, Association, and Foundation of 1956,” to give it its full English name.

Even though this law has been in force since 1956, not all managing directors are aware of its existence and may suffer an unpleasant surprise when they find out that not only is their company criminally liable, but as managing directors, they may face even higher fines than their company.

For all managing directors who have not paid much attention to these matters until now, here are a few pointers to help you ensure that your private limited company is set up and run in compliance with Thai corporate laws and the rules of good corporate governance.

One obligation that is sometimes neglected by private limited companies is the duty to keep a register of shareholders at the company’s registered office. Should the company not have such a register or fail to provide its shareholders access to it, or should the company’s shareholder register not contain the particulars required by law, the company may be fined up to THB 20,000. The company’s directors, however, face an additional fine of up to THB 50,000 for this offense.

The same fines may be imposed if your private limited company has moved to a new office location without giving notice to the Registrar of Companies to register the new company address.

These penalties also apply not only if your company did not hold any annual general shareholders’ meeting, but even if your board of directors failed to publish the notice summoning the shareholders to the general meeting in a newspaper seven days in advance of the meeting as required by law.

Since a change of Section 1,175 of the CCC a few years ago, the board must now both summon the shareholders’ general meeting by registered mail and additionally publish the notice in a local newspaper by a specified number of days in advance. Unfortunately, due to an editorial error, a widely used bilingual Thai-English edition of the CCC still contains the now-outdated version of the law in its English translation, according to which the summons can be either published or alternatively sent by mail. However, if your Thai reading skills are sufficiently advanced, a quick look at the original Thai version of the law will show that now both means of notification are required.

In a private limited company, the civil liability of its members/shareholders to creditors of the company is limited to the remaining amount unpaid, if any, of the registered capital due on the shares respectively held by them. Many foreign-run companies only register company capital of THB 2 million when setting up initially, as this is usually the minimum required for obtaining a work permit for a foreigner.

By law, at least 25% of the company capital must be actually paid up. As long as the registered capital has not been paid up 100%, the company is not allowed to mention its company capital in any notice, letter, or other document without also mentioning the percentage of the paid-up capital. In case of non-compliance, the company will be liable for a fine of up to THB 20,000, while its directors will be liable for up to THB 50,000.

Most managing directors are aware of their obligation to submit an annual balance sheet to the Registrar and to keep all minutes and resolutions of their board and shareholder meetings in their books at their registered office. But did you know that if you allow any falsification of your company’s accounts or any false statement or omission of important issues in your company documents, and if a Thai Criminal Court deems that you acted with the intention to deceive the company or the shareholders about their benefits, you may face a prison term of up to seven years?

One should always keep in mind that a person is known by the company he keeps.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

December 20, 2024
With intellectual property playing an ever-increasing role in economic development, the need to harness, promote, and protect ASEAN innovation remains urgent as integration progresses. Among its objectives, the ASEAN Economic Community aims to transform the region into a hub of innovation and competitiveness and ensure that the region remains an active participant in the international IP community. With ASEAN member states increasing IP generation and further committing to global IP regimes, the region is increasingly looking toward sophisticated IP ownership and holding structures. IP Holding Companies ASEAN-based companies continue to centralize ownership of their IP assets in offshore holding and licensing vehicles—an approach multinational companies headquartered elsewhere have been using for a number of years. IP-intensive companies look to locate their IP portfolios in low-tax jurisdictions with strong IP registration and protection laws. The company then licenses the IP to operating companies in the group or to third-party licensees, franchisees, agents, distributors, and other partners in return for royalties or license fees. These special-purpose vehicles are typically referred to as IP holding companies. IP holding companies are popular because they can help corporations minimize tax, gain tax benefits or concessions, protect IP from bankruptcy or other claims against the parent company, and focus management attention on the IP portfolio as an income generator. Tax and IP Holding Companies Tax is the primary reason most companies park their IP in separate IP holding vehicles. Sometimes, companies choose to establish their IP holding company in a no-tax, low-tax, or preferred-tax jurisdiction close to their home country. The selected jurisdiction should also be a country with a large and well-established tax treaty network. Double taxation treaties are key considerations in jurisdiction shopping. If the IP assets need to be pledged as security for future borrowings or if they are to be included
December 4, 2024
Tilleke & Gibbins has contributed the Cambodia, Laos, Myanmar, Thailand, and Vietnam chapters to Restructuring in Southeast Asia, a comparative guide produced by Drew Network Asia (DNA). The publication outlines the principal debt restructuring processes available to corporate debtors across nine Southeast Asian jurisdictions and provides an accessible overview for lenders, creditors, and companies navigating financial distress in the region. Structured in a question-and-answer format, each jurisdictional chapter addresses the same core topics, allowing readers to compare approaches across markets. The guide covers key issues such as available restructuring mechanisms, court-supervised and out-of-court options, the roles and powers of creditors, and the implications of restructuring on ongoing business operations. As with other DNA resources, the guide aims to provide practical orientation rather than exhaustive analysis. Legislative developments and jurisdiction-specific considerations may affect the applicability of certain procedures, and readers requiring tailored advice are encouraged to contact the practitioners listed at the end of each chapter. The full guide is available for download using the button below or directly from the DNA website.
December 4, 2024
Thailand Legal Basics, a valuable primer for foreign investors, explores all aspects of living and doing business in Thailand. Written by specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins in Bangkok, it is the only comprehensive English-language guide to the Thai legal system with a focus on the concerns of foreign business and investment.
November 27, 2024
In Thailand, a business rehabilitation plan in court-supervised rehabilitation proceedings is a crucial element of the business rehabilitation process that outlines how a debtor’s assets will be managed. It also provides guidance for resolving a debtor’s business challenges so that the business can survive and continue to generate returns, increasing the likelihood that its creditors will be repaid. Key Plan Components The Bankruptcy Act B.E. 2483 sets forth the following components to be covered in a rehabilitation plan: The reasons for rehabilitation; Details about the debtor’s assets, liabilities, and other binding obligations at the time the court-ordered rehabilitation; Principles and methods of the rehabilitation; Redemption of collateral when there are secured creditors and guarantor liabilities; Ways to resolve problems arising from a temporary lack of liquidity during plan implementation; Action to be taken when a claim or debt is assigned; Name, qualifications, and letter of consent of the plan administrator, as well as information on compensation; Appointment and release of the plan administrator; Period in which the plan will be implemented (maximum of five years); and Refusal of the debtor’s assets or refusal of contractual rights if the debtor’s assets or contractual rights have obligations that exceed the benefits they yield. Considering the diverse nature and challenges of each debtor’s business, the details listed here are only general guidelines for what should be included in a rehabilitation plan. The planner has the flexibility to create a plan with different details or guidelines than those outlined above to best suit the nature and challenges of the debtor’s business. The planner can also omit some of the mentioned requirements if they are not relevant to the debtor’s business. Concerns of Relevance Court approval of the rehabilitation plan. Once the plan is approved by a meeting of the creditors, it is necessary