You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

June 15, 2012

Offenses Related to Private Limited Companies

Bangkok Post, Corporate Counsellor Column

A substantial number of private limited companies in Thailand are run by foreign managing directors, who often prefer to leave the task of dealing with the legal formalities of Thai corporate law to their accountants or to outsource it to legal service providers and accounting offices.

However, for any managing director it is important to personally know and heed the duties and requirements stipulated by the Thai Civil and Commercial Code (CCC) in order to avoid inadvertently committing an offense. Such an action could make one liable for criminal penalties under the “Act Determining Offenses Relating to the Registered Partnership, Limited Partnership, Limited Company, Association, and Foundation of 1956,” to give it its full English name.

Even though this law has been in force since 1956, not all managing directors are aware of its existence and may suffer an unpleasant surprise when they find out that not only is their company criminally liable, but as managing directors, they may face even higher fines than their company.

For all managing directors who have not paid much attention to these matters until now, here are a few pointers to help you ensure that your private limited company is set up and run in compliance with Thai corporate laws and the rules of good corporate governance.

One obligation that is sometimes neglected by private limited companies is the duty to keep a register of shareholders at the company’s registered office. Should the company not have such a register or fail to provide its shareholders access to it, or should the company’s shareholder register not contain the particulars required by law, the company may be fined up to THB 20,000. The company’s directors, however, face an additional fine of up to THB 50,000 for this offense.

The same fines may be imposed if your private limited company has moved to a new office location without giving notice to the Registrar of Companies to register the new company address.

These penalties also apply not only if your company did not hold any annual general shareholders’ meeting, but even if your board of directors failed to publish the notice summoning the shareholders to the general meeting in a newspaper seven days in advance of the meeting as required by law.

Since a change of Section 1,175 of the CCC a few years ago, the board must now both summon the shareholders’ general meeting by registered mail and additionally publish the notice in a local newspaper by a specified number of days in advance. Unfortunately, due to an editorial error, a widely used bilingual Thai-English edition of the CCC still contains the now-outdated version of the law in its English translation, according to which the summons can be either published or alternatively sent by mail. However, if your Thai reading skills are sufficiently advanced, a quick look at the original Thai version of the law will show that now both means of notification are required.

In a private limited company, the civil liability of its members/shareholders to creditors of the company is limited to the remaining amount unpaid, if any, of the registered capital due on the shares respectively held by them. Many foreign-run companies only register company capital of THB 2 million when setting up initially, as this is usually the minimum required for obtaining a work permit for a foreigner.

By law, at least 25% of the company capital must be actually paid up. As long as the registered capital has not been paid up 100%, the company is not allowed to mention its company capital in any notice, letter, or other document without also mentioning the percentage of the paid-up capital. In case of non-compliance, the company will be liable for a fine of up to THB 20,000, while its directors will be liable for up to THB 50,000.

Most managing directors are aware of their obligation to submit an annual balance sheet to the Registrar and to keep all minutes and resolutions of their board and shareholder meetings in their books at their registered office. But did you know that if you allow any falsification of your company’s accounts or any false statement or omission of important issues in your company documents, and if a Thai Criminal Court deems that you acted with the intention to deceive the company or the shareholders about their benefits, you may face a prison term of up to seven years?

One should always keep in mind that a person is known by the company he keeps.

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

September 17, 2025
M&A specialists at Tilleke & Gibbins have contributed the Vietnam chapter to Private M&A 2025, a newly released guide from Lexology Panoramic. The publication provides practical insights into private mergers and acquisitions frameworks in jurisdictions worldwide. The Vietnam chapter addresses key aspects of private M&A transactions, including: Structure and process, legal regulation, and required consents Advisers, negotiation, and documentation Due diligence and disclosure obligations Pricing, consideration, and financing Conditions, preclosing covenants, and termination rights Representations, warranties, indemnities, and postclosing covenants Taxation of transfers Employees, pensions, and benefits Recent legal, regulatory, and market practice developments The chapter highlights how Vietnam’s legal framework governs private acquisitions and disposals, outlines typical transaction processes and structures, and provides guidance on common regulatory and practical considerations. It also notes recent trends, including increased scrutiny of merger control filings by the Vietnam Competition Commission and regulatory changes affecting M&A approvals. The full Vietnam chapter is available as a PDF through the button below. Readers can also gain 30 days of complimentary access to Private M&A 2025 and Lexology Panoramic’s full library of resources through this link.
September 10, 2025
Under Thai law, authorized directors stand as a company’s mind and will and, as such, may incur personal criminal liability for acts or omissions committed in the course of company business. When allegations surface, directors must be prepared for the practical reality that, before guilt or innocence is ever adjudicated, they could be deprived of liberty unless bail release is promptly achieved through the competent legal authority. When Bail Can Be Granted Two procedural moments trigger the need to consider bail. The first arises during the investigative phase, when a claim is lodged against a director with the competent law enforcement authorities. Upon receipt of a complaint, the assigned inquiry officer summons the director for questioning, compiles evidence, and ultimately forwards a prosecution or nonprosecution recommendation to the public prosecutor. Although the public prosecutor retains ultimate discretion to indict an accused director, the police or prosecutor may conclude that pretrial detention is necessary and may therefore apply to the court for an order to hold the director in court custody. The second moment occurs after a criminal case is filed directly with the court. This occurs once a court accepts a criminal case filed by a prosecutor against a director or, alternatively, when the court accepts a case filed by an individual for trial. For cases filed by individuals, the plaintiff presents prima facie evidence at the preliminary hearing, and the court will accept the complaint if it finds sufficient grounds, thereby conferring upon the director the status of a criminal defendant. Upon acceptance of the criminal case, the court then has the inherent authority to order custody pending trial unless the defendant secures bail release. Procedural Considerations Experienced litigants typically prepare bail security in advance and submit a bail petition at the earliest possible time. While there are
September 8, 2025
On September 1, 2025, Myanmar’s Directorate of Investment and Company Administration (DICA) issued Directive No. 106/2025 to remind all companies and organizations registered under the Myanmar Companies Law of their obligation to strictly comply with the DICA registrar’s orders, directives, and procedures. This directive highlights the importance of legal and procedural compliance in corporate filings, governance changes, and operational conduct. It also signals increased scrutiny over documentation submitted during annual returns, share transfers, and director appointments or resignations. Public companies will be subject to closer regulatory attention, and new company registrations will involve vetting of proposed directors to ensure prior compliance with applicable laws. Compliance The directive emphasizes the following points: Companies must ensure full compliance with the Myanmar Companies Law and all directives issued by the registrar. This includes the proper submission of annual returns and adherence to updated requirements for share transfers and changes in directors. Companies and organizations must comply with all applicable laws, rules, directives, and procedures issued by relevant ministries and departments. If any authority takes action due to noncompliance, the registrar may also take appropriate measures. Noncompliance may result in regulatory sanctions, including restrictions on future company participation and vetting under anti–money laundering and counter–terrorism financing protocols. Prospective directors of newly registered companies will be vetted to confirm no prior violations of applicable laws. Entities must respond promptly and accurately to document requests from the registrar, both during initial registration and in subsequent filings. Companies are strongly advised to review their internal compliance frameworks and ensure readiness to meet DICA’s documentation and procedural expectations. In particular, companies must respond promptly and accurately to document requests from the registrar, whether during initial registration or in subsequent filings. For more information on this DICA announcement, or on any aspect of corporate registration, or assistance with
September 2, 2025
Thailand’s Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) has initiated a sweeping regulatory review of licensed direct sale and direct marketing businesses in Thailand and is in the process of notifying business operators to submit their annual business report and financial statement to the OCPB as part of their postlicensing obligations. This move marks a significant escalation in the government’s efforts to enforce compliance and transparency in the sector, which has faced growing scrutiny in recent years. Key Regulatory Considerations All businesses holding a direct sales or direct marketing license are required to submit their audited financial statement along with their business operation report to the OCPB within 60 days from the end of their fiscal year (extendable for up to 30 days by request, if necessary). The OCPB is currently conducting license audits as part of its enforcement duties. The office aims to complete audits for at least 90% of the 2,983 registered businesses that have obtained their license since 2022. This includes a review of the business conduct of the license holder. New license applications are also under scrutiny. Applicants are currently being subjected to background checks, and the OCPB has signaled a more rigorous vetting process moving forward. Impact of Noncompliance Failure to comply with these reporting obligations may result in escalating enforcement actions, including: Official notice to rectify noncompliance within a specified timeframe. Revocation of business registration, if the operator fails to respond. Revocation of business registration could result in a five-year prohibition on reapplying for a direct sales or direct marketing license following the revocation. The OCPB has already initiated outreach efforts, including SMS and email notifications, and has hosted seminars to raise awareness of these obligations. These measures are part of a broader initiative to enhance transparency and consumer trust in the sector. Businesses operating in the direct selling and