You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

March 18, 2024

New Telecom Services Set Out in Vietnam’s Telecom Law and Draft Decree

Subscribe to Updates

Vietnam’s new Telecom Law 2023 was promulgated on November 24, 2023, and will take effect on July 1, 2024, for most telecom services. For three newly introduced telecom services—OTT telecom services, internet data center services, and cloud computing services—implementation and compliance will be delayed until January 1, 2025. These new services will be explored briefly below.

The Ministry of Information Communication (MIC) is currently in the process of developing a number of decrees and circulars that will detail the implementation of the Telecom Law 2023, including one main decree that guides the new law in general. This decree is scheduled for prompt promulgation to coincide with the law’s effective date of July 1, 2024.

The draft version of this decree, dated February 22, 2024 (“Draft Decree”), was shared for consultation with international organizations, associations, and enterprises by the Vietnam Telecom Agency (VNTA) in early March 2024 to gather feedback. The Draft Decree is expected to undergo further revisions before being sent to relevant state agencies for input and submission to the Ministry of Justice for assessment by the end of March 2024. The MIC anticipates submitting the subsequent version to the government by April 15, 2024.

 

New Telecom Services: OTT Telecom Services, IDC Services, and Cloud Computing Services

In comparison to the Telecom Law 2009, the Telecom Law 2023 has three new telecom services:

  • Basic telecommunications services on the internet (OTT telecom services) are defined as services whose primary functions including the sending, transmission, and receipt of information between two persons or a group of people using telecommunications services on the internet (Article 3.8 of the Telecom Law 2023). By incorporating the term “primary functions” into the definition, the Telecom Law 2023 aims to exclude services such as ride-hailing platforms where the primary function is transportation, not telecom services for sending and receiving messages between users. This intention has been clearly confirmed by the VNTA in its series of consultation meetings with industry groups during the development process of the new law.
  • Internet data center (IDC) services are services that provide functions including processing, storage, and retrieving information for users via the telecom network by partially or fully leasing a data center.
  • Cloud computing services are telecom services that provide functions including processing, storage, and retrieving information for users over the telecom network via cloud computing.

Under the Draft Decree (Article 5.3), these three new services are all classified as “value-added telecom services.”

 

Indications of Light-Touch Management Principle

Unlike traditional telecom services, these three new services will be subject to a light-touch management principle. While this was not clearly provided in the new Telecom Law 2023, which left it to future decrees to provide further guidelines, the Draft Decree reflects this intention much more clearly.

Cross-border service provision: In particular, the Draft Decree excludes these three new services from the requirement of subjecting offshore companies to sign a commercial agreement with a local licensed telecom company for service provision. Providers of these three new services only need to notify the VNTA before service provision.

Nevertheless, there are certain unclear matters that require refinement in a subsequent version of the Draft Decree. One such issue is whether offshore service providers can commence services immediately after notifying the VNTA, or if they must wait for the VNTA to issue a confirmation of notification. During its meeting for gathering feedback in early March 2024, the VNTA affirmed that offshore companies could provide services immediately upon notification, eliminating the need for any confirmation, and noted that it will consider removing the confirmation requirement from the Draft Decree.

Onshore service provision: The Draft Decree has also lifted the foreign ownership restriction applied to these three new telecom services. It requires onshore service providers of OTT telecom and cloud computing services to merely notify VNTA before providing their services. Onshore IDC service providers must register with VNTA before beginning service provision.

Similarly, there is ambiguity regarding whether IDC service providers must wait for the issuance of a confirmation of registration before providing the services, or can provide the services immediately upon registration. In response to this query, VNTA clarified that IDC service providers are required to obtain a registration certificate before commencing their services.

 

Key Obligations of Service Providers

The Draft Decree introduces a few key obligations of service providers:

  • Verify information about users’ mobile phone numbers before providing services, and store users’ information (service username and mobile phone number) and information about the service usage for the duration specified in the cybersecurity law with regard to OTT telecom service providers.
  • Store and manage user information (full name and telephone or email for individuals; organization name and address, and full name, telephone or email of contact person for organizations) with regard to IDC and cloud computing services. The industry has expressed concerns that this Draft Decree might pose a trade barrier, as current trends among OTT service providers involve minimizing the collection and storage of users’ personal information, aligning with their obligations for personal data protection. By reducing the collection and storage of personal information, not only are costs lowered, but the risk of user data leakage during system attacks is also diminished. Despite these concerns, VNTA has justified the inclusion of telephone numbers, asserting that they are essential for tracking violators in the event of violations through OTT services. Furthermore, VNTA highlighted the effective management of junk SIM cards by the MIC, reducing the risk of being unable to trace individuals based on such junk SIM cards. It is worth noting that the name provided to OTT service providers is the service username, not the actual name of the users.
  • Protect state secrets pursuant to the law on protection of state secrets: This requirement introduces compliance risks as service providers primarily serve as intermediaries without direct access to user information, which is typically encrypted. In response, VNTA has expressed an intention to review and clarify the wording, emphasizing that the obligation applies when service providers are aware of violations but fail to comply with authorities’ requests to prevent or stop such violations.
Related Professionals

Industries

Technology

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 23, 2026
Vietnam has progressively positioned blockchain as a strategic technology within its broader digital transformation agenda over the past decade. From early policy orientations to more recent legislative developments, the regulatory approach has gradually shifted from high-level recognition to more concrete legal integration. Against this backdrop, a new draft decree regulating activities relating to product and goods identification, authentication, and traceability (the “Draft Decree”) marks a notable turning point. Rather than merely referencing blockchain as a policy priority, the Draft Decree incorporates blockchain directly into a nationwide regulatory system, positioning it as part of the underlying infrastructure for data governance and public administration in relation to the management, verification, and traceability of product-related data. Evolution of Vietnam’s Blockchain Legal Framework: The Draft Decree in Context Vietnam’s blockchain legal framework has developed in several distinct phases. The first phase, beginning around 2019, was characterized by high-level policy recognition in several resolutions of the Party Central Committee. Particularly, blockchain was identified as part of the broader category of digital technologies critical to industrial modernization and participation in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. These resolutions did not regulate blockchain directly, but established its strategic importance at the national level. The second phase (2023 to 2025) saw the introduction of national strategies and technology policies that more explicitly recognized blockchain as a priority technology. Those policies collectively signaled a clear policy commitment to developing blockchain infrastructure and applications. However, these instruments remained largely at a policy-level and did not establish binding regulatory frameworks. The third phase (from 2025) involves the gradual integration of blockchain into sectoral legislation. Laws such as the Law on Digital Technology Industry (2025), the Law on Personal Data Protection (2025), and the Law on Science, Technology, and Innovation (2025) have introduced concepts such as digital assets, crypto assets, and even specific
Read More
April 21, 2026
Thailand’s Personal Data Protection Committee (PDPC) has launched a public consultation period on a draft notification setting out criteria for data subject access requests (DSARs). The draft notification addresses practical uncertainties in handling DSARs by introducing standardized procedural requirements for data controllers. The consultation period runs from April 16 to May 15, 2026. The notification will enter into force 30 days from the date of its publication in the Government Gazette. Key Features of the Draft Notification The draft notification covers the following key areas: Scope of information subject to access. Data controllers must enable data subjects to access at least the following upon request: (1) personal data collected directly from them; (2) personal data obtained from other sources; and (3) the source of personal data obtained from other sources without consent. Information required under section 23 of the PDPA and information that must be recorded pursuant to section 39 of the PDPA—such as the categories of personal data collected and purposes of processing—must also be made available. Submission channels and formal requirements. Data controllers must provide at least in-person and postal channels for DSARs, while electronic or other channels are optional. Requests may be made either directly by the data subject or through an authorized representative, and must be signed and include sufficient identifying information, a preferred response method, and DSAR details. Identity verification documents (and proof of authority if the request is through a representative) are required, and additional documentation may be requested for verification or communication purposes. Data controllers may use different verification methods for DSARs submitted via electronic or other channels, provided this does not create undue obstacles to the exercise of data subject rights. Verification and response timelines. Data controllers must complete preliminary verification within seven business days of receiving a request. If a
Read More
April 10, 2026
Thailand has introduced new regulatory guidance requiring digital platform operators to adopt structured, transparent, and fair fee practices. On March 16, 2026, the Electronic Transactions Development Agency (ETDA) published Announcement No. DPS 2/2569, titled “Guidelines for Transparency and Fairness in Digital Platform Service Fee Determination,” issued under the Royal Decree on Digital Platform Service Business Operations B.E. 2565 (2022). The guidelines establish a framework governing how digital platform operators should set, disclose, and adjust fees charged to users and related service providers such as logistics and payment providers. Although framed as best-practice guidance rather than legally binding rules with explicit penalties, the guidelines carry regulatory weight under the royal decree and represent a significant step toward structured governance of digital platform fee practices in Thailand. The guidelines establish various transparency principles and divide fees into two distinct categories—compulsory and additional—with specific governance principles for each. Transparency Principles The guidelines recommend that digital platform operators adopt several transparency measures to ensure that users can fully understand the costs of using a platform. Fee catalog. All fees should be consolidated into a single, accessible location, which should include the fee name, definition, scope of covered services, calculation methodology, rate, billing period, and calculation examples. Minimum service disclosure. Operators should disclose the minimum service that users can expect, such as baseline visibility, product listing capabilities, access to transaction data, and back-end dashboard access. Price structure disclosure. Operators should disclose the categories of costs underlying their fees, such as system maintenance, cybersecurity, and operational costs. While exact cost figures need not be made public, operators should be able to provide numerical data to regulators upon request. Clear fee formulas. Fee calculations should be simple and easy to understand—for example, percentage of net sales, cost per order, or cost per product listing. Operators should
Read More
April 10, 2026
As digital commerce continues to reshape consumer behavior in Thailand, the Office of the Consumer Protection Board (OCPB) has been taking steps to review and update key regulations for online platforms. The OCPB has had a particular focus on addressing the risks posed by e-marketplace businesses—from misleading product information to fraudulent online transactions. Some of the regulator’s current legislative efforts related to Thailand’s labeling regulations as well as potential changes to the country’s law on direct sales and marketing. Proposed Changes to Consumer Protection Labeling Regulations On February 24, 2026, the OCPB convened a public hearing to review the Notification of the Committee on Labels re: Specification of Goods as Controlled Label Goods B.E. 2565 (2022) and its annex issued under the Consumer Protection Act. The closed-door session, which started the OPCD’s process of seeking feedback on the proposed changes, brought together representatives from government agencies, business operators, and consumer groups. The OCPB explained that its review of the labeling regulations aims to address regulatory gaps arising from evolving commercial practices, particularly the expansion of e-commerce and cross-border transactions. Authorities highlighted recurring issues involving product information that is unclear, incomplete, or potentially misleading in digital sales channels. The proposed revisions are intended to improve consumers’ access to accurate and complete product information, ensure that label disclosures remain relevant amid the growth of e-commerce, and strengthen protections against deceptive or misleading digital advertising. The review is being undertaken pursuant to the Consumer Protection Act B.E. 2522 (1979). As part of the initiative, the OCPB signaled a potential update to the categories of “controlled label products” as well as enhanced disclosure obligations for business operators, with the broader aim of promoting greater transparency, reinforcing operator accountability, and aligning Thailand’s labeling framework with current market conditions. The OCPB secretary general emphasized that
Read More