You are using an outdated browser and your browsing experience will not be optimal. Please update to the latest version of Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome or Mozilla Firefox. Install Microsoft Edge

November 24, 2015

New PPP Law Encourages Private Investment in the Railway Sector

Subscribe to Updates
Informed Counsel

Two years ago, the Private Investment in State Undertaking Act B.E. 2556 (2013) (PISUA) replaced the Private Participation in State Undertaking Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (PPSUA), which set out the criteria for a private party to jointly operate a government project. There were calls to replace the PPSUA because the law had a convoluted project approval process that discouraged private investment. During its 21-year lifespan, only 40 projects were completed under the PPSUA.

The PISUA aims to streamline and simplify the project approval process to attract more private investors. An increase in private sector investment would lessen the need for government loans and reduce the impact of financial restrictions caused by limited government budgets. In turn, this would improve the efficiency of developing infrastructure and providing public services to citizens.

Thailand’s railway sector would benefit tremendously from an increase in private sector investment. According to the Global Competitiveness Report 2015-2016, Thailand’s quality of railroad infrastructure ranks 78th out of 140 countries, indicating that there is scope for improvement. In light of this potential for improvement, this article will discuss the impact of the PISUA on Thailand’s railway sector.

Strategic Plan

The PISUA has proposed a draft Strategic Plan on Private Investment in State Undertakings (Strategic Plan), which sets out a five-year investment and policy plan that explicitly details the subsectors that are suitable for public–private partnerships.

The draft Strategic Plan was approved by the Thai Cabinet on May 26, 2015, and it was published in the Royal Gazette  on June 25, 2015. State agencies are therefore bound to prepare and approve projects that fall within the ambit of the Strategic Plan.

The Strategic Plan distinguishes between subsectors that require  private sector investment, such as certain infrastructure sectors, and subsectors in which the government only encourages  private sector participation. The railway sector largely falls within the former category and thus explicitly requires private sector investment.

Project Pipeline

On May 26, the Cabinet also acknowledged the Strategic Plan’s Project Pipeline, which lists all of the public projects with private sector investment. In the urban rail transit area, the Project Pipeline includes eight projects with an overall investment volume of approximately THB 568 billion. Twenty-five percent of this amount, which equates to THB 142 billion, shall be covered by private investors. Two of these projects are already under construction; five projects are undergoing feasibility studies; and for one project, the search for a suitable private investor is ongoing.

A feasibility study must be conducted for projects that exceed THB 1 billion. It has to be prepared by an external consultant who is in the State Enterprise Policy Office’s list of qualified consultants. A feasibility study aims to identify project costs, risks, and impacts, as well as the legal issues and potential problems in implementing the project through examination of Thailand’s current legal and regulatory framework. For PPPs in the railway sector, this includes railway-related laws and regulations.

In addition, the Project Pipeline outlines two projects in the high-speed rail sector with a total investment amount of THB 234 billion. One of these projects, a Bangkok-Rayong high-speed rail, requires a total investment of THB 152 billion, but the amount of private sector investment has not been determined yet. The other project, a Bangkok-Hua Hin high-speed rail, requires THB 81 billion of investment, and 11 percent of this amount, which equates to THB 9 billion, will be covered by private investors. Both of these projects are currently undergoing feasibility studies.

In total, private sector investment in the railway sector amounts to THB 802 billion. Nineteen percent of this amount, which is THB 154 billion, will be covered by private investors, excluding the Bangkok-Rayong high-speed rail. For capital-intensive railway projects, the government budget is the main source of funding, as private sector investment in infrastructure projects is limited to THB 500 billion. 

Acquiring Land or Immovable Assets

In order to construct new railways or railway accessories, it may become necessary to acquire land or immovable assets. The State Railway of Thailand is allowed to acquire land or immovable assets under the Railway Authority of Thailand Act B.E. 2494 (1951) (with amendments), which refers to the Expropriation of Immovable Property Act B.E. 2530 (1987). Under this Act, the state may acquire immovable property for the purpose of any public utility or for other public purposes. An appointed committee will appraise the estimated price of the immovable property to be expropriated and the amount of compensation to be provided.

The Mass Rapid Transit Authority of Thailand Act B.E. 2543 (2000) and the Act on Arrangement of Immovable Property for Mass Transit Undertaking B.E. 2540 (1997) apply to mass rapid transit systems within the Greater Bangkok Area and other provinces as stipulated by Royal Decree. They set out an independent procedure regarding the acquisition of immovable property for infrastructure projects.

Environmental Impact

The potential environmental impact of a project must also be considered. Under the Enhancement and Conservation of National Environmental Quality Act B.E. 2535 (1992), an environmental impact assessment report must be prepared at the stage of conducting a feasibility study on a specific project. This report must be approved by the Office of Environmental Policy and Planning. In the case of a public–private partnership, the government agency or state enterprise has the duty to prepare an impact assessment report.

With more streamlined project approval procedures and clearer guidelines, the PISUA is poised become a powerful tool in strengthening Thailand’s infrastructure sectors. It sets out a stronger framework for private investment in public sectors, and the recently enacted Strategic Plan may drive increased private investment in the railway sector. The development of private investment in the railway sector, however, will remain to be seen over the next five years as the impact of the PISUA evolves in practice.

Download Full Article
Related Professionals

Industries

Energy

Location

RELATED INSIGHTS​ 

April 8, 2021
On March 24, 2021, the Prime Minister of Vietnam issued Decision No. 12/2021/QD-TTg issuing regulations on oil spill response. One of the more notable changes is the introduction of templates for oil spill response plans.
Read More
February 23, 2021
As many are already aware, following the change of government in Myanmar on February 1, 2021, a draft Cyber Security Law was proposed which attracted widespread criticism. However, less attention has been paid to significant amendments to two existing laws, some of which have a similar effect to parts of the draft Cyber Security Law. In other words, while the draft Cyber Security Law has not progressed further and is under public scrutiny, significant elements of it have found their way into law in Myanmar by other routes. Because these amendments are already law, it is very important that individuals and businesses in Myanmar understand their implications. Amendments to the Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens The Law Protecting the Privacy and Security of Citizens (2017), or the “Privacy Law,” was amended on February 13, 2021, less than two weeks after the military government came into power. These amendments chiefly address the power of the government to conduct searches, seizures, and arrests; to extend detention without judicial oversight; and to carry out broad surveillance and investigation activities that could intrude on individual privacy. The amendments accomplish this by suspending various sections of the Privacy Law for as long as the State Administration Council (the military body now governing Myanmar) is in power. The suspended sections include the following: Section 5: Search, seizure, and arrest without civilian observation The relevant part of Section 5 of the Privacy Law states, “The responsible authorities shall … when acting in accordance with existing law, not enter into a person’s residence or a room used as a residence, or a building, compound or building in a compound, for the purpose of search, seizure, or arrest, unless accompanied by minimum of two witnesses who should comprise Ward or Village Tract Administrators…”. The suspension
Read More
February 22, 2021
Following the recent imposition of sanctions on Myanmar individuals and companies by the US, the UK and Canada have now imposed new sanctions. As with the US sanctions, these new measures impact UK and Canadian citizens and companies, and non-UK and non-Canadian companies and citizens with interests in those jurisdictions. The EU has indicated that it is planning to issue similar sanctions in the near future. New UK Sanctions In addition to the 16 individuals already sanctioned by the UK government, on February 18, 2021, the UK government announced that three individuals have been sanctioned for serious human rights violations and are now subject to asset freezes and travel bans. The full list of Myanmar individuals and companies sanctioned by the UK is available on the website of the Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation. Breaches of UK financial sanctions are criminal offences punishable in the UK by up to 7 years imprisonment and heavy fines. New Canadian Sanctions Also on February 18, timed to coincide with the UK sanctions, new Canadian sanctions were imposed on nine individuals. As with the UK, Canada already had a number of individuals in the Myanmar military on its sanctions list, and the new additions bring the total number of individuals sanctioned by Canada to 54. All assets of these individuals in Canada are now frozen, and they are banned from travelling to Canada. Canadian businesses or entities may not do business with any of the 54 individuals. Full details of the impact of the sanctions are available on the Government of Canada’s website, as is a database of the Myanmar individuals and companies subject to them. Breach of Canadian sanctions carries with it up to 5 years’ imprisonment in Canada and/or a large fine. Other Countries The EU is reportedly drawing up sanctions
Read More
February 18, 2021
As you will no doubt know, on February 1, 2021, the Myanmar military declared a state of emergency in Myanmar for a period of one year. State Counsellor Daw Aung Sang Su Kyi was detained, as were the president and various significant political and civil leaders. Min Aung Hlaing, commander-in-chief of the Tatmadaw (Myanmar armed forces) has installed himself as chairman of the State Administration Council, the current administration. New sanctions The reaction of the Biden administration has been swift. On February 10, 2021, President Biden issued Executive Order 14014, which provides bases to impose sanctions on individuals and companies deemed by the US to, among other things: operate in the defense sector of Myanmar; be responsible for policies that undermine democratic processes in Myanmar; have taken actions to undermine democratic processes or institutions, or prohibit, limit, or penalize the exercise of free speech, in Myanmar; or be a spouse or child of the foregoing. On the next day, February 11, the US Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), imposed sanctions under the new executive order on ten individuals—including General Min Aung Hlaing—and three companies, including Cancri Gems & Jewelry Co, Myanmar Imperial Jade Co, and Myanmar Ruby Enterprise.  All such individuals and companies have now been designated on the US list of specially designated nationals (SDNs). Effect of sanctions As a result of such sanctions, the property of these individuals or companies that is located in the US or is under the possession or control of US companies and citizens is frozen, and US companies and citizens are generally prohibited from dealing deal with any such property.  Reportedly, roughly USD 1 billion of funds belonging to the individuals and companies blocked on February 11 are located in the US and thus now frozen. The SDN list As many
Read More